Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hamas strike on Israel - Threadbans in op - mod warning in OP updated 19/10/23

Options
1105210531055105710581266

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,273 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    Well, interestingly, whenever the actual Palestinian populace is polled they indicate strong support for Hamas.

    For example, here's the results of a poll from mid-December:

    1. 44% in the West Bank said they supported Hamas, up from just 12% in September. In Gaza, the militants enjoyed 42% support, up slightly from 38% three months ago.
    2. 57% of respondents in Gaza and 82% in the West Bank believe Hamas was correct in launching the October attack
    3. Overall, 88% want Abbas to resign

    So presenting Hamas as an entity that somehow stands apart from the 'ordinary Palestinian' and does not represent their wishes is inaccurate. Hamas enjoys broad support among Palestinians.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,273 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    Given the results of the above and other polling, if an election was held in Palestine (unlikely as that seems), Hamas would win in a landslide.

    That is a somewhat uncomfortable truth.



  • Registered Users Posts: 202 ✭✭Toeuptony


    I responded to a post asking "why don't Palestinians ever criticise Hamas?". My post indicated that they have criticised them in the past, in spite of the inherent dangers in doing so.

    You responded to my post showing roughly 50% favourability ratings for Hamas in Gaza, which corresponds with my post and also addresses the original question.

    You then finished up with "So presenting Hamas as an entity that somehow stands apart from the 'ordinary Palestinian' and does not represent their wishes is inaccurate.", which is not something that I attempted to do.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,273 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    Good, so we are in agreement that Hamas enjoys broad support among Palestinians.

    What is interesting is the level of distrust and disdain they have for the PA. That is Arafat's legacy.



  • Registered Users Posts: 202 ✭✭Toeuptony


    The IDF and the satanic right wing Israeli govt has strong support among Israelis. Evil organisations being supported by their brain washed supporters is not as much of a gotcha as you think it is.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,273 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    I don't think it's any kind of 'gotcha'. I think it's a fact that is worthy of analysis and discussion (although I do appreciate the internet doesn't place great value on either of those!).



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,040 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    The IDF protect Israel though (through brutal callous and illegal means). Hamas don’t.



  • Registered Users Posts: 202 ✭✭Toeuptony


    The IDF damage Israel too, as the court of international opinion is showing that Israel is very reputationally damaged by the current actions of the IDF.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,739 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    It's not that hard to understand if we look back to the time of Irgun; terrorists,rightly or wrongly, have their supporters. Lest we forget the terrorist Yitzshak Amir became Prime Minister of Israel. He never once apologised for the murder of the Nordic diplomat either. The only difference between Irgun and Hamas is that at least Irgun were secular terrorists, but they both engaged in terrorism. The only way to make Hamas less popular is through a deal. Israel, even if they defeat Hamas, won't have long term security in the absence of a political solution. The other Yitzshak (Rabin) realised that but unfortunately it cost him his life due to "softies" like Bibi and his pals.



  • Registered Users Posts: 72 ✭✭NoMoreDonegalTuesdays


    Well done Israel. The killing of this child and tens of thousands of others like her must surely be sweet revenge for the Holocaust. Israel should write the names of Holocaust victims on every indiscriminate bomb they drop.

    "From Auschwitz With Love". "The best way to pay tribute to the victims of a past genocide is to genocide others in their name". "It's what they would have wanted."

    These are the most crass, cynical distortions of history that genuinely guide every monstrous act Israel commits. Genocidal monsters invoking the Holocaust to inflict another holocaust on somebody else.

    Maybe they can also write on the bombs the names of the fictional beheaded babies on October 7th they made up to crush dissenting voices against this genocide.

    This is 7 year old Sidra, the cousin of my wife. The impact of the Israeli missile was so powerful it flung her out, leaving her mutilated body dangling from the ruins of the destroyed building in Rafah 48 hours ago. My wife’s aunt Suzan, her husband Fouzy Hassouna, two of their sons, Muhammad and Karam, Karam's wife Amouna and her three children (7-year-old twins Sidra and Suzan, and 15-month-old Malik) were all killed. The family had been displaced from the north of Gaza and took shelter in Rafah. We will be relentless until those responsible brought to justice.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 25,520 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,273 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    There's Security (big) and security (small) though.

    Big Security = 'no one will start a full-on war with us' and actually on that measure, Israel is probably more secure now than at any point in its history. It would be even more secure if it could defang Iran, who is its major strategic foe. Old adversaries like the Arab states are no longer a strategic threat.

    Small Security = 'our citizens can go about their lives without fearing terrorism' (suicide bombings, stabbings, shootings etc). Up until 07-Oct, Israel probably thought they were more secure on this measure too.

    Hamas is somewhere in between the two.



  • Registered Users Posts: 202 ✭✭Toeuptony


    The first casualty of war is truth, even when the war is taking place elsewhere.




  • Registered Users Posts: 82,379 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    What an callous, if not hateful thing to say.

    Do all those children bombed to death have a religious belief system I wonder or a concept of the afterlife.



  • Registered Users Posts: 72 ✭✭NoMoreDonegalTuesdays


    Sure to hell with any kind of Palestinian security. To hell with any kind of Palestinian existence.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,739 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    Yes. They have been secure for a long time in terms of conventional war. This is the reason the likes of Iran has not gone to war directly with Israel as they know they are on a hiding to nothing. In terms of asymmetrical warfare they may never achieve 100 per cent security from external actors( unless there is a new government in Iran), but they can with Palestinians if a two state solution can be achieved between the PA and a moderate Government in Israel. With Hamas and the current Israeli Government it will never happen-the one thing they share in common is they both don't give a damn about Palestinian civilians.



  • Registered Users Posts: 202 ✭✭Toeuptony


    Great comment here from Lula, taken from the Guardian live blog:

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2024/feb/15/middle-east-crisis-live-rafah-offensive-ceasefire-talks-israel-gaza-latest-news?page=with:block-65ce2d128f08de9c33d131ea#block-65ce2d128f08de9c33d131ea

    Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, speaking to the Arab League, said Brazil had condemned the Hamas attack on Israeli civilians on Oct. 7, but he added that the Israel’s response was “disproportional and indiscriminate” and unacceptable.

    “The killing must be stopped,” the Brazilian leader said, adding Palestine should be recognized as a sovereign state and admitted to the United Nations as a full member, and he called for reform of the U.N. Security Council.

    “The multilateral institutions that were created to help solve these problems do not work, which is why Brazil is committed to making the necessary changes in global governance bodies, and we hope to count on Egypt’s support,” he said to reporters alongside Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

    Lula said the permanent Security Council should be expanded and its veto powers abolished. “It is the permanent members of the Security Council that foment wars,” he said.

    Brazil has supported South Africa’s case brought before the International Court of Justice against the Israeli military campaign in Gaza, he added.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,273 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    Right. So any talk of reviving a two-state solution is bordering on delusional really. As neither side wants it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 202 ✭✭Toeuptony


    The US pressured Canada (and I presume other nations) to suspend the UNWRA funding after the ICJ ruling.

    Maybe this coming to light is part of the reason that Canada called for a ceasefire last night.



  • Registered Users Posts: 202 ✭✭Toeuptony


    More shocking* revelations

    https://euromedmonitor.org/en/article/6153/%E2%80%9CThey-brought-Israeli-civilians-to-watch-our-nude-torture%E2%80%9D:-IDF-torture-of-Palestinian-prisoners-is-turned-into-entertainment-for-Israeli-viewers

    "The Israeli army introduced groups of Israeli civilians into detention centres and prisons holding Palestinian prisoners and detainees from the Gaza Strip, permitting the civilians to witness torture crimes against the detainees, with many allowed to film them on their own phones.

    Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor received shocking testimonies from recently released Palestinian prisoners and detainees, in which they reported that the Israeli army invited a number of Israeli civilians during their interrogation sessions to witness torture and inhumane treatment, to which they were deliberately subjected in the presence of the civilians."

    *actually not that shocking when you think about it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 82,379 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    And to think there was self-righteous indignation in this thread when it was pointed out that all Israelis of military age could possibly be considered combatants when everyone age 18 to iirc 40, is drafted into reserve and required to perform so many years of military service in the IDF




  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 20,318 Mod ✭✭✭✭Weepsie


    I think you're thinking of a different word. Shill isn't a word with any sort of antisemitic meaning and its origin never was. You're thinking of another sh word, but good to know where youre leaning.


    Shill was a word for any sort of confidence person, or someone who was being a patsy in a carnival game.


    That the fact people have taken offence to this, and likely reported it , highlights some of the ignorance being visited upon this thread.



  • Registered Users Posts: 72 ✭✭NoMoreDonegalTuesdays



    Every single person in every single centre of political and economic and media power and pressure that is propping up Israel knows full well Israel is committing a genocide.

    Most of them are scared shltless of saying so for fear of being smeared as anti-semitic by Israel's evil propaganda machine. The ones that aren't scared just like the genocide.

    It's as simple as that.

    Any line from any western country that goes against Israeli propaganda in any way is always phrased in the most timid, tepid, feeble, apologetic language. It's pathetic.

    The Israelis are genocidal bastards inflicting a holocaust and Netanyahu, Ben Gvir, Smotrich and all the rest of them, and their sick, bloodlusting propagandists like Eylon Levy would spend the rest of their lives behind bars in The Hague if there was any justice in this world.



  • Registered Users Posts: 257 ✭✭thereiver


    Israel is vulnerable to attacks by Iran proxy groups which have access to unlimited free missiles and drones drones are cheap and they are getting more dangerous as tech advances

    Ukraine is almost out of standard artillery shells so they are making more drones to attacks Russian tanks and ships

    Hamas will rebuild and regroup even if it takes years

    If Israel wants to wipe out Hamas they would have to kill every male over 16 in Gaza are they ready to do that?

    Gen z and eu country's are turning against Israel because of their extreme attacks on civilians

    That's not a great result

    Even is Hamas is wiped out there will still missile attacks on Israel from other terrorist groups meanwhile Iran is building nuclear weapons

    The state of Israel depends on America for military support to exist

    This war could leave Israel in a more dangerous situation in the long term with reduced support from Eu country's and American politicans

    Commiting genocide against a large civilian population and limiting food and water supplys is not a viable political decision in the long term



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,520 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    70% of homes - DAMAGED

    84% of health facilities - ATTACKED

    90% of the population - DISPLACED

    80% of the worlds starving - IN GAZA


    Yeah, it's genocide





  • Registered Users Posts: 18,479 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Fascinating to see that politicians in the West know full well (privately) that the claims against UNRWA are total BS and have come about because of pressure from the Jewish lobby and Israel's allies in the US.



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,520 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    "Its early hours of this morning & a tank shell has just hit Al Nasser Hospital in Khan Yunis"

    It's genocide





  • Registered Users Posts: 25,520 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Hamas might have been using that ambulance so we blew it up when it was on the way to rescue a 6 year old girl



    Who we also murdered


    It's genocide.





  • Registered Users Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    1 month prior to Oct 7, support for Hamas is at 12%

    2 months into the genocidal campaign, multiple war crimes later, families shredded, cemeteries bulldozed, population beginning to starve etc., Palestinian support for Hamas went up.

    What did you think would happen? Palestinian support for the IDF would have gone up?

    Do you think it conceivable that support was simply evidence they hoped Hamas would be able to stem the genocidal tide?

    And putting out those numbers as evidence of "broad support for Hamas" does not reflect the full article you posted:

    "Shikaki said that Gaza residents are more critical of Hamas than those in the West Bank, that support for Hamas typically spikes during periods of armed conflict before leveling out, and that even now most Palestinians do not back the militant group."

    So even by your own quoted source, no, there is no broad support for Hamas.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 653 ✭✭✭Fr D Maugire


    History repeating itself. Lots of posters use the UN 1947 Resolution as a justification for Israel, but how many realise there was huge pressure put on several countries to vote in favour of the resolution. US president Truman, said he had never witnessed anything like the pressure put on the US Government and Senators to approve the resolution. In turn, the US coerced several countries into voting the same with a veiled threat to withhold aid, including on European countries like France who were recepient of aid post WW2.

    Ironically the Soviet Union had their own agenda, by favoring the creation of Israel, they were hoping to drive a wedge between the British and their Arab allies, they also had a belief that Israel might become a Socialist state whom they could sell arms to as the Czechs did. Of course all the Soviet satellite counties voted the same way including Ukraine which despite being part of the USSR had a separate vote.



Advertisement