Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

Options
1350035013503350535063691

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 12,401 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Same conversations about Bakhmut.

    I'd love Avdiivka to resist and stand, but it's the same thing with Bakhmut the previous year. Russia throws everything, excluding the kitchen sinks they stole at it, and eventually overwhelm the UAF positions with sheets numbers. And with the republicans In USA acting like cnuts, ammo shortage is a worrying thing.

    All Eyes On Rafah



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,205 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    Watching that, either weather conditions have deteriorated significantly or they're managing to hit ships much further out at sea. Kudos to the drone operators, keeping those little things heading in the right direction in those waves looks like no easy feat!



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,740 ✭✭✭zv2


    They seem to be weaving around to avoid fire. There's another video on Twit showing it in the distance, exploding. Very foggy weather. 87 sailors on board.


    “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” — Voltaire



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,305 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    In the absence of your previously assumed most-reliable ally giving you weapons ... maybe there's some canniness on display here that should give us hope, not despair the tide is turning: ie, the Ukrainians' apparent switch to basically bleed Russia dry through drone-strokes on oil production, the sinking of its navy, alongside the perennial strategy of bumping off the conscripts and dregs manning the trenches; 'cos by all accounts Russia seems to have no effective response to the drones ATM and while Washington tries to work around the Cult of MAGA gumming up basic legislative momentum, Ukraine can just chip away at the fringes. It's clearly a concerted effort when you look at the sheer volume of attacks on assets within Russian soil - I suppose the only question would be: how substantial to Moscow's overall logistics these attacks amount to?

    You'd have to imagine those ww2 vehicles now used won't be what anyone would call ... efficient when it comes to fuel consumption, and if Russia simply doesn't have the oil to fuel or build its war machine, how long can that last? As long as Ukraine can effectively endure the worst Russia can throw at it, then assuming dawn breaks at some stage Stateside Kyiv can fashion a win by means of starvation. It has been said before that Ukraine can win this on attrition alone - and with conventional weaponry now not guaranteed, they're pivoting to a different approach.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,876 ✭✭✭✭Discodog


    During one of the episodes of Putin & the West on the BBC there was a suggestion that Ukraine were "advised" not to attack the Kersh Bridge again by the US as it was considered too much of a provocation.

    The other interesting claim was that the Chinese were surprised at how bad the Russian army is.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,512 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    There's definitely an Irish accent to be heard in that video



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,453 ✭✭✭weisses


    But between Bakhmut, Adviika, and Vulhedar the Ukrainians did some serious ass kicking. I would really like to know the accurate numbers of personnel and equipment Russia/Wagner lost there.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,401 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    I'll try find the Twitter thread, but the lads who posted the video claimed two irish lads were in thar group.

    All Eyes On Rafah



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,458 ✭✭✭denismc


    Interesting article on CNN on an unspecified threat from Russia, I wonder is this being released to coincide with the Ukraine defence bill currently going through Congress?



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,411 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    This recent clip tells a lot. From the teenage girl warning the other teenage girl they are not allowed criticise Putin but instead say those around him. To the young man being too coy about turning up for registration in the district for voting cards as he knows it's a ploy to grab him for Ukraine. To the young woman working for the civil police and saying she has to vote for Putin as they know which way ballots are cast and by whom. To others saying they just won't vote.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,305 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Now that's how you circumvent a MAGA cult:

    Quito accepted a U.S. offer to exchange Soviet-era military equipment for modern U.S. weapons in a deal worth $200 million.

    The United States said that Ecuador's Soviet-era equipment would be sent to Ukraine amid the ongoing war started by Russia in February 2022

    Though correct me if I'm wrong but isn't the ask to grow your own bananas impossible? Not just climate but aren't bananas impotent or somesuch?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,604 ✭✭✭dasdog




  • Registered Users Posts: 29,367 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Something to do with satellites or gps blocking?

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,699 ✭✭✭✭briany


    When Ukraine creep forward, metre-by-metre in an offensive, the commentary is that the offensive is failing. When Russia do it, the commentary is 'is this the beginning of the end for Ukraine?'

    When or if Russia show signs of actual mobility and ability to advance at pace, that's when you can really say Ukraine are in trouble. Until then, the fog of war is deliberately opaque.

    This is a knock-down drag-out war, the horrors of which can only be fully appreciated in the aftermath since there is too much fighting going on right now to soberly catalogue them all. What we do know is that the AFU fights on, which should put to bed the idea that the Ukrainians are being put up to this war by the West. They fight for their country because it is their right to defend their territory from an invader, as it is the right of any country, and we've seen what happens to armies armed by the West who did not want to fight - they fold quickly because will is a a key thing. Probably the most key thing.

    Putin has achieved nothing like the aims he set out in the opening days of this conflict, and he has said to Tucker Carlson that the aim remains the 'de-nazification of Ukraine'. The subtext I read, there, is the elimination of any concept of Ukrainian nationhood that would seek to stand separate from Russia. He would tolerate a Ukraine that would act in vassalage to Russia. Nothing else. Now that Ukraine sought alliances elsewhere, it was his judgement that this must be eliminated with as much force as is necessary. So he still wants Kyiv. He still wants Odessa. He still wants Kherson. He won't want to stop until they exist under Russian occupation or are pulverised to dust and built over. From this, you can appreciate why the Ukrainian people do not just give up.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,562 ✭✭✭jackboy


    A threat that may exist in the future. Sounds a bit like a weapons of mass destruction scenario.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,740 ✭✭✭zv2


    “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” — Voltaire



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,682 ✭✭✭SleetAndSnow


    Looks like the threat relates to nuclear weapons in orbit?




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,740 ✭✭✭zv2


    The don't want nuclear weapons in Ukraine but they want nukes whizzing over New York. The U.S. will have to do a president Kennedy on this one.

    “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” — Voltaire



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,562 ✭✭✭jackboy


    Sure what can they do if this only some plan and there is no actual weapons in space.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,839 ✭✭✭Polar101


    Russian version of the most recent ship loss seems to be "we destroyed six Ukrainian drones" and "no comment".

    We're just missing the ship's promotion to a submarine.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,436 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Quote " Too much of a provocation"??? Short of using Nukes, just what else can Putin do? Currently with the anniversary of the invasion coming up plus the election, he's throwing everything he has at Ukraine. And unfortunately, due the US dillydallying over funding, it's looking increasingly likely will succeed in taking at least some if not all of Ardviika. Hit the damn bridge!!!.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,401 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Fairly sure it's an anti-satellite weapon. Use a small scale Nuke to cause a cascade event and wreck the Western worlds satellite systems

    All Eyes On Rafah



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,684 ✭✭✭flutered


    the banannas are set to reach russia via china at a massive markup



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,455 ✭✭✭francois


    Frikkin sharks with frikkin lazer beams on their heads



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,401 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    All Eyes On Rafah



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,801 ✭✭✭Wolf359f




This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement