Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Time for a zero refugee policy? - *Read OP for mod warnings and threadbans - updated 11/5/24*

Options
1456457459461462851

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 23,695 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    The point was that nobody can get an appointment for weeks, locals, asylum seekers or medical card holders, because it’s a situation which existed long before any increase in asylum seekers!

    That particular dentist won’t be making anything from medical cards anyway because he doesn’t take medical cards. Another dentist in the town does. There’s not many dentists or GPs are willing to take medical cards any more anyway because they’re left waiting for payment from the State that simply don’t cover their costs:


    According to the HSE, the number of dentists holding Dental Treatment Services Scheme (DTSS) contracts is now 1,082. However figures from the start of this year show just 660 dentists across the country were actively treating medical card patients.

    The number of dentists holding DTSS contracts has fallen from 1,660 in 2017.

    “What that means is that the eligible number of patients has remained the same but the number of dentists available to provide the care has halved,” Hourihan said.

    “The consequence of that is that it’s more difficult for people to get an appointment to see a dentist.

    https://www.thejournal.ie/dentists-medical-card-2-5785725-Jun2022/



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,022 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Not so sure about that.

    You do to publish it afaik which is what these are doing.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    But increasing the numbers over night by hundreds won't have an effect,

    Seriously do you think people are actually that gullible to believe that,

    The problem was already there, just like the schools who don't have the resources for children who don't speak English or arrive here with special needs ,

    But nothing to see here folks move along now



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,106 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    because they don't want to f**king be there, russia is invading the place. jasus i'd be out of there asap especially if i had kids. anyway lots of doctors stayed in ukraine and also palestine, they've more balls than i'll ever have.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,106 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    per capita they still pollute less than we do, most of china's industry is to provide cheap crap to rich countries like ireland



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 18,470 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Good luck with trying to opt out of our international refugee obligations 'because it will put extra pressure on local services'. If that is the case, every country in Europe could decide to opt out of all refugee treaties and not take any refugees at all. Refugees by their very nature are a burden on their host country i.e. they're vulnerable and don't have any money or possessions : that's the whole point of offering them shelter, doing it because it's the right thing to do.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,106 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    They have 100s of millions of cars because they have a bigger population than us, they have something like 180 car owners per 1000 people there. Most people there get around by public transport. Honestly the China thing is like "small, far away" from Father Ted with you people.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    We can deport them in large numbers,like the danish who deport 40 % of failed asylum seekers and increasing and they push the other to leave,

    Why can't we do it ,



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    So why are we being pushed to give up our cars for bicycles but yet china has 319 million cars , Emmon loves China but hates his own .....

    Wonder when he gets his ideas




  • Registered Users Posts: 54,149 ✭✭✭✭Headshot


    You're wrong there. We ask the failed asylum seekers to leave nicely and they deffo leave! They wouldn't lie to us



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 14,106 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    i mean if you can't figure that out for yourself, if you can't figure out why we can't just keep focusing on planning everything around private car ownership, you're just not smart enough to discuss these things



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling




  • Registered Users Posts: 23,695 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    It won’t have an effect. Whether anyone believes that or not is entirely their own business, but those facts were established long before there was ever any increase in asylum seekers. Those people who are trying to claim asylum seekers are adding any additional pressure are doing so only to serve their own interests. That’s why their rhetoric isn’t actually resonating with the general public, precisely because people aren’t that gullible.

    I’ve never said there’s nothing to see here, people were seeing the issues long before a small cohort latched onto the issues in order to promote their own interests.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,470 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    I would have no particular issue with deporting anyone who is an 'economic migrant' and who is just trying to better themselves and bypass the visa system. But by all accounts, the majority of asylum seekers are genuine refugees and fit the criteria of being one....definitely in the region of 60%-70% of them according to official stats.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Yeah they leave,how do you they leave oh because there not here ,who says they are not here???,

    because .....

    There not .....


    This has actually been discussed exactly like this .....

    Another poster claimed his dad works in the Aer Corp and they fly the Deportation flights hence why he knows that they actually leave.......



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    The figures are probably worse those are only the ones coming through Dublin airport,

    The same government who are one stage had a 75 % refusal rate of asylum several years later ohhh it's 70/80% there all genuine.....

    That was quite the script flip ,

    What's next we have deported tens of thousands of failed asylum seekers over the last 30 years, nope less than 2000 or so over 30 years in which there was north of 20,000 some years coming from Nigeria alone



  • Registered Users Posts: 219 ✭✭minimary


    When people get to the stage of having a deportation order against them, they have nothing to lose, you will essentially be barred from getting a visa anywhere else because it will be seen as a risk to that country that you'll apply for asylum there. We should offer an alternative to people and say to them if you provide us with evidence that you have left the State within a week we will not issue a deportation decision against you.

    The State should also withdraw any support (accommodation, allowance etc.) from people who have had a negative decision for IP and subsidary protection, we shouldn't be subsidising living costs for people who have had negative decisions against them we have obligations and I believe we should fulfil those obligations but once multiple negative decisions have been issued, its not the States obligation.

    Leave to remain should only be granted where someone can prove that they can support themselves and their families independently without State support. Any petition received from a community that wants someone to be granted leave to remain should have a guarantor who will assume the financial obligation to support the person/persons if they can't support themselves or that the community will have raised the average cost of support for a period of 5 years and gift that to the State.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    There's something like 800 +currently living in DP despite being allowed to stay here but yet we are still funding their stays , dp is so shocking terrible but yet can't get people to leave...

    There should be zero option Deportation order and Deported within 24 hours ,



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,695 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    That was quite the script flip


    As script flips go, while claiming that a rise of 40% in rejected claims for asylum being deported from Denmark, that’s ignoring the fact that the approval rates for applicants seeking asylum has risen to 74%:

    The success rate (recognition rate) from Immigration Service (first instance) has moved up and down a lot during recent years. In 2015 it reached a record high of 85%, in 2020 it dropped to 44%, and in 2021 it was 59%.

    During the first 9 months of 2023, 74% of the applicants were granted asylum. However, the percentage includes both newcomers and people who already had a residence permit but applied for asylum later. They are called 'remotely registered' and form around 40% of the applicants. Out of the 1,020 who were granted asylum, the municipalities have only received 409 new refugees (besides Ukrainians). During the same period, 40 refugees have had their permits revoked.

    http://refugees.dk/en/facts/numbers-and-statistics/what-are-the-chances-of-being-granted-asylum/



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    What's that

    In 2021, UNHCR urged Denmark to reform its asylum system, stating that it is ‘concerned with the pace and scope of the restrictions introduced over the years to restrict asylum space’.

    Meanwhile, the deportation rate is rising: in 2020, 18.5% of rejected asylum seekers meant to be deported were sent out of the country, but by 2022, that percentage climbed to 40.5%.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    We really should adopt the Danish model , rather than this free for all while trying to blame the far right and misinformation



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,695 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    Come on now Gatling, you’re not stupid. Compare what the two different statements are saying about two different things:

    Approval rate: 74%

    Deportation rate: 40%

    There are significantly less deportations happening than there are approvals, with 40% of those approved already residing in Denmark (ie not subject to deportation).

    That 40% figure you’re hanging your hat on breaks down like this:

    How many leave?

    Without a residence permit

    In 2022, a total of 222 rejected persons left Denmark, out of these 79 were accompanied/by force and 142 'seen leaving' which means that the police put you on a plane but doesn't accompany. This is not many, considering that 548 were in a position where they are supposed to leave, after a final rejection. Most of the rejected can't be deported for various reasons, even if the Return Agency is trying their best. A large part of the ones who are rejected disappear from the system – trying again in other countries or going under ground. Only very few return to their home countries. 

    http://refugees.dk/en/facts/numbers-and-statistics/how-many-return-home-again/



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    No .

    Sure I read that they don't deport anyone it's like the UK apparently,,,,,

    Not



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,695 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    What do you mean no? The actual figures for the number of applicants who are successfully deported is right there in front of you. A 40% success rate amounting to 200 failed asylum seekers being deported, is nothing compared to the amount of asylum seeker applicants who are successful.

    The UK Government too have tried the same nonsense of massaging statistics to try and claim they too have taken a tough stance on asylum seekers, but there again too the figures speak for themselves:

    LONDON — It’s official: net migration to the U.K. is at an all-time high.

    New figures published Thursday show migration added 606,000 people to the U.K.’s population in 2022 — the highest number on record.

    The data from the Office for National Statistics is likely to prompt fresh criticism of the governing Conservatives, who promised in their 2019 election manifesto to ensure “overall numbers come down” at a time when net migration stood at 226,000.

    The rise also comes three years after Britain left the EU touting more control over arrivals through a “points-based” system in place of the bloc’s free movement of people.

    Prime Minister Rishi Sunak told ITV Thursday: “Numbers are too high, it’s as simple as that and I want to bring them down.” Labour accused him of having “no grip on immigration.”

    https://www.politico.eu/article/three-years-after-britain-left-eu-net-migration-never-been-higher-brexit/


    They’re really in no different a position than Ireland, in spite of their respective Governments attempts to claim that they’ve gotten tough on immigration.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Let's look at the UK ,no ..

    So as of July 2023 there was only 180 applications for asylum in Denmark,but yet somehow in 2023 they Deported 200 ...



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,695 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    I dunno what you mean by let’s look at the UK, no… but from your own link even:

    The Ministry has stressed that the number of rejected asylum applications has significantly decreased from 1,155 registered at the end of 2020 to about 550 two years later, based on the figures from the Home Travel Agency, accounting for the lowest number since 2 009.

    And of those 550 whose claims have been rejected, only 200 have been successfully deported. That’s where the figure of 40% successfully deported comes from. Not only has the numbers of rejected claims decreased, the numbers of successful deportations isn’t actually that high in comparison to the number of claims approved, which has been increasing, and likely will continue to increase in coming years.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,132 ✭✭✭malinheader


    It's about time you stopped believing in fairy tales. Explain to me then what dental services will these people use, unless immigrants don’t need dentists.

    You still never answered if you still stand by your statement that the thousands upon thousands of immigrants that have entered the country are not adding to the collapse and strain on all services.

    Do you really believe that they don't



  • Registered Users Posts: 98 ✭✭mauries wigs




  • Registered Users Posts: 6,825 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    This post has a touch of the old casual racism thrown in.

    Classy.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 98 ✭✭mauries wigs


    They should get him on the tonight show to plead his innocence



Advertisement