Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

"Green" policies are destroying this country

1101010111013101510161120

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,500 ✭✭✭howiya


    Its clear you are making up stuff. Your example earlier of a 30 minute bus route becoming a 15 minute service and the frequency doubling as a result of these changes was laughable. There will be no additional services provided directly as a result of these changes. There aren't even dates for implementation of future phases of busconnects and you're suggesting that frequencies will double when these changes are introduced when nobody else is. Surely such a rise in bus capacity would be trumpeted from the rooftops.

    .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,349 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Traffic doesnt evaporate.

    There may be fewer journeys if people get annoyed sitting in traffic. But if those journeys have to be made, they will still happen.

    Nothing short of a congestion charge or genuine car blockades will ease central Dublins traffic, outside of a proper metro system that is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,420 ✭✭✭alias no.9


    There is a huge challenge getting staff for home care packages in the greater Dublin area and the biggest barrier is transport.

    People with care needs somehow haven't figured out that they need to organise themselves at convenient intervals along bus routes, how very inconsiderate of them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,102 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    I gave you a hypothetical example to explain how improved journey time, as a result of improved bus priority, could increase service frequency with the same amount of buses and drivers. You've either chosen to ignore that or you're not intellectually equipped to understand it, either way not my problem, you have the information now, as requested.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,102 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    "Traffic doesn't evaporate" - incorrect, it does and is a well documented phenomenon.

    Wrong again on metro. Metro systems alone do not remove cars, Paris and London (and dozens of other cities) have had extensive metro systems for over a century and all also had chronic car congestion until they took steps to reduce the number of cars using their streets. Regardless of having a metro or not a strong bus network is also required and cannot be provided without taking space from cars and giving it to buses.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,773 ✭✭✭WishUWereHere


    So who is right, RTE or cgcsb?

    Mixed and conflicting information here, and if JD is right, 26 weeks away from enforcement.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,773 ✭✭✭WishUWereHere


    Another thing Howiya ( & this I guess will be the outcome ) eventually thanks to Ryan’s folly, businesses will be moving out of the city centre or shutting down, there won’t be any need for these extra busses, as there will be f’all people wanting to get to the city centre.



  • This content has been removed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,102 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,102 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    You could go to dcc website and look at the plan and eliminate all doubt, Joe Duffy needs clicks and likes



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,102 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    Any evidence of this? Transport models predict increasing number of trips to thw centre and that's what was seen in cities that took on similar measures, Amsterdam, Copenhagen, Oslo etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,500 ✭✭✭howiya


    Its not really to do with Ryan though. He just happened to discuss it on the same day he announced the active travel budget. Its a DCC initiative. Yet others think it'll mean more bus services. The clue is in the name of what he announced. Active travel not public transport.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,500 ✭✭✭howiya


    What information? Where is the announcement re extra bus services? Even now you are saying "could increase service frequency". Could is a maybe. Are they or are they not increasing bus services directly as a result of these changes? The answer is no.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,443 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    I'm no fan of the Greens/Ryan but to say it's "Ryan's folly" is a bit of joke really...

    Plus the fact that whilst some businesses may be affected then there's many more who will move in to take their places.

    Any business closures in the city centre would be more related to cost of rents, security and energy...

    Enabling more efficient Bus services will massively increase footfall in the core city centre because as it is having to compete with private vehicles isn't working well for the Bus companies (who also need to hire more drivers).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,051 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    Firstly, you don't know where I live. But I can tell you my car is parked on the street, I've no back garden, no possibility to have a car charger, opening the door lands me on the footpath and from my window here I can see a few tree tops over the houses cross the road. Also, there's no national PT only the local link service which only passes twice in the morning, and twice in the evening. I definitely have to have a car - 100%.

    Everyone in Dublin has to pay high rent because demand out strips supply (unless you live in one of the many deprived shitholes overrun by wasters). Despite the protestations of all, that rent is being paid. If you want to live in Dublin, you gotta pay higher prices for that. It's a balls, and it shouldn't be like that, but it is the way now and noone has been able to offer up a solution to change it. Cars are and can be expensive to run, but aren't unaffordable. Plenty of cheap cars, with cheap tax and if you go the EV route, you have cheaper driving too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,102 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    The answer is real world (not timetabled) service frequency will increase with the same number of drivers and buses as a direct result of this scheme. Separately there are ongoing efforts to increase service frequency through bus connects and hiring more drivers. I don't know how to make this any simpler for you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,349 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Traffic will reduce if there is a viable alternative or the demand for the journey is removed.

    These bus changes achieve neither, in any meaningful way.

    I would be very confident thst post implementation of these bus gates, Dublin will still rank very poorly in terms of city centre car congestion.

    That will be the evidence of whom is right and whom is wrong here.

    Paris and London have metro populations of 12 million each vs 2 million in Dublin.

    Imagine what their traffic would be like if they both closed their undergrounds...

    An Underground and/or congestion charge is the only way to significantly reduce car traffic inside the canals.

    Anything else is just window dressing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,102 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    You could probably get by with a good ebike, it might be a cheaper option for you. Anyway, nobody is topping you from owning a car if you so wish.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,051 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    I have a bike for leisure purposes, but hasn't been used in a while. Neither am I looking for a cheaper option. And no one, rightly is stopping me nor am I complaining about anyone doing so. Overall, your reply is irrelevant to anything I've said.

    On the possible bus frequency changes, are there tenders out or contracts signed for more buses? Hopefully there is.

    I don't agree that traffic volumes will drop significantly if the changes come in. I'd be more in the camp that other routes will get busier. My thinking being that if the buses that run today aren't being used by motorists, why would there be a sudden switch to them because cars are no longer permitted in a section of the city? Wouldn't those drivers be already using buses to avoid the car congestion?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,349 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Exactly.

    We wont see a huge exodus of car drivers to buses, just because of a few bus gates in the city centre.

    People that choose to use the bus are already doing so.

    Making your bus journey 5 mins faster by virtue of a small bus lane is irrelevant if i already have no intention of getting a bus in the first place.

    If my car journey takes 10 mims longer as a result, it is what it is.

    Its still faster ajd more convenient than the bus.

    I think thats most car drivers perspective. (not my own)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,102 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    Yes there's more buses on the way. "More in the camp that other routes will get busier" so the wrong camp then according to all local and international research on the topic. The adjacent routes are already at max link capacity so they can't get busier.

    why would motorists switch mode? Because the bus will become a faster option for many journeys as a result and cycling will become safer and a much faster option for many journeys.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,102 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    Many people will have the option of a bus, say 5 mins faster than present, or drive, 20 mins longer than present and that switch will happen. Many others will be attracted to cycling their journey because of the added safety and comfort particularly women who are under represented amongst cyclists. Also walking will get a lot quicker, most of the time spent walking from Grafton st to OCS is time waiting for pedestrian lights to go green. Some will decide not to take their journey or drive at a non peak hour. All of the driving routes in Central Dublin are at max capacity already so there is no space for them to get any busier, forcing the traffic to evapourate.

    This has been well documented globally and modelled here already so your prediction of something else happening based on no evidence is fairly meaningless.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,349 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Traffic can always increase. You can model anything. It doesnt result in a universally accepted outcome.

    As I said previously, the proof is in the pudding and I am very confident that the bus gates will not reduce the traffic volumes significantly through the city centre.

    I know plenty of car drivers in Dublin. Not a single one of them has any intention of not using the car as they all have small kids and use it to ferry them around. Ergo, they use it to goto work.

    A lot make cross city journeys from outside the canals(dont travel in a straight line into the city centre) which are journeys that are just not suitable for buses, especially on roads that are 90% shared with the same cars they could be driving.

    The bus gates might reduce the road share to 88%. Big deal. It aint going to add 20 mins to an average car journey.

    And even if it did, it wouldnt stop them driving.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,926 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    A lot of people would probably opt for a substantially longer drive than be stuck on a horribly crowded bus.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,102 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    I'm now hearing that DART+ SW will not require a oral hearing, perhaps due to relative lack of concerns. DART+ W are expecting to be granted their railway order this month. Separately metrolink hearing will get going on the 19th. We may still see contract awards and some prep works before the end of the year on all 3 rail projects which is massive for Dublin, and Ireland.

    It looks like it's going to be a very successful year for green policies which prioritised public transport infrastructure over building more roads and ultimately prioritised people over the oil and automotive industries.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,320 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    ...its not enough, we clearly need a monumental long term rail plan for the entire country, and fast, the current rail plan doesnt go anywhere near enough of what we actually need, increasing cycle infrastructure is great, but its not enough, the nation isnt gonna all of a sudden move from their private car onto bicycles, we clearly need to flood the country with rail over the coming years and decades, in order to fulfill our needs, including and in particular our environmental needs....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,102 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    The all island rail strategy 2050 covers this but is more aspirational and contains no funded projects as of yet.

    Walking and cycling are the core focus of the current transport policy. And yes it is envisaged that a greater number of people will opt for bike than car commuting



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,051 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    Is it due to lack of concerns? Wasn't there some push a while ago to bypass the planning and consultation processes for projects to speed them up to delivery? Which in theory, is a nice plan but that then means citizens can't have a say over what's being built



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,258 ✭✭✭ginger22


    So ye think that a load of trains and busses traversing the country half full is going to save the planet.



Advertisement