Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

General Irish politics discussion thread

Options
1104105107109110154

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 68,806 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Not the ones I know of. They've only started moving away now.

    These people felt the last two governments weren't Real FG due to coalition / Independent Alliance; and are only now willing to take up the idea that FG aren't the right wing farmer party.

    While I doubt the same view is national, I'd say it's common anywhere with good farmland and an old FG vote



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,027 ✭✭✭Blut2


    BBB went backwards, but largely because Geert Wilder's even more right wing party surged and took a large number of BBB votes (and finished as the largest party in NL). Thats not an option in Ireland, theres no other mainstream party calling for lower immigration etc.

    BBB still got 5% of the vote in the GE too at that, enough to put them on par with our Greens or Labour here - which is enough to have a big influence on government policy as a junior coalition partner.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,920 ✭✭✭Augme


    The problem is there's no main steam party in Ireland who would want them in a coalition.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,027 ✭✭✭Blut2


    What are you basing that on? None of our mainstream political parties in Ireland have had a problem relying on conservative, rural, Independent TDs for votes who have very similar views/policies to the Farmers Alliance. Its very unlikely the Farmers Alliance will be substantially more coalition toxic in the eyes of the other parties than the Healy-Raes.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,920 ✭✭✭Augme


    There's a massive difference between need votes for one of issues versuses allowing them dictate policy decisions and having a input on a programme for government. The other question is, would the farmers Alliance go into government with other main stream parties given they disagree with them on nearly every major issue?


    Until the FA show that have any clue about what they are doing no major party will go near them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 21,435 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    I'd say SF would accept their support in a heartbeat. They could blame them for dragging on climate change policies.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,027 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Do you think Independent Alliance had no input on government policy decisions or the programme for government in 2016?

    73% of Irish people think we need to reduce immigration now according to the latest polls, and 23% say its their #1 election issue.

    If the Farmers Alliance have 4-7 TDs and are given the option of Minister for Integration its probably a safe bet that 1) they'd take it, given changing policy in that area is their main reason for existing and 2) it wouldn't be particularly toxic to the other mainstream parties, given the FA would be implementing the will of the vast majority of voters.

    The Greens arguably represent a more 'extreme' ideological preference in regards to being out of sync with the wishes of our voting public and have had no problem being accepted into government as a junior coalition party.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,478 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    I don't think so. AFAIK they didn't make even the most tentative of approaches to independents after the last election even though they would have required the support of most of them to form their favoured non-FF/FG government. If SF are a bit short of the numbers to put together a 'left' government after the next election IMO their next move will be to approach FF. I think doing grubby little side deals with a dozen gombeen independents would do more damage to their 'change' mandate than a proper negotiated agreement with FF.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,920 ✭✭✭Augme


    They did. Where the Healy raes in they alliance?


    Why would any of the major parties give the Integration portfolio to a group who know nothing about the laws and rules around immigration and who have proposed a system that is the complete opposite to all the major party? For the laugh? If the FA were implementing the will of the vast majority of voters they'd get alot more than 4-7 TDs. If the vast majority of voters want thet system why haven't any of the othe political parties changed to an anti immigration and anti EU position then? Also the main reason for their existence is farming issues. Hence the party name.


    I don't think accepting climate change exists, is real and is a significant problem is an "extreme ideological preference" tbh.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,910 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    What a load of idiots.

    They favour unrestricted planning in the countryside, they will re-open coal burning power stations, they want to withdraw from the WHO, and fight the EU, and as for their health and education policies, it reads like satire.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 27,910 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    I agree, Sinn Fein could also cancel BusConnects and the Metro, and blame the Farmers Alliance.



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,848 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Ah yes, coalition government as we are used to it. Blame the smaller party?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,027 ✭✭✭Blut2


    No, but the IA had people like Michael Fitzmaurice who were very much rural conservatives. And the Healy-Raes have propped up other governments.

    Why would any of the major parties give the Environmental portfolio to a group who know nothing about the laws and rules of the state and have proposed a system that will raise living costs and reduce the quality of life of everyone in the country? For the laugh? Because thats what they've repeatedly done with the Green party.

    The Irish political system has shown our mainstream parties are more than happy to give ministerial positions to minority, single issue, parties over the years. They provide votes for propping up the government, but more importantly also serve as useful public opinion mudguards for the bigger parties. Theres absolutely no reason to suspect the FA won't follow in the well trod foodsteps of the PDs, Labour, IA and the Greens.

    The polls are extremely clear on what the views of the majority of Irish voters are on our immigration situation. Are you living under a rock? Our current political parties aren't reflecting the views of the electorate on this for multiple reasons - hubris (all of them), international pressure (all of them), business leaders and housing providers wanting more immigrants (FF/FG), left-wing pro-migration party members (SF/Greens) etc.

    This exact scenario has played out in multiple European countries over the last 30 years, Ireland is just 10 or so years behind. Look at the AfD in Germany, Le Pen in France, Meloni in Italy, Geert Wilders in NL etc. The mainstream political parties ignore/gaslight the immigration issue ("Anyone possibly questioning this must be racist") for years, public opinion reaches a boiling point, and the far-right rises because they actually address public feelings on the topic. Theres no reason whatsoever to suspect Ireland will differ from this trajectory based on whats happened so far, we've followed it like a road map.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,920 ✭✭✭Augme


    Michael Fitzmaurice never joined the government and didn't vote for Kenny as Taoiseach in 2016. What Governments have the Heal-raes propped up?


    I'm fairly sure the Green party do know a bit about climate. I understand people don't like then but to claim they don't know about climate is bizarre tbh.


    The government are happy to give ministerial positions to people or parties who have a similar view as they do or else who they will feel will do what they want. The FA approach is in line with any current political party or EU law or Ireland obligations under the ECHR. None of the current governments have shown they are willing or want to rip those up.


    The polls are very clear on what the majority want and they clearly show they agree with the policies of either FF, FG and SF and don't particularly have much interest in the FA.



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,806 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Some of the Greens reactionary actions in the 07-11 government still haunt us. Diesel cars and wood burning stoves for all, actively killing asthmatics for dubious even then, now proven to be no carbon benefits

    I can't vote for a party that actively contributed to something that may actually kill me in the short term.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,027 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Fitzmaurice was a member of the Independent Alliance and influenced its policies. The Healy-Raes have voted to support all of our governments since 2011 on numerous occasions, have a look at their voting records.

    As L1011 says the Greens' responsibility for the majority of car sales in Ireland in the 2010s being diesel cars, promoting of wood burning stove and other such measures would suggest they very much don't know about environmental measures. Their diesel car efforts alone will have cost hundreds of Irish lives to respiratory problems in the long run.

    FG gave ministerial positions to LAB politicians in 2011. Did they have similar views? Do rural FF TDs have similar views to urban Green TDs in our government since 2020? Coalitions are rarely made up of parties that only share a similar view on all issues.

    The polls show 73% of Irish people want all migration to Ireland to be reduced. 75% (as of a few months ago, very likely higher now) want us to stop taking asylum seekers. And for 23% of the electorate this is their #1 issue. How exactly do the pro-migration policies of FF, FG and SF align with this and represent the views of the majority? Because the FA are the only party representing these now very widely held views that I can see.



  • Registered Users Posts: 21,435 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    I think we are all on a learning curve in relation to environment and climate issues. So I wouldn't be pointing the finger at the Greens on their support for diesel cars, at the time. Hindsight is the exact science. A whole lot of us are still in denial, that it's an issue at all. FA are tapping that vein as are the Healy Raes, Fitzmaurice, Collins and McGrath.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,920 ✭✭✭Augme


    Yes but he left when they went into Government. Hinting he didn't agree with what direction the government were going to go and what policies they were implementing. How they have voted is irrelevant, it doesn't mean the government ever cared or listened to what they wanted.


    No they didn't have similar views, but Labour ended up basically abandoning all their policies. FA might be willing to do the same just to get into government as well I guess. They share similar views on all major core issues like EU and obligations to international conventions. Not one member of any of the main political parties have said they will try and cut down on immigrstion or abandon their obligations to asylum seekers. In fact, the three leaders have pretty much said exactly the opposite.


    Just because 75% think we are taking too many aslyum seekers doesn't mean that same percentage want to leave the EU, ignore EU law and our other international obligations. The reality is, 80% of people have said they will vote for parties who havent shown any interest in doing things drastically different.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,027 ✭✭✭Blut2


    The party he was a founding member of, and policy maker in, went into government. They absolutely influenced government policy. The Healy-Raes were listened to and bought off by the respective governments in question, you're very very naive if you think they of all people lend their votes for nothing in return.

    Right, so junior coalition parties actually in fact do not need to have the same views as the major parties to go into government. Good to see you've done a complete 180 on that.

    The real world evidence from literally countless countries across Europe would disagree with you. Plenty of voters have proven willing to vote on immigration as a single issue vote, even for parties that advocate for other things they disagree with - because its that important to them. Le Pen got 42% of the vote in the last French presidential election, do you think 42% of French voters agreed with her wanting France to leave the EU, ignoring EU law and other international obligations? Do you think the one quarter of Germans supporting the AfD currently all agree with their heavily Eurosceptic and pro-Putin agenda?

    23% of the electorate in Ireland say reducing migration is their number one election issue, and that figure is growing steadily over time. A large portion of them are likely to vote to reflect that. And the FA are the only party they can vote for to do so. If even one third do, and the FA get 7% of the vote in our next general election, theres a very real chance they'll be in a position to enter government as a junior coalition party as other parties who polled at similar levels frequently have in Ireland. As I said from the outset.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,657 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Just a slight correction : the poll didn't say that reducing immigration was the main priority of the 23%, just that immigration was their main concern. One might assume that many of these might want reduced immigration, but we don't actually know, as the question wasn't asked (nor do we know whether they were talking about legal immigration, asylum seekers or both).



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,920 ✭✭✭Augme


    The independent alliance didn't have policies though. They were a collection of individuals and he left because he didn't agree with going into government. Again, I cant remember a time when a government needed the vote of the Healy Raes. It might have happened, but they certainly didn't do a complete 180 on their own policies to achieve it.


    Thinking anout it in more detail, Labour and FG would have very similar positions on the EU, on immigration, and nearly every other core issue. I actually can't think of one big issue they would have the complete opposite view on tbh. I also can't remember a coalition party who jave had the complete opposite view on major policy that have gone into government and been given that Ministry. Can you?


    I have no interest in what the rest of Europe are doing, I also find it no surprise that countries with a very very strong ring wing past have found themselves going back that direction. Irish people will vote for the person who cab solve their local issue, that's nearly always been the case. That won't change. The FA will need very strong local candidates with proven track records of doing that to get anywhere close to 7%.


    As pointed out, they didn't. They said it is the biggest issue. Also, what we have seen from the protests is clear. Once it isn't on people's doorsteps they really don't give a ****. If the Government develop these new large reception centres then that will reduce a significant portion of that problem.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,478 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    I cant remember a time when a government needed the vote of the Healy Raes. It might have happened

    If you go back far enough...

    In a secret deal done with Taoiseach Bertie Ahern in 1997, Jackie Healy Rae claimed that “98 or 99 per cent” of his wishlist was granted,



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,027 ✭✭✭Blut2


    The 23% of the population saying immigration is their #1 issue are not saying it because they want more immigration, they're obviously saying it because they want less immigration in the context of the poll where they were also being asked if they wanted more or less, and 73% said less and only 3% more. To even imply the opposite is absolutely ridiculous.

    The poll very clearly stated "all migration" also. In the most recent polling on only asylum seekers the figure was even higher, at 75% wanting it reduced, and that was from months ago - its very likely even higher now.

    The IA negotiated before going into government, had multiple cabinet ministers, and very obviously influenced that government's policy. They didn't get nothing for their troubles. If you can't remember a time the Healy-Raes voted with the goverment thats on you - have a look at their voting record and you'll see plenty.

    Labour and FG had very different policy platforms on a whole range of issues - welfare and taxation being the obvious, biggest two. The Greens and FF have pretty diametrically opposed views on climate change measures, yet the Greens were given the Environmental ministry in this very government.

    "I have no interest in what the rest of Europe are doing" then you have no interest or knowledge of politics. Neither France nor Germany have a strong right-wing past, before the 2010s neither had significant right-wing political presence. And the same was true in most of the rest of Europe where the far-right has risen. The Irish electorate is not sui generis, it follows very similar patterns and trends to other European democracies.

    If you think Irish people "don't give a ****" about our current immigration levels you have absolutely no contact with reality in 2024. Large majorities of people polled say its an issue, there were massive riots in Dublin over it, there are regular weekly protests breaking out at asylum seeker accomodation around the country, its coming up regularly at local political party meetings now for every party etc. Reducing immigration is up there with housing as the biggest thing voters in Ireland care about right now.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,657 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Not necessarily on the 'reducing' immigration thing. Are the communities concerned about 'unvetted single males' worried about the actual numbers of asylum seekers in Ireland? We don't actually know - their main concern appears to be safety / security. You're making an assumption that every one of the 23% are in in favour of reducing immigration to the country, when that question wasn't even asked of them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 21,435 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    We could do with more workers in the construction area for example. The only mid term solution for that is foreign workers. We're are at full employment by any matrix. A migration policy should be balanced and such needs should be a core part of the plan and targetted.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,657 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    I read somewhere that perhaps as many as 100,000 construction workers might be needed for a full housebuilding programme. We have nowhere even near those types of numbers available among the domestic labour force.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,920 ✭✭✭Augme


    The IA has no set policiy positions as a party. They were a group of individuals. You claimed Michael Fitzmaurice was a rural TD with a rural goal. That's why he wasn't in government, his mindset was to the goals of the government and of the IA . Shane Ross wasn't of that same mindset, hence the reason he was given a Cabinet position. I never claimed the Healy raes didn't vote with the government but its irrelevant. The government have no control over them. What I am saying is they didn't change government policy or provide the Healy Raes with anything to ensure their vote because they dont need their vote.


    Maybe that's why Labour weren't given the Dept. Of Finance portfolio? I could see a FA getting the ministerial for agricultural portfolio a lot sooner than the integration one. The FF and Greens both agree climate change exists and is an issue that needs to be tackled. As I said, the FA are the only major party who have the complete opposite position on immigration.


    I have plenty of knowledge. As for Germany not having a strong right-wing win past. I'd suggest a looking into your history a bit there. Focus on the 1930s and 1940s woukd be my suggestion.



    Ireland have no interest in brekaing EU law EU and ignoring our international obligations. Hence the reason they have very little interest in voting for the only political party advocating that. A coupe of 100 hundred chavs looting footlocker doesn't change that and neither does a couple of hundred protesting either. You said yourself you'd give the FA about 4-7 seats, that's about the height of people's importance on the issue.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,910 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Exactly, you can't blame the Greens for the diesel cars, the carmakers lied repeatedly about their emissions and it didn't come out until 2014, after the Greens had left government.




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,747 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    I seriously wonder whether the unvetted single male bit is a strawman and/or moral panic given that Ukrainian males are not actually allowed to leave Ukraine.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,703 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Of course it is totally a straw man.

    Demonstrators were complaining that single males were unvetted - not true in that they are fingerprinted and checked against an EU database. They even expressed horror that the establishment was next door to a creche.

    They were complaining about hospital and GP capacity - but young single males are healthier than families with children. Lack of schools comes into the same trope - single males do not bring children into the issue.

    Unvetted tourists visit the country without any checks of any kind other than their passport identity. That appears OK even though there is no consultation with the locals. None of us can veto new neighbours moving in next door, even though we might like to.

    Now there are actions needed to be taken by the Gov but these protests and threats of arson (and actual acts of arson) do nothing to solve the problem.

    I think the Gov setting up a few large hubs run by the Gov rather than private companies will go some way to solve the current problem.

    Other countries have a much harsher approach to IP applicants, like housing them in the equivalent of an open office spave with a sleeping bag on the floor.



Advertisement