Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

Options
1734735737739740807

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2,985 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Half of the of the discussion on the last two pages of this thread has been about one particular development being bought in bulk this week. So yes, they certainly still are purchasing large blocks of units. So their accountants must disagree with you.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,600 ✭✭✭Villa05


    One wonders why nothing has been done on these measures over the last 5 to 10 years while every measure implemented drove up prices and rents.

    Government who list housing and inflation as there top priorities can't be taken seriously

    One possible solution offered by the ESRI is directing construction activity towards housing and away from other activities such as office space, hotels and car parks


    The report also suggests that “certain construction skills be added to the Critical Skills Employment Permit (CSEP) to facilitate certain types of inward migration”.


    Its report also noted that there are close to 84,000 vacant homes across the country according to Geodirectory’s Q4 report in 2022.




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,650 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    Because the people who run the state deliberately reinflated the property market and have no desire whatsoever to see their "progress" reversed?



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,985 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Thats a large part of it. But they're going to suffer for it at election time. 69% of Irish people apparently back SF's goal of reducing the average Dublin house price to €300k, including 63% of people who agree with it even if it means a decline in the value of their own property [1]. Those are huge majorities for what on the face of it is a very radical, extreme policy - deliberately aiming for a 20%+ drop in house prices is not normally a vote winning policy.

    The problem FF & FG seem have to overlooked is that incredibly high rental and housing prices don't just screw renters (ie young people whos votes they don't care too much about), they're screwing hundreds of thousands of older middle class home owners who have their 20something and 30something children now living with them too - and those older people are core FF/FG voters. And lots of the 'young' renters are now entering their late 30s and 40s, when they would traditionally have become home owners and FG/FF voters, but thats no longer happening.

    The goal of restoring house prices somewhat from the depths of the market was probably sound politically for the 2011-2016 government, but from 2016 onwards, ie the duration of our current and last government, aiming for continual house price inflation has been very very bad policy. Damaging for the country, damaging for the people, and even damaging to FF and FG themselves.

    [1]https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/poll-public-backs-mary-lou-mcdonalds-call-for-300000-average-house-price-in-dublin/a1386646140.html



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,262 ✭✭✭The Student


    I don't agree I think it goes much deeper than that. We have a societal issue that no one wants to address. We have an "entitlement" culture and no one wants to take the tough decisions to address this. If we look specifically at housing (as it relates to this forum).

    The state has left the private sector deal with the housing situation because the State is incapable of dealing with social housing and the issues that come with it. I fall within SDCC and we have I think the figure was either 40% or 60% of social housing tenants under all of the different schemes (HAP, RAS etc) are in rent arrears. So if we just look at this as an example these rental rates are set at the differential rates (which take account of the income people earn, the make up of their family etc) and yet they are in arrears.

    I don't have any breakdown of the figures regarding how long/how much people are in arrears but the fact that there are so many would suggest that the system is not working either people feel no consequences of not paying or underpaying rent or the figs need to be revisited.

    If you privatise any product/service then there is always going to be a profit motive otherwise why do it?

    Why should someone be able to go on the housing list once they reach 18? Should they not make the effort to house themselves and if they can't then they can go on the housing list? By all means there will always be a small number of people at 18 who need support because of family issues etc.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 18,485 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    How many hoses would have being build if construction costs were/are not covered. there was little or no building in 2013/14 as the price a builder woild get for a house would not cover the cost. You could buy apartments in Limerick for less than 50K could you build apartments for 50k/unit even single bedroom ones ?

    A daughter of a lad I know was renting in Dublin he visited her in 2014 and a house accross the street was for sale for 160K he wanted her to get a mortgage and he give here the balance to buy it. She did not the house increased by 100k in 18-24 months and was probably still below cost of construction

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,600 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Every time I've brought it up there is push back here but in light of the decision to take outstanding child maintenance money from sw/wage payments I see little reason for those availing of subsidised housing to have the outstanding payments deducted from SW/wages as a condition of inclusion



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,719 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    For many private LLs the question is no longer profitability, it is all about avoiding potentially ruinous liabilities. The way gov't has used tenant-related legislation to force all the problems onto private actors has finally come home to roost.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,033 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Ze Germans are coming

    Good little Irish renters, got to keep the German pensions funded somehow



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,600 ✭✭✭Villa05


    If the taxpayer never bailed out Anglo, would that bank have gone under also. They were on the list of high risk back in March also

    Wasn't it worth it taxpayers!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,985 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Its absolutely bonkers that they aren't. If the state is providing your income directly, and the state is providing your housing in addition, and you're behind on your rent... surely it would take very little effort to take any rental arrears (or just the rent in general from the start..) directly out of your income.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,719 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    Dunno the legal background but docking any sort of benefits in Ireland is basically a no-no. Even court-awarded fines are usually unpaid.



  • Registered Users Posts: 615 ✭✭✭J_1980


    German here:

    Well you Irish left wing losers can leave the EU if you want? It’s not a cherry picking thing. The EU is a free market union explicitly protecting property rights. It wouldn’t work any other way.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,675 ✭✭✭CorkRed93




  • Registered Users Posts: 7,033 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Is this post supposed to be ironic?

    German property rights and rental rules are some of the most restrictive in the EU.



  • Registered Users Posts: 615 ✭✭✭J_1980


    German property rights are not “restrictive”

    social housing and housing benefits are far less abundant than in Ireland.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,033 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    What has social housing benefits got to do with property rights? Nothing

    Berlin has had a rent freeze for years now

    German renter protections are far stricter than Ireland. And the ability to evict to sell is much harder done in Germany than here.



  • Registered Users Posts: 617 ✭✭✭lordleitrim


    David McWilliams: Ireland will not have any political peace until we fix housing



    Unfortunately a subscriber article only but glad the absolute urgency of the housing crisis is being called out by a newspaper that normally panders to NIMBYs and the vested interests of those that want property prices to always rise even if it is to the detriment of society as a whole...



  • Registered Users Posts: 615 ✭✭✭J_1980


    …which was ruled unconstitutional. Just proving my point.

    social tenants can’t go years without paying rent in Germany too….



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,600 ✭✭✭Villa05




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Subscribers Posts: 5,920 ✭✭✭hometruths


    It's the same old thing. he's saying we need to build 55,000 houses a year every year just to stand still. Though as is typical with these predictions he makes no attempt to calculate what position we're at now.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,033 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Mentioned here in the past, first time I recall seeing it described in a mainstream paper

    Describes the effect HAP has in pushing rents up - a floor on rents essentially



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,888 ✭✭✭Jizique


    As always, article on housing accompanied by picture of 2 up 2 down (from 30s) or alluding to Crumlin which was built in 40s/50s, but these houses are not what acceptable to either the young employed workers, the gig economy workers with fragile contracts, the welfare classes or our recently arrived protection applicants.

    Everyone wants a garden, space for 2 cars in the driveway, 3 or 4 enquires as every kid deserves their privacy - this issue must also be addressed in these articles.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,033 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Nonsense strawman argument - the demand for those houses proves that people are not turning up their nose at them.

    Last I checked, there arent a glut of 30s/40s/50s ex council houses sitting around on the market struggling to be sold. People will happily take them, there just isn't the supply.

    Also average household size is shrinking so 2&3 beds are more in demand now than tiger years as families are smaller. Majority can only dream of having 3+ kids, cost would bankrupt them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,985 ✭✭✭Blut2


    https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-41112766.html

    https://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/state-spending-e1-88m-a-day-on-accommodation-for-international-protection-applicants-1562886.html

    Our government is apparently on track to spend in excess of €2.25bn this year on housing (and thats just housing, not even all the other associated costs) non Irish citizens. Thats an absolutely astronomical number to be spending yearly.

    You'd wonder how much impact on the housing crisis that money could have if spent on things like building houses instead of renting out entire hotels at extortionate rents.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,675 ✭✭✭CorkRed93


    The analysis shows that the Dublin market lacks depth in affordability, in that the lowest quality submarkets present greater affordability issues than the top end. A considerable element of this is due to government rental supports, like Hap, at the low end and a narrow pool of renters who can afford the top end.

    All this means that lower-priced apartments in Dublin are proportionally more expensive than in other markets, and there is little by way of cheaper rental supply anywhere in the city. Hap has played a major role in making some of the weakest submarkets of the city, the least affordable. A debate on the role Hap has played in driving up rents is long overdue.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,392 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    There is definitely an entitlement culture alright. Among the "boomer" generation who got things handed to them by the previous generation and apparently made it their mission in life to sit on the backs of, and leech off, the one behind them in perpetuity.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,392 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    I've been making that point on here for the year or two I've put any pass on, and posted in, this forum. Do away with HAP (and similar) in the morning and there would be no need for rent caps.

    The likes of HAP are merely a subsidy towards those in society are already relatively wealthy. It increases the rental levels above where a free market would be. Which increases income for landlords, which increases the price of houses, which also increases the price of land, which feeds back into even more increase in the price of houses.Which the State then outbids private individuals for in order to house those that are priced out of the market.

    Those who don't work will be looked after. Those that do work will have to be subsidised. Those that work in jobs such as construction won't be able to afford the houses they build - if you want to buy a house then you better be chasing the 100k+ jobs. It doesn't have to be that way, but that is the way it has been set up.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,985 ✭✭✭Blut2


    HAP and other rent subsidies are also now costing the government over €1bn a year. So on top of all the valid terrible market inflating/distorting you mention they're also just a colossal waste of tax payer euros.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Subscribers Posts: 5,920 ✭✭✭hometruths


    The likes of HAP are merely a subsidy towards those in society are already relatively wealthy. It increases the rental levels above where a free market would be. Which increases income for landlords, which increases the price of houses, which also increases the price of land, which feeds back into even more increase in the price of houses.Which the State then outbids private individuals for in order to house those that are priced out of the market.

    Nail on the head. And whilst HAP is happily increasing all of the above, the government have no choice but to increase the income thresholds to qualify for HAP, pumping more HAP into the market and up and up we go. It's a vicious circle.

    It's insane there is not more outrage about this.



Advertisement