Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Madame Web

«13

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,217 ✭✭✭TheIrishGrover


    Sweet JESUS that looked terrible. I want 3 mins of my life back. The "acting". The voiceover. I've seen less wooden acting in Pinocchio! That thing about researching spiders in the Amazon is going to be a meme by the end of the week. "My mom was in the Amazon researching spiders when she took an arrow to the knee"

    That was one of the worst things I've seen this year... And I've seen half of Morbius

    As you said, it looks like a (Expensive-but-almost-immediately-cancelled) TV show. Something that would have been on the CW back in the day.

    That. Was, AWFUL.... Where's that Zack Snyder Netflix thing trailer again?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,272 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson




  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 40,537 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Saw the trailer at Cineworld a few days ago. Nothing alluring about it at all. I'd say they're scraping the barrel now but that was the same impression I got with Morbius.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    The whole concept was always doomed from the start: Venom kinda fluked it with a fairly unique Odd Couple approach that yielded box office success, but Mobius really whiffed it spectacularly. This and Kraven only underlining what cynical, misguided vehicles they all are, ultimately.

    Though at least the trailer has yielded some unintentional comedy with its awful appearance and hilariously bad dialogue.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 40,537 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    I didn't even know there was a Kraven film. I go to the cinema a lot so that's pretty bad.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I think it was pushed back? Honestly I don't think anyone cares either way and maybe Sony are realising that themselves.

    If this also flops ala Mobius Kraven might get quietly shoved onto digital, and nothing of value will be lost. Then perhaps these villains can actually get used properly lol



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,559 ✭✭✭✭CastorTroy


    Wasn't Keaton's Vulture moved to this universe at the end of one of the previous movies?



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Yup, at the end of Morbius and it was a dreadful scene where Keaton didn't even show his face (probably cos it cracked up saying the terrible dialogue)




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,217 ✭✭✭TheIrishGrover


    God all these spider-adjacent Sony movies are coming across as the hollywood mid-budget equivalent of a Roger Corman move: Hey, if we don't use these characters, we lose them so let's chuck out a bargain-basement movie until the rights are worth more.

    Venom was knowingly fun. But Morbius? Jesus. That Kraven looks cheap and silly while still being humourless.

    And this? It looks like Charlie's Spider-angels: "Hey, girls can do action too! Look!" And all the patronising sexism that goes with that. Remember that god-awful scene in Avengers? Note, I'm not even describing the scene or which of the four Avengers films I am referring to but we ALL know which one I'm on about.

    Now compare this with the last episode of season 2 of The Mandalorian. A show that has its own faults but when the cavalry arrives and it's all women you think "Oh that's right, never occurred to me that they were all women." It wasn't pandering, it wasn't patronising, it just was what it was.

    Both this and Kraven look straight-to-streamer fodder/filler. Simply to add another 4-5 hours of content to wherever they turn up. With minimal promotion and impact.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    And this? It looks like Charlie's Spider-angels: "Hey, girls can do action too! Look!" And all the patronising sexism that goes with that. Remember that god-awful scene in Avengers? Note, I'm not even describing the scene or which of the four Avengers films I am referring to but we ALL know which one I'm on about.

    I see that now that you say it, but my main takeaway was more Sony's anxiety to shout at viewers, "look look, this film definitely has Spider People in it this time!" where even the villain appears to be dressed in a (slightly cheap looking) Spidey suit of sorts. Maybe with the Spider-Verse films doing such a good job at bringing well-known Spider People from the comics into the mainstream like Gwen Stacey or Miguel O'Hara, they figured given they have a bunch of minor live-action ones themselves - why not use 'em? Albeit extremely tangentially.

    IIRC, Sony are/were also trying to get a "Silk" movie produced, being another notable Peter NotParker. And if you've no idea who Silk is: she's Cindy Moon, a girl who just so happened to get bitten by the same spider that Peter was bitten by, was raised in captivity & secret for years and I think was a bit of an antagonist for a while. Oh and because "comic books" she had an uncontrollable lust for Peter Parker due to her spider powers. That part will probably get shelved for the adaptation.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,730 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    I honestly don't know if it's a joke or not, but I saw on Twitter that Madame Web will feature a twist on the usual "With great power comes great responsibility", and will instead be:

    “When you take on the responsibility, great power will come.”

    Which would be such an idiotic idea and isn't even a laughably-bad and needlessly-wordy rephrasing of the line like Martin Sheen in The Amazing Spider-Man "He believed that if you could do good things for other people, you had a moral obligation to do those things! That's what's at stake here. Not choice. Responsibility."

    "When you take on the responsibility, great power will come", essentially means "If you do good things, you'll be rewarded by getting powers!"



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 40,537 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Agreed. It's hard to see what the point is. You could almost say that of Spiderman himself now that he's been shorn from the MCU. I know it's to do with the rights but it's still crap for the fans. Not sure how much longer Holland fancies the role since his value as an actor has skyrocketed by now.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,217 ✭✭✭TheIrishGrover


    Any worse than?: "Ezekiel Sims, he was in the Amazon with my mom when she was researching spiders right before she died."

    Basil Exposition in Austin Powers



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,730 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    I'd say yes. That Amazon line is bad just because it's awfully written, clunky, and hilariously bad exposition.

    The other line I posted, it's like they tried to do their own version of the iconic "With great power comes great responsibility" line, but ended up completely changed the meaning of it to mean almost the exact opposite.

    The original line is about having a moral responsibility to use your powers for good. Their version of the line means you should do good things so you are rewarded with powers.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Here's a funny little tidbit I only just stumbled across while listening to a podcast: apparently only days after the first trailer for this appeared, Dakota Johnson changed her agent.

    Of course it could have been entirely coincidental on Johnson's part, but it wouldn't be the first time an actor hasn't seen the final product 'til the rest of us did - and was as shocked as well.

    ... Johnson’s conspicuous jump from WME to CAA in November — just days after a baffling first trailer debuted — raised industry eyebrows, along with a razz in her recent “SNL” monologue describing the film as “like if AI generated your boyfriend’s perfect movie.”




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,878 ✭✭✭✭gmisk




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,217 ✭✭✭TheIrishGrover


    Shocked, I say. SHOCKED!!!!!*




    *Not shocked



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    If this bombs as spectacularly as it threatens to do, I wonder where that leaves Kraven; it's still on course for August (I think?), while IIRC Venom 3 is due November; Venom's probably safe enough given those movies have been the only ones to scrape by - but Kraven suddenly looks an even stinkier prospect.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,730 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    It's still insane that half these films ever got the greenlight at all. So desperate to use the Spider-Man rights to make anything remotely linked or referential to Spider-Man, without using Spider-Man, and completely ignoring the fact that what people like in the Spider-Man universe.... is SPIDER-MAN!

    Why they didn't just say to Marvel to go make whatever Spider-Man stuff they want and include whatever Spider-Man characters they want, and just give Sony a cut of the profits, is beyond me. I mean Christ.... Morbius and Kraven? They'd be low on the list for who people want as Spider-Man villians never mind having their own "anti-hero" films.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I've seen it confirmed that the now ruthlessly mocked line about "He was in the Amazon with my mom when she was researching spiders just before she died" isn't actually in the final cut of the film, so you'd have to presume Sony had it pulled out of desperate panic over the crazy amount of bad press it created. Bit of a bolting-horse & stable situation mind you.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 40,537 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    I'm a lot better at resisting my urge to go to the cinema for its own sake. This looks absolutely abysmal. It appears that I missed out on nothing by skipping Morbius so I'll pass on this as well. Even the Venom films are pretty bad and the bar isn't exactly high.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,896 ✭✭✭Hande hoche!


    Reminds me of the rebellion line from the Rogue one trailer, wasn't in the final product. Sony seems to have awful luck with some of their decisions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,730 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Dakota Johnson was asked about the line in an interview and what was her opinion on it going viral.

    “Why did that go viral? Somebody brought this up, and I have no idea what it’s about,” Johnson said in an interview with HuffPost UK. “But isn’t any sentence out of context…out of context? What a silly thing….’He was in the Amazon researching spiders with my mom before she died.’ That seems like a basic storyline to me, but maybe I’m just underneath it.”




  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 30,019 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    I appreciate Johnson’s candid press tour, and honestly I think she’s a pretty good actress with plenty of charisma on screen who just has pretty awful luck with the projects she settles on. Outside a handful of films like The Lost Daughter it’s a fairly lousy run of films, but it’s usually the film’s fault rather than hers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,592 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    Of these recent spidey-spinoffs, Kraven's the only one i've been actively interested in. Always liked the character, and it works well as its own standalone story. Decent casting with Aaron Taylor-Johnson and Russell Crowe, and the director's got a great record as well (made Margin Call, All is Lost, and A Most Violent Year). The awfulness of Madame Web (seriously who the fck thought anyone wanted a Madame Web movie?!) and Morbius might well tarnish its reputation long before it even hits the screen though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,878 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Currently 23 percent on rotten tomatoes ouch.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Worst case scenario I suppose is Kraven gets a couple of weeks in the cinemas then turns on one of the streaming platforms, fast-tracked to try and recoup "something" through an early transition to digital.

    I wonder what Marvel/Disney make of all this; you'd have to imagine the internal memos and whatsapp are spicy when it comes to Sony's little attempted universe of "villains".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,878 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Ah sure who knows with Kraven the hunter, I thought the trailer made it look pretty awful but in a fun way kind of like Venom.

    Though I will say Venom has decent name recognition, I don't think many people outside of more hardcore fans would know much about Kraven, in fairness same goes for Madame Web.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,854 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Kraven looked at least it has more purpose and energy I'll admit; not to a degree I'd pay money to see it in the cinema, but definitely had more "something". Madame Web was always off to a rough start as something brazenly cynical given anyone passingly familiar with the character would know her as a wizened, blind lady in a chair - and someone who decidedly does not look like Dakota Johnson.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,843 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    So I just seen this. My god was the first hour + a slog. Its not perfect. Some terrible CGI in it some terrible dull and wooden acting and the story is not great either but the last 30 mins or so minutes are brilliant and worth it for all that.

    I woukd give it a 5 out of 10. Its an average film at best.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Regional Abroad Moderators Posts: 11,106 Mod ✭✭✭✭Fysh


    The response to this, as with Morbius, has me wondering how Sony keep green-lighting this sort of derivative-looking guff when there's so many other options they could go for. One that could really work without needing a huge budget would be a "Superior Foes of Spider-Man" vehicle - it's essentially a heist/crime flick that happens to starsome second-rate Spider-Man villains who team up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,217 ✭✭✭TheIrishGrover


    Not all heroes wear capes. Thanks for taking this for the team.... Still think I'll give it a miss though :)



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    One that could really work without needing a huge budget would be a "Superior Foes of Spider-Man" vehicle - it's essentially a heist/crime flick that happens to starsome second-rate Spider-Man villains who team up.

    See, your fundamental flaw is to forget that this entire "shared universe" is creatively bankrupt from its very foundation: Sony clinging on to that remaining suite of IPs out of dogged insistence they might have value, like the hoarder hoping their garage full of bric-a-brac might one day yield megabucks - while the rest of us just see junk.

    And because of that pathological mania, they're not going to take any risks on the properties - that lack of risk ironically resulting in output nobody wants to watch 'cos its flavourless porridge - while simple greed means your team-up idea would only result in one movie; Sony instead preferring to spread already thin gruel far past credibility.

    Like I said I'd love to know what Marvel make of these movies, and if there are a bunch of Spider-Man sequel treatments just itching to make use of Kraven et al but can't 'cos Sony are holding on for dear life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,730 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    From what I know of the comics, I think the Julie Carpenter Spiderwoman (played by Sydney Sweeney) takes over as Madame Web from the old woman, and she goes around in a red leather jacket and red sunglasses. So I guess that was the style they wanted to go with Dakota Johnson's version rather than the old woman.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,843 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Your welcome and your right. Much better to just stream it. Just watch the beginning and the last 30 minutes at the end and that is all you need to see. The rest was rubbish.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,559 ✭✭✭✭CastorTroy


    Do Sony have the rights to all Spider characters or is it only the older ones? I know Spider-Gwen was in the Spider-Verse movies but then animation has different rules I think. Though I think the planned Silk series is from Sony as well.

    I guess that answers my own question.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,492 ✭✭✭brianregan09


    Yeah sadly they own all Spider Related characters



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    At this rate, not for much longer you'd wonder. This is getting absolutely kerb stomped; the box office might be something to behold.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,492 ✭✭✭brianregan09


    With the success of the Spiderverse films they're not letting go anytime soon



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,611 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    What exactly were they trying to make?


    Morbius was a far better film which is damning all in itself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,559 ✭✭✭✭CastorTroy


    Slightly off-topic but since I mentioned Silk, reports that they've now scrapped the writers' room for the series after Madame Web's performance and plan to skew to a more male audience.

    So many questions...




  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Is the implication that Madame Web was "one for the chicks?" cos yikes.

    And yeah, talking about rejigging Silk for a male audience invites so many questions.

    Also also, what does Gwen Stacey have to do to get her own live action movie? She's clearly popular in the comics, was also thus in the Spider Verse, but instead we're getting Silk? The one who was written as genetically horny for Peter?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,611 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55,571 ✭✭✭✭Mr E


    I went to this last night, more out of curiousity than anything.

    I went in with really low expectations (to a screen with about 10 seats taken out of 200), but it was definitely a watchable 6/10.

    Not the worst superhero movie I've ever seen by a long shot.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Not the worst superhero movie I've ever seen by a long shot.

    Out of curiousity, what would you reckon the worst would be?

    Ha. I do think there might be some crisis management going on here cos the Sony SpiderVerse is flat lining if not dead.

    15 million dollars domestic too, opening weekend. Bad word of mouth will see that drop you'd imagine so it may not even make its 80 million budget back!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55,571 ✭✭✭✭Mr E


    @pixelburp Thor Love and Thunder, The Eternals and Thor 2 for starters.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,171 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Disagree on all of those - Madame Web is far, far worse. The only way I can see someone coming to that perspective is because expectations going in to this one were so, so low compared to the other ones on that list.

    The movie is watchable only in the sense of completely turning off a person's brain and being interested/enjoy the car crash that is happening in front of you. To do that you need to ignore a never ending list of plot holes, things that just make no sense, and pointless shoehorned spider-man nods. I actually saw it in a pretty full theatre and there were active groans throughout and laughter during what was supposed to be serious moments due to the terrible lines. It is an absolute waste of the cast and the trailer implies a much more interesting story that we never see.

    When this was announced I wondered how they'd make it work with the character and it just doesnt. It isn't the worst movie I've ever seen - that online talk is hyperbolic - but a few days later I cannot think of a single positive moment in the movie.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,843 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Thir 2 is a brilliant move and probably the best Thir Movie. Now if you had of said Thor 1 I might agree but not with Thor 2 .

    Thor Love and Thunder while not perfect was a lot better than this rubbish film.

    No idea about the other film have not seen it but heard it was rubbish.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,854 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    why didnt they just make a female Spiderman movie starring Sweeney? it would have made a morbillion dollars


    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Advertisement
Advertisement