Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Public Pay Talks - see mod warning post 4293

1208209211213214235

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,379 ✭✭✭AyeGer




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,213 ✭✭✭bobbysands81


    You’re actually making this ridiculously easy to tear your argument apart.

    The public service is a meritocracy, join it if you think our T’s&C’s are so good?! Though from looking at your lack of grasp of basic maths I think it’s quite probable that you did go for a CO role but failed the Numerical Reasoning. (see your ludicrous comment on a family with two Govt workers being 25% better off! **snigger**)

    Increments have nothing to do with this pay agreement. It’s a ridiculous situation whereby many Govt workers have to work for, at times, 18 years before they get to their correct level of pay that’s at the top of the increment scale. Increment scales are used throughout the private sector as well though this is another piece of logic that has passed you by!



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 25,065 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    It's a no from me, it's under 10% and over 2.5 years and not even front loaded to make up for the poorness of the last deal. I think it will be no from alot more than expected but will sadly still pass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,669 ✭✭✭Gusser09


    Id reckon it will be in the high 80's or low 90's.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 25,065 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    This said, delighted for my lower paid colleagues, so when it does go through I can take a silver lining.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 986 ✭✭✭Greyian



    OK, so here's my analysis.

    For my imaginary worker, I'll take an AP at the very beginning of their scale, and they will remain at the beginning of their scale for the entirety of this exercise (so increments don't inflate the change in pay based on each increase). I have also chosen an AP because they will get the percentage based increases, rather than the fixed figure where larger than the percentage increase (i.e. the increases which give a larger increase proportionally to lower paid public sector workers).

    So, at the beginning of 2024, prior to this proposed deal, our fictional AP worker would have earned €75,822 per year. To begin with, we have to see what they would have earned in total in 2023. In 2023, there were 2 increases: 2% on 01/03/2023 and 1.5% on 01/10/2023. From this, we can work out that their pay prior to 01/10/2023 would have been €74701.48 (75822 / 1.015). We can then work out that their pay before 01/03/2023 would have been €73236.75 (74701.48 / 1.02). So, what can we glean from this? Well, in January and February, they would have earned €6103.06 (73236.75 / 12) per month. From March to September, they would have earned €6225.12 (74701.48 / 12) per month. And then from October to December, they would have earned €6318.50 (75822.50 / 12) per month. So 2 months (Jan + Feb) * 6103.06 + 7 months (Mar to Sep) * 6225.12 + 3 months (Oct to Dec) * 6318.50 is their total earnings for 2023. This totals €74737.46 for 2023.

    Now that we have 2023's gross earnings, we can start working on 2024 onwards.

    Assuming no pay deal whatsoever, our AP would have earned €75822 in 2024. This would be an increase of 1.45% ((75822 - 74737.46)/74737.46 * 100) over 2023, with no increase during 2024, all as a result of the staggered increase in 2023.

    But what about when we factor in the proposed deal?

    So from 01/01/2024, there will be a 2.25% increase, which will result in annual salary increasing to €77528. Then on 01/01/2024 there will be a 1% increase, to €78303.28 (77528 * 1.01). And finally on 01/10/2024, there will be another 1% increase to €79086.31 (78303.28 * 1.01). So for 5 months (Jan to May), our AP will earn €6460.66 (77528 / 12) per month. For 4 months, our AP will earn €6525.27 (78303.28 / 12) per month. And for 3 months, our AP will earn €6590.53 (79086.31 / 12) per month. This means their total pay will be €78175.97 (6460.66 * 5 + 6525.27*4 + 6590.53*3). This equates to increased gross earnings in 2024 of 4.6% ((78175.97 - 74737.46) / 74737.46 * 100) compared to 2023.

    I need to pop out now, but if I get a bit of time later I'll come back and run the figures for 2025 and 2026 (and perhaps 2027, as the increases in 2026 will flow into 2027).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,669 ✭✭✭Gusser09


    A good day for HEOs and above considering the increase and increments.

    You cant just casually brush aside increments.



  • Registered Users Posts: 139 ✭✭Bobby2004


    Getting mixed messages. I've been told by some that it's not for everyone. Maybe someone can clarify does it apply to all sectors and public servants.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,368 ✭✭✭Deub


    Majority of workers don’t have their pay that kept up with inflation and it is not a bad thing when inflation is more than the 2% target. If it was the case, businesses would have to up their price further and the following year, you would be back to square one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,669 ✭✭✭Gusser09




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,586 ✭✭✭caviardreams


    No it doesn't, it is committed to by the govt in terms of the spend, but who receives it/ how it is divvied up is decided at a sectoral level e.g. it could be used to address pay inequality or other discrepancies/claims etc for a certain group of the unions want (e.g. lower pay for new entrants)


    That's why it is really only 9.25 guaranteed (and possibly more for others) but from the govt perspective they will be paying 10.25



  • Registered Users Posts: 34 Doughnutholer


    A general round increase isn't on the cards. It's specifically not allowed by the agreement. All public sector workers will be put into bargaining groups, like last time. Unions can use the pot for their group to solve claims. For example, the INMO and SIPTU both resolved something specific last time rather than giving general round increases.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,379 ✭✭✭AyeGer


    I’ll be voting for this deal anyway. Staff in my office were generally positive about it, they just couldn’t see an offer much higher.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,954 ✭✭✭bren2001


    it does keep up with inflation. 10.25% is greater than the predicted inflation over the next 2.5 years.

    It doesn’t address the previous deal which didn’t keep up with inflation as we’re currently 6.5% off.

    For some workers earning below 50k, it will catch them back up due to the minimum salary increases.

    As you said, it’s a passable deal. This will sail through imo.

    how would a 4 day week work in schools or universities?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,100 ✭✭✭salonfire


    Let's see some calculations proving me wrong then so. Take an example of two teachers say in their early 30s who would be often used as a group struggling to pay childcare, mortgage, etc.

    Show me how they are not close to earning 25% more at the end of the deal than they are today.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,100 ✭✭✭salonfire




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,379 ✭✭✭AyeGer


    When working hours and holidays are accounted for teachers would probably only work the same number of days as the rest of the public service doing a 4 day week.

    Alternatively schools could do a 4 day week too, my former school is doing a half day Wednesdays at present.



  • Registered Users Posts: 847 ✭✭✭Norrie Rugger Head


    Jesus, you can brush aside increments. The are one of the reasons the employers gets away with underpayment in the first place, are agreed at the start of the employment, and a MAJOR reason that we can't attract staff. No matter their experience, in the private sector, they start at the bottom. This is often far far below what their experience deserves or what's available elsewhere, without having to wait 10 years to still be paid less

    ⛥ ̸̱̼̞͛̀̓̈́͘#C̶̼̭͕̎̿͝R̶̦̮̜̃̓͌O̶̬͙̓͝W̸̜̥͈̐̾͐Ṋ̵̲͔̫̽̎̚͠ͅT̸͓͒͐H̵͔͠È̶̖̳̘͍͓̂W̴̢̋̈͒͛̋I̶͕͑͠T̵̻͈̜͂̇Č̵̤̟̑̾̂̽H̸̰̺̏̓ ̴̜̗̝̱̹͛́̊̒͝⛥



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,954 ✭✭✭bren2001


    What about universities? If someone tried to extend the semester, I’d vote to reject that deal. If someone tried to condense teaching to 4 days. I’d vote to reject that deal.

    How would Garda? Nurses? Firefighters? Work where shifts are already long and they’re understaffed?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,379 ✭✭✭AyeGer


    I don’t know why you expect me to be an expert in this area. My union has mentioned the 4 day week in recent years. I would be in favour with the idea as it would work in my job. I’ll leave the planning and implementation of any prospective future 4 day week to those with more expertise in these matters than me.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,954 ✭✭✭bren2001


    The point being, it’s not something for a pay deal. It can and should be negotiated locally. The pay deal is for the entire public sector. A 4 day working week has to be considered in a sector by sector basis.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,570 ✭✭✭Padraig Mor


    It's a No from me as well. I don't think it's greedy to reject a deal which leaves me worse off in real terms after inflation across the whole period of the two agreements. 'Running to stand still' is hardly an extortionate demand. Is that selfish when some workers don't have that luxury? Yes, but I'm not going to apologize for it

    I fully expect it to pass easily though, especially as the magic 'over 10%' figure is being (falsely) advertised.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,570 ✭✭✭Padraig Mor


    Not always. A colleague (PS but not CS, but advertised as first point only) recently started here from a distant country - very experienced tangentially but not in the specific area of interest. Talked his way into second last point on the scale (above me the bollox but all power to him!) although even that was a significant pay cut.



  • Registered Users Posts: 847 ✭✭✭Norrie Rugger Head


    My inlaws were telling me, no matter what I said, that I was getting a 12.5% payrise and, once I showed, them the actual figures they still were claiming a 10+% payrise. Couldn't comprehend it's staggered nature means that I won't see that raise for years, and that it's less than inflation will probably be

    ⛥ ̸̱̼̞͛̀̓̈́͘#C̶̼̭͕̎̿͝R̶̦̮̜̃̓͌O̶̬͙̓͝W̸̜̥͈̐̾͐Ṋ̵̲͔̫̽̎̚͠ͅT̸͓͒͐H̵͔͠È̶̖̳̘͍͓̂W̴̢̋̈͒͛̋I̶͕͑͠T̵̻͈̜͂̇Č̵̤̟̑̾̂̽H̸̰̺̏̓ ̴̜̗̝̱̹͛́̊̒͝⛥



  • Registered Users Posts: 847 ✭✭✭Norrie Rugger Head


    It's the vast majority of time though. I got in on point 3 only because I was an embedded contractor doing the same job.

    Trying to recruit experienced people externally recently and no way were they getting above the ground floor

    ⛥ ̸̱̼̞͛̀̓̈́͘#C̶̼̭͕̎̿͝R̶̦̮̜̃̓͌O̶̬͙̓͝W̸̜̥͈̐̾͐Ṋ̵̲͔̫̽̎̚͠ͅT̸͓͒͐H̵͔͠È̶̖̳̘͍͓̂W̴̢̋̈͒͛̋I̶͕͑͠T̵̻͈̜͂̇Č̵̤̟̑̾̂̽H̸̰̺̏̓ ̴̜̗̝̱̹͛́̊̒͝⛥



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,669 ✭✭✭Gusser09


    Ffs you cant. Payscales are important. Jesua christ. Some of the idiotic shite on this thread between inflation porn and people dismissing increments is plain moronic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,669 ✭✭✭Gusser09




  • Registered Users Posts: 12 cunla


    And how would you describe yourself? Misogynistic male middle management no doubt.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,954 ✭✭✭bren2001


    It is a 10% pay rise (including the local bargaining clause). It’s not 10% more in your pocket over 2.5 years. It’s less than that.

    This deal likely does beat inflation. Unless you’re suggesting inflation will be greater than 10.25% over the next 2.5 years? You’re starting on 2.25%, inflation is 0%. You’re already ahead.

    It doesn’t address the outstanding 6.5% but that’s a separate point.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 847 ✭✭✭Norrie Rugger Head


    Increments are temporary and part of the joining remuneration.

    It's a way to actually NOT pay people what the job is worth, for a decade.

    ⛥ ̸̱̼̞͛̀̓̈́͘#C̶̼̭͕̎̿͝R̶̦̮̜̃̓͌O̶̬͙̓͝W̸̜̥͈̐̾͐Ṋ̵̲͔̫̽̎̚͠ͅT̸͓͒͐H̵͔͠È̶̖̳̘͍͓̂W̴̢̋̈͒͛̋I̶͕͑͠T̵̻͈̜͂̇Č̵̤̟̑̾̂̽H̸̰̺̏̓ ̴̜̗̝̱̹͛́̊̒͝⛥



Advertisement