Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

41 new ICR centre cars

12357

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 655 ✭✭✭Political Wall Map


    Jamie2k9 wrote: »
    Any stats to back up power packs isolation occurrences?

    Im not against the change. Im sure it will deliver various benefits but on paper must benefits are overstated to what is actually achieved.

    Just listen to them going by you kid.... that's all the stats you need. :cool:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,789 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    Replacement would need to be stage V anyway so the cost has to be paid, the only extra cost is the hybrid stuff

    So 29s will get the same or will there be an exemption?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 655 ✭✭✭Political Wall Map


    Jamie2k9 wrote: »
    So 29s will get the same or will there be an exemption?

    No exemption needed if not planned to be changed. If IE plan on changing the powerpacks then maybe IIIB under derogation or else Stage V.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,789 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    No exemption needed if not planned to be changed. If IE plan on changing the powerpacks then maybe IIIB under derogation or else Stage V.

    So fuel saving policies selectively applied.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 655 ✭✭✭Political Wall Map


    Jamie2k9 wrote: »
    So fuel saving policies selectively applied.

    Yep. Exactly. Larger fleet. More miles. More journeys. So they chose the option that makes the most sense based on funding constraints.....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 655 ✭✭✭Political Wall Map


    Jamie2k9 wrote: »
    So fuel saving policies selectively applied.

    I think that because the new intermediate cars are NEW, they must have Stage V powerpacks to comply with emissions legislation.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 655 ✭✭✭Political Wall Map


    Jamie2k9 wrote: »
    So fuel saving policies selectively applied.

    Also, if for example the Stage V or hybrid powerpacks do not fit into existing space of the underside, derogation can be sought to allow to fit a IIIB powerpack if that was to fit. Dont forget that Stage V and hybrid comes with added exhaust, battery space, and whatever else they have.

    So sometimes not selectively but the situation faced can determine the outcome.

    Its happened on several re-power projects abroad.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,262 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    The new engine is a direct slot in replacement, it all comes on a raft with all the bits and pieces, lift in lift out

    The only design issue is where to put the battery unit, easy on the B cars at there a chunk of space at the end which doesn't have a toilet


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 655 ✭✭✭Political Wall Map


    The new engine is a direct slot in replacement, it all comes on a raft with all the bits and pieces, lift in lift out

    The only design issue is where to put the battery unit, easy on the B cars at there a chunk of space at the end which doesn't have a toilet

    Its not the actual powerpack. (I have my doubts that it will be as easy as you say).... it would be the location of the transformer probably 500kg, moving of existing fuel and air pipes to accommodate the new envelope of the powerpack, the hybrid batteries at 350 kg per battery will be larger, heavier than the existing...... im sure there are more things than we would think of.....

    And lets not forget, the objective would be fit to the entire 22000 fleet.... so there will be a lot of work in this.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 655 ✭✭✭Political Wall Map


    The new engine is a direct slot in replacement, it all comes on a raft with all the bits and pieces, lift in lift out

    The only design issue is where to put the battery unit, easy on the B cars at there a chunk of space at the end which doesn't have a toilet

    Is the transformer in the new powerpack?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,262 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    There is no transformer

    The PR spiel is here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ji95_pTZnc


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 655 ✭✭✭Political Wall Map


    There is no transformer

    The PR spiel is here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ji95_pTZnc

    For the hybrids?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,262 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    Thats the hybrid spiel, its real. Everything bar the battery is within the existing engine raft

    And i'm hiding behind Jim Meade in the video, the demo engine also made an appearance at the ploughing festival. Irish Rail is potentially the biggest single customer looking at 275 engines + spares.

    The engine with the near ZF gearbox is already out and about in set 22007


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,484 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Its not the actual powerpack. (I have my doubts that it will be as easy as you say).... it would be the location of the transformer probably 500kg, moving of existing fuel and air pipes to accommodate the new envelope of the powerpack, the hybrid batteries at 350 kg per battery will be larger, heavier than the existing...... im sure there are more things than we would think of.....

    And lets not forget, the objective would be fit to the entire 22000 fleet.... so there will be a lot of work in this.

    What transformer? There is no reason you would need anything of that scale in this type of product.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 655 ✭✭✭Political Wall Map


    Thats the hybrid spiel, its real. Everything bar the battery is within the existing engine raft

    And i'm hiding behind Jim Meade in the video, the demo engine also made an appearance at the ploughing festival. Irish Rail is potentially the biggest single customer looking at 275 engines + spares.

    The engine with the near ZF gearbox is already out and about in set 22007

    There is a transformer on the powerpack? Or no transformer at all? I am nearly 100% sure the lads said about the transformer at the ploughing champs. Thats how i knew about it


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,262 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    No transformer is needed for the hybrid system.

    There is generator in the existing raft which pushes out 380vAC 3 phase, 110vDC and 24vDC for which a transformer probably needed


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 655 ✭✭✭Political Wall Map


    No transformer is needed for the hybrid system.

    There is generator in the existing raft which pushes out 380vAC 3 phase, 110vDC and 24vDC for which a transformer probably needed

    No there is no hydraulic Generator new powerpack. The power comes from the "EMachine." I screenshot the transformer, and circled in yellow for reference. And I think that the powerpack is already so cramped, it will not fit so space somewhere else will be needed. Hopefully the screenshot makes sense


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,363 ✭✭✭✭Del.Monte


    Is there a need for a new sub-forum within Train & Rail Systems as all this very detailed technical stuff leaves me cold. Anybody else?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,351 ✭✭✭highdef


    Del.Monte wrote: »
    Is there a need for a new sub-forum within Train & Rail Systems as all this very detailed technical stuff leaves me cold. Anybody else?

    Not at all. Much better to have everything in the one place. Personal preferences of different aspects of the subject are to expected so when you come across something you've no interest in, read ahead until you find the next bit that fits your personal preferences.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,932 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    Can I clarify?

    The new 41 ICR cars will have these new MTU hybrid diesel engine + electric motor+battery, ok?

    AND

    IE are going to remove all the existing engines from all existing ICR cars, and replace them with new MTU hybrids?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 655 ✭✭✭Political Wall Map


    Geuze wrote: »
    Can I clarify?

    The new 41 ICR cars will have these new MTU hybrid diesel engine + electric motor+battery, ok?

    AND

    IE are going to remove all the existing engines from all existing ICR cars, and replace them with new MTU hybrids?


    From what I can make out, wont be hybrid. But Stage V. They can be changed to Hybrid with a few changes in a few years.

    If the trials were a success that would be next logical step....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,262 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    Certainly be Stage V and the ZF gearbox


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,342 ✭✭✭dowlingm


    Del.Monte wrote: »
    Is there a need for a new sub-forum within Train & Rail Systems as all this very detailed technical stuff leaves me cold. Anybody else?
    certainly not until fare disputes has their own forum.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,932 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    Have all 41 been delivered?


    Are all 41 in service?


    Very expensive, 150m for 41 coaches.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,212 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    You really do have some strange ideas about how much rail infrastructure or rolling stock should cost. They're never cheap, but you have to look at how long benefits will be derived from them.

    None are in service yet - they are awaiting the safety approval from the CRR.

    Once that is forthcoming, I would expect that it will be late summer or even early autumn I would imagine before they will all be in service.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,932 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    "This represents an investment of €150 million, and the delivery of the carriages began in September 2022."

    Delivery began 15 months ago, and none are in service yet.


    This safety approval process seems to take a long time?

    I would have thought a week or so, but obviously I'm wrong.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,932 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    Finland - 20 Stadler FLIRT EMU trains (not single coaches) = 80 vehicles for 250m

    So 12.5m per set, or 3.125 per car, including spare parts


    We are paying 3.66m per coach, 150m/41, so I suppose we are not too far out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,320 ✭✭✭✭end of the road



    the big thing that takes up the time is the running trials i guess.

    a certain amount of milage has to be done as part of those trials to make sure the cars are working properly and iron out any faults if there are any.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,372 ✭✭✭howiya


    So the 41 new cars they reference in every budget speech are one set of 41 cars that have been planned since 2016 when this thread started? Wow.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,484 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Yes. I think they may have double referenced the DART orders too (there have been two, but more than two references to them as new)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,252 ✭✭✭✭Losty Dublin


    FLIRT are suburban electric units, which are somewhat cheaper than a diesel mainline given less mechanical systems internally. Nonetheless, they look to be a superb unit and come with a good track record.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,789 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    Is there a date for starting to entre service. Worth remembering the first 3 coaches arrived in Sep 2022 and at the time were due to enter service early 2023. I'm sure its a complex process but its now almost 15 months...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,212 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,789 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    I don't think the CRR are fully responsible for the long delay between arrival and EIN or IE underestimated the project.

    I am sure someone around here has some reliable estimate on dates.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,212 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    You asked when they are likely to enter service.

    My understanding is that the only thing holding that up now is the final sign off from CRR.

    Once that comes it shouldn’t be too long after when the first one enters service.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,262 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    There was certainly talk of issues with the documentation coming from Korea and that doesn't help with the CRR.

    It might the same train, but its its not. The rules have changed since and the equipment onboard is different

    External cameras are different?, the CCTV gear is different, the seat reservation kit is different, the interior layout is different, smoke sensors in different places, the position of the above floor equipment is different, the engine raft is different, the engine mount is different, safety assessment of the new multipurpose space etc etc.

    Had the trains been ordered back in 2016 when all this started the delta between the original and the 41 would have been less



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,789 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    I asked for a timeline.

    Anyway I see Jim Meade is expecting CRR approval middle of Feb.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,932 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    If a new bus model is delivered into Ireland, is it subject to 15 months of tests and certification?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,212 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Well at the time of writing my post, that was a “how long is a piece of string” question!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,262 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    Take a look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Rail_Class_701 took 3 years 9 months from first unit arriving to entering revenue service.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 371 ✭✭TranslatorPS


    Ireland can buy buses right off the market (union requirements notwithstanding) and they're usually somehow certified, or otherwise require some sort of new certification. The railway is different as it runs essentially custom-tailored stock due to the 1600 mm gauge.

    Also one doesn't really compare to the other, the safety levels required of the two are hardly comparable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,342 ✭✭✭dowlingm


    At the same time, I think people were expecting more commonality - Rotem had all the designs and the experience of the original 22s. Clearly they couldn’t replicate it exactly and Irish Rail presumably had improvement requests of their own, but comparing it to a new design, such as the new DARTs will be, is surely inapposite.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,484 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Someone mentioned the staggering volume of changes that had occurred from the original design somewhere on this thread.

    They've had a mild refit (new seat covers, carpets, side walls, USB power, lighting I think?) but there's also been mechanical changes.

    I also presume the new units have the new gearboxes that are in trial on another unit but that's just a guess.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,262 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    The 41 have the stage 5 engine + ZF gearbox and the electric machine for the hybrid mode which is currently unused.

    The parts simply are not available or no longer compliant so you can't build the same. The structure as in the bodyshell, bogies etc is the same. Pretty sure the door mechanisms are the same, same for brakes. Seats are the same, but come with the Muirhead leather trim for factory (Rotem now offer this to other customers...) The wiring loom is different, PIS, reservation displays, CCTV are different



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,262 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    Just a correction to that the anti-climbers on the car body ends are structurally different on the new 41. It doesn't look different but it is



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,872 ✭✭✭Poxyshamrock


    https://x.com/IrishRail/status/1758412508207935877?s=20

    first new carriages entered service this morning.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,262 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    1 carriage on trial operations, depending on how you read the schedule

    Should have entered servce in Q2 2019, multiple revisions became Q4 2023 and then today.

    It captures everything wrong with how we treat public transport investment, lots of talk, little actual action and that action comes too late.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,212 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    I think that your first line is a bit off.

    I believe that you’ll start seeing them entering service steadily from now on.

    Your last line is bang on. The NTA prevaricated for so long about ordering them - they should have been ordered ages before they were and we ought now to be ordering the next tranche of rolling stock for Intercity/regional rail.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,262 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    CRR require a trial period of operations before issuing the final acceptance

    There are 4 configurations to be certified as there are 4, 5 and two 6 car configs

    Also need acceptance to be obtained from the DFI in NI



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,212 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    There won’t be any 5 car sets going forward?

    Also, aren’t the six-car premier sets being reformed with the original cars that were removed being re-inserted? Surely that’s a straightforward exercise?

    I would have thought you’re talking about two “new” configurations as such, 4-car and 6-car sets with the new coaches inserted.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement