Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hamas strike on Israel - Threadbans in op - mod warning in OP updated 19/10/23

Options
19399409429449451266

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 25,520 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    So surrender to the IDF and get executed?

    How did that work out for the 3 israeli hostages that were shot by the IDF?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Settlers appear to have no preference on who they attack or whose land they steal.


    The apparent involvement of known Jewish settlers in attacks alongside other evidence has increased long-held suspicions that a powerful settler organisation is involved in the attempted land takeover.





  • Registered Users Posts: 51,742 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    There is NOTHING left to say that thousands of pictures of slaughtered children could not convey. It is NOT the EYES that are BLIND but the HEARTS.

    Saw that earlier and thought it summed up this thread very well.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Shapps 'disappointed' by Netanyahu opposition to Palestinian state





  • Registered Users Posts: 812 ✭✭✭Hey boy




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 812 ✭✭✭Hey boy


    He/she must know some he/she has been chucking it around like confetti.



  • Registered Users Posts: 838 ✭✭✭Iscreamkone


    So you personally don’t think a Hamas/Palestine surrender could work.

    I don’t agree with your opinion.

    But it is an option that should be explored in the media. Why is it being ignored in the media at present?

    Anyone who ignores it as an option is not neutral.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,441 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    So, all the palestinian men being mistreated in the article linked to from Al-Jazeera didn't surrender?

    What happened with the 3 hostages was a tragedy and sadly not unexpected in any war. But, you're implying wholesale massacres of those that surrender - that's Hamas's gig, especially with women.



  • Registered Users Posts: 51,742 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    '' anyone who ignores it as an option is not neutral''

    What kind of a statement is that??



  • Registered Users Posts: 838 ✭✭✭Iscreamkone


    Those that ONLY call on IDF to declare a ceasefire are not neutral.

    In Ireland , the left and the media are not neutral.

    Are those who support Palestine/Hamas only interested in a ceasefire?

    They really want to take out the Israeli state (from the river etc).


    With this in mind Israel should drive on to provide ‘learnings’ to Palestine/Hamas that their actions have consequences. And if they try an October 7th event again sometime in the future , that they will be inviting a similar response.

    Palestine didn’t learn any lessons from attacks on Israel in 1948, 1967 or 1973 so it’s doubtful whether they will learn this time either.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 82,370 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    "self-defence"

    Those classrooms were coming right for them!

    'But Overheal it IS self defense' oh yeah that's why standard NATO doctrine is to make sure to level every hospital and school in our wake. I forgot.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,327 ✭✭✭Frank Grimes


    Don't forget targeting killing of journalists. No doubt they all just happened to be in the way of the bombs/bullets, and/or just got what was coming to them so it's all fine.



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,520 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Those Palestinian men that included innocent civilians and journalists? If thenIDF treat innocent people that way then yeah.


    What happened with then3 hostages was murder, same with the israeli citizen who was shot dead after tackling the Hamas terrorists that attacked innocent people at the bus stop.


    That's the IDF way, shoot first ask questions later, not much comfort f9r their families. They did the same.on the 7th, massacred many of their own civilians.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,441 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    So, you agree that the Palestinian men shown in the Al-Jazeera article weren't killed? They surrendered "safely?" Like Hamas could do, should they so desire? That was the original question - could Hamas safely surrender? Your contention is no, they'd be killed. I've shown that's not the "rule" with the IDF using an example from Al-Jazeera.


    Why won't you support the idea of Hamas surrendering? Want to keep the war going?



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,441 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    "Palestine didn’t learn any lessons from attacks on Israel in 1948, 1967 or 1973 so it’s doubtful whether they will learn this time either."


    1948, 67 and 1973 were all attacks from neighbouring soverign states like Jordan, Egypt, Iraq, Syria,...- no Palestine as a political entity then. No did any of those states attack as advocates for "Palestine," they wanted the land for themselves.

    As to whether anyone learns anything, that remains to be seen. Hamas could surrender the hostages and themselves and end this conflict.



  • Registered Users Posts: 51,742 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    Hamas won't surrender imo. They'd be back to square one again. They have the world supporting Palestine too and have Israel in great financial difficulty. They obviously see this as the chance to finally get their own independent state for Palestine. As people have already said Hamas is not Palestine so who knows what happens next?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    @Iscreamkone

    Just unpacking your recent opinions (which are not facts).

    The only group that wants to commit genocide is Hamas and the Palestinians.

    They openly state they want to kill all Jews


    Hamas would surrender to the IDF or continue the war against the IDF. They have choices.


    But it is an option that should be explored in the media. Why is it being ignored in the media at present?

    Anyone who ignores it as an option is not neutral.


    With this in mind Israel should drive on to provide ‘learnings’ to Palestine/Hamas that their actions have consequences.


    In Ireland , the left and the media are not neutral.


    So, Hamas and the Palestinians want to kill all the Jews, Hamas can choose to surrender and anyone not agreeing with surrender is not neutral, Israel should teach Palestine/Hamas a lesson.

    You're all over the place. You want Hamas to surrender and Israel to press forward with its Genocide. But its Hamas and the Palestinians who want to kill all the Jews.

    I googled "the left in Ireland" and all the hits I got were "The Most Important Rules of the Road in Ireland".

    OK.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Haaretz:

    HOSTAGES: Yonatan Shimriz, whose brother Alon was kidnapped to Gaza on October 7 and accidentally shot to death by IDF soldiers last month, spoke at an anti-government protest in Tel Aviv on Saturday, saying: "This leadership will be remembered as a black stain in history. You have turned an entire country into refugees through years of criminal neglect and betrayal."



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Haaretz:

    U.S. intelligence agencies estimate that Israeli forces killed 20 to 30 percent of Hamas' fighting force in Gaza, slightly lower than Israel's estimate of 10,000 fighters killed, the WSJ reported. Officials estimate that Hamas still has enough munitions to continue fighting for months, the report said.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Haaretz:

    • Israel will escalate fighting with Hezbollah in the "next several weeks" if no diplomatic agreement is reached to distance the Iran-backed organization from the Israel-Lebanon border, several Lebanese officials told the Washington Post, which also noted that Israel told U.S. officials they prefer a negotiated solution to the crisis but that time is running out.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Haaretz

    Far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said that "there is a broad consensus in Israel against a Palestinian state... Israel's friends need to understand that the push to establish a Palestinian state is a push for the next massacre." Nissim Vaturi, a Likud MK, said "there will be no 'Palestinian' state. The blood of our sons was not spilled so that a terrorist state would be established."



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Ben Gvir wanted to keep the money...


    ISRAEL: Israel's security cabinet approved a plan to transfer tax funds to the Palestinian Authority through Norway. The sole cabinet opponent was far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir.

    • The U.S., Egypt and Qatar are pushing Israel and Hamas to agree to a new cease-fire proposal and are likely to begin negotiations in Cairo in the next few days, the Wall Street Journal reported. Officials briefed on the negotiations said both parties have shown interest in engaging in discussions.




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Seems to me that Israel is realising that the campaign is not going to result in success (whatever that is).

    I'd imagine the international pressure for a ceasefire is huge, internal demonstrations around the hostages and dissension in the cabinet are leading to what seems a willingness to negotiate a cease fire. I hope that includes the release of all hostages.

    The Hamas numbers surprise me - combatants and munitions. That will be a sticking point and if that means the bombing continues, the civilians will continue to pay a heavy price.

    The Israeli comments on Hezbolla are also surprising. I had read articles stating that they are a different level compared to Hamas. Perhaps the US have promised support. Or perhaps Israel is well able on its own. I don't know what that would mean for UN peace keepers in the region.

    The two-state solution seems to be the only game in town internationally. If there are elections in Israel (I think they are set for this year) and the far right gets the boot (seems more likely than not) it should at least stand a chance.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭dmcdona




  • Registered Users Posts: 8,197 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    So just wanting Israel to continue to exist makes someone an evil zionist? That's most people tbh.


    What do you think the solution is, if not a two state one?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    It seems to me that a two-state solution is the only solution to the cyclical violence.

    The current situation hasn't worked for over 75 years. Both parties have suffered immense atrocities.

    What that two state solution looks like is anyone's guess.



  • Registered Users Posts: 838 ✭✭✭Iscreamkone


    The fact that Hamas/Palestine want to kill ALL Jews is a major stumbling block to a two state solution.

    The Palestinians were offered this before but didn’t go for it because the offer was a little less than their ultimate goal of killing ALL Jews.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭dmcdona




  • Registered Users Posts: 5,801 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Do you think a 2 state solution could work if you ignore Gaza, if you take the West Bank. If Israel stopped the ethnic cleansing and agreed to respect borders etc....?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,082 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    If Israelis dont respect a two state solution then they have to give Palestinians more rights in Israel, or another entity like Hamas will inevitably be created. If they dont then they will truly be running an apartheid system with the Palestinians living in the equivalent of the South African townships.



Advertisement