Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

Options
1733734736738739804

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,457 ✭✭✭SharkMX


    I know a few people who still think Homebond is worth the paper its written on.

    When the pyrite problem appeared they covered people, until they found that there were a lot more houses with pyrite. Then suddenly homebond wasnt worth the paper it was written on. Scam.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,615 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Self regulation was the major problem and still remains. There have been incidents linked here where offenders are building in the same development for the state where defective apartments were built with the state picking up the bill while the developer gives 2 fingers



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,690 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    There are a LOT of Celtic Tiger era builds that are really not looking their best these days, and there a plethora of cases of apartment blocks with issues. There's an apartment block near my house that's of the era, and it really does look rough. A lot of the houses from that time were of poor quality too, and one has to wonder how they will fare in another 20 years.

    One would hope that the current generation of new builds are of a higher quality, but we may be assured of one thing; the builders will be long gone if there are problems with them in 20 years.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,202 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    It really depends on what you mean by "not looking their best"

    I've seen plenty of houses with black and pink discolouration on the render because it was never cleaned.

    Broken gutters because they were never maintained.

    Damaged window seals in a house near 20 years old? The odd one is to be expected.

    Interior condensation because the vents have become blocked (sometimes intentionally)

    It takes work to maintain a house and many people won't or can't do it. Obviously there are plenty of cases of poor design and construction, but most of this stuff is purely down to age and lack of maintenance.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,690 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    Well in the block I'm thinking of, the render is filthy, and the window frames are covered in moss on the outside. It doesn't seem especially well-maintained, so I'd wonder how much the management company is doing for the property.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,237 ✭✭✭herbalplants


    Funny part, the houses I have seen that fell through and came back on the market, they came back at a higher price, possibly the price they went sale agreed as. So looney tune bids high then cannot afford it and pulls out and the house goes back on the market at what looney tune offered. It should be back on the market at the price originally advertised months previously.

    Living the life



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,747 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    From my own experience so many Sale Agreeds fall through because an agent's fibs and/or omissions got rumbled.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,119 ✭✭✭Roberto_gas


    exactly....makes me wonder if the seller actually got greedy and relisted it for higher offers !



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,119 ✭✭✭Royale with Cheese


    I went sale agreed 3 times last year, didn't buy any of them.

    1. The house was a bit of a wreck and needed an extension, we budgeted €450k for renovations and an extension and an architect gave us rough costs or €700k to do the work we wanted. Had this more or less verified by a QS and withdrew our offer almost immediately.

    2. The house was supposed to be B3 rated and in great condition but a survey threw up a lot of little issues and we caught the seller outright lying about one of them when queried on it so we didn't trust a thing we were being told about the house and pulled out. It was very expensive for what it was and only made any kind of sense of you didn't need to put a cent into the existing structure, that wasn't the case. It was taken off the market before Christmas, didn't sell. The agent was also somebody you wouldn't trust in the slightest.

    3. Great house, loved it and we were very happy with the price even though we'd agreed to pay €45k over asking, no issues with the survey this time. 7 weeks go by and the deal hasn't moved an inch, eventually the estate agent calls us to tell us the sellers are getting divorced (not disclosed to us initially, we were told their kids had grown up and they wanted to downsize) and the wife now wants to pause the whole thing (husband very much the opposite). We were fed some bullshít about her changing solicitors and this being her new legal advice but I'm pretty sure she never had any intention of selling the house based on how the process never moved at all. I'm guessing she played along with the sale in order to get the husband to move out and then reneged on it as soon as he was gone so she could stay living there by herself.

    So there you go, three different reasons why a sale might fall through. I doubt an agent would be honest with anyone about the first two, and the third one the house wasn't for sale anyway so they just took the ad down and I doubt it will be going back on the market anytime soon. I would say she fed us a lot of bullshít about why the seller has changed their mind to save face, she got duped by them initially.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,747 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    Thinking about case 2, I think it is common practice for EAs to omit certain details and then try to bounce the buyer into signing once they have blown a few grand on engineer fees.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 660 ✭✭✭FernandoTorres


    What kind of extension were you looking at? I'm in the same boat trying to weigh up buying an already extended or doing it myself. Most things online will say cost is 2,500-3,000 per sqm. We'd be looking at a 50-70sq m extension which would be in our budget but then all I hear are stories of people being quoted 300-400k for a bog standard semi d extension. 700k sounds like madness!



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,119 ✭✭✭Royale with Cheese


    Standard rear extension but also knocking down the god awful garage conversion they'd stuck their kitchen in and replacing it with a two storey side extension. It was a big job alright but the rough costs we were given were €4000-5000 per m² to build and 80% of that to renovate. We were working off figures of €3000-3500 per m² as my wife's parents had only finished a massive job in their house 6 months prior and this is what they paid, but the architect assured us that things had got considerably worse since they went to tender. We were shocked, as was the estate agent who was there, but we verified the right costs with the QS from my in laws job and he said hard to give exact estimates they weren't too far off. Most of our €450k would have gone on must renovating the existing house which wasn't massive. It needed to be gutted though. The architect said it was basically pure gouging at this point and he was seeing a lot of jobs go to tender but not go any further so he expected costs to come back down slightly soon enough, we hadn't signed contracts yet though so just ran a mile.

    This was south Dublin, I'm told the cost to build here is the worst in the country. It put us right off anywhere that needed any kind of major building work anyway.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,615 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Channel 4 can make a new show for Irish audiences a spin off of Location, location location to

    Regulation, regulation, regulation



  • Registered Users Posts: 617 ✭✭✭J_1980


    In Ireland/Dublin new builds are desirable and command a sizeable premium over existing stock.


    in the UK/London no one wants a new build and these come at a discount vs period and 30’s houses.


    building regs do make sense. I prefer houses that match German standards.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,615 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Of course they make sense, but it's not the difference between cost of construction being so out of kilter between the 2 jurisdictions on our island.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers Posts: 5,984 ✭✭✭hometruths


    So most new builds are priced at basically just construction costs + vat and new builds command a sizeable premium over existing stock?

    Seems legit.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,690 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    There are a group of new builds near my mom that are going on the marker soon in Dublin 5. They're priced at 875k, whilst a good condition house in the area would be about 600k. That's a huge mark-up, but some of them have apparently already sold.

    Personally speaking, if I had the funds, my choice would be an old house in Dublin. I absolutely love the old red-brick houses from the 19th century that are found around the city, and I would love to buy a neglected house and do it up nicely. It's a pipe-dream for now, but we'll see in the future.



  • Registered Users Posts: 617 ✭✭✭J_1980


    Premium over existing stock.

    existing stock is terrible build quality/maintenance and hence extremely cheap.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,615 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Buy a house that was built during a recession/high unemployment. The best workers usually survive such events.

    Don't expect perfection during a labour shortage

    Wisdom past down from my elders



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 558 ✭✭✭Gussoe


    Has anybody ever heard of a RPZ being rescinded?

    I haven't.

    Seems to me it's more likely a government will just extend RPZ across the entire country.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers Posts: 5,984 ✭✭✭hometruths


    The point I was making is it seems highly unlikely the market price including the sizeable premium reflecting increased demand for new builds just happens coincidentally to be the same as the construction costs + VAT.

    It seems a lot more plausible that the market price of new builds is construction costs (including developer margin) + VAT + sizeable premium.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,029 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Wasn't that exact premium quoted recently in this very thread as being to the tune of tens of thousands of euros on an average house?

    And that not even accounting for some of the dodgy vertical integration that a lot of developers do to minimise profit.

    A quick google brings this up as the relevant figures from 2016, you can add circa 25% on top to all of them for now.




  • Registered Users Posts: 12,631 ✭✭✭✭AdamD


    Would you not expect 10s of thousands of profit on building a house? Seems pretty reasonable



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,029 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Most people absolutely (and correctly) would, but J_1980 claimed "most new houses and apartments are basically just construction costs + vat."



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,394 ✭✭✭Ray Palmer


    But to a higher standard in many cases. The thermal insulation is far superior in a new build versus an older build. You get a toilet downstairs as standard. Older houses have a lot of maintenance work and you also have failing parts that need replacing completely. Most people will not buy an older house and prices prove it. My wife certainly never wants to have to work on the house again and wouldn't go near a house that requires it as most old houses do.

    It one thing getting a new sheet of insulation board versus hiring a specialist plasterer to put lime plaster up



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,202 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    I doubt if there's any evidence to support that at all.

    Seems like old wives tales.


    Standards have changed between 2012 and 2024. Best worker building to poor standards with poor material. Average worker building to higher standards with higher quality material.

    The Pyrite investigation showed "the legacy of building failures or severe non-compliance concerns following the downturn in economic and construction activity in 2008, which exposed vulnerabilities in the building control system that was in place at that time"



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,056 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    The point --->


    Your head ---


    The claim was that new builds are basically just construction cost + VAT, implying a minimal margin for the developer. Which is complete BS. There is plenty of money to be made selling new builds nowadays.

    And on that point about how old stock is crap etc ? Old builds are typically bigger and have bigger gardens & more desirable, central locations. Most new stock are tiny plots farther out. The premium is not worth it imho



  • Registered Users Posts: 622 ✭✭✭Summer2020


    New builds are mainly desirable here as there’s so many government supports tied to purchasing them. We’ve bought in a new build and 5 years later moved to a 1990 build house and if we moved again I’d never buy a new build again.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,119 ✭✭✭Roberto_gas


    is new build quality poor than 20-30 year old houses?



Advertisement