Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

"Green" policies are destroying this country

Options
1101810191021102310241067

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,891 ✭✭✭SlowBlowin


    Everything must be taken into account when its relevant, not simply the emissions when burning. Coal is deemed better that local peat, even though our local coal was imported from Colombia on ships powered by heavy diesel, then driven in diesel lorries from Dublin to Kerry, everything should be taken into account.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,993 ✭✭✭✭JRant




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,380 ✭✭✭WishUWereHere


    You are right about the greens saying to buy a diesel car in 2009 ( I was one of those hoodwinked ), but I’m almost certain it was Gormley though. Afaik Ryan was unknown then



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,891 ✭✭✭SlowBlowin


    I have a piece of paper with my maths on it for when the Green candidate calls, the same maths I posted on here a few hundred pages back. The greens always focus on direct emissions from burning the fuel, just repeating what their leader tells them, not doing the maths themselves.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,297 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Nobody told you to buy a diesel car in 2009. the Green Party have always said to keep the current car you have for as long as possible.

    If you wanted to buy a new car that was your own decision, not any political party in Ireland telling you to.

    If you want to complain about the emmission scandal I would suggest you look at the manufacturers for cheating the system



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,740 ✭✭✭PommieBast



    No problem with that bit, it is how they come up with the numbers I was querying. If mega-leak disasters like Nord Stream are on the gas side of the equation, did for fairness they include things like coal mine fires on the coal side?



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,380 ✭✭✭WishUWereHere


    Where have I said the greens told me to buy a diesel? They fed us rubbish about how good for emissions it was to buy a diesel, introduced incentives ( if memory serves me right, buying a diesel led to cheaper road tax ), yet now diesel is public enemy #1.

    I said this before & I’ll say it again: 15 years from now I suspect EV will be in the same boat as a diesel car was 15 years ago.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,297 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    You are right about the greens saying to buy a diesel car in 2009 ( I was one of those hoodwinked ), but I’m almost certain it was Gormley though. Afaik Ryan was unknown then

    The Green didn't say to buy a diesel in 2009, time to take some responsibility for your own actions. Changing the car tax system doesn't mean you need to buy a new car, no political party at any stage have told people they have to buy a new car.

    Diesel is still a perfect fuel for cars, if the manufacturers didn't lie about the emissions they wouldn't have the stigma it has now



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,740 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    Away from urban areas NO2 (what the cheat devices targeted) isn't even an issue. Given what little driving I do I always borrow my parents' diesel rather than the petrol..



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,380 ✭✭✭WishUWereHere


    Obviously only I sign for a purchase, while literally Gormley didn’t tell me to buy a diesel car, he fed the public waffle which years later proved to be false.

    Why do I think in 15 years, we’ll be hearing something similar about EV’s?



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,756 ✭✭✭Captain_Crash


    You don’t mind posting that maths again do you? I seem to remember it but I wouldn’t mind having a closer look myself



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,297 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    So you bought the car yet are blaming a political party?? I bought cars around that time, not in 2009 because the crash had just happened and we bunkered down to see what would happen, but plenty of petrols and diesels available to choose

    Electtic cars are just cars use electric fuels, I have already saved thousands on fuel over the last few years as I bought one many years ago as a run around and back up to my diesel. In 15 years time I will have potentially saved more thousands so the car will have paid for itself and also small service costs compared to a combustion car.

    it was my decision to buy an electric and have another diesel car, nothing to do with a political party👍

    FYI in 15 years time any electric car bought today will be coming to it's natural end of life, the majority anyway, so talking about what you think will happen in 15 years is totally irrelevant. Im sure technology will have moved on at that stage same as combustion engine cars and over 15 years the engines got better and the older car was obsolete. Standard with any product

    So maybe you can explain why you keep repeating the same thing?

    Post edited by Clo-Clo on


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,137 ✭✭✭323


    That was just more climate fear porn from the Guardian with the aid of Imperial College London, the leaders in Green policy. "estimates of methane leaked to the atmosphere, from 200,000 to more than 400,000 tonnes."😲.

    They seemed to conveniently overlook that the Nord Stream 2 lines were never commissioned, ergo, there was no methane in there to leak to the atmosphere.   “Never let the truth get in the way of a good story,”

    “Follow the trend lines, not the headlines,”



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,105 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Afaik Ryan was Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources in 20098so not exactly an innocent bystander.

    November 2009 the Green Party claimed credit for the VRT regime as proof that "green policies do work" (Irish Examiner 6th. November 2009)

    After being hoodwinked by dodgy statistics back then when he was a government minister and with him now again being a government minister and leader of the party it doesn`t appear as if he or greens have learned anything from the experience.

    But perhaps I am mistaken on that and any day now he will call for the recinding of the policy they threatened to bring down the government on culling cattle if they did not get their way or the claim that burning biomass is carbon neutral both of which were based on dodgy statistics which have now been shown to be incorrect as well.

    I won`t be holding my breath on either though after seeing how they sat on their hands while energy supply companies here were claiming that they were selling 100% guaranteed green energy based on Guarantee of Origin Certificates that were not worth the paper they were written on where it took the Advertising Standards Authority of Ireland (ASAI) on foot of a complaint to expose the scam for what it was. And it`s not as if that was an elaborate statistical scam. Even a cursory glance at the figures would have shown anyone who wished to look that the figures were so far off they were farcical.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,297 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Why are you posting nonsense to my post? none of which has anything to do with the original post?

    I have zero interest in you spreading false information.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,464 ✭✭✭Gloomtastic!


    In the real world today, we couldn’t walk on Howth harbour last week because the waves were continuously coming over the top for a couple of hours either side of high tide, no wind either.

    Beach in Portmarnock now has all the bins removed due to repeated flooding at high tide. Dunes are disappearing too.

    Please carry on arguing about this party said this and that leader said something else. We’re fucked!



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,297 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    This thread is over 1000 pages based on my setting of the same 4-5 people complaining about anything to do with the environment.

    This is not a view of the public opinion at all, just a few people sharing the same information over & over. Any decent conversation on the topics is long long gone.

    It's reduced now to "wHaT hAPens wHen ThE wInd dOesN't bLoW" most days



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,105 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Would you care to point out where my post contains false information, or will I just mark it down to just another of your antics when it come to inconvenient truths that do not suit your narrative ?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,297 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Well majority, the wood pellets was the first I noticed and went down hill after that

    The fact I was talking to someone about cars and you ploughed in with some nonsense about Eamonn Ryan says it all

    No interest in trading nonsense posts with you either, best of luck on your travels



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,105 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    No idea where you are getting your public opinions from but it`s certainly not from public opinion polls. The public opinion consistently in those has The Green Party registering within the margin of error.

    Considering what the actual plan here is for reaching carbon zero emissions it`s a pretty valid question as to what happens when the wind does not blow. One that neither you nor anyone else to date can give an answer too.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,297 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    The thread is not the Green Party thread.

    It is about Green policies

    All parties have Green/environmental policies

    Post edited by Clo-Clo on


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,105 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    So basically the only answer you have to me asking where according to you I had posted misinformation in my post is wood pellets which I did not even mention.

    then contrary to what Ember, a green think tank, research has shown as well as others when it comes to emissions from burning wood, you most likely believe that a sprinking of green magic dust applied before burning negates that.

    While greens can claim to not knowing about diesel in 2008 it`s not a claim they can now make as regards wood burning being carbon meutral.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,105 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Whether you like it or not the Green Party are front and center on our present green policies and whatever gave you the idea that those policies are favoured by public opinion is very far off the mark.

    Public opinion polls have consistently shown what the publics opinion on the Green Party is.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,380 ✭✭✭WishUWereHere


    Last time I checked, the title of this thread was ‘green policies are destroying this country’. To me that would indicate all aspects of what they are standing for. That, for me, includes EV’s & wood pellets. It’s obvious to me that doesn’t suit certain pro green lobbyists.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,559 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    Thanks to green policies, I'm beginning to get just as worried about what happens when the wind does blow. According to the regulations, we (the end user) will be paying for any unused wind or solar along with what is used. That's bad enough, but the market fails us further. Our higher prices means that we're importing more often than not these days, including during medium to high wind. Just look at the smart grid dashboard any night (it works) and see that the actual wind is under forecast and we're importing. It's even more pronounced in Northern Ireland. That just means more wind is curtailed on the island of Ireland. There's nothing that states indigenous wind gets priority over imported wind, especially when the imported wind is cheaper - so we pay twice. All that while Eamon wants to add 37GW of the stuff (at unknown CAPEX or OPEX)!



  • Registered Users Posts: 47 rdser




  • Registered Users Posts: 15,105 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    It`s not just that we would be paying for generation when we would neither want or need it, it`s the costs that would be required under this proposed plan from people who seem incapable of even the most basic understanding of mathematics.

    We are supposed to become carbon zero emitters by 2050 where by which time Eirgrid is predicting our requirements in electricity to double to around 14GW. At a capacity factor of 42% 37GW would provide that, but as a poster here keeps mentioning (and never providing an answer to) "wHaT haPens wHen The wind doesN`t bloW"? What would happen, as we have seen for extended periods of peak demand where wind generation has fallen to 6% or less, is that 37GW providing nothing much more than 2GW of a 14GW demand.

    The original proposal was that offshore generation would be split 50/50 between domestic consumption and hydrogen production, but for that to work, (where nobody has a clue as to how, at what cost, or even if it would work to scale), to provide our 2050 requirements would require around 70GW of offshore. Not 37GW.

    It really does now look as if their is a recognition that the cost of this 50/50 plan is insanely economically unviable, but with them having no idea or wish to look at any alternatives they are throwing around this 37GW`s, (again without any costings) hoping that nobody notices the great big generation hole it will not come close to filling.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,055 ✭✭✭patnor1011


    Who is the greenest of them all? While holding all others by the ba11s?



Advertisement