Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hamas strike on Israel - Threadbans in op - mod warning in OP updated 19/10/23

Options
19789799819839841266

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 25,548 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    What's this?


    Oh just more israeli lies


    Edit: dunno why it's says sensitive content, it's just a CNN report on alleged tunnels near a cemetery.





  • Registered Users Posts: 5,964 ✭✭✭Cordell


    I'm a big fan of terrorists being disposed of as early as possible, by any means necessary.



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,548 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr




  • Registered Users Posts: 13,826 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    The Palestinians are as radicalised as they have ever been, though less so in Gaza where they is an anger against Hamas for bringing this on them,for continuously stealing food aid and for shooting protesters.


    Netanyahu isn't that far removed from the centre remember Hamas targeted left wing Jews the hardest on Oct 7th, not just solely because they were Jews or left wing which they hate as much being Jewish but because the left in Israel were for a 2 state solution , something which Palestinian society is deeply opposed to.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,825 ✭✭✭SeanW


    These cases are not analogues, nobody in Ukraine was looking for a fight pre-2022 and at no time did the Republic support IRA terrorists. Indeed, when it became clear to the Irish government that there was a problem with IRA members crossing the border, they passed legislation to proscribe them. Furthermore, at no time were "the Troubles" a fight to the death for either Ireland or the UK: even if the UK had to withdraw completely from Northern Ireland, the IRA were never going to continue to the Mainland and drive all the English people into the sea.

    Expecting Israel to co-exist with people who are determined to wipe them out completely is not realistic. As mentioned in a recent post, true peace will probably require the removal of both Netanyahu and the Mullahs of Iran. And hopefully that happens: but in the meantime, we must stand with Israel, its right to exist and its right to defend itself against its mortal enemies.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,951 ✭✭✭circadian



    Go ahead spin masters, what ya got? Hamas done it? They done it to themselves?



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,548 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    They've already started, have seen some on other SM claim this was Hamas killing people who refused to fight or were trying to escape.



  • Registered Users Posts: 812 ✭✭✭Hey boy




  • Registered Users Posts: 27,877 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    You may be correct and there may be some who say that if it makes Israel more secure, then the Palestinians shouldn't have a state.

    On the otherhand, it is Palestinian state doctrine set out by their Hamas government that Israel shouldn't exist because Jews don't deserve a homeland and the elimination of all Jews is a goal.

    There is also the contradiction in your first sentence where you dismiss Iran not wanting Israel to exist but condemn "some" who may not want Palestinians to have a state, without quantifying or qualifying that the "some" you refer to are fringe, rather than the whole Iranian state wanting the elimination of Israel.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,877 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    If you are going to start a wild rumour, you should always make sure that it is credible. Whether or not the particular rumour you are quoting is true or not, it is certainly credible, as it is something that Hamas are more than capable of.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 14,544 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    With funding being cut off to the largest provider of support to Gaza, someone needs to present the evidence to justify it.

    How do you know they haven't?

    Do you think Biden made a judgement on a whim, of a tweet?

    No, information and intelligence are shared between Israel and the US, and the US will share it with other allies.

    Each of these has its own intelligence agency that can corroborate and stand over what each other is saying, or call it out as bullshit.

    It stands to reason the US, UK, Canadian, Australian, German, Swedish and Japanese intelligence services (just to name a few) have their way of verifying that UNRAW is indeed riddled with Jihadists, this funding is suspended pending a full investigation on the extensiveness of his.


    Therefore stuff in the press, from CBS, and WSJ just to name a few gives credence that indeed UNRAW has an issue with Hamas and Jihadists using it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,544 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    They are really tightening the noose now.

    Hopefully, Hamas will be cast out of Gaza forever in the next month or two.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,544 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    You seem to have an issue with evidence - I pointed out that evidence - it's in this thread. And it's not just evidence from me, it's from others too.

    Look, lets just let it lie, seeing as you are not going to front up.

    Your agrument amounts to just 'Goggle it'


    There is zero evidence or credibility for your outlandish claims about Israel wanting to kill everyone, civilians being deliberately targeted as per government policy, or that no rapes were committed by Hamas, or that no Jewish civilians were killed on October 7th by Hamas.

    The last two in particular are a vile conspiracy theory, right out of the Nazi playbook.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,544 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Excellent post.


    There is a deep and disturbing trend of 'Atrocity denialism' perpetuated by some in this thread when it comes to what happened on October 7th.

    The fact is some of this is down to the fact that Jews are involved, and they cannot be trusted.

    Is everyone towing the Pro-Palestine line an anti-Semite? No.

    Are some anti-Semitic? Absolutely 100% yes.


    Even when verifiable, independent facts, are pointed out, along will come another poster, with some Tweet from some random guy, or Quads News Network, with some fake news and disinformation, ready to go and spout propaganda.

    I seriously question the motivation and agenda behind some of these posts.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,219 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    When was the last time it was a fight to the death for Israel? Are Hamas that much of a threat? From what I saw they performed a pretty nasty terrorist attack and then went and hid in their bunkers. For months Israel have been dropping thousands of bombs on them and leveling Gaza. Are hamas biding their time till they launch their nukes? Are Hamas going to spring up in their millions behind the Israeli front lines with tanks and march on Tel Aviv?

    How exactly is this a battle for survival for israel?

    And yes, I do believe Israel needs to protect itself against Hamas. And yes they do need to go after Hamas. I'm just not hyperbolic enough to claim that hamas can do anything to threaten Israels actual existence unless you count making empty threats. Get over yourself and your melodrama. people won't take you seriously unless you do.


    Now, I do believe that if there's a group of people who won't survive this intact, it's the Gazans. The whole territory is surrounded on all sides. Pretty much no-one goes in or out. There's constant daily bombardments which have killed so many children. Starvation is getting worse and there's less food getting in. People are proposing starving the whole territory because that might hurt Hamas so famine is a distance possibility.

    And back in Israel, people are going to the cinema, going to the beach and just basically hanging out.

    So tell me again, which populace are actually facing an existential crises? Which ones are facing off against one of the worlds most powerful military's which is backed up with supplies from most of the western world.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,544 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    The Jews have made a living out of being victims, they have clowns like you going to bat for them while they massacre defenseless people in Gaza.

    Yet another exhibit of Anti-Semitism, just to show that it exists even on a well-moderated thread.

    @wearedem2024 You need to think of your life choices when it comes to spouting racist, anti-Semitic crap like that. But at least now you have shown your true self in case there is any doubt about your motivation



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,086 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    I have read posts questioning specific parts of the 7th attack but can't recall anyone denying the 7th Oct attack didnt kill civilians.

    They are plenty of here denying that the killing of 10k kids is an atrocity. That is a fact.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,823 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Initially after the Oct 7th attacks some countries announced they would stop funding to Palestine, you may remember the drama within the EU. That was suddenly backtracked etc...

    In light of the accusations against UNWRA the funding being cut off could easily be explained as a knee jerk reaction.

    Israel could have shared the actual evidence to all countries who fund the UNWRA, if they wanted countries to make an informed decision. Equally they could have shared all this information to potentially get the genocide case thrown out of court.

    Remember the only evidence presented publicly seems to be about the 12 UNRWA workers involved in the Oct 7 attacks. Although that may be just 11 if the counterclaim that one suspect isn't actually a UNRWA worker. Still zero evidence presented publicly wrt the 1200 UNRWA workers with ties to Hamas.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,544 ✭✭✭✭markodaly




  • Registered Users Posts: 14,544 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Oh please.

    Some posters won't admit to women being raped by Hamas on October 7th, regardless of the mountain of evidence that now points to a premediate plan to use rape and sexual violence as a weapon of terror.

    Sure, other posters genuinely think that is was the IDF who killed the vast majority of people, including civilians because there may have been the odd case of friendly fire, of course, means that the Israeli government ordered EVERYONE in the region to be killed and mowed down.

    Yes, it's tinfoil crazy lunatic stuff, but it's right here in this thread.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,086 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    I dont agree with anyone who would deny rapes happened. I think there is crazy stuff being written as you say.

    But criticism from those that are expressing very little sentiment regarding the thousands of women and children being killed in Gaza is always going to ring a bit hollow.



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,548 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr




  • Registered Users Posts: 8,270 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    No, there was evidence presented publicly, to the US Congress, by Canadian lawyer Hillel Neuer. He's been investigating this for years and has the receipts. It's been posted here a couple of times just yesterday. Weird how that's another subject that certain posters never seem to see or comment on, a bit like all the blatant anti semitism and Hamas support posted throughout the thread. We get "I didn't see any of that, where is it?". Tiresome



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,488 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    You didn't misrepresent that article at all. It's in my opinion not the best written article, as it goes on about the current events between it's lede:

    "Sky News has seen Israeli intelligence documents that Israel claims are evidence that staff working for a UN agency were connected with Hamas in Gaza."

    and later, Sky's conclusion (somewhat buried in the middle):

    "The Israeli intelligence documents make several claims that Sky News has not seen proof of and many of the claims, even if true, do not directly implicate UNRWA."

    But, they (Sky) don't actually flesh out their claim. The claims about UNRWA are coming from a variety of sources, and I don't believe the document Sky saw, is one of them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,823 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    The WSJ article was behind a paywall (I asked you to copy and paste or summarize the part specific to the 10%) and no, I didn't watch the video but found news reports on it. It was listing all the things wrong UNWRA have been doing, teaching hate in school etc... UNWRA staff being a member of a Whatsapp group celebrating the Oct 7 attacks and so on. Definitely seems to be an anti-israel sentiment with those staff members. However zero evidence about 10% of UNWRA staff are members of Hamas.

    Some reporting mentions them being members of Hamas, some mention links to Hamas. So you can see the confusion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,073 ✭✭✭✭end of the road



    because israel wouldn't know the truth and reality if it hit them in the face.

    those countries, the US especially, are held to ransom at worst and at best, scared of doing anything to go against, or be seen to be going against israel.

    israel want to discredit and destroy this organisation because it exposes israel's behaviour.

    the funding is removed out of fear on the basis of a mostly baseless allegation by a state who do nothing but lie.

    sure, there probably are a couple of gihadis in the organisation, but it will ultimately be small because the organisation provide a full list of all of their staff to host countries yet israel don't object.

    so either israel are allowing a gihadist organisation to operate to facilitate it's own ends, or as we can clearly see, they are simply making baseless allegations against an organisation that they want to destroy.

    Post edited by end of the road on

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,073 ✭✭✭✭end of the road



    hamas aren't gone anywhere.

    they are not going to be cleared out of gaza, apart from in the mind of a delusional netanyahu.

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,073 ✭✭✭✭end of the road



    all of the claims made by that poster have been backed up and shown to be the case.

    in the case of israel deliberately killing civilians, decades ago.

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,073 ✭✭✭✭end of the road



    he is correct, he doesn't need to read it to know that israely "evidence" proves nothing, or proves the opposite of what they claim.

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 27,877 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Nobody is denying that the killing of children in Gaza is horrific. However, something that may be horrific may also be legal. Some of us have been pointing out that the screaming and shouting about firstly war crimes and secondly genocide by Israel, is based on spurious legal grounds. When it came down to it, the most practical and immediate recommendation of the ICJ was the immediate and unconditional release of the hostages, something that Hamas and the other Palestinians holding the hostages did not comply with.



Advertisement