Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

Options
1349734983500350235033691

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2,574 ✭✭✭Field east


    The death of Russian soldiers is a NECESSARY evil because they are the core driving force of Putins effort to take over UKr. There are no ifs or buts about Ru dead soldiers. These are the actual people that are advancing into UKr/shooting UKr soldiers /Ukr civilians. So the more the merrier as the saying goes. The way to reduce Ru soldiers deaths is for them to immediately move back to the Ru |Ukr boarder pre 1991 - end of.

    BUT if there was a more humane way of getting Ru to move back to the pre 1991 border- I would be definately on for that



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,339 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    Oh the poor Russian army who volunteered to go Ukraine and commit war crime and atrocities in places like Bucha.


    Spare me.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,878 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    No, it is not quite the only group that matters. No sign of Russia stopping right now whatever words might come out of Putin's mouth, if the Ukrainian military fails, everyone gets the joy of being occupied by the Russian military in regions they capture.

    Your idea of people bravely resisting that and Russia being somehow forced out any time soon by costs imposed by an occupation, when they seem undeterred by ruinous costs they are incurring in this war is a pipedream. For someone who likes to call other people "rubes", it seems idealistic and naive to me. Even if they do get forced out, it will be long after they have done horrible damage.

    Technology heavily favours the occupying power now if you have no qualms or morals at all and are willing to be as brutal as the SS, which the Russian military certainly is on evidence of their behaviour. You think it's like the US in Iraq or even Vietnam or something, it is really not.

    They will use the information to have to weed out anyone remaining in regions they occupy who might resist, and extended families + they will all be cowed, end up in a Russian prison or dead. Thanks to the IT revolution, they will be very efficient at that.

    It is why we are seeing so few dictatorships get toppled these days imo, they don't need many functionaries, propagandists and goons and secret police any more to keep a firm boot on the neck of a large (by comparison) population.

    Post edited by fly_agaric on


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,772 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition


    Unfortunately, because of the policy of expansion the country has followed, the killing of Russian troops has to be welcomed as very good news right now.

    Of course it'd be better if they'd go home, but in the absence of that, them being killed is the next best thing.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,772 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition


    You'd really have to wonder about the state of mind of people who argue the Russian position in the west. I suspect they just enjoy something different happening, at what they see as a safe remove from them.


    In reality the Russian soldiers have been raping women, stealing children and bombing people's homes. They are the personification of evil.


    It is a monstrous campaign that the West (including Ireland) should be doing far more about. Read pages 18 and 19 here https://www.understandingwar.org/sites/default/files/24-210-01%20ISW%20Occupation%20playbook.pdf



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 25,520 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    The Mongolian empire want their land back from Russia :pac:





  • Registered Users Posts: 1,906 ✭✭✭.Donegal.


    Piers Morgan is a strange one. When Russia large scale invaded Ukraine in 2022 he was calling for the west to respond militarily. Now he’s tweeting Trump is right, why should America automatically help nato members. Pay up or pay the price. London oligarchs gave him a Christmas present?



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,801 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Apart from the 800 non US NATO soldiers who died in Afghanistan, I wonder how much that war cost NATO countries (excluding the US)



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,982 ✭✭✭rogber


    Meanwhile Norway's intelligence service, quite likely better informed, takes a very different view:




  • Registered Users Posts: 4,441 ✭✭✭Harika


    Most military experts agree that Russia has the initiative and as long the west, even if you ignore the US, is not pulling its weight and could provide far more and could have done it far earlier. One reason of the failure of the Ukrainian offensive was the military aid delivered too little too late.

    Also EU NATO countries have bigger defense spending than Russia. Cowering behind the US is getting old.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,740 ✭✭✭zv2


    Russia


    “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” — Voltaire



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,428 ✭✭✭macraignil


    I agree with the intelligence services of Norway that the threat from putin to Ukraine and the rest of Europe needs to be taken seriously. While the armed forces of Ukraine are doing a great job of eliminating elements of putin's military they should be getting more help and many sensible country's have committed to continue their support for them and increase the supply of military equipment to help. Just because putin's empire continues to produce weapons and pose a threat does not mean they wont be defeated at some stage and while my post you quote emphasised the destruction of putin's army I in no way wanted to make a claim the job was already done.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,635 ✭✭✭Nermal


    You don't need to make a hypothetical equivalence. There's a real one. We did give away a significant fraction of our territory to an invader.



  • Registered Users Posts: 144 ✭✭Steviemak7


    It was actually the other way round we freed 80% of our territory from the invader.



  • Registered Users Posts: 680 ✭✭✭I.am.Putins.raging.bile.duct


    The Americans, Canadians, and Ukrainians destroyed 22 Russians at the stronghold. 08/23/2023

    Amazing HD footage



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,789 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Lots don't, the paper costs a good bit.

    It was on rip.ie alright though.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,436 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Must have been on the Moscow version of RIP so, I missed it!!! 😂



  • Registered Users Posts: 232 ✭✭IdHidden


    Military and cybersecurity experts from France have reportedly uncovered a network based in Moscow that is actively disseminating propaganda and disinformation across western Europe. The Viginum agency, established in 2021 to identify digital interference by foreign entities attempting to influence public opinion, claims that Russia is setting the stage for a fresh surge in online manipulation leading up to the European elections and other pivotal votes in the current year.

    According to the agency, the online network, dubbed "Portal Kombat," comprises a minimum of 193 sites spreading pro-Russian propaganda supporting the Russian invasion of Ukraine while criticizing the government in Kyiv. The majority of the disinformation is being channelled through social media platforms and messaging apps, with a particular focus on individuals promoting conspiracy theories.


    Full details of the story are here https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/feb/12/french-security-experts-identify-moscow-based-disinformation-network



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,634 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    When Ukraine was getting the upper hand on Russia over a year ago Putin mobilised a few hundred thousand civilians and within weeks sent them to plug the gaps.

    If Russia is getting the upper hand what do Ukraine do? Maintain defence while hoping better weapon deliveries improve their chances? If western jets could prevent the FAB bomb drops that alone would help massively.



  • Registered Users Posts: 211 ✭✭highpitcheric


    Europe needs extra 'life insurance' in addition to NATO - France

    Europe needs another "life insurance" policy in addition to NATO, France's foreign minister has said, following comments by US presidential contender Donald Trump that have cast doubt on his commitment to the alliance.

    Mr Séjourné insisted that it was necessary to build on the European element of NATO and build up its own defence industry and "buy European within the framework of our defence industries and prepare in the event of conflict".



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,305 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    It would be a weird and unexpected piece of fallout from Trump's deranged geopolitics, if it fast-tracked the whole "EU Army" idea that had become distinctly shelved for the past few years. And with that, greater Federalisation. Plenty of European politicians spoke about how America was no longer a dependable ally during the first Trump presidency and that remains true to an extent; Trunp's lunatic comments must surely reignite that sense that Europe needs to coalesce for it to survive and prosper.



  • Registered Users Posts: 211 ✭✭highpitcheric


    Germany and Poland are in the same article, supporting the French conclusion, the three countries named in other articles as the 'Weimar' group/triangle.

    Logical conclusion really when you think about it. Why not have a fallback for if/when Trump has a random ego tantrum. Or the other fella forgets which planet hes on.



  • Registered Users Posts: 253 ✭✭vswr


    Hopefully, but Europe being Europe, it will take until 2026, 2 years into a potential Trump presidency before something gets some actual motion in place when they realise they actually have to, when it's too late.

    MEP's in general seem to attract the fringe extremists from every country, the ones who won't win at home, but are a bit weird and mad enough to take the "we'll stick it to Europe on your behalf" vote, because in General people think of Europe as this potential overlord that they don't want.

    This results in a non conducive situation the Taoiseach et al arguing one side, with our democratically elected MEP's who are meant to be our European voice, arguing the polar opposite. Multiply that by 30 odd states and you have a clusterfuck.



  • Registered Users Posts: 211 ✭✭highpitcheric


    Hamstrung by nato and UK in the past. Brexit helped with that.

    But its not just Macron now. Scholz and the Polish lad (not typing it) on the same hymn sheet now.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement