Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hamas strike on Israel - Threadbans in op - mod warning in OP updated 19/10/23

Options
1104810491051105310541266

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,192 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Ceasefire talks carry on.

    Hostage families accuse IDF of sacrificing the lives of their loved ones and go to The Hague

    Silence from the US on whether Netanyahu is an honest broker (of course he isn't)

    And Deja vu in Lebanon


    Haaretz:

    The Hostage and Missing Families Forum said they will protest in front of the Defense Ministry HQ in Tel Aviv on Thursday against "the decision to sacrifice the lives of the hostages."

    Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas called on Hamas to secure a hostage release deal with Israel to spare the Palestinian people further "catastrophe," the official Palestinian new agency WAFA reported.

    U.S. National Security Council spokesperson John Kirby declined to answer whether U.S. President Joe Biden believes PM Netanyahu is an honest broker, focusing instead on their their decades-long relationship and ability to speak candidly with one another.

    Louis Har and Fernando Merman, the two hostages rescued from Hamas captivity Tuesday, were discharged from Sheba Medical Center at Tel Hashomer. The hospital reported that "signs of captivity are visible on their bodies and emotional state."

    A delegation of family members of hostages being held in Gaza is at The Hague to file a complaint at the International Criminal Court against Hamas. "It's time justice is done," they said.

    woman and two children were killed in the strikes on a village in southern Lebanon, two security sources told Reuters, and at least seven other people wounded.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,192 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    This is an odd one. I recall Israeli stating that as regards the Settlers, they would bring them to justice if found to have committed crimes.

    So why is Israel afraid?


    Israel fears that other countries will join the U.S., Britain and France in imposing sanctions on settlers involved in violence against Palestinians, a diplomatic source told Haaretz, adding that Paris' decision not to wait for a European Union decision on the matter could now encourage other EU countries to take similar steps.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,192 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Tell that to the family of the six year old in the car for three hours on the phone to the Red Crescent - living the last three hours of her life in terror. Or to the two medics shredded just as they got to her.

    Scrub the family bit - 5 of them were already dead in the car with her whilst she waited for help.

    Thats the sad reality of genocide and war crimes - not war.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,512 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    You obviously don't understand the term "whataboutery" - it requires an unconnected issue. The Hamas attacks and the kidnappings are why Israel attacked Gaza.

    By your logic, somebody complaining about Berlin being run by foreigners in 1945 would be perfectly entitled to shout "whataboutery" if the answer given was "Because the Nazis".

    Which would be ridiculous. As is the attempt to do the same here.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,333 ✭✭✭Frank Grimes


    It'll be ignored but on the off chance it's not no doubt we'll get some casual, glib dismissal of the fact that a small child spent her last moments alive in terror surrounded by her dead family before being killed.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 82,963 ✭✭✭✭Overheal




  • Registered Users Posts: 82,963 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    So how are you actually sure it's been proven that Hamas carried out October 7th? Step out of your foxhole.

    IDF posts videos of itself comitting war crimes though: 'we just can't be sure, sad'



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,507 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    What Hamas did was a terrorist attack. Soon as their leaders are turned over, war crimes can be tried (rape, dismemberment, murder). There is evidence being gathered about this attack. The tragedy of that family that Sky reported on, is just not evidence yet. It's a news report. And it's disgusting.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,192 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    If that is allowed to happen (Hamas rebuilt) the cycle of violence will continue.

    Whilst it's impossible to remove the ideology, the ability to attack Israel must be removed.

    This can only end if both the Israelis and Palestinians are assured of security and peace between them.

    It will require intermediaries.



  • Registered Users Posts: 82,963 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    What Hamas did was a terrorist attack. 

    But that hasn't been proven. Apply your standard evenly.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 23,638 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Christ is this the level now? What would you call it, a birthday celebration?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,192 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    There were posts here along the lines of "there is little evidence on the alleged rapes on Oct 7th". Those posts were pilloried by all and sundry. And to be crystal clear, those posts did not state rapes or sexual violence did not happen. Just that there was no corroborated evidence.

    I might be misreading you but are you saying those rapes etc on Oct 7th are "alleged" and cannot be proven until tried in court?


    As an aside, Zaka took video "evidence" of the massacre, the bodies of victims, the destruction etc. They then used that footage to raise funds for themselves.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,614 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Ironically, the term first came into use in relation to Northern Ireland. You possibly weren't aware of that. It arose because when someone from "one side" was taken to task about something that happened, they would respond with "whatabout" something the "other side" had done.

    For example, hypothetically if the IRA had just killed 30k+ loyalist women and kids and a spokesperson or connected politician was asked about it, they would invariably respond with "whatabout the loyalists killing all those people in the pub yesterday".


    I guess one can always revert to an ad-hoc a-la-carte approach of deciding what is and isn't "connected" depending on what suits their agenda at the time. If you were on "team IRA" you could say they were definitely connected because they were part of the same conflict, whereas if you were on "team UDA" you could say they were separate incidents and it was pure whataboutery.



  • Registered Users Posts: 82,963 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Is that what the slaying of the sheep was? A birthday celebration?

    It's unfortunate that Israeli apologism would stoop so low as to throw its hands up in the air and say 'it just can't be proven' to matters that would otherwise go unchallenged, except, lo, the allegations are leveled at Israel, the Most Moral Army in the World TM.

    What do you call the murder of people waving white flags? Or would you just decline to answer?



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,638 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    So you wont admit it was terrorism.

    Good to clarify.



  • Registered Users Posts: 82,963 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    How can we admit what hasn't been proven under the standard applied used to excuse the IDF from murders?

    Haven't seen you admit that what Israel is doing is committing war crimes. Clarify that please.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,512 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    You're doing it again. Yes I'm aware of the term in relation to Northern Ireland, and the issues weren't actually connected: one side has a grievance, and the other side has another, unrelated grievance: we can commit crimes because you committed other crimes. That's whataboutery.

    In this case though, the issues are directly related. There was no IDF presence in Gaza until Hamas attacked. It's not whataboutery to link Israel's actions in Gaza with Oct 7th. Because the two events are directly linked.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,512 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    Well there's the fact that Hamas claim themselves to be holding those captives in Gaza. Do you think they are lying?



  • Registered Users Posts: 82,963 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    I don't think Israel is lying either when it says it has thousands of Palestinians in lockup, or begrudgingly admitting it has a problem with prisoners being raped in their prisons.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,958 ✭✭✭circadian


    I think you missed the point of that post entirely, or you've decided to intentionally misconstrue it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,958 ✭✭✭circadian


    Any chance of a withdrawal of the claims or at least present a valid source?


    @Danzy



  • Registered Users Posts: 82,963 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    The same rational, critical thinking approach that allows me to conclude what happened on the 7th was an abhorrent act of mass terrorism, also allows me to see that what Israel is doing in response, is Genocide.

    "Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass"

    I wish more people who are so sure of command and control centers under every bakery and school and home without the sufficient evidence were as willing to admit what Israel is conducting here is a genocide.



  • Registered Users Posts: 600 ✭✭✭scottser


    Smug remarks won't answer the question. No response to the glaring hypocrisy of Israel not releasing any of their 'administrative detainees' then?



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,614 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    As I said, and anticipated, one can of course take an ad-hoc a-la-carte approach to deciding what is and isn't connected in order to suit themselves.

    If one group in a fictitious place, lets call it Northern Island, kills a group of people in a pub on Monday and in retaliation the second group explodes a bomb on the Wednesday, then the second group cannot go on about the Monday incident as we have decided it suits us to dismiss it as unconnected and therefore "whataboutery".

    Whereas in another fictitious place, let's call is Philipstine, if one group does something on October 7th, then if the other group goes on a genocidal rampage, then there is no maximum length of time the the second one can say "whatabout" what happened on October 7th without it being whataboutery. They can keep milking it even 4 months and 30k+ murdered later.

    Perfectly logical and consistent. As always.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,894 ✭✭✭nachouser


    Chucking a grenade into a civilian home. Let that sink in. Just think about it. When you go to work tomorrow. Just think about someone chucking a grenade your way.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,444 ✭✭✭Gerry T


    He did outline his plans to "make room" for the expansion of the German people in mein kampf, he also had a very antisemitic stance. He marched all over Europe but never pretended that it was self defence. Unlike the pretence stance of the "defenseless Israelis."



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 20,407 Mod ✭✭✭✭Weepsie


    The us who sat on their hands in both world wars because it had nothing to do with them until it did,

    And the UK , who for all sorts of reasons were partly at fault for some of the reasons of the outbreak of the first and spent the years preceding the second ignoring a what The nazis were doing and trying to placate hitler to protect their own colonial interests.


    At the same time trying to keep their boot down on 100s of millions indians and other people in other country.


    They are also not the good guy.


    History, and this conflict is very black and white and a lot of people must have given it up after junior cert given some of the muck being trotted out here.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,130 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    My view of the Israel vs Arab conflict when you break it down- one side has been winning the war for 75 years. One side has been losing the war for 75 years. The side that is losing isn’t prepared to accept that it is losing and make peace. The side that is winning is cruel but the side that is losing is stupid. There is no prospect of this situation being resolved. It could go on for another 20 years. It could go on for another 100 years.


    roast me



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 20,407 Mod ✭✭✭✭Weepsie


    One side was consulted fully when land was partitioned, the other wasn't despite the calls of many countries on the UNSCOP hearings for no decision be made until Palestinians be heard.


    As a result, and relentless threats by the us to countries who intended to vote against, 55;% of land was given over to 6 % of the population.


    It's absurd it was ever allowed happen



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 82,963 ✭✭✭✭Overheal




Advertisement