Cold Case Review of Sophie Tuscan du Plantier murder to proceed. **Threadbans in OP**

The Fanboys love discussing how it would have been almost physically impossible for Bailey to have committed the crime because of the imaginary times they post about and then exaggerate.

What time did Bailey and Jules leave the pub? Nobody knows as the only times provided are by Bailey. (Lol)

What time did they arrive back at Jules properties, a 10 minute drive away? About an hour and a half later according to Bailey. (LOL).

What happened after that? Take your choice, but according to Bailey, on reflection after finding out his only alibi changed their mind and told the truth that he wasn't with them, he suddenly then remembered he was definitely on his own the whole night and had no alibi.

Why would you choose to take offence at one word in a 4 paragraph post that is encouraging discussion?

The best way you can learn anything Oscar is to look it up yourself.

Everyday is a schoolday, start with the libel trials.

Why on earth would that chap or any of the other people who testified that they knew one another lie?

Bailey himself admitted/let it slip that he knew Sophie.

This is all common knowledge to anyone with a genuine passing interest in the case.

I find her the most mysterious and suspicious in all of this

her husband has a history of violent assaults, it’s also said in an interview that one of the guards who she was very close to said she told him her husband had assaulted her

yet she publicly says she was out with another man, a man she refused to name

quoted in the Irish times “guards said if I gave a few lines of a statement they would keep my secret and the fact I had a daughter in Longford”

the latter has never been mentioned again or proven to be true so I’m presuming this is another lie if she can make up she has a child I think she’s made up the whole lot from the very start

Hard to take you seriously with posts like this.

During Baileys 2004 libel trial, Alfie Lyons stated he was 90% sure he introduced Bailey and Sophie. The judge accepted on balance it was true they were introduced and found against Baileys claim. Now I just know someone will allege that Alfie was put up to this by the gardai, but there is no evidence of this and if he was doing the garda bidding he'd say it was 100% true.

Now its one thing for people to speculate if they knew each other, but you can't really argue with a judge who determines who is telling the truth.

Multiple other wisnesses have stated there was evidence of a connection including the French friend who said Sophie was in contact with an Eoin Bailey.

Makes no sense that she would give an interview to The Irish Times talking about something she wanted kept secret.

Really? Hard to take my posts seriously? Seriously?

Oh dear. That isn’t good. Ok let’s change that and get a quote from one of your wonderful “witnesses” that your claiming can kick Bailey into oblivion forever more:

here you go:

“Ms Thomas admitted her memory was ‘a bit polluted’ and could not say if Ms Toscan du Plantier had used Bailey’s name, but she knew he was an aspiring poet at the time.”

That’s your response is it? Your total evidence that Ian Bailey is a murderer?

OK, let’s recap here :

tobefrank321 thinks Ian Bailey murdered Sophie because some French “friend” mentioned a “poet’ who’s name she couldn’t recall, in a phone call - and she brought this to the attention of Gardai how many years later after her dear friend was brutally murdered?

SO- you have an “INTRODUCTION” (L whatever that means ) that may or may not have happened and some “witness” who claimed years later after her supposed friend was murdered that Sophie mentioned a poet in a phone conversation.

you know what tobefrank321- I wouldn’t be running to the guards with that information - they’ve already tried that pitch - DPP said neh naaaah!

https://www.irishmirror.ie/news/irish-news/witness-tells-court-sophie-toscan-16215551?int_source=amp_continue_reading&int_medium=amp&int_campaign=continue_reading_button#amp-readmore-target

your posts are getting shorter the closer I’m getting to the truth of your own posts- funny that 😀

"1999, March: French film maker, Guy Girard comes forward to tell gardaí how Sophie Toscan du Plantier had told him in early December 1996 about this friend she had in Ireland called Ian Bailey who was exploring themes of violence in his writings."

It's a stretch to believe the above is somehow made up

How about not changing things and sticking to the fact that it is really hard to take you seriously.

Of course you can have your own opinion, but surely you know you can't have your own facts.

Might be best if you wait and see what the result of The Cold Case Review is because I think you are seriously underestimating the skills of the team involved.

To be precise he wanted to discuss themes of domestic violence with Sophie.

A field he had vast experience in and actually specialised in.

A “probably”?

Hang him at dawn so… … must be guilty with a “probably”…oh wait… what?

He’s dead already?

How dare he!

I've never said he definitely killed her

There isn't enough evidence to show that

There's enough circumstancial evidence though to make him the prime suspect

Which he was and still is by all accounts

I think at this stage we need to await the "new" details hopefully to draw a highly likely conclusion

A conclusion of some sort is badly needed here