Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Hamas strike on Israel - mod warning in OP updated 19/10/23

1624625627629630781

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,332 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    1947/48 doesn’t matter anymore in my opinion. It’s an irrelevance.


    But assuming it’s not an irrelevance, the 6% won the war and won every major flashpoint in the region….for 75 years. And still the Arab side think it’s peace treaties that will get them no where. The war is a catastrophe but all loss of life in the war since maybe 1980 is a catastrophe. Because it was all needless and pointless since the war’s outcome was fixed since around that time or earlier.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85,278 ✭✭✭✭Overheal




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,918 ✭✭✭SeanW



    I do believe so. It's no a co-incidence IMO that both Russia and Hamas are allies of Iran, and that Iran is funnelling weapons to both for the explicit purpose of use against civilians in Western-style democracies. Nor that the 7th of October is Putler's birthday. Nor that there have been meetings directly between Russian and Hamas leadership. Nor that this attack has successfully divided Western attention from Russia's genocidal war in Ukraine - something I am certain Hamas would have understood and taken into account as an Iranian puppet.

    Even if you don't like Israel, intellectual consistency requires recognition that it's in the same position as Ukraine, Guyana, South Korea, Taiwan etc, with each to some degree sharing a common, unified enemy.

    The 1947 UN Partition plan called for mostly worthless desert to be given to the new Jewish state. Much of that 55% comprises of the Negev desert, which was virtually uninhabited. Again, the founders of Israel accepted the '47 partition plan (even if there were some reservations).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85,278 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Can you apply the "intellectual consistency" doctrine of yours to Israel's open-face plans to ethnically cleanse the Gaza Strip? Can you apply it and recognize what's happening as genocide or will we get another hand wringing about population density per square kilometer?

    https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/israels-far-right-plots-a-new-gaza-without-palestinians-8563a08d



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,043 ✭✭✭circadian






  • Why don't Hamas just give up? And why don't Palestinians ever criticise Hamas? If Hamas just surrendered and freed the hostages, this war would be over.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,668 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    The war might end, the apartheid state wouldn't, the stealing of homes/land wouldn't, the oppression of the Palestinian people wouldnt, the kidnapping/jailing of innocent men, women and children wouldn't.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,633 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    Muslims believe in a good afterlife and often don't view death as a bad thing.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,668 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    More israeli scumbaggery


    Hospital in Khan Yunis bombed killing one person.


    It's genocide




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,416 ✭✭✭chewed


    Yeah but there were was probably Hamas in there somewhere 😐️



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,340 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    And you didn't address a single point I made.

    The vast majority of people do not support Israel in this conflict. they see 30k civilians dead and are disgusted. Likewise they don't support Hamas. they see the attack that Hamas committed and are disgusted.

    In a bigger picture, over a longer time frame I'd say most Irish people are pro palestinian. They want to see an end to israeli apartheid and occupation.

    At the moment there are bombs dropping in Gaza. They are dropping every day. Every day more and more civilians are being killed indiscriminately. Every day more and more people starve because Israel blocks aid from entering Gaza. people see this and are disgusted by the ongoing relentless killing of Gazans. And they want it to stop. And when they say this, there's a certain cohort that go "what about the hostages".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,340 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    No. Whatabouttery is a distraction. Whatabouttery is about trying to excuse the faults of one side by pointing at the faults of the other. Rather than addressing an accusation, it's about making a counter accusation. So I say israel should stop bombing civilians and someone goes "What about the hostages". Yes, hostages should be released, but by bringing up the hostages, it's removing the focus from the bombing of civilians. Or it's trying to justify blowing up a family of Palestinian civilians because some other people kidnapped some people.

    Another example.... In the north when someone brings up an IRA atrocity, the IRA's defenders will bring up something that a unionist paramilitary did. Yes, they're all part of the same conflict but just because one side did something horrible, doesn't detract from the horrible things the other side did. The IRA are no less to blame for the killing of innocent people because some unionists also killed some innocent people.

    I have no issues calling out both Israel, more specifically the israeli government, and Hamas for their killing of innocent civilians.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,043 ✭✭✭circadian


    Gonna assume the answer is no. Between these claims and the idea October 7th was a birthday present for Putin, I think some people should really assess their sources and quality of the content being presented.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,668 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Should have been done weeks ago.


    The leaders of Canada, Australia and New Zealand called for an immediate humanitarian ceasefire in Gaza





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,033 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    Palestine is also the West Bank

    So by extension Bibi and his ilk is Israel using your logic as he has dominated Israeli politics for decades and been leader for much of that time

    This is the guy that was happy to prop up Hamas to stifle the PA. Of course this assertion is just as inaccurate as you saying all Palestinians are in favour of Hamas. Many of the civilians killed didn't vote for Hamas .

    The few that have tried to speak out against Hamas have been severely dealt with. It's easy for us to say Palestinians should just depose of them from the comfort of Ireland. This is not to say they don't have support in In Gaza, just as Irgun terrorists had support among Israelis, some of them went on to become leaders in the state of Israel.


    As we see also in more recent times the Likud and far right terrorists obviously have enough support in Israel to be in government. The terrorists on both sides need to be removed. You won't agree with that characterisation of course, but far right ministers have excused and encouraged Settlers terrorism in the West Bank. If they had their way the carnage in Gaza would be even worse



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,033 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    My mistake. I see that now you referring to another poster when you agreed with Iscreamkone. I agree the likes of Iran, Saudi Arabia are not pleasant regimes. Objections to US foreign Policy over the years doesn't mean you should throw in your lot with their enemies



  • Registered Users Posts: 202 ✭✭Toeuptony


    The only innocents in Gaza are children under the age of 4. I guess that explains a lot of the IDF actions.

    There is something seriously wrong with the Israeli psyche.




  • Registered Users Posts: 202 ✭✭Toeuptony


    They have criticised Hamas in the past. Maybe this was partly a reason why Hamas launched the Oct 7th attacks when they did, as they saw their grip on power being impacted.

    https://www.timesofisrael.com/protests-against-hamas-reemerge-in-the-streets-of-gaza-but-will-they-persist/

    But to say that the general population all support (or supported at least) Hamas is another lie that is being trotted out continuously.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,408 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    Well, interestingly, whenever the actual Palestinian populace is polled they indicate strong support for Hamas.

    For example, here's the results of a poll from mid-December:

    1. 44% in the West Bank said they supported Hamas, up from just 12% in September. In Gaza, the militants enjoyed 42% support, up slightly from 38% three months ago.
    2. 57% of respondents in Gaza and 82% in the West Bank believe Hamas was correct in launching the October attack
    3. Overall, 88% want Abbas to resign

    So presenting Hamas as an entity that somehow stands apart from the 'ordinary Palestinian' and does not represent their wishes is inaccurate. Hamas enjoys broad support among Palestinians.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,408 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    Given the results of the above and other polling, if an election was held in Palestine (unlikely as that seems), Hamas would win in a landslide.

    That is a somewhat uncomfortable truth.



  • Registered Users Posts: 202 ✭✭Toeuptony


    I responded to a post asking "why don't Palestinians ever criticise Hamas?". My post indicated that they have criticised them in the past, in spite of the inherent dangers in doing so.

    You responded to my post showing roughly 50% favourability ratings for Hamas in Gaza, which corresponds with my post and also addresses the original question.

    You then finished up with "So presenting Hamas as an entity that somehow stands apart from the 'ordinary Palestinian' and does not represent their wishes is inaccurate.", which is not something that I attempted to do.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,408 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    Good, so we are in agreement that Hamas enjoys broad support among Palestinians.

    What is interesting is the level of distrust and disdain they have for the PA. That is Arafat's legacy.



  • Registered Users Posts: 202 ✭✭Toeuptony


    The IDF and the satanic right wing Israeli govt has strong support among Israelis. Evil organisations being supported by their brain washed supporters is not as much of a gotcha as you think it is.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,408 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    I don't think it's any kind of 'gotcha'. I think it's a fact that is worthy of analysis and discussion (although I do appreciate the internet doesn't place great value on either of those!).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,332 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    The IDF protect Israel though (through brutal callous and illegal means). Hamas don’t.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 202 ✭✭Toeuptony


    The IDF damage Israel too, as the court of international opinion is showing that Israel is very reputationally damaged by the current actions of the IDF.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,033 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    It's not that hard to understand if we look back to the time of Irgun; terrorists,rightly or wrongly, have their supporters. Lest we forget the terrorist Yitzshak Amir became Prime Minister of Israel. He never once apologised for the murder of the Nordic diplomat either. The only difference between Irgun and Hamas is that at least Irgun were secular terrorists, but they both engaged in terrorism. The only way to make Hamas less popular is through a deal. Israel, even if they defeat Hamas, won't have long term security in the absence of a political solution. The other Yitzshak (Rabin) realised that but unfortunately it cost him his life due to "softies" like Bibi and his pals.



  • Registered Users Posts: 72 ✭✭NoMoreDonegalTuesdays


    Well done Israel. The killing of this child and tens of thousands of others like her must surely be sweet revenge for the Holocaust. Israel should write the names of Holocaust victims on every indiscriminate bomb they drop.

    "From Auschwitz With Love". "The best way to pay tribute to the victims of a past genocide is to genocide others in their name". "It's what they would have wanted."

    These are the most crass, cynical distortions of history that genuinely guide every monstrous act Israel commits. Genocidal monsters invoking the Holocaust to inflict another holocaust on somebody else.

    Maybe they can also write on the bombs the names of the fictional beheaded babies on October 7th they made up to crush dissenting voices against this genocide.

    This is 7 year old Sidra, the cousin of my wife. The impact of the Israeli missile was so powerful it flung her out, leaving her mutilated body dangling from the ruins of the destroyed building in Rafah 48 hours ago. My wife’s aunt Suzan, her husband Fouzy Hassouna, two of their sons, Muhammad and Karam, Karam's wife Amouna and her three children (7-year-old twins Sidra and Suzan, and 15-month-old Malik) were all killed. The family had been displaced from the north of Gaza and took shelter in Rafah. We will be relentless until those responsible brought to justice.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,668 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,408 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    There's Security (big) and security (small) though.

    Big Security = 'no one will start a full-on war with us' and actually on that measure, Israel is probably more secure now than at any point in its history. It would be even more secure if it could defang Iran, who is its major strategic foe. Old adversaries like the Arab states are no longer a strategic threat.

    Small Security = 'our citizens can go about their lives without fearing terrorism' (suicide bombings, stabbings, shootings etc). Up until 07-Oct, Israel probably thought they were more secure on this measure too.

    Hamas is somewhere in between the two.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 202 ✭✭Toeuptony


    The first casualty of war is truth, even when the war is taking place elsewhere.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85,278 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    What an callous, if not hateful thing to say.

    Do all those children bombed to death have a religious belief system I wonder or a concept of the afterlife.



  • Registered Users Posts: 72 ✭✭NoMoreDonegalTuesdays


    Sure to hell with any kind of Palestinian security. To hell with any kind of Palestinian existence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,033 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    Yes. They have been secure for a long time in terms of conventional war. This is the reason the likes of Iran has not gone to war directly with Israel as they know they are on a hiding to nothing. In terms of asymmetrical warfare they may never achieve 100 per cent security from external actors( unless there is a new government in Iran), but they can with Palestinians if a two state solution can be achieved between the PA and a moderate Government in Israel. With Hamas and the current Israeli Government it will never happen-the one thing they share in common is they both don't give a damn about Palestinian civilians.



  • Registered Users Posts: 202 ✭✭Toeuptony


    Great comment here from Lula, taken from the Guardian live blog:

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2024/feb/15/middle-east-crisis-live-rafah-offensive-ceasefire-talks-israel-gaza-latest-news?page=with:block-65ce2d128f08de9c33d131ea#block-65ce2d128f08de9c33d131ea

    Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, speaking to the Arab League, said Brazil had condemned the Hamas attack on Israeli civilians on Oct. 7, but he added that the Israel’s response was “disproportional and indiscriminate” and unacceptable.

    “The killing must be stopped,” the Brazilian leader said, adding Palestine should be recognized as a sovereign state and admitted to the United Nations as a full member, and he called for reform of the U.N. Security Council.

    “The multilateral institutions that were created to help solve these problems do not work, which is why Brazil is committed to making the necessary changes in global governance bodies, and we hope to count on Egypt’s support,” he said to reporters alongside Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

    Lula said the permanent Security Council should be expanded and its veto powers abolished. “It is the permanent members of the Security Council that foment wars,” he said.

    Brazil has supported South Africa’s case brought before the International Court of Justice against the Israeli military campaign in Gaza, he added.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,408 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    Right. So any talk of reviving a two-state solution is bordering on delusional really. As neither side wants it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 202 ✭✭Toeuptony


    The US pressured Canada (and I presume other nations) to suspend the UNWRA funding after the ICJ ruling.

    Maybe this coming to light is part of the reason that Canada called for a ceasefire last night.



  • Registered Users Posts: 202 ✭✭Toeuptony


    More shocking* revelations

    https://euromedmonitor.org/en/article/6153/%E2%80%9CThey-brought-Israeli-civilians-to-watch-our-nude-torture%E2%80%9D:-IDF-torture-of-Palestinian-prisoners-is-turned-into-entertainment-for-Israeli-viewers

    "The Israeli army introduced groups of Israeli civilians into detention centres and prisons holding Palestinian prisoners and detainees from the Gaza Strip, permitting the civilians to witness torture crimes against the detainees, with many allowed to film them on their own phones.

    Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor received shocking testimonies from recently released Palestinian prisoners and detainees, in which they reported that the Israeli army invited a number of Israeli civilians during their interrogation sessions to witness torture and inhumane treatment, to which they were deliberately subjected in the presence of the civilians."

    *actually not that shocking when you think about it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85,278 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    And to think there was self-righteous indignation in this thread when it was pointed out that all Israelis of military age could possibly be considered combatants when everyone age 18 to iirc 40, is drafted into reserve and required to perform so many years of military service in the IDF




  • Site Banned Posts: 20,685 ✭✭✭✭Weepsie


    I think you're thinking of a different word. Shill isn't a word with any sort of antisemitic meaning and its origin never was. You're thinking of another sh word, but good to know where youre leaning.


    Shill was a word for any sort of confidence person, or someone who was being a patsy in a carnival game.


    That the fact people have taken offence to this, and likely reported it , highlights some of the ignorance being visited upon this thread.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 72 ✭✭NoMoreDonegalTuesdays



    Every single person in every single centre of political and economic and media power and pressure that is propping up Israel knows full well Israel is committing a genocide.

    Most of them are scared shltless of saying so for fear of being smeared as anti-semitic by Israel's evil propaganda machine. The ones that aren't scared just like the genocide.

    It's as simple as that.

    Any line from any western country that goes against Israeli propaganda in any way is always phrased in the most timid, tepid, feeble, apologetic language. It's pathetic.

    The Israelis are genocidal bastards inflicting a holocaust and Netanyahu, Ben Gvir, Smotrich and all the rest of them, and their sick, bloodlusting propagandists like Eylon Levy would spend the rest of their lives behind bars in The Hague if there was any justice in this world.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 447 ✭✭thereiver


    Israel is vulnerable to attacks by Iran proxy groups which have access to unlimited free missiles and drones drones are cheap and they are getting more dangerous as tech advances

    Ukraine is almost out of standard artillery shells so they are making more drones to attacks Russian tanks and ships

    Hamas will rebuild and regroup even if it takes years

    If Israel wants to wipe out Hamas they would have to kill every male over 16 in Gaza are they ready to do that?

    Gen z and eu country's are turning against Israel because of their extreme attacks on civilians

    That's not a great result

    Even is Hamas is wiped out there will still missile attacks on Israel from other terrorist groups meanwhile Iran is building nuclear weapons

    The state of Israel depends on America for military support to exist

    This war could leave Israel in a more dangerous situation in the long term with reduced support from Eu country's and American politicans

    Commiting genocide against a large civilian population and limiting food and water supplys is not a viable political decision in the long term



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,668 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    70% of homes - DAMAGED

    84% of health facilities - ATTACKED

    90% of the population - DISPLACED

    80% of the worlds starving - IN GAZA


    Yeah, it's genocide





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,236 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Fascinating to see that politicians in the West know full well (privately) that the claims against UNRWA are total BS and have come about because of pressure from the Jewish lobby and Israel's allies in the US.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,668 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    "Its early hours of this morning & a tank shell has just hit Al Nasser Hospital in Khan Yunis"

    It's genocide





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,668 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Hamas might have been using that ambulance so we blew it up when it was on the way to rescue a 6 year old girl



    Who we also murdered


    It's genocide.





  • Registered Users Posts: 1,342 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    1 month prior to Oct 7, support for Hamas is at 12%

    2 months into the genocidal campaign, multiple war crimes later, families shredded, cemeteries bulldozed, population beginning to starve etc., Palestinian support for Hamas went up.

    What did you think would happen? Palestinian support for the IDF would have gone up?

    Do you think it conceivable that support was simply evidence they hoped Hamas would be able to stem the genocidal tide?

    And putting out those numbers as evidence of "broad support for Hamas" does not reflect the full article you posted:

    "Shikaki said that Gaza residents are more critical of Hamas than those in the West Bank, that support for Hamas typically spikes during periods of armed conflict before leveling out, and that even now most Palestinians do not back the militant group."

    So even by your own quoted source, no, there is no broad support for Hamas.



  • Registered Users Posts: 663 ✭✭✭Fr D Maugire


    History repeating itself. Lots of posters use the UN 1947 Resolution as a justification for Israel, but how many realise there was huge pressure put on several countries to vote in favour of the resolution. US president Truman, said he had never witnessed anything like the pressure put on the US Government and Senators to approve the resolution. In turn, the US coerced several countries into voting the same with a veiled threat to withhold aid, including on European countries like France who were recepient of aid post WW2.

    Ironically the Soviet Union had their own agenda, by favoring the creation of Israel, they were hoping to drive a wedge between the British and their Arab allies, they also had a belief that Israel might become a Socialist state whom they could sell arms to as the Czechs did. Of course all the Soviet satellite counties voted the same way including Ukraine which despite being part of the USSR had a separate vote.



  • Site Banned Posts: 20,685 ✭✭✭✭Weepsie


    THE UNITED NATIONS PLAN OF PARTITION FOR PALESTINE REVISITED: ON THE ORIGINS OF PALESTINE’S INTERNATIONAL LEGAL SUBALTERNITY by

    ARDI IMSEIS* is worth a read on the subject



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 663 ✭✭✭Fr D Maugire


    It was the British who backed Zionism and the creation of a Jewish homeland in Palestine through the Balfour declaration, which is why they wanted the Mandate for Palestine, yet by 1937 realised it was not workable and indeed abstained from the UN resolution vote on Palestine. Some turnaround. Yet that was always the inevitable outcome. It was not like they had not been warned. The King/Crane commission conducted by the Americans had very clearly highlighted the issues and rejected the idea of a Jewish homeland in Palestine as early as 1920. Of course the British/French had zero interest in the King/Crane findings.

    It's a bit like a company wanting to implement some idea, a feasibility study telling them it is a bad idea that will produce disastrous results, the company ploughing on ahead regardless and the whole thing turning to **** exactly as predicted.



Advertisement