Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Hamas strike on Israel - mod warning in OP updated 19/10/23

1567568570572573781

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,400 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Well, I have explained to you how I see the meaning of the words in my signature.

    Hamas, the government of Gaza, have been found by the ICJ to be committing war crimes, and have been ordered to release the hostages immediately and unconditionally.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,325 ✭✭✭howiya


    Not all journalists killed by Israeli forces were in Gaza.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,400 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    It is the supporters of Hamas like yourself that are trying to distract from the ICJ ruling. The hostages must be released immediately and unconditionally.

    It is only a supporter of Hamas who could have a signature that reflects the desire to genocidally eliminate all Jews from the river to the sea.



  • Registered Users Posts: 535 ✭✭✭Antipathetic


    I don't remember ever saying that I support Hamas or shown any support towards them. Can you point towards the post where I have shown any support towards the group?

    It's only Israeli supporters like you who continue to bring up Hamas in every conversation about Palestine. It's a lazy argument at this stage and shows that you can't defend Israel's current actions or its inability to get the charges levelled against the nation, dismissed at the ICJ.

    Do you not think Hamas might be more inclined to release the hostages. Once Israel stops indiscriminately bombing Palestine?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,400 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    It's your signature - the Hamas slogan of genocidal intent against the Jews.

    Hamas have been told by the ICJ to release the hostages, are you saying that Israel can also ignore the ICJ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,508 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    I'm not saying there have been no instances in which the IDF may have a case to answer. Clearly there have, and they do need to be investigated.

    However the claim that Israel is targeting journalists en masse, in a way that other democracies would never do is propaganda, because in many of the recent incidents such as the one where the son of an Al Jazeera reporter, Dahdouh, himself a journalist too, was killed in a car, the allegations of suspicious drone activity from the car, and of Hamas fighters being in in the car, make it rather more complicated.


    Maybe it was just a case of directly attacking reporters - or maybe not. The fact that Hamas controls everything in Gaza, even NGOs, as we're seeing with UNRWA, means we can't always assume that a journalist is really just a journalist.

    Reem Alsalem UNSR Violence Against Women and Girls: "Very concerned about statements by the IOC at Paris2024 (M)ultiple international treaties and national constitutions specifically refer to women & their fundamental rights, so the world (understands) what women -and men- are. (H)ow can one assess fairness and justice if we do not know who we are being fair and just to?"



  • Registered Users Posts: 535 ✭✭✭Antipathetic


    I'll remove it when the Israeli government apologises for saying something similar.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,400 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    It is quite incredible that a UN agency assisted terrorist operations. Stunning stuff.

    How can anyone trust the UN again?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,400 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    You claim to be better than them, to want a two-state solution.

    Your hypocrisy is now clear for all to see.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,508 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    LOL that will show Netanyahu alright! I'm sure he's really upset.

    The point is that you can't pretend to want to two state solution when that's your signature - Netanyahu doesn't pretend to so at least he's more honest than you.

    Reem Alsalem UNSR Violence Against Women and Girls: "Very concerned about statements by the IOC at Paris2024 (M)ultiple international treaties and national constitutions specifically refer to women & their fundamental rights, so the world (understands) what women -and men- are. (H)ow can one assess fairness and justice if we do not know who we are being fair and just to?"



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 535 ✭✭✭Antipathetic


    Absolutely. I know the Palestinian side is better than the Israeli side. Remind me again. Which country is up for trial by the ICJ for breaching the Geneva Convention?

    I am for a two state solution, but that can't happen while Israel continues to deny the Palestinians an opportunity to form a functioning state as it is now indiscriminately killing innocent civilians and subjecting the people to a brutal blockade.

    At least I don't spend my time defending a genocidal state.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,325 ✭✭✭howiya


    I've no idea why you are repeating yourself about Gaza. Did you read the post you quoted?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,325 ✭✭✭howiya


    Would you not want to hold yourself to a higher moral standard than the Israeli government?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,325 ✭✭✭howiya


    An agency didn't. Employees of it are alleged to have. Should we not allow the investigation to occur first?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,508 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    I did. It didn't apply to my point. As I explained.

    Reem Alsalem UNSR Violence Against Women and Girls: "Very concerned about statements by the IOC at Paris2024 (M)ultiple international treaties and national constitutions specifically refer to women & their fundamental rights, so the world (understands) what women -and men- are. (H)ow can one assess fairness and justice if we do not know who we are being fair and just to?"



  • Registered Users Posts: 535 ✭✭✭Antipathetic


    If anyone wants to read where the phrase "from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free" comes from, then this is an excellent article by Al Jazeera.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,325 ✭✭✭howiya




  • Registered Users Posts: 5,918 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    As already mentioned, it was staff acting independently from the UN agency.

    Nearly as bad as an Israeli representative saying the Irish funded the Hamas tunnels. Although he did delete that tweet.

    It's like saying Israeli's funded and assisted terrorist operations when it was just the Israeli government handing suitcases of cash over to Hamas in person.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,508 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    Oh I have a point alright. Just not the one you wanted me to have made. But that's your problem.

    Reem Alsalem UNSR Violence Against Women and Girls: "Very concerned about statements by the IOC at Paris2024 (M)ultiple international treaties and national constitutions specifically refer to women & their fundamental rights, so the world (understands) what women -and men- are. (H)ow can one assess fairness and justice if we do not know who we are being fair and just to?"



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 535 ✭✭✭Antipathetic


    Israel and its western lapdogs continue to show how despicable they truly are. The information they are relying on about the supposed actions of a few employees was most likely obtained by torture.



  • Registered Users Posts: 812 ✭✭✭Hey boy


    You asked where did you claim to be an expert on antisemitism? Here you are opining on the word.

    So, what does your map image mean? I only see one flag overlaid over the map.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,307 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Interesting. I wasn't aware ICJ could find against a terrorist organisation.

    I checked the ICJ judgement and I didn't see that in their judgement - do you have a paragraph reference? There are a lot of pages so I may have just missed it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,307 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    The ICJ has no enforcement powers so Israel can ignore it - just like Russia.

    I don't see where the ICJ made any findings directed at Hamas.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,918 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Probably when they mentioned Hamas releasing the hostages. They would have acknowledged that by taking the hostages, Hamas committed a war crime.

    Surprised Hamas hasn't been calling them prisoners of war. Not that they are, but you know how Hamas thinks.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,307 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    There's a lot of incredible things that have happened.

    IDF bulldozed cemeteries, sniped women in a church, killed a woman waving a white flag, even killed three of their own hostages.

    incredible, absolutely.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,307 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Sorry - I'm not seeing where the ICJ acknowledged where anyone committed a war crime.

    By the way, I'm not defending Hamas at all. Just pointing out that the ICJ judgement is very clear and very limited. For example, absolutely Israel has not been found to have perpetrated genocide. But some people are actively stating it.


    "85. The Court deems it necessary to emphasize that all parties to the conflict in the Gaza Strip are bound by international humanitarian law. It is gravely concerned about the fate of the hostages abducted during the attack in Israel on 7 October 2023 and held since then by Hamas and other armed groups, and calls for their immediate and unconditional release."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,325 ✭✭✭howiya


    It's not my problem that you have no defence for the targeting of journalists by the IDF. You've offered an opinion on why journalists have been killed in Gaza. What about all the other locations? The West Bank etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,508 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    You complain when I repeat myself, but you keep repeating your misunderstanding of my point. I don't have to give a blanket defence for all such deaths because I wasn't claiming that there could never have been any problem with any of them. It's a war - there will be all sorts of incidents, some excusable, some not.

    But the claim was that Israel was unique among democracies in actively targeting journalists - based on high numbers of deaths of supposed journalists. I explained why this was a misunderstanding of the situation in Gaza. I won't repeat it yet again. I don't know whether a similar situation applies in those parts of the West Bank that are controlled by Hamas, but it seems highly likely.

    Reem Alsalem UNSR Violence Against Women and Girls: "Very concerned about statements by the IOC at Paris2024 (M)ultiple international treaties and national constitutions specifically refer to women & their fundamental rights, so the world (understands) what women -and men- are. (H)ow can one assess fairness and justice if we do not know who we are being fair and just to?"



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,918 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    If you believe that holding/taking hostages is a war crime and you acknowledge that Hamas are holding hostages then join the dots.

    The fact the ICJ acknowledge there are hostages being held by Hamas. No allegedly or reported in front of it. But you're right the ICJ haven't specified that taking and holding hostages is a war crime, but they have specified that Hamas are holding hostages.

    But that's just my take on why the poster stated the ICJ said Hamas committed war crimes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,020 ✭✭✭boetstark


    Yep. Ireland an absolute disgrace. We are going to NY next week and I am sorry to say I will be ashamed to say I'm from Ireland.

    Ever wonder why other countries aren't supporting this farce at the ICJ. Just look at who you would be aligning with , SA / ANC , Bolivia and Mexico. What a beautiful lot.

    Like down with pigs and you will smell of s#it.

    I can see this backfiring on Ireland yet. And they will deserve every bit of I'll will coming their way. This is after all the same country that opened a book of condolence on Hitlers death.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,307 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    I'm not disputing Hamas committing war crimes - they have. I don't need to join any dots thanks.

    I'm disputing that the ICJ made that finding.

    I'll equally call out anyone saying "ICJ found Israel perpetrated genocide"

    Facts matter.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,307 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    It is remarkable that you find a picture on a signature is "clearly genocidal" yet you you seem unable to agree that 11,000 dead children is genocide.

    Gaza is not currently threatening Israel. Gaza is a wasteland full of dead people.

    Still, the ICJ have at least now told Israel they must stop.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,888 ✭✭✭SeanW


    I would accept it as war crimes if the children were being targeted, as opposed to incidental fatalities. But even then, genocide would be a stretch as Gaza has something like 2.4 million people.

    As to Gaza not being a threat to Israel, Hamas are still in charge there, fighting is still going on, and rockets are still being fired into Israel every day. Oh and Hamas still has Israeli hostages in Gaza. Any claim that Israel does not still have casus belli there is insane - and the ICJ agrees seeing as they did not order a unilateral ceasefire.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,307 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Source: Haaretz (paywall)

    Egypt considered recalling its envoy to Israel after allegations made by the Israeli defense team at the world court about Cairo's failure to bring humanitarian aid to Gaza, according to the Wall Street Journal.

    "Whatever good or bad things we may say about the legal reasoning of the ICJ, it is the humanitarian catastrophe [in Gaza] and the need to end it – including the situation of the Israeli hostages – that resonates from" the Court's ruling - Aeyal Gross

    The IDF said it has opened a humanitarian corridor for residents in Khan Yunis to move away from areas of fighting, and published a recording of evacuees from Khan Yunis chanting: "The people want to overthrow Hamas."

    ISRAEL: Shin Bet chief Ronen Bar, addressing Israel's cabinet, demanded to establish an investigative committee to examine the failures that lead to Hamas' October 7 attack.

    Demonstrations calling for the release of the hostages in Gaza and rallies against the Netanyahu government will be held this evening in several locations across Israel.

    In Tel Aviv, thousands are expected at three separate rallies. The first calls for immediate elections; the second, under the banner of "Never again is now," after International Holocaust Memorial Day, calling to return the hostages; and a third anti-occupation bloc-led protest calling for a ceasefire, ending the Gaza siege and a hostage deal.

    Family members of Israeli hostages held in Gaza protested today in front of PM Netanyahu's house in Caesarea for the third week running, demanding a hostage deal.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,307 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    I asked your opinion before because you made a similar statement in the past. You may not have seen that post so I'll ask again.

    Given you think genocide is based on some kind of number and since only a few civilians are dead out of a population 2.4 million, what's the number of dead civilians that constitutes genocide?

    Seems you're at odds with the ICJ who believe the SA case was plausible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85,174 ✭✭✭✭Overheal




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,307 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    I find this quite barbaric and disgusting (from the posted UN source).

    How anyone can support this or think it's right is beyond words.

    "The IOF recognized a draft law approved by the Israeli parliament (Knesset), allowing the courts to impose punishment of up to 20 years in prison on children charged with throwing stones at Israeli soldiers and settlers. The IOF use Hebrew as the language during interrogations with these children and force them to sign documents written in Hebrew which they do not understand."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,888 ✭✭✭SeanW


    Genocide requires intent, in the case of war, this can be gleaned in part by how the war started. For example there is plenty of evidence of Russian genocide in Ukraine, and intent is plausible given that Russia started a war of conquest in which Ukraine had not provoked them in any way. Same is true of the Nazis against Poland and other countries they invaded. Israel by contrast was provoked and has casus belli. IMHO that means the bar for such a ludicrous claim as "genocide" is much, much higher.

    You need to prove that Israel is not targeting Hamas and that civilians killed were actually murdered and not collateral damage. Even then, you have to prove that such deaths go beyond war crimes (which happen in all wars) and are part of something much larger.

    To be clear, cases of specifically targeting civilians, like what is alleged to have happened with snipers targeting nuns in a church, are clear war crimes, and should IMHO be prosecuted to the fullest extent of Israeli or International law.

    Funny how you say "since 1967" as before 1967 the West Bank was territory of Jordan and the Gaza Strip was under the sovereignty of Egypt. It is thus quite convenient to only refer to Palestinians "since 1967."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85,174 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Funny how suddenly you attribute what the UN wrote in a report as something 'I said'

    Funny how when prompted to critically think about Israel's genocidal policies, suddenly 'it needs intent' 'you need to prove it's happening' etc yet you've spent days (weeks?) complaining about a user's signature for something that you swear is 'explicitly' genocidal

    ha

    ha

    ha



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,307 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    So, explain to me how a picture in a signature shows intent? I'm struggling with the whole signature thing to be honest.

    And again, seeing as you state the claim of genocide is "ludicrous", why did SA take a case and why did the ICJ find the case "plausible".

    I doubt you think the ICJ is ludicrous but there's no apparent consistency in your posts as regards basic logic.

    I certainly do think that a signature of the Palestinian flag with "from the river to the sea" might trigger some but given exactly the same graphic and the phrase has been used by Israel, it's seems hypocritical to be outraged by it.

    We are in agreement with war crimes - any and all Hamas and IDF crimes should be investigated and this found culpable brought to justice.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 Faith Steep Comic


    "I'm struggling with the whole signature thing to be honest."

    Are you now? If I stuck a swastica in my signature would I be signalling a lack of intent?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85,174 ✭✭✭✭Overheal




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,307 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Yes I am in the context of what was said.

    I've no idea - why don't you give it a go?



  • Posts: 0 Faith Steep Comic


    I would have thought overlaying a Palestinian flag over the whole mandate of Palestine must mean something?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,307 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Israel did it with the Israeli flag.

    Netanyahu and Likud use the phrase "from the river to the sea"

    I'm just struggling as to why people are outraged by one but not the other.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,804 ✭✭✭Rezident


    12 UN staff so far accused of taking part in the mass-rape/mass-murder attacks of 7 October against the Jews and others.

    I wonder how much influence they have had over the UN narrative the meantime. How can we trust what the 'UN' says now. It would explain why the UN has been seen to be so biased against Israel, instead of being balanced. UN has lost much of its credibility now. Well played by the radical Islamists though, they have really made fools out of the UN, and so easily.

    It's not really a UN anymore at all is it? If it was honest it would call itself now the Divided Nations, at least that would be honest.



  • Registered Users Posts: 339 ✭✭tandcapply


    "Britain, Italy, the Netherlands and Finland became the latest countries to pause funding for the United Nations' refugee agency for Palestinians (UNRWA), following allegations that some of its staff were involved in the 7 October Hamas attacks on Israel.

    The United States, Australia and Canada had already paused funding to the aid agency, a critical source of support for people in Gaza, after the allegations by Israel. The agency said yesterday that it had opened an investigation into several employees and severed ties with those people.

    Encouraging more donor suspensions, Israeli foreign minister Israel Katz said UNRWA should be replaced once fighting in the enclave dies down and accused UNRWA of ties to Islamist militants in Gaza.

    "In Gaza's rebuilding, @UNRWA must be replaced with agencies dedicated to genuine peace and development," he added on X."

    https://www.rte.ie/news/middle-east/2024/0127/1428918-israel-gaza/



  • Posts: 0 Faith Steep Comic


    "Israel did it with the Israeli flag"

    They did. I'd be equally suspicious of the motives of someone overlaying the Israeli flag over the whole mandate area too.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,804 ✭✭✭Rezident


    Statistics. The only genocide in the Middle East is the genocide of Christians who have gone from 20% of the population to 4% of the population of the Middle East - that's a genocide as the radical Islamists wipe them out.

    The only other likely genocide in the Middle East is that of the Jews, who, surrounded by 21 countries and c. 300 millions Muslims next door (and 1.5bn in the wider area) who want to wipe them off the face of the earth 'From The River To The Sea' as you say. There's only 15m Jews left on earth and 7m in Israel, why do so many support killing all the Jews? You seem to be on their side, can I ask why? They are an endangered species now. That is what Palestine stands for. That is all that Palestine stands for now. That is why Palestine will never want a Two State Solution. Do you really understand why Palestine will never want a Two-Solution? Do you want one?

    What was the population of the Palestinian Territories in 1967? What was it in 2000? What is it now? The chart looks like the growth of Tik Tok, to call it a "genocide" is either statistically incorrect or 'you know what' and delusional.

    Statistically, factually, it is, literally, the opposite of a genocide, look at the growth of Palestinians! What is in those Israeli bombs? Fertiliser? 750k Palesintians in 1967 to what now, 13 million? Why do they have so many babies if they cannot afford them? I presume that only the most ardent of Anti-Semites are calling this population explosion a 'genocide' and if you are really not one then do not side with their the Anti-Statistics-Anti-Semitics, as if they have been programmed to do by the ideology of hate. Why do they hate the Jews so much? Do you know why? I bet you do not. You know the Palestinians mass-raped their women and girls (and children), no wonder they are upset. Do not google: "hamas sex crimes" it would blow your mind.

    Remember what the Palestinians did to the Jordanians after they took them in after the 1967 war? These people do not appear to be able to do 'peace'. And their boss, Iran, have bombed like 7 countries in the last year or so, do you think these monsters are suddenly going to live in 'peace' with you after they've killed all they Jews? Do you really? You know you're next right?

    Post edited by Rezident on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,307 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    The UN allegations are shocking and must be thoroughly investigated. If proven, justice must be served.


    ""When I see Palestinian citizens escaping into Sinai, the way Lebanese citizens escape toward Beirut when there is a round of fire against Israel -- we will then know that the deterrence has been achieved.""

    Israel Katz, Israel's Transport Minister, in the Orthodox Hebrew website B'Hadrei Haredim on November 11. Katz's mention of Lebanese citizens escaping refers to an Israeli attack on Lebanon in 2006 which displaced close to a million Lebanese citizens, and killed over 1,300.





Advertisement