Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Abortion Discussion, Part the Fourth

15455575960

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,920 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Here's a brief Newstalk report if you don't trust ole grift.ie

    Here's a list of the naysayers if that is what you were looking for

    Aontú’s Peadar Tóibín, and Independents Mattie McGrath, Danny Healy-Rae, Michael Healy-Rae, Peter Fitzpatrick, Noel Grealish, Michael Collins, Richard O’Donoghue, Seán Canney, and Michael Lowry.

    Predictable names there, minus Carol Nolan for some reason. Not a government TD among them, this seems like ancient history now




  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,420 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    Ye gods, is Michael Lowry still a TD?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,741 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Oireachtas site now updated

    Interesting that there were no absentions recorded, Carol Nolan must have been absent for whatever reason.

    Some of the commentary from the Healy-Raes, Michael Collins et al is just bizarre.

    I do not support this Bill and I will not be supporting it going forward. The right to protest and the freedom to exercise one's religion are pillars of a democratic society. 

    I'm not aware of any religion in which standing around outside maternity hospitals whether silently or otherwise is a form of worship.

    Remember the 2018 debates here and in the media when we were constantly told that the opposition to repeal of the 8th was not religious in nature... 🤥

    They really need to press on now and remove the 3 day wait and seriously look at the time limit too.

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,955 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    IANAL, and I'm REALLY unhappy the Judge in Nevada ruled the way he did, but this proposed state constitution amendment was kind of poorly worded:

    (can't link, apparently Boards is going through captcha, and it's not on archive. yet, site is thehill.com. googling nevada abortion russell thehill.com should get it.)

    "Judge rejects attempt to enshrine abortion rights on Nevada ballot"

    The Judge ruled it too broad - it is, and it isn't. It tried to be specific about forms of abortion and shouldn't, like why tubal ligation is enshrined but the more common, and FDA approved, Bilateral salpingectomy isn't? I get a vibe of 'resolution by committee' where maybe copying what another state like Ohio did would have passed.

    Still, even in failing it keeps the issue in the news and it might be that the Nevada supreme court overrules the judge in question.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,741 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    No surprises here

    And no surprise that the Russian Orthodox Church is right in there.

    Authorities are concerned that the decreasing number of young people, particularly men, will make it more difficult for the Russian military to recruit soldiers. There are also worries about the effects of a stagnant population on the economy.

    They might consider that the kleptocratic shít economy is causing the stagnant population? And who wants to raise sons just so they can be conscripted and killed in pointless wars?

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,193 ✭✭✭✭Pherekydes


    Yep, the Nazis banned abortion, at least for Aryan women, for much the same reasons.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,771 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Actually, no. Abortion was already banned in Germany before the Nazis came along; under the Weimar republic it was decriminalised only the case of grave danger to the life of the mother.

    The Nazis in fact widened access to abortion, making it available in in cases of deformity or disability, if either parent was the carrier of a genetic disease, if either parent was Jewish, or on various other eugenic grounds. And of course in many circumstances they practiced forced abortions, again on eugenic grounds. But they also increased the penalties for abortion in cases where it wasn't permitted, up to and including the death penalty for repeat offender abortion practitioners.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,420 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    And who wants to raise sons just so they can be conscripted and killed in pointless wars?

    The white boys from Moscow and St Petersburg are largely free of this risk which applies, in the main, to the sons of the Turkic + Asiatic republics and other ethnic minorities within the Russian Federation. The abortion rate in Russia is down substantially from twenty years back, when it was around two million abortions per year - that's now reduced to around half a million per year, or a reduction from around eight times the Irish rate to around twice the Irish rate.

    https://www.statista.com/statistics/1034529/russia-total-number-of-abortions/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,552 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    At one stage they were performing around 6M a year. apparently at one point they had more abortions in a year than live births. the decrease in the last 20 years is most likely down to the increased availability of contraception.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,420 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    the decrease in the last 20 years is most likely down to the increased availability of contraception.

    That and a set of tax breaks which apply to larger families only:

    https://www.cnbc.com/2019/02/20/putin-wants-mortgage-relief-and-cash-for-big-russian-families.html

    ...plus a set of frankly blunt adverts exhorting the women of Russia to produce one for you, one for your husband and one for your country - a bizarre line which I think first saw use in Australia. Russia is also attempting to address its demographic decline by stealing unknown thousands of children from Ukraine.

    https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-children-taken-ukraine/32527298.html

    https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/9/20/ukraine-calls-for-return-of-abducted-children-as-more-arrive-in-belarus



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,420 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    Kenya proving once again that if you can't go in the front door, you can always go down the backstreet:

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-67473183

    "At an unregulated clinic on the outskirts of Nairobi, the man in charge offers women abortions for 2,500 Kenyan shillings ($16; £13). [...] He charges extra for the safe disposal of the foetus. If the woman cannot afford that he pays someone to throw it in the river."



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,420 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    [...] one for you, one for your husband and one for your country [...]

    Family policy hit by war inflation - VVP now calling for four, five, even eight children. Bonus - in the second video, one lad helpfully pointing out that if a woman has more than one kid, then it's easier for her to say goodbye to one of them.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,741 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Finally

    Five more maternity hospitals are to offer abortion services from next Monday, December 4, Health Minister Stephen Donnelly has announced.

    Hospital sites at Kilkenny, Portiuncula, Letterkenny, Wexford and Portlaoise will provide the services from next week, bringing to 17 the total number of maternity hospitals providing early (under 12 weeks) termination of pregnancy services, as prescribed in the Health (Regulation of Termination of Pregnancy) Act 2018.

    Speaking on Friday, Mr Donnelly said the expansion of services was "a significant step towards the provision of full termination services for women in all 19 maternity hospitals".


    The HSE has said that the two remaining maternity hospitals — Cavan and Clonmel — will begin service provision in 2024.

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,955 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Nice, but these are 'early pregnancy' terminations. This is currently being provided by GPs AFAIK. Not a lot to get excited about, why did it take hospitals 5 years to get to where GP's have been for awhile. I think surgical abortions are still only provided by a couple of hospitals.

    Note that, naturally, the HSE web page is out date and doesn't show the new hospitals though I suppose you could call. Over/Under of when it'll be updated?

    And of course the 3 day misogyny is still in effect.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,115 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    The "Life" campaigners are trying out a new publicity ad tactic, that the money they claim has been used to terminate pregnancies has cost other branches of public health medical the ability to provide care for the public.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,741 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Which is of course total bullshit, do they think abortions cost €500,000 each or something? IIRC a GP gets €600 to cover two consultations and the medication cost. The actual bulk cost of the medication is something like €5.

    Of course if ~6000 a year extra unwanted births were to occur a year, what would the cost be in terms of welfare, lost economic productivity, family breakdown, child neglect, etc etc ? They'll run a mile from answering that.

    Would they apply the same cost argument to unwanted end-of-life care? like hell they would, they want us to spend fortunes on people who regard themselves as better off dead.

    All in all it's an incredibly stupid line of argument to open up, even for them.


    @Igotadose Due to the prospect of a 14 year prison sentence if they get the dates slightly wrong, most GPs (who are opted in) don't want to know at 10 weeks so between 10-12 it's still a medical abortion but done through a hospital.

    After that it's surgical abortions but only in FFA or life-threatening cases, you'd hope any maternity hospital would be set up for this already? because the 8th has allowed the latter since 1983 and confirmed by the Supreme Court in 1992 and by legislation in 2013.

    Dunno what the blockage was in the others but Kilkenny had a famously conservative catholic obstetric consultant and his deputy consultants were muslims. What a country we live in... let's hope the legislative review removes the 3 day wait at the least.

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,955 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    And, lest we forget, childbirth is very impactful on the mother (so, lots of potential medical expenses) and a percentage of children born with disabilities will require significant medical resources all through their lives.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,552 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    The cost of providing pre-birth medical care to a pregnant woman for exceeds the cost of an abortion



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,420 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    Texans being Texans again -

    "The Texas Supreme Court temporarily blocked a pregnant woman from obtaining an emergency abortion on Friday, shortly after the state's attorney general requested the block. The Texas court halted a lower court ruling allowing the emergency abortion [...] The woman, Kate Cox, 31, of the Dallas-Fort Worth area, sought court authorization for the abortion because her fetus was diagnosed on Nov. 27 with trisomy 18, a genetic abnormality that usually results in miscarriage, stillbirth or death soon after birth. Cox, who is about 20 weeks pregnant, said in her lawsuit that she would need to undergo her third caesarean section if she continues the pregnancy. That could jeopardize her ability to have more children, which she said she and her husband want. District Court Judge Maya Guerra Gamble sided with Cox on Thursday, issuing an order that applied only to Cox and does not expand abortion access more broadly. But Paxton, who had previously warned that any doctors involved in providing the emergency abortion would not be safe from prosecution, asked the state's highest court to intervene. Cox said in her lawsuit that, although her doctors believed abortion was medically necessary for her, they were unwilling to perform one without a court order in the face of potential penalties, including life in prison and loss of their licenses."

    https://www.reuters.com/world/us/paxton-asks-texas-supreme-court-stop-woman-emergency-abortion-2023-12-09/



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,741 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Trying and failing to come up with a printable reaction to that.

    Like the Tories currently in the UK, it's all about making people suffer just because they can.

    Scrap the cap!



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,420 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,920 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Process chugging along

    The report will cause headaches for the Government with Taoiseach Leo Varadkar saying earlier this year he would be uncomfortable making changes.

    No, he said he would be uncomfortable to make 'major' changes, and I have a sneaking decision he will decide the changes recommended by this committee do not qualify as 'major'.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,741 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    As long as the necessary changes are made I couldn't give a fiddler's how "comfortable" or otherwise Varadkar and co. are.

    The 12 week limit isn't nearly enough but nothing in that article about that and scaredy cat politicians will kick for touch.

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,955 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    As I recall, there's some question on the 'counting' of the 12 weeks. Apparently Ireland's is actually less than 12 weeks. I remember some of the pro-choice campaigners pointing that out, too. Determining when the pregnancy starts is not straightforward and days matter.

    I'm guardedly optimistic about this, but with the pernicious, pervasive influence of the RCC in Irish government I'm wary of 'slow it down' shenanigans by their actors in government. If Ireland ditches the awful '3 day cooling off,' will there be any more EU governments that require it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,920 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    The 12 week limit isn't nearly enough


    Is this a widely held position? Seems a gestational limit of in and around 12 weeks for 'choice' abortions is standard across the developed world, even in the ultra-liberal Scandinavian countries

    My impression is the big pressure for change, and where the debate is likely to focus, is over the definition of 'fatal foetal abnormality'...



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,741 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Yes the 12 weeks (and pregnancy generally) is counted from the last menstrual period, ovulation usually occurs two weeks later.

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,741 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    That link requires a login.

    12 weeks for any reason is common enough, but what can happen after 12 weeks varies a lot.

    We continue to rely on the "safety valve" of the UK. If it was up to me then non-fatal foetal abnormalities would be allowed (which would solve the "is it fatal enough" problem), but the usual suspects who want more severely disabled babies to be born would be up in arms. Their efforts are meaningless anyway as couples affected just go to the UK, the expense, difficulty and additional trauma involved is something they don't care a whit about.

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,955 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Implementation leaving a lot to be desired. Some anecdotes on accessing services today. "I'd 100% take the boat"

    (https://archive.is/VZsBI)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,955 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Fwiw a lot of info on abortion, which might have helped some of the women in that article can be found at reddit.com/r/abortion



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,741 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Just not acceptable that GPs who don't provide the service are refusing to refer.

    Scrap the cap!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,955 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Conceiving a child and raising it to birth are choices. Fortunately, we have them in Ireland. Likewise everywhere else.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,741 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Some will continue to look down their noses at those who make choices other than they hypothetically would have made, they're just getting ever so slighly more subtle about it but it still stinks of smug moral hypocrisy

    I say hypothetically because nobody knows the full circumstances surrounding anyone else's decision and really has no right to judge.

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,929 ✭✭✭Greyfox


    The bible teaches many good things and you are entitled to your opinion but religion should never be allowed to dictate the laws of society, its not fair on the people who are not practicing Christians.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 15,783 Mod ✭✭✭✭smacl




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,115 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    In matters related to the referendum on the 8th amendment on the 25 May 208 and a statement alleged to have been made by Gemma O'Doherty about Kitty Holland on O'Doherty's website when she was interviewed by John Waters, Hollands SC [Shane English] read out a statement in open court today which he said was made online by O'Doherty about acts of murder O'Doherty alleged were committed by Holland against two of Hollands own children.

    Holland is suing Waters for defamation in relation to the allegations made against her by O'Doherty. Today's hearing was to set dates for the defamation hearing which is now to take place over four [4] days at the end of April next. Waters, who describes himself as an unemployed journalist, pro-life and an opponent of abortion, has entered a full defence in which he denies having published the words complained of and claims that at all times he was exercising his right to free speech. He claims he was not aware that an address by him to the November 2017 annual party conference of Renua Ireland was being recorded and broadcast on line.

    Mention was also made by Mr English during todays hearing of allegations on the same website referencing the Judge hearing todays case and two of the judges brothers. Judge O’Connor advised Mr Waters’ barrister to get instructions from his client in relation to the very serious allegations in relation to the court.

    The report on today's court hearing concerning the journalists is in todays Irish Independent.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,741 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    South America? No, Britain.

    An unprecedented number of women are being investigated by police on suspicion of illegally ending a pregnancy, the BBC has been told.

    Abortion provider MSI says it knows of up to 60 criminal inquiries in England and Wales since 2018, compared with almost zero before.

    Some investigations followed natural pregnancy loss, File on 4 found.

    Pregnancy loss is investigated only if credible evidence suggests a crime, the National Police Chiefs' Council says.

    File on 4 has spoken to women who say that they have been "traumatised" and left feeling "suicidal" following criminal investigations lasting years.

    Speaking for the first time, one woman described how she had been placed under investigation after giving birth prematurely, despite maintaining that she had never attempted an abortion.


    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,955 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Vive la France



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,741 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Vive la revolution

    Fúck this bullshit of tinkering with this catholic constitution piece by piece, get rid of the whole fûcking thing

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,741 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Florida is getting a six-week abortion ban, in effect total

    https://www.irishtimes.com/world/us/2024/04/02/florida-supreme-court-clears-way-for-abortion-ballot-and-six-week-ban/

    But it's also getting a referendum later this year to embed abortion rights in its state constitution. Overturning Roe v. Wade, and court decisions since then which have restricted abortion rights, have already turned out to be counterproductive as the electorates of other states have voted to copperfasten abortion rights.

    Scrap the cap!



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,420 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    Arizona has banned abortion too - but, Lo!, Republicans are up in arms about it.

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/apr/10/arizona-republicans-against-state-abortion-ban



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,741 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Ballot box poison, and it serves them bloody well right.

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,115 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,955 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Seems like AZ has blocked the first attempt to repeal the 1864 abomination. Republicans thought it too soon. New boards linking doesn't seem to like archive.ph. archive.ph zrgE7



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,955 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Oh, and lest we forget, IVF is not decided yet in Alabamastan. There's a 'short-term measure' reducing risk to IVF providers is all.

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/alabama-lawmakers-ivf-protection-bill-vote-rcna141710



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,920 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Growing calls for proposed changes to Ireland's abortion law to be implemented

    Motivated I guess by the appointment of a new taoiseach and the sense that the clock is running out for the current government



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,955 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Bullsht 'counseling services' making de wimmens lives miserable if they think about abortion. RTE nailed 2 of them in an investigation. https://www.rte.ie/news/investigations-unit/2024/0415/1443681-undercover-in-counselling-services-misleading-women-on-abortion/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,741 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Programme is on RTE1 right now (starts on RTE1 +1 at 10:35)

    Good so far and not getting into the usual crapola about whether abortion should be allowed or not. It is allowed, the focus is on whether services are being delivered as they should.

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,741 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    SF joining in now.

    Sinn Féin’s health spokesperson David Cullinane said he is “open” to changes on the 12-week abortion limit.

    He said it is not right that women have to travel abroad to access abortion services but said the 12-week limit needs “further engagement”.

    He called on the three-day waiting period between a woman visiting a GP and having a termination to be scrapped.

    Currently, two doctors need to sign off on an abortion in fatal feotal abnormality cases if they agree the baby would die within 28 days. Mr Cullinane said the 28-day period also should be done away with.

    Okay…

    “I’m very conscious that that 12 weeks was part of the original legislation that went to the people

    Aaaarghhh

    No, we didn't put legislation to the people, we put a constitutional amendment to the people. We voted to allow the Oireachtas to legislate precisely because we did NOT want the legislation surrounding abortion to be set in stone like it was under the 8th. There is no time provision in the constitution and rightly so.

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,342 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Harris questioned today about it.

    Brîd Smith ( of all people !) very capably reading back his previous stance on it which illustrates that he would have considered what is now happening as a " government in dereliction of its duty " ...this his own statement on how legislation should be enacted to support the results of the referendum effectively!

    He then replies with it being put ' to the people ' in the referendum. But as she responded to him , the 3 day wait for an abortion , and 28 day limit for the 2 doctors to sign off on a FFA was never suggested or discussed before the referendum , so it was incorrect to say it was what people voted for .

    Both of those points along with the threat of a 14 year sentence for doctors are what is causing the stifling of abortion services for women in this country .

    Not a fan of hers in general but I am in agreement with her on this .

    Women have fobbed off with this legislation which is ham fisted and ill conceived , unless of course you are a government trying to reduce the effectiveness of legislating for abortion.

    Nobody wants legislation set in stone I agree .

    And it is precisely for this reason that the government need to enact legislative changes based on the review they commissioned , and the report they have sitting on their desks for over a year now .

    Those changes are three years a-waiting , two years delay in the report being commissioned, because of Covid ..fair enough .

    But why has nothing been done about it in the last year ?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,955 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Because the RCC runs the politicians as always. Why has the Tuam forensic investigation not happened? Why are the various fines and penalties not been collected for the Magdalene laundries. All point to one thing.

    Good for TD Smith to rake Harris over the coals a bit. Still, I'm not encouraged anything will change, I don't think there's a groundswell for protest about it.



Advertisement