Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

Options
1348034813483348534863691

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2,574 ✭✭✭Field east


    Russia has picked / is picking the ‘low hanging fruit’ when it comes to Getting private Russians to join the army. I suggest that the more it recruits the more resistance it will come across. We have already seen glimpses of that . I know that Putin has his ‘WAYS’ of convincing individuals to join -eg withdraw all payments/services to them ; threaten the whole family in some other way .

    The above scenario must be clicking in more and more. The UKr army should therefor be increasingly facing Russian soldiers that DO NOT want to be in the war zone , their low moral would would be getting worse, etc.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 14,502 Mod ✭✭✭✭johnnyskeleton


    I dont understand why the democrats dont respond with - "grand. We wont give them any money at all, we will just give them weapons manufactured in the USA creating American jobs". EU can give the money, US the military equipment. Problem solved.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,805 ✭✭✭CelticRambler


    @Polar101 Have to agree, it's a ridiculous number. It would pretty much mean every single Russian soldier who visited Ukraine either died or was injured. There's no realistic way it can be accurate.

    There are countless blog posts, phone intercepts and other accounts indicating that it is indeed a realistic assertion. Over and over we hear of a group of a hundred Russians going out and only ten comeing back. Or twenty refuse to go "over the top" so they're thrown in a pit by their commanding officers and left to rot.

    @jmreire Thats a very conservative figure for the disabled at 2 injured per 1 killed. 3.1 is nearer to the truth, and in Ukraine during 2022, the ratio recorded was 5 wounded to 1 killed.

    From the start of this war, and especially in the early stages, numerous (western) commentators were estimating troop losses on the Russian side by extrapolating data from various historic conflicts, and regularly applied the 3-injured-to-1-killed formula in defensive situations. What this never took into account is that the Russians, whether by deliberate choice or sheer incompetence, have applied the principle of "leave no-one alive" to their own troops. "Attack, even if it's pretty certain you'll be killed, or I'll shoot you myself. Wounded and need evacuation? Feck off and die, you're no use to anyone now. Oh, you made it back and need medical treatment? Good luck - the nearest doctor is in Moscow."

    So I would be fairly confident that taking the numbers prepared for the initial 2022 invasion plus the successive "scheduled annual mobilisation" cohort plus the numbers of prisoners recruited by Wagner (then the Russian MoD) plus the L/DPR conscripts we'd arrive a total over a million; and out of that, I wouldn't be surprised to learn that 75% never returned to Mother Russia.

    Even after the end of hostilities, it'll be really hard to get accurate information on this, especially as there are so many bodies left uncollected (at least those where there's anything left to collect) but I reckon we'll see a very clear impact in the demographic charts in due course. And I think it'll be much worse than expected.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,792 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    The problem is that Europe won't give that money and it definitely won't give enough arms.


    The MAGA crowd are a recent but long standing manifestation of US isolation and opposition to involvement in foreign conflicts, they are extra sore over the refusal of western Europe to pay for its own security and defense, or secure its neighbouring interests, and have America do it instead.


    It's nearly 10k Kms from America to Ukraine and without their aid it would be long over, while the nextdoor neighbours keep the purse tightly held.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    But that's essentially already happening with the various aid packages the majority of the actual money was staying in America and going to American companies, while at the same time US defence companies made record sales to foreign buyers



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,740 ✭✭✭zv2


    One Russian soldier said that if one of their men is lightly wounded he can survive. Badly wounded are left to rot.


    “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” — Voltaire



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,436 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Whatever about the dead /injured ratio in the current war in Ukraine, in previous wars, where there were accurate counts of both dead and injured (in military's who cared for their soldiers, unlike Putin's regime) a very conservative figure of 2-1 was what was arrived at, but realistically, it would have been 3-1+. There has been reports coming from the Russians, about their own wounded being abandoned, even when they could have been saved. And then you have Putin's cash saving efforts when it came to paying the bereaved families compensation....no body? no cash. So my figures of 365'000 dead, multiplied by 2 = 730 injured., is pretty reasonable. And bear in mind that these figures, based on reports from Ukraine, are possibly out if date by now.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,306 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Isn't there also the complication where Russia is also false reporting dead as "missing in action", so they can avoid paying the next of kin their dues? Seem to recall that chicanery going on, similar to how Russia underreported their COVID cases as fast listing then as "pneumonia"



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,805 ✭✭✭CelticRambler


    I'm not disputing the total number of casualties - just that I think a huge number of the 730k you'd estimate as "injured" are more likely to be dead, alongside the other 365k.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,436 ✭✭✭jmreire


    The thing with Americans is that most of them do see the threat posed by Putin, and support moves to destroy that threat, and they will not ever have better chance than now at a miniscule cost of 3.5 % of their defense budget, and without any boots on the ground. Never mind the fact that most of the cash will be spent in the US, and a lot of the supplied arms would have been considered obsolete and scheduled for disposal in any case. Problem with the rest of the Americans, the anti-support Ukraine brigade is that until US marines start getting killed and American cities getting bombed, they will not be convinced of the threat Putin and his like-minded henchmen around the world pose.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 981 ✭✭✭Mike3549


    I wouldn't be surprised if a Russian killed/injured ratio is 1:1.

    My point is, if in a standard war ratio is 1:3, say 100k killed, 300k injured. In russia, a big part of those 300k injured, would be left to die, or wouldn't get required treatment and then die. Then it would make 200k dead and 200k injured.



  • Registered Users Posts: 486 ✭✭junkyarddog


    Another drone strike on a oil refinery.



  • Registered Users Posts: 680 ✭✭✭I.am.Putins.raging.bile.duct


    But that's where a lot of the money is actually going and it's obsolete weapons mostly too that would have cost them to destroy.




  • Registered Users Posts: 13,447 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose




  • Registered Users Posts: 11,022 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    It's entirely reasonable for Ukraine as a state to ask/ demand that anyone who meets criteria for serving in this war and who has fled the country, to return voluntarily or be returned. That is their basic duty as citizens and they should not be given a free pass to escape it.

    I'm surprised that we don't hear more here from the Ukrainian refugee community and the Ukrainian ambassador on this subject. If they want to sustain public support for our sheltering them, then they need to pull their fingers out and comply with requests from their native country.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,154 ✭✭✭saabsaab




  • Registered Users Posts: 4,546 ✭✭✭political analyst


    One would've assumed that TV news broadcasting would make the US public more aware of world events today than they were during World War 2 and even more so than they were during the Vietnam War because of the proliferation of cable news channels.

    Even Fox News doesn't ignore world events!

    So how is it that the availability of breaking news on TV hasn't changed the isolationists' minds?



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,546 ✭✭✭political analyst


    Presumably, deserters constitute a small minority of able-bodies Ukrainian adult males. Nothing that any Ukrainian ambassador would say would prevent desertion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,546 ✭✭✭political analyst


    Wouldn't approval by Capitol Hill still be necessary for the sending of military equipment to Ukraine?



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    They are refugees protected under international law there can be no demanding them to be returned or to Deported to face forced conscription,

    They don't want to fight or be in Ukraine while there is a war going on ,

    If zelensky tries to force this he's going to face reactions from Europe



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,801 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Didn't stop Biden bypassing Congress on approval recently for selling arms to Israel.

    I'm sure there are ways around it all, but the biggest issue would be with EU companies loosing out to American companies. I assume all, if not most of that EU money will be staying within the EU.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,306 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Don't bother. This segue has been well worn, repeatedly, and is only the fantasy of anti-migrant rhetoric mixed with paper tiger "I'd pick up a rifle in the morning" bravado of those who'll never be asked to prove it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,740 ✭✭✭zv2


    “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” — Voltaire



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,022 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    We've been over this before, on the outbreak of open hostilities Ukraine quickly brought in rules regarding males leaving the country. If any of current refugees broke those rules and left, they are deserters, not refugees.

    The reason this is important is to sustain support for genuine war refugees from Ukraine. Those who may be abusing the system should be returned and that includes those from unaffected areas who see no problem with returning for periodical visits.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,801 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Maybe a deserter in Ukraine's eyes, in the EU's eyes they are seen as refugees.

    Can Ireland even extradite people who will be conscripted into an active war zone?

    Should we also extradite any Russians also? Need to be consistent and not just single out Ukrainians.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    They are refugees it doesn't matter what your opinion or anyone's opinions is ...

    And they are probably the only genuine refugees here



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,792 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    One would be to help Ukraine and no one outside of the Socialist Meps ilk want to help Russia so the others wouldnt be send.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,801 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    So pick and choose who the laws apply to?

    That would go down well in court when some Ukrainian refugee is trying to fight the extradition order. Which I'm not even sure Ireland could actually accommodate as do we even have a law against draft dodging?



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement