Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Self directed pension plans

2»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18 FlipFlopAgain


    The AMC can depend on the fund you're invested in. I've a PRB with Aviva invested in a Global Equity ESG Passive Fund, which basically tracks the MSCI world index. The AMC is 0.7%. If you go for their SDIO option, which allows you to choose your own investments, I think the AMC is higher. You really just have to ring around either directly to the companies (if they take direct business) or to the brokers to see what AMC you can get.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,974 ✭✭✭rocky


    Person in Zurich I talked to said the PRB is not self directed, and would be around 1% annual charge.

    So far, Davy seems the best one, even with the high charge, because they allow me to choose individual stocks, not ESG crap funds that are going out of fashion anyway 😀



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,105 ✭✭✭Trigger Happy


    The top tech 100 had a great year last year. But yeah, a mix of funds focusing on different geographies and sectors is wise. Never have too many eggs in one basket.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,456 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    Nobody is going to give you this stuff for free, you always pay in some form or another. The real question is are you going to be able to outperform the pension fund managers while paying that fee?



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 17,786 Mod ✭✭✭✭Henry Ford III




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,113 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    I don't have a pension, I simply invest directly, so it's self directed with no fees other than those necessary to make or divest individual investments.

    Of course it doesn't have the tax benefits of a pension, but my investment strategy is near solely focused on the benefit being dispensed via dividends rather than a lump sum cash out based on capital gains.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,456 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    Are you actually doing performance and attribution analysis on your performance? And just as important do you have the data and the skills to do it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,113 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    I am unfamilliar with your jargon. For 2022 I was getting a dividend return on assets of 4.1% and a capital appreciation of 6.07%, so an annual return of 10.17% In contrast, I do have a small sum in professionally managed cumpulsory super from a previous employment which managed a return of 2.37% in capital appreciation, returned no dividend, and then the pro's gobbled about 25% of that gain in fees.

    All this is leaving out the BTC, which would distort everything too much.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,974 ✭✭✭rocky


    I can invest in the QQQ myself, don't need any managers for that. And I probably have the option of selling and holding cash when I think a downturn is coming.

    Which one, about ESG? Well, it seems to be pushed back a bit in recent months, even BTC is now greenwashed as not that bad, since Blackrock are promoting it and they like money.

    Hence 9 new btc ETFs.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,456 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    It it is not jargon, it is the rules and calculations underlying how the 2.37% is actually measured. And done correctly your comparative return would not be remotely close to 10.1%. The fact that you can’t actually measure your performance means you don’t know how you are doing versus how well you could or should be doing. And on top of this by opting out of the pension framework you are leaving a chunk of the return on the table each year.

    You might be one of the very few individuals capable of consistently out performing the pension fund over a thirty to forty year period, but I would not be willing to bet my financial well being on it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 43 fitzgea1


    "And I probably have the option of selling and holding cash when I think a downturn is coming."

    I think, as Jim has been trying to point out, that this is the problem with managing your own investments. Very few people can time the market, you'll end up selling near the bottom and then buying back in after the bounce has already happened.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,974 ✭✭✭rocky


    Very few, but not none... Even the option to rotate between plays on AI, defensives, energy etc is appealing.

    Could have at least doubled the pension fund in the last year, when META, NVDA etc have done a 3+x



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,113 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    My portfolio delivered an income of 4.1% of it's capital value via dividends and the capital value of the assets appreciated 6.07%, which despite being a manual calculation, agrees well with my portfolio reporting software that has the annualized XIRR being 6.11%.

    So how is it that you claim 4.1+6.07 is not remotely close to 10.17?



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,456 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    Because that is not how you do the calculation, it is as simple as that! I don't have access to your portfolio, nor do I want to, to tell you what the correct figure is. But 35 years doing this kind of analysis tells me it is not going to be remotely close to that figure, maybe around 1% - 2% would be my expectation. The majority of fund managers are not capable of delivering a 10% annualised return over say 30 years never mind the average person trying to do it on their own. The expectation for a pension fund manager would be say 5% - 6% over a thirty year time span and one of the contributing factors on that is that they don't have to deal with the float problem.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,456 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    Because the Swiss population is much older that most in Europe they had to tackle the second pillar pension problem much earlier than most and more by accident than anything else I got involved in it over 35 years ago. At this point it is very well regulated to protect the employees funds and to ensure they get a reasonably good return on their contributions.

    I can invest in the QQQ myself, don't need any managers for that. And I probably have the option of selling and holding cash when I think a downturn is coming.

    If a Swiss pension fund manager was to do anything close to this strategy he commit a criminal offence and could go to prison, that is how dangerous your strategy is considered.

    Understand that I'm not saying any of these approaches are doomed to fail, but that you are taking on way to much risk to achieve them versus the wisdom of well constructed portfolio in which there is a reasonable expectation of a good return. A very big chunk of manage pension funds is about understanding and manage risk so that you don't loose the clients money. And most people don't understand the nature of financial risk, ETFs for example. ETFs are not all the same, some of them can be way more risky than than others because of the way they have been constructed and instead of replicating an index the actually magnify the gains and losses on that index.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,113 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    How do you do the calculation? If total gain is not the addition of income and capital valuation change, what is the correct definition?

    The performance of fund managers put's an upper limit on what an individual can achieve; yeah, right.

    I do my own tax returns. I'm really confident as to the exact dividend returns my investments generate. I also think I have a good grasp of what constitutes a capital loss or gain, for tax purposes.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,456 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,113 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Lol.

    You remind me of my former Swiss bank. I once asked them could they not provide me with a way to log into my account online? Too which they replied, 'certainly Herr sucker valued customer, just authorise us to deduct CHF 85 from your account and we will send you a code device.'

    Rabo bank and later AIB, gave me one for free, well what passes for free in bank terms.

    Post edited by cnocbui on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,974 ✭✭✭rocky


    Pension funds try do the best for everybody, so there's a pension fund in the future, even if it's smaller than expected.

    On the other hand, I try and do best for myself, which is not necessarily applicable to large cohorts of people. We can't all invest in the next disruptive company or technology so we all get rich at the same time...

    Also, I assume the risk of losing this pension fund, if I couldn't afford it, I wouldn't do it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28 PenguinEggs


    I have a Davy Self Directed PRSA for about 5 years. I moved to this from a institutional retail fund after years of poor performance in the good times which in no way reflected the growth in the markets and drops in value to my fund which mirrored drops/crashes in the market. After years of bullshit and incompetence I made the switch and have done pretty well and would recommend this approach for like minded people

    You need to go through an independent broker to get in. Mine was a IFA who I guess I had to persuade I was up to looking after myself in this regard. I think there is a minimum pot they require but I don't think it's that much

    I pay fees on each transaction, buy & sell, these vary depending on the exchange and than a 1% annual fee

    You then have total control over what you buy and sell except you are limited to stocks/etfs/bonds that are on their trading platform. If something you want to buy but isn't available through the very clunky online trading platform you can ring the trading desk and see if they can make it available for you

    Davy are complete boomers when it comes to crypto and won't let you trade the BTC efts. A BTC EFT went live in Amsterdam in August and Davy refuse to open this up in the platform to "protect their customers". When speaking to Davy support they don't distinguish between bitcoin and alts

    So on the one hand you will have freedom and control to manage your investments but on the other you will have to navigate this ridiculous paternalistic attitude - BTC up around 80% since August. They are inconsistent as well as you can trade Coinbase and Micro Strategy which are 100% crypto companies. Obviously they know better than Blackrock etc

    I have read the comments about trading style in this thread and really its up to yourself. I have actively traded in the five years except for one. The one year I was not getting in and out, taking profits - limiting losses, was the year I lost money. You can be conservative and it can all go to ****. On the otherhand I can look back at some of the first trades I made and if I had just left them alone I would be better off. But I really enjoy actively trading. I'm a retail trader, nothing like a pro and I'm doing well. I am assuming we are in for another year of growth but the peak is, if not on the horizon, just over it. If I get out somewhere between 1-20% off the top valuation of my pot when the crash comes I'll be happy. 20-30% down won't be a disaster.

    There is no chance my pot would be anywhere near the valuation it is now if i remained in the retail fund and when the crash happens it would plummet in value and the fund managers will shrug and take their fees anyway



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,113 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Yes it is how you do the calculation.

    You don’t need a doctoral degree in finance to calculate your portfolio’s investment returns. A few principles are enough to make even the most math-phobic savvier investors. Knowing your potential returns is not simply wise; it is essential.

    Your investment returns can be calculated by comparing their current and initial values while accounting for dividends or interest earned.

    That boils down to exactly what I said the calculation of total returns, ROI, amounts to. The only slight difference being the explicit mention of costs, which I account for automatically in the calculation of the change in capital value.

    My professionally manged super scheme delivers risible returns compared to my own investment portfolio. In a single year the managers of the scheme creamed off 25% of the annual gain in fees, so it's no wonder.



  • Registered Users Posts: 56 ✭✭BishopBrennen


    Which ETF's would you regard as being very accurate at replicating their Index and not magnifying the highs and lows? How would you rate VWCE is this respect?

    I read of some of the Insurance company passive funds getting slagged because they don't even replicate the Index accurately, is this true, and if so if this the norm or the exception regarding the insurance tracker funds? Also, is the reason they don't track the Index accurately because of them magnifying the highs and lows concept that you speak of?



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,456 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    Well if you seriously believe we pay people around 150K a year to apply a a formula from investopedia then that is it, I guess.

    I did not expect for a second that you’d actually sit down and read the text, had you done so you’d realize it is way more complex than you think and furthermore that you have insufficient data to do the calculations.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,113 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    You never expected anyone to read the text when the cost to do so was €74.

    Hands up anyone who bought the book?

    Your cute version of the Swiss banker asking for CHF 85 just so I could have something close to online banking.

    As an interesting additional data point to your implication my returns are incorrectly calculated when I say my portfolio returned 10.17% ROI in 2022 - Vanguard have started offereing Australians a superannuation product, for which they claim current annual returns of 14.7% for people under 47, with fees of 0.58%.

    They offer a different product that they say is more conservative and returned 10.89%, for someone aged 61, so that makes me feel better.

    Next you will be claiming Vanguard can't calculate ROI or performance correctly, either.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,456 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    I'm not asking you for any money.... you asked how it should be done, I gave the reference book on the topic... And we were talking about your ability to calculate your return.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,113 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    I never said you were, you suggested I buy and read a €74 book.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,149 ✭✭✭amacca


    After some casual research in the intervening weeks...it seems quite difficult to do what I would like to do within a run of the mill PRSA available on the irish market.


    I want to invest in a global index tracker that includes developing as well as developed markets such as VWCE....It seems on an execution only basis (or even with advice) I cant do this without going for self directed


    It did seem that it might be possible via standard life but looking through their documentation I dont think their Vanguard Global Stock index fund is even close to what I want...their literature mentions this uses the MSCI as a benchmark, uses sampling and has over 1000 equities in it


    What I want is VWCE ...tracks the FTSE All World, uses full replication and has well over 3500 equities or something similar so the sampling above means its not the same product


    The only way I can see to buy VWCE or something similar is through a self directed pension


    Could anyone confirm this?


    And would you be willing to enlarge a bit on why you think buying something like VWCE is such a bad idea Jim2007? It wouldnt be my only pension so I think all equities isnt a bad idea in my case but on top of that my reasons for thinking its a decent course of action is the diversification, its not all US companies (although it has a fair whack of them) it has developing markets (so can take advantage of opportunities/growth there if it occurs), it rebalances and over the long term very few fund managers seem to do better than the index, tracking the market appears to work as long as its a long term approach you take


    I cant help wondering would I really be better with a managed fund from irish life/zurich etc with approx 100 equities etc...or those kinds of products...maybe just from a cost point of view (zurich do offer higher than 100% allocation rates on large single deposits over certain amounts so that could be taken into account I suppose)...


    Is it just the costs associated with self directed that make the other products more desirable? What they are invested in dont seem inherently more diversified or capable of similar returns over the long term...


    Are there decent value self directed pension products out there does anyone know?


    And if manged versions I havent considered may be more capable or likely to deliver better returns over a long term investment horizon (15/20 years) what are they? And are costs/charges etc being taken into account?



Advertisement