Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Scotland vs France

1234568»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,511 ✭✭✭Augme


    This where I read it. It's either described as an apology or a public admission that an error was made depending on which report one reads. Even if it's just the second they want, while not as bad as the first, I still don't think they should be doing it and I can't remember when that's happened before either. Still confused as to why Scotland feel they are worthy of special treatment.





  • Registered Users Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    The word apology is in title but doesn't feature elsewhere PR is fairly clickbait at this stage.

    The story of the communication to WR was broken by Tom English with the BBC who claimed that the SRU had asked for World Rugby to clarify and acknowledge an error was made. He had no actual formal source aside from an unnamed source "close to the situation" who provided the below quotes:

    "The dialogue between the referee and the TMO made no sense," said a source close to the situation.

    "There is a need for lessons being learned so that it never happens again. This is not about Scottish Rugby being belligerent."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,449 ✭✭✭Dave_The_Sheep


    I suspect the reporting has changed, I'm not going to search too much though - as you say I'm not finding it now. Also entirely possible I may also be mistaken based on headlines from titles (I don't read PR, so it's not them I saw it on). You can treat it as "demanding admission of an error though" and I'll stick by that with what I'm saying.

    By decision, badly worded on my part given what we're talking about, I mean the decision by WR to admit a mistake was made or that the ref got something wrong. Not the call on the pitch, obviously that's not going to change.

    They're similar, sure, no problems agreeing there. I'm merely pointing out there's a difference in degree. So I suppose we're broadly in agreement, just approaching from opposite sides maybe.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,771 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I don't think you are mistaken, as I think I remember reading something similar but I can't find it anywhere now. Even the article linked earlier in the thread has changed. I suspect basically Scotland got done dirty a bit with the early reporting.

    I am all for hating on Scotland normally, I just think this is a lesson in poor reporting more than anything grossly different from what other teams would do. I still think its funny they tried to sue a typhoon like.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,639 ✭✭✭ersatz


    Fair enough Podge, though Im partial to the explanation that for the Scotland team pushing blame for the French loss off to officiating is one way for the coaches to pick them up off the floor after two frankly disastrous weekends of rugby. The second half capitulation against Wales followed by throwing away the French match can't be easy to wish away or even explain. There is something up when a team with that quality can't get the job done against teams they should put to the sword. And in terms of building, if ever there was a year when Scotland might have realistically expected to come in first or second this is it, yet they find themselves in a vulnerable third position with Ireland and England to come.



  • Registered Users Posts: 190 ✭✭tmc1963


    They didn't apparently - presumably media hysteria

    Regardless of how the first game was won in the end, the fact is that they were denied being 2/2 by a decision that is a terrible look for rugby.

    I am pretty sure a stronger ref like Barnes would have quickly jumped on the TMO's statement that the ball was on the ground and awarded the try based on what he could see on the screen with his own eyes.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    There was a high tackle on a wales player in Rd1 missed in the last sequence. Think Scotland have had some good fortune too



  • Registered Users Posts: 190 ✭✭tmc1963


    Really?

    Not heard that or read about it in numerous articles so it's clearly not an issue.

    Just saw Andrea Piardi in the Connacht match show Berry what he should have done - would have saved a lot of angst!



Advertisement