Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Room to Improve (v2)

1383941434461

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,483 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    Sorry, where did 700k come from?

    Edit... The original purchase price

    Jesus wept



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,050 ✭✭✭hamburgham


    On the side of a road outside Cashel. Absolute madness.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 397 ✭✭lmk123


    I missed the first few minutes, how much was the house bought for



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,483 ✭✭✭✭lawred2




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 397 ✭✭lmk123




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,726 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    The houses are staged. But the stairs was built to be kept the way it was without painting or varnishing



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,726 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    Did they not sell a previous property , if they made a gain it’s only fictional money.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,318 ✭✭✭Deeec


    It was pretty obvious that they were still living in the house. All their belongings were still there - even photos. No way they would leave photos to get damp in an unlived in house. The nonsense of them moving in with the sister before they had even discussed plans was for TV.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,978 ✭✭✭standardg60


    Red brick looked absolutely atrocious, first thing I'd be doing would be plastering over and painting the same as the rest.

    And another BS starting budget with fantasy grant land thrown in, again far more money was obtainable than admitted. No problems with having a third child in the midst of the build, though obviously sympathy for their loss.

    Think she had a grà for keeping up with/outdoing the sister under a lot of it all, the husband was just a yes man, a conduit for her ambition.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,000 ✭✭✭✭freshpopcorn


    The listing for the house when it was for sale!




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,485 ✭✭✭harr


    How can you pay €300,000 for a house and not know the roof was gone as far as needing to be condemned.. surely they got an engineers report .. why did all the defects come as surprise. They basically paid €300,000 for a site and a view ..

    How is the vacant home grant policed , going by tonight anyone in an older home can say it hasn’t been lived in and apply for the grant .. that house tonight was clearly being lived in . The kids toys , photos , toiletries in bathroom and even a bale of briquettes in sitting room.

    It might have been cold and that’s what the energy grants are for but it’s definitely bending the truth or say it was vacant for as long as was needed for grant.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,318 ✭✭✭Deeec


    At the start of the show when they were showing Dermot around the house they even had a lamp on,which shows electricity was still connected. Dermot mentioned that they had fresh flowers in a house that they were not living in - she quickly said they were fake but they clearly were fresh Lillie's 😂. Kids bath toys still there etc.

    I'm guessing they wanted to avail of whatever grants was available to them - derelict/vacant whatever and lied that they had to move out and in with the sister. It's not clear what grants they did actually get though. If they got the vacant home grant then it's a joke as they were clearly living there!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,485 ✭✭✭harr


    Well what ever grants they got it came to nearly €100,000 worth 😬 you would have imagined they would have at least tried to make it look vacant.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 476 ✭✭ax530


    It's not clear what grants they did actually get though.

    Think at the end QS gave figure of 90 something from grants.

    I had expected that electricity needed to be disconnected to quality as vacant.

    Just shows if these 'loopholes' can be shown on TV that there are even more ways around them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,978 ✭✭✭standardg60


    Nevermind the vacant grant, pretty sure the QS said they got the derelict grant too.

    The local councils are sanctioning these grants, nuff said.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,441 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    Its 2 years with electricity disconnected I think, thats the least that would be asked for.

    As for derelict, theres no way that house would be in any way derelict, the structure was solid.

    Thats the problem with all these grants, people are abusing them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 610 ✭✭✭ottolwinner


    The as mentions at the end the total cost and the grants availed of.

    what I think is off though id her price per sq metre. She never factors in the initial purchase cost of the house. Which would near double the cost per sq metre. A different value then altogether.

    all in all i wish them well in life with their new home and family.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,483 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    Surely there's a simple checks and balances process for approving these grants.

    Although I wouldn't be remotely surprised if there wasn't. They probably just check the date of construction.



  • Registered Users Posts: 84 ✭✭User567363


    Is there systems in place to report grant fraud, why do we have to pay for white teeth to show off



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,708 ✭✭✭✭The Cush


    Had a look at the planning permission for the house, retention permission was only granted last week, 11 Jan 2024. Applied for last Nov.

    The previous owner also applied for retention permission prior to selling it in September 2022.

    Sold €303k, asking price €250k



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,342 ✭✭✭Tow


    Won't worry, there will be meeting in the Civil Service and The Controller and Auditor General.

    When is the money (including lost growth) Michael Noonan took in the Pension Levy going to be paid back?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 707 ✭✭✭mykrodot


    well if you look at the beginning of the show Dermot himself was the one suggesting and outlining these grants on a spreadsheet. He suggested them. He also was on the front of the Sunday Indo yesterday for seeking clarification from the Department about these grants (or one in particular) https://evoke.ie/2024/01/14/entertainment/dermot-bannon-show-meeting

    So he's definitely covering himself in a very public way about these grants and if there is any blame it has to be the Housing Department/Councils who are sanctioning them. You can't blame people for being advised to apply for them and for getting them. I'd be applying if I was advised to. Its huge money. I think the Government is throwing buckets of money at the building sector for the simple reason they want house built, whatever way it takes. They are making it easy. Pity they wouldn't do something about British investment banks hoovering up entire housing estates for ordinary people who don't go on these show.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,377 ✭✭✭✭PARlance


    Are they making it easy? From what I've heard, the grants are a bit of a nightmare to get.

    I think the reason why Dermot is all over the news / making so much noise about this is because couples that he has advised, haven't yet or probably won't get them.

    From the first two episodes, I think the show & Dermot has been very reckless in the advice given. I think they are trying to "make better" now by causing a fuss about the grants process.

    I'm taking this from a third party but someone said that retention planning permission for last night's house was only granted earlier this month. The QS said they had "got" the grants at the house reveal. I would be 99.9% sure they hadn't got any grant at that stage.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,340 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Dermot still should have know about the grant. Ignorance of the law is no defence. It is a vacant property refurbishment grant. The derelict home grant is for homes that were vacant for 2 years, you are supposed to show 2 years ESB bills to help prove that. That house was obviously being lied in, with the family photos, coat hanging on back of door etc. At 303k it was a fine house, with radiators etc. Probably better than the average house in rural Ireland, it did sell for 303k after all. It was neither vacant nor der

    elict. Fine if they want to give it energy upgrade grants etc but to give it derelict house and vacant property refurbishment grants is simply fraudulent.

    There was a lot of money involved. Almost 100k in grants. That takes the rest of us 200k to earn.

    I hope the grant money is repaid and people should be punished for fraudulent behaviour.

    100%. And when people are blatant enough to show this on tv, there could be worse fraud suspected of going on too in respect to these grants. I know of an employee of the council somewhere building a fancy new home where a cottage used to be, and he kept just one wall. If he getting every grant under the sun too? Nudge nudge wink wink. Duuno how he could afford it otherwise.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,369 ✭✭✭phormium


    No electricity is not a requirement, know that from a family application ongoing at the moment, but it's obvious from the actual bills that no one is living there, bare minimum of a bit of heat on to stop deterioration so extremely low usage. Disconnecting it would just be more awkward and costly to reconnect again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,073 ✭✭✭✭event


    The woman lost her mother and a child in the space of 3 years.

    She used the grants available to anyone thats eligible (that Dermot probably told them about, lets be honest. I would say he filled out the paperwork and all).

    Yet in here we have people sneering her hair, tan and teeth, while they probably idolise sports people and celebrities.

    Good christ this place is toxic as hell



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,318 ✭✭✭Deeec


    I agree that nobody should be talking about how the couple looks - thats wrong.

    However there are couples all over the country who are finding it difficult to get approval for derelict and vacant home grants - they are literally tearing there hair out with the strict criteria of the schemes. Based on the house we seen last night that couple should not have qualified for neither the derelict home or vacant home grant as it was neither derelict or vacant. Is Dermots clients getting special treatment or were we misled about the grants they availed of.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,505 ✭✭✭maynooth_rules


    Essentially did they pay 300k for a site? Would it not have worked out much cheaper to get a green field site outside of Cashel and design the same house?

    I feel like they were blinded by the view when buying the property. Lovely couple though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,199 ✭✭✭TinyMuffin


    300k for a site. The more ya think about it Crazy.

    Fools and their money are easily parted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,474 ✭✭✭Sunny Dayz


    What was lovely on last night's show was just how excited the couple, in particular the lady, was about the renovation and the progress. Every time they went to the site she was beaming and so happy and excited. My heart broke for them when they lost their baby and I can't imagine how it must have been a bittersweet moment when they moved into the house.

    However their champagne tastes didn't seem to align with their more lemonade budget. After already being told they are over budget they are enquiring can they get a home gym put in the shed, get the grounds landscaped. Personally I didn't like the furniture in the house, but that's just my personal taste.

    I take it that on RTI that when someone says their budget is X, it really means it's X + €50k/€100k. I can understand going a little over if you are unsure what things cost or if there are price increases or unforeseens. But if I engaged an architect to design a renovation for €250k, I don't want the plans for a €325k job.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,867 ✭✭✭lisasimpson


    No he's not. But sure the good dead on national television. Best advertisment for his business



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 733 ✭✭✭marilynrr


    The whole point was that they wanted the view.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,150 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    300k for a view is madness.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,150 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    Pity the government wouldn't throw buckets of money at the thousands of home owners in Donegal, Mayo and beyond to get their crumbling homes fixed.

    They created a scheme that is next to impossible to access, with Donegal County Council asking for so many hoops to be jumped through before you can move through each stage of the process. People have been in it for a few years and are basically no further forward to getting their homes fixed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,441 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    It seems that you are right:

    Proof that the property is vacant. Utility bills can be used to show that a property has been vacant at a particular time. If you can’t get utility bills for the property, you can provide a signed affidavit stating that the property has been vacant for at least 2 years. Your local authority may accept other documents that prove the property is vacant.

    It also says

    The grant must be approved before any work begins.

    Well that most certainly isnt the case in this weeks or last weeks episode.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,340 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Correct. Dermot said last night it was practically a new build and the Quantity Surveyor Claire said " "Its essentially a brand-new build here for €1972 per sq.m "

    Why is the taxpayer giving over 98,000 towards a brand new build for this particular couple?

    Other people in the country are not being allowed take off rooves and knock walls of perfectly good 1970's bungalows and rebuild them while getting grands for a vacant house and derelict house. The house was neither vacant or derelict?

    Fraud if you ask me, plain and simple.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,340 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    +1. They had family photos, toys, bale of briquettes, clothes, bath shampoos , flowers , electricity etc around the house, it looked lived in and do neighbours not say it was lived in within the 2 years / should not have qualified for the grants?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,824 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    Lovely couple, obviously dealing with a few hearbreaking events and making the best of what they had.

    That said, essentially it was 300K for a site but thats yet another issue with our failed planning system I would suggest.

    I am not sure about Tipp but I know in Galway is is ridiculously difficult to get planning permission on a site, there are a significant number of hoops to jump through, including the housing need test which is difficult to pass if you already have a house. It's "easier" buy an old house and remodel etc


    In general they spent a tonne of money on the house - closee to 600 K all in, a few miles out from the village on a road I doubt you could walk on, granted a decent view. If they could afford it and are happy - thats sound.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,340 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Not sound when the taxpayer gives them over €98,000 they should not have got for what their quantity surveyor and architects hails as a "new build".

    The grants are not for new builds.

    As someone else said " It was pretty obvious that they were still living in the house. All their belongings were still there - even photos. No way they would leave photos to get damp in an unlived in house. The nonsense of them moving in with the sister before they had even discussed plans was for TV."

    It takes the rest of us 200k to make 98 or 99k net.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,340 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Fine looking house in the listing, not bad at all, certainly not what I would call derelict and so qualify for a derelict grant!

    According to the property price register it was only sold on 15/09/2022.

    And elsewhere in the country people are going through loops to show no electricity useage etc.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    There is clearly some backhanded moves here...if that's derelict, so are half the house in the country. Strange to be so open about it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,906 ✭✭✭Zardoz


    Its not derelict, nowhere near it.

    Try and tell Revenue that your house is a derelict house and shouldn't be liable for Property tax and see what they will ask for.



  • Registered Users Posts: 137 ✭✭KLF


    Thought the same, very surprised to see you can 'stack' the grants. Getting the vacant home grant, derelict grant, and the SEAI energy grants together in a home that was suspectly vacant and hardly derelict. They threw in the 'roof was condemned', by who? The builder they got in to make a packet from the work.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,340 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    It sticks to high heaven. The roof was fine when the property was sold less than 2 years ago. The property went for €303,000, which is an above average price for a dwelling in rural Ireland? It surely is a poor use of €99,000 of taxpayers money that they should get to make on what Dermot's Claire ( the Q.S. ) called , and I quote, "essentially a new build".

    A new build is not refurbishing a vacant and derelict house. And it seems it was not vacant or derelict.

    Dermot himself called it a new build or words to that effect when the jcb was pulling down a 3m high section of (perfectly good) exterior wall.

    If they can get €99,000 in grants, why cannot everyone else?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,734 ✭✭✭ec18


    you can probably can, you just need to have the professionals employed to be able to put the applications together with the right language for them. It's the same for any grants really.....look at the numbers of sports clubs in affluent areas that get govt grants mostly due to the membership being made up of professionals such as solicitors and accountants.


    It's not nice but it's how governments work around the world. There are schemes that are exploited



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 707 ✭✭✭mykrodot


    I completely agree with you, my sister lives in Donegal and its enraging what has happened with Mica up there. I am just saying I don't blame the couple in last nights show. Dermot Bannon suggested all those grants. And he seems to be publicly saying everything is ok by being on the front of the Sunday Indo yesterday. I am not saying it is right/ wrong/ good/bad..... I am simply stating the facts.

    I know an awful lot about the entire process of these grants. My own daughter has been going through a derelict farmhouse renovation process for the last 2 years, trying to avail of the grants and trying now to get them paid, its all they've talked about .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,150 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    Can I ask, is DB appearing on the front of the Indo and the talk of these grants, is this related to the latest episode? Or just coincidence?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,377 ✭✭✭✭PARlance


    I think not. I mentioned earlier in the thread, I suspect DB has led a few couples up the garden path in terms of what grants they can avail of and his latest activism is probably an attempt to show those couples that he is trying to do something about it.

    I would love to know what architects think of DB and RTI... I'm not sure the ridiculous budget overruns and general attitude to spend is doing the profession much good.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,340 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Putting something "together with the right language" is a phrase Dermot would use.

    Saying a house is vacant when it is not, or is derelict when it is not, in order to get a Vacant / derelict house refurbishment grant is not on, especially when your q.s describes it as essentially a new build ( her words, not mine ).

    The diversion of close to 100,000 of taxpayers money is money that could and should have been spent better elsewhere?

    I suspect damage limitation, he probably knows this money may have to be repaid to the government, and he has opened a can of worms?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,150 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    Well I hope that poor couple don't have to repay another 100k. Would be devastating news for them.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement