Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

organic farming

1424345474853

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    5 years is the Dept organic contract. Yeah 15/18 cows seems about right. Depends how long you keep stock. Lim X would be good mothers. If you're finishing the AA stock would be smaller, finish earlier and could finish off grass. I'd say book yourself in to do the 25 hour course. NOTS will be running one somewhere fairly near you: https://nots.ie/courses/ Found it very good. There are plenty walks on farms each year too. Go to a couple of those. Learn a lot from the other farmers present too.

    Dosing is on dung samples, the way most vets are recommending all farmers go anyway.



  • Registered Users Posts: 331 ✭✭RockOrBog


    I would have always dosed going by a timeline, I tried the dung samples testing this year, they actually didn't need dosing at all when I thought they did

    Edit. Totally anecdotal, I am not an organic farmer



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 588 ✭✭✭n1st


    I believe it's a no brainer for smaller operations. Reduce stock is no harm, you'll be getting a few thousand from the organics and will be reducing your costs with not fertilizers and probably less feed.

    Less animals less spraying and spreading less cost more money.

    The 25hr course is very informative on good farming practice and food regardless.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,077 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    I am not really about that after the conversion you are more or less paid 100/ acre after conversion. For a sixty acre farm that is 6K.

    Your out put will probably drop 20-40%, you will have extra ration and straw costs. Organic rations are twice the price of standard ones. Straw was uneconomical at 15-20/ bale, at 50+ I just cannot see the sums adding up.

    The only plus is the ability to take in slurry but you would want to be in a strong dairy area with plenty of lads In derogation

    If you are a hill farmer with a couple hundred acres where you can draw the 70HA ( 175 acre) then it makes sense on a 40-60 acre farm I am not sure.

    I am not sure what the implications of rented land are

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 588 ✭✭✭n1st


    Yes around 6k per year for a 50 or 60 acre farm.

    Everyone will have to do their own maths and also decide how they want to farm.

    For me 6k per year equates to about the profit on 10 - 15 weanlings per year (buying at 10 months, selling at 20 months). So I decided to reduce my stock to 10 animals. I'll need less grass, I'll most likely sell silage, no fertilizer, possibly no slurry, no feed, less marts, less vets, less profit from cattle, less risk. I'm also changing the way I farm, outwintering instead of summer grazing for example.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    It can be about a system that suits the person. Really found my niche there, at a personal level. Finished organic cattle are at €6/kg ATM, that may not last. You hardly see the vet. I use mob grazing, another guy is talking of outwintering, to each his own, but we can all still learn something from each other.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,147 ✭✭✭endainoz


    Living shed from agroforestry is the next plan, the idea would be to see if it's possible to save on 6 weeks of winter feeding. Would be a huge saving on feed and bedding.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,212 ✭✭✭893bet


    How do you hardly see the vet? What change did you make to reduce vet costs?


    I am in first year Conversion and have treated as I always done under vet supervision.

    Maybe a difference for me was I never treated cows or 2yr olds for parasites like fluke or stomach so no faecel change for me.

    But I had to treat for hoose based on visibile symptoms (this is detailed in my heard plan and the product was purchased in the vet). Same for lice.


    The one thing I did reduce/eliminate was the “just in case shot” for antibiotics but that was t that often in any case.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,147 ✭✭✭endainoz


    Generally organic farms have better nutrients in the ground that the animals can pick up themselves to self regulate. Not always the case of course but thats probably what Walter is referring to I'd imagine. I know myself the vet bill is lower, and the dose bill is almost non existent. The odd dung sample is always good to keep an eye on things though.



  • Registered Users Posts: 171 ✭✭massey 265


    On your example of a 60 acre farm getting 6k per annum from organic scheme ,you forgot the 1400 top up per annum for inconversion period bringing this to 7470, and that the top up is 2k with 300 per hectare for the 2 years conversion period so thats 9300 approx per annum for first 2 years.The total organic payment for the 5 years on this 60 acre farm example will be 41k.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,147 ✭✭✭endainoz


    Also conveniently forgot whatever profits come from regular sales or weanlings/year and a halfs etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    The stock are under less pressure. Maybe it's me, but I think that helps with TB as well. Their immunity seems to be higher. I also have over 40 days growth in front of stock, with the mob grazing. Lots of various plants and seeds in the diet. I notice red sorrel is their first choice.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,077 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    For the first two years you have not got organic status so all stock sold go into the market at conventional prices not organic.

    The top up on 60 acres is equivalent to 23/ acre. It's no magic bullet. Its 100/ head on 14 weanlings. I be expecting to keep more suckler units than that on 60 acres if fairly decent land even in organics.

    The 4k extra on the first two years some will get swallowed up on of the initial costs of setting up organics. If you want to make money out of it you have to look at it longterm

    I did not forget Acres either. If you go into organics it limits you environmental scheme choices. You are probably looking at 2-3k less on a 60 acre holding

    Stock sakes are stock sales. From what I see some are going into organics because there present system is struggling with profitability. In the scheme of things. In the organic payment Massey 265 mentioned above seems to be a way of solving a profitability issue. But of the 41k over five years you will be lucky to hold on to half it. After year two it 6k/ year that is what you should do the calculations on

    Any animal on the farm when you convert cannot be sold as organic. The beef price is not substantially ahead of ordinary beef. AA and HE cattle vary between 4.8-5.7 in any twelve month period at present. On average how much of an organic bonus is on top of that.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 588 ✭✭✭n1st


    Finances aside, here are some reasons that someone might switch to organic beef (copied), might be worth considering for some:

    **Environmental benefits:**


    * **Improved soil health:** Organic farming practices, such as crop rotation and compost application, help to improve soil health by increasing soil organic matter, which in turn improves soil structure, nutrient retention, and water infiltration. This can lead to increased crop yields and reduced reliance on synthetic fertilizers.


    * **Reduced pollution:** Organic farming prohibits the use of synthetic pesticides and herbicides, which can harm beneficial insects, pollute water sources, and pose potential health risks to consumers. This can lead to cleaner water and air and a healthier environment for everyone.


    * **Enhanced biodiversity:** Organic farming practices, such as avoiding monoculture and maintaining hedgerows, help to promote biodiversity by providing habitat for a variety of plant and animal species. This can help to maintain ecological balance and resilience in the face of climate change and other environmental challenges.


    **Animal welfare benefits:**


    * **Natural diet:** Organic cattle are fed a diet of grass and other forages, which is closer to their natural diet than the grain-based diet fed to most commercial cattle. This can improve their overall health and well-being.


    * **Outdoor access:** Organic cattle have access to pasture and outdoor grazing whenever possible, which allows them to express their natural behaviors and live a more natural life. This can also improve their health and well-being.


    * **No antibiotics or growth promoters:** Organic cattle are not given antibiotics or growth promoters, which can help to reduce the risk of antibiotic resistance and promote a more natural production system.


    **Consumer benefits:**


    * **Healthier food:** Organic beef is generally considered to be healthier than conventional beef, as it is free from synthetic chemicals and antibiotics. This can reduce the risk of health problems, such as antibiotic resistance and foodborne illnesses.


    * **Support for sustainable agriculture:** By choosing organic beef, consumers can support a more sustainable agricultural system that is better for the environment, animal welfare, and public health.


    * **Taste and quality:** Many people believe that organic beef has a better taste and quality than conventional beef. This is likely due to the fact that organic cattle are fed a more natural diet and are not given antibiotics or growth promoters.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,077 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    The first two words in your post are where your whole argument fails.

    Ya if you are interested in organics for all of the above. But @massey 265 and @endainoz were on about the economic benefits.

    None of the reasons you gave above are economic reasons to join organics. I am a commercial farmer, I farm to make a profit. The numbers on organics just do not stack up.

    As I posted in an earlier post, ya if I had a 200 acre hill farm with 100-150 sheep the numbers add up well.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,763 ✭✭✭Birdnuts


    In fairness its stacking up for more and more folks in the beef/sheep sector at least(just look at the latest published rather grim figures for incomes on conventional farms!!), especially the growing numbers doing it part time.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29 manno


    I did the organics course last year as I was interested in converting. I had hoped there would be a niche for someone trying to be fairly productive while adhering to the organic scheme rules. By this I mean, using herbal leys, clover etc to fix nitrogen so as to be still able to farm semi intensively but in a way that was environmentally friendly. Overall I found the instructor was completed uninterested in this kind of thinking and only wanted to see land let go wild (he was dead against cultivating grassland). I didn't join in the end but I picked up a few ideas that may be useful. For instance I have been growing herbal leys for a number of years but I found out that I was applying too much nitrogen to them and I now find that the clover grows better with less nitrogen applied. My thoughts on some of your points would be as follows:

    You don’t need to be in the organics scheme to practise crop rotation and compost application. Improving soil structure, nutrient retention, etc should be the aim of any progressive farmer regardless of whether they are in the scheme or not.

    It is not true that no antibiotics are used in organic production. We were told that one of the key aims of organics is to foster animal welfare so obviously any ailments have to be treated. The veterinary side of things potentially doesn’t change that much other than there is an increased need to seek permission before treating and the withdrawal periods are doubled.

    Overall I feel that most people who are joining currently are only interested in the "handy money". Down the line (it has started already), there won't be enough food to feed the world and government policy should be focussed on maintaining production while also adopting more sustainable methods. The EU's unwillingness to use modern science such as gene editing is a big hindrance to advancement of this goal.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 3,952 Mod ✭✭✭✭Siamsa Sessions


    Might all be true (or might not), but it's also pointing a finger at conventional farming and saying it's wrong, dirty, full of chemicals, unhealthy, etc.

    I did the 25-hour intro organic course last year and picked up a few bits from it. And I can see where organic certification and direct payments would be a good fit for some farmers, but I'll try to stick to organic ideas and principles for now and see where I land in a few years.

    Lest anyone think I'm somehow giving out about organics: I've zero issue with it and best of luck to anyone on that path. If we all did the same thing, it'd be a boring world. But the organics bombarding from the current Government is for their benefit, not the farmers.

    Trading as Sullivan’s Farm on YouTube



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 942 ✭✭✭trabpc


    Have you calculated what you are missing out on by not going into Acres and Organics? Not having a go just curious. I'm in both myself and would need to turn over 50 to 70 more cattle a year just to cover those organic and Acres payments if i wasn't in those schemes.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    It's a pity if course instructors pass on their biasis in any area, poor work. Yes, the whole regenerative and biological field is there as well. Organic happens to be the only formalised, documented system. It's all about learning, go on farm walks, listen to podcasts; Farming for Nature, IOA. Use some of the practices that suit you. Certainly, the use of inorganic nitrogen can be reduced. It has fallen 31% in the last few years and the stock haven't gone hungry. As Dr. Cristine Jones says, 'the best contribution farming can make to the environment is to stop using artificial fertiliser'.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,077 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Can you give a bit more detail on how long the cattle will be in the system. Every animal I drop will see a net margin reduction of 300+ and a gross margin of 800+.

    Acres has costs.and at least the first years paynent goes in costs and certain actions will see ancillary costs.

    I have takenaction that do not generally effect my farm operation its about 3.5k. Organics would cost me about half that payment.

    On a 60 acre farm there is a limit to linear actions you can carry out, most area based actions are not compatible with Organics.

    In your example I be dropping 15 to 20k+ in net margin.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 171 ✭✭massey 265


    Re the example 60 acre being organic and being compatible with acres ,its possible to draw the max of 7k plus in general scheme by taking the linear options with minimum deduction eg 200 euro from organic payment .i detailed this some time back in either this tread or the acres thread.The costs assosiated with acres are there regardless whether you are in organic scheme or not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 588 ✭✭✭n1st


    I don't think anyone is asking anyone to go organic. If anyone is interested then they can learn more and go from there and if not interested then continue as normal.

    Personally I don't believe organic beef farming for example will suit everyone. I am a small part time farmer and it will probably suit me.

    In terms of food shortages I believe when is comes to beef and lamb at least it's not an essential foodstuff it's a high end product product and "should" be priced accordingly. I've no interest in bringing my cattle to supply Big Mac's and that's where the commercial beef is going, burgers and mince. Irish beef is too good for that.

    ACRES, I'm doing the linear actions, hedgerows and stonewalls. The other benefits of Acres didn't interest me anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    I do believe carbon farming will be a thing paid for in the future. Even Head of Teagasc Prof Frank O'Mara mentioned it. But I look too far ahead sometimes. Organic beef, chicken, pig meat, cereals, vegetables and fruit should all be niche, high end products. Sadly, looks like the supermarkets here and abroad are the main route to market and they'll only drive product one way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,147 ✭✭✭endainoz


    Carbon farming will definitely be a thing in the future, I'm looking forward to the meltdown on these threads when it eventually does come in the next CAP. I'd safely say there will be quite a bit of opposition to such an idea.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,711 Mod ✭✭✭✭blue5000


    If anyone is thinking about going organic and having hens or chickens, don’t bother. Dept of aggravation seem to be hell bent on closing that sector down. Luckily I don’t have them but one of the farmers in our group is being crucified by them.

    Beef and sheep suits organic fine, grass based suits the green image etc.

    If the seat's wet, sit on yer hat, a cool head is better than a wet ar5e.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Is it the mobile units that they have problems with?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,833 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    There's already a quasi system of carbon "farming" except the farming is gone out of it as are the farmers.

    Didn't dublin county council sell land or the carbon rights of Mountain land to a Web based multinational.

    Farmers and farming will left aside in the carbon bs. Multinationals will simply buy land with the sole purpose of abandonment to nature. People and farmers are being wound that this is a positive. Naturalists are rubbing their hands at glee for consultancy jobs from the Multinationals. To sit in vans on site and claim an income.

    For 'farmers' to welcome this leads me to believe they haven't much experience in the carbon side of farming.

    Question to all.

    What is the preferred level % of Organic matter in soil to farm while having peak production in grass, cereals or veg?

    What is a higher level % of Organic matter that production drops off?

    What is the mathematical conversion rate that laboratories use for soil Organic matter to carbon?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 588 ✭✭✭n1st



    I have no answers. As a part time farmer I do not care about feeding the world and highest yields.

    I believe that one of the reasons that farmers are interested in high yields is because they have been taught that by orgs such as Teagasc under the instruction of DAFM under the instruction of big pharma, big meat factories, big exporters.

    If we all try to push the yields up and up, which is exactly what has been going on for the past 50 years, then the return gets less and less and the dependencies on inputs becomes more and more, farmers are then caught in the cycle and the only winners are the big pharma, big meat factories, big exporters.

    Not to mention the land and minds suffering.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    With 35/40% of the food production of the land not ending up being consumed, there is plenty room to feed many million more. Producing more doesn't increase the farmer margin, but uses a lot extra inputs.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,833 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    To be blunt and I'd say you'd agree.

    As a part time farmer you've no need for 2 gallons of milk instead of 1, 2 tons of barley instead of 1, 2 sheep instead of 1, 2 cabbages instead of 1. You won't be feeding your parish let alone the world. The financial side is of less interest to you from production due to your off farm job. It's suits to have money coming in from everything other than what your farm produces. This leaves you less exposed to the vagaries of weather, labour, inputs be they electricity to fertiliser. Agree?

    However is it people's wish that farmers become blase about the technical efficiency of farming and ignorant to all that can be done to improve profitability through increasing or maintaining output while increasing the health and viability of their soils? The most enthusiastic posters here on carbon and soil health don't know what the organic matter % levels are what you should be looking for? What does this say of their own practices? Do they not soil test themselves for carbon and have found out which fields are their most profitable? Or is it just virtue signalling to the world that carbon is good but I don't really know enough and I don't care as I have the off farm job?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 588 ✭✭✭n1st


    I don't believe the organics are encouraging high yields or increasing productivity. I believe it's a different way of looking at things.

    Possibly we should look at what we need to get out of our farms and see which process fits. For myself it's biodiversity, soil health , animal health, no chemicals, less pollution, less machinery, less risk, better wildlife, healthier animals and humans. I don't feel that I need to calculate the percentage of organic matter in the soil to achieve that,I should see it with my eyes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,833 ✭✭✭✭Say my name




  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,711 Mod ✭✭✭✭blue5000


    I posted mine over in the soil sampling thread, 10 Million euro Soil Sampling Programme. - Page 11 — boards.ie - Now Ye're Talkin'

    you are welcome to have a look. Like everyone else, including yourself the peaty soils were the highest, and a rough conversion of organic matter to carbon is 58% It's a long time since I was in school but I think the atomic weight of C is 12g per mole and O is 16g per mole. Now to be honest I don't know how the boffins calculated the carbon from OM% perhaps you could help us out here?

    As I said the peaty soils were highest and fields that have been ploughed in the last 10 years tend to be lower, also sandy fields here are low too. As for producing 2 cabbages instead of 1 or two tons of barley instead of 1, what's the point if the net profit from one organic ton is better than the net profit of two produced conventionally? Teagasc have a trial on spring oats, showing conventional oats yielding 7.2 ton /ha vs 4.0 ton of organic oats. Bottom line is GM/ha of 373/ha vs 1025/ha. I will let you figure out which is which.

    If the seat's wet, sit on yer hat, a cool head is better than a wet ar5e.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,833 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    58% of OM. I have no idea how it was worked out bar over trial work. But then some will be slightly different with bulk density I suppose. But for now that's how they do it is measure the Organic Matter and then apply 58% for Carbon.

    Maybe the peat soils are different to mineral soils. But 8 - 9% Organic Matter is good. When it goes higher it slows down plant growth. Your total nutrients level will be high but the ground will be too wet and claggy and the plants won't be accessing these nutrients.

    As for soil tests and what use are they in an organic situation in Ireland as was mentioned further up. Organics in Ireland has access to dung, slurry from other farms and digestate from digestors. One could have all the soundbites like reduced antibiotics, sprays, saving the environment, yet be officially allowed import dung and slurry from farms where antibiotics and sprays are used, imported in that way and human antibiotics imported via digestate. Soil tests would be required for those imports I believe? Maybe stocking rate may negate soil tests required?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,368 ✭✭✭✭Base price


    Ah jaysus is this thread going to deteriorate into something akin to the dairy chit chat thread where there is constant sniping back and forth over which type of cow/system is better. Can people accept that a particular system may suit them but not a different one and just move on.

    We are not in organics as it's too restrictive for our system but I appreciate other farmers converting to Organic status if that suits their system and posting their experiences. We should all learn from reading posts on F&F and take bits out to suit our own enterprises.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,833 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    It's the various different licences required and denying access from wild birds and grazing animals mixing and packing and processing facilities. I'd bet. @blue5000



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,833 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    How do you learn Base. But by asking questions. It's the same in the dairy thread. They all learn from one another. You don't learn if you think your system is 100% with no feedback on the system or don't think it needs explaining.

    I asked a poster how long they were organic as they seemed all the joys of spring being a new entrant from their entrant course. I never got an answer how long they were either way. It's their choice to answer or not. But we're all posters here and we can still ask questions. It's not sniping to ask. It is a forum.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,711 Mod ✭✭✭✭blue5000


    As for soil tests and what use are they in an organic situation in Ireland as was mentioned further up. Organics in Ireland has access to dung, slurry from other farms and digestate from digestors.

    One could have all the soundbites like reduced antibiotics, sprays, saving the environment, yet be officially allowed import dung and slurry from farms where antibiotics and sprays are used, imported in that way and human antibiotics imported via digestate. Soil tests would be required for those imports I believe? Maybe stocking rate may negate soil tests required?

    Only thing I've noticed is with bought in straw which we are allowed use. Winter wheat straw seems to take a lot longer to break down when composting FYM. I suspect it could be the strobs it was sprayed with as a fungicide, stopping the fungus breaking down the straw in the compost pile. It was easier to break down the straw from the previous year. Are you talking about digestate from sewage? AFAIK organic farms can't use human sewage sludge, only dairy processing sludge. At a walk on a farm where that was used they thought it kills the field mushrooms, but I think field mushrooms only appear when the fungus underground is stressed and needs to come to the surface to produce spores and re-produce. The reason I think no mushrooms appeared where the dairy sludge was spread was because the mushrooms weren't stressed because of all the extra nutrients in the sludge. I honestly don't know.

    Yes I agree with you on the 8-9% OM being the optimum level. Peaty soils are high because they are acidic and the OM simply hasn't broken down, if you think about it peat OM isn't very stable. If it dries out it gets oxidised and goes to the atmosphere. But properly sequestered carbon in soil is very stable and can stay there for a long time.


    Sorry WJ, they are just on this man's case, the mobile hen houses that are imported from Germany are savage money, like 10-15k to hold 2-300 hens. Wooden perches aren't allowed because of mites, fresh water freezing last week was another issue too.

    If the seat's wet, sit on yer hat, a cool head is better than a wet ar5e.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,368 ✭✭✭✭Base price


    Are you sure about that?

    A farmer friend who had a commercial calf/beef farm along with three or four poultry rearing houses has converted to organics recently. He quit the cattle and focused on the poultry side of the farm.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,711 Mod ✭✭✭✭blue5000


    100% sure, this man isn't a huge operator, maybe 200 laying hens max. How many has your neighbour? Perhaps they have a better setup.

    If the seat's wet, sit on yer hat, a cool head is better than a wet ar5e.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Some interesting contributions. I'm officially organic since 2019. However I was farming part of my farm organically for many years before that, not that it matters, we are all equal in my view. It's a pity if the small scale egg producers are under pressure. I understand the bird flu lockdown, all free range egg producers are affected by this.

    The majority of increased production has been down to genetic improvement not artificial inputs. Of course all the cos supplying those products claim its their product. One is always looking for an extra margin. For those who do cereals, heritage crops are in demand by bakeries. Lower yield, higher margin.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 3,952 Mod ✭✭✭✭Siamsa Sessions


    Best of luck with it all. But you'll find a lot of those things on farms that aren't certified organic too.

    To my naive eyes, there's a spectrum of farming/land from old forestry - scrub - mountain - naturally organic with 40 years - organic - technically/certified organic - mostly organic but not certified - conventional - intensive - whatever. And this doesn't cover the half of it.

    Apart from the certification, I would see little difference in practise between farms in the middle of that spectrum.

    Trading as Sullivan’s Farm on YouTube



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,368 ✭✭✭✭Base price




  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,711 Mod ✭✭✭✭blue5000


    Anyone doing the annual paperwork for OT this week or month? It's online this year but Jesus it's still some dose. Tried doing some of it on excel and transferring it over, but lost it all, now trying it on jotform. I think I'll have to go to specsavers for new glasses.

    If the seat's wet, sit on yer hat, a cool head is better than a wet ar5e.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 942 ✭✭✭trabpc


    I certainly wouldn't be near a margain of 300 a year per animal. But have averaged 260 head past 5 years. But agree biggest issue i have now is sourcing stock. Feed,bedding, sheds all ok but such a small market makes it difficult to get stock. Look at ads on DD already looking for stock. Have 2 yrs left in my contract and its the above reason i may have to leave..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    It's just having to enter 0 in every box not applicable to you which makes it a bit odd.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,147 ✭✭✭endainoz


    Google sheets might easier to use than excel blue, it saves everything automatically and I found it a bit easier to use than excel myself.



  • Registered Users Posts: 171 ✭✭massey 265


    I had such work with the on line bord bia quality assurance pre inspection section that i coudnt face into the annual OT stuff on line as well so i requested a paper format and filled thet up in 10 mins,photocopied it as always and sent it off.Still old school here but i find it has worked out ok last 23 years so thatl do me.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,147 ✭✭✭endainoz


    Conventional stock can absolutely be farmed organically, though they won't get certified, all of their progeny will be though once the farm is out of conversion.

    So say a herd of 20 conventional cows with one bull go into conversion, all going well they'll all have 20 fully organic calves so no need to buy anything.

    In terms of selling, organic farmers have access to a wider market than conventional farmers simply because they have access to both markets.

    Now in saying all that, the lad looking for the easy money that wants to buy in a few bits of organic stock to graze for the summer will likely struggle to source stock.



Advertisement