Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Why wont die hard GAA fans admit football these days is muck?

191012141527

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,583 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    It's a team game. When teams are well matched, football games usually have between 20 and 35 scores. More these days than when teams kicked the ball up the field and hoped for the best.

    When there are mismatches you get scorelines like Dublin 4-30 Laois 2-09 and Down 8-16 Laois 2-12 in 2023. The best entertainment is watching two good teams battling to engineer scores in the face of resolute defences, with 15 behind the ball if required.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,598 ✭✭✭pgj2015


    why did they change the back pass rule in soccer? because it was making the game boring to watch, thats why. big changes are needed in gaelic football or eventually lots of people will give up watching it.


    I think the reason people still go to matches is they have nothing else going on in their lives, they wont admit 99% of games are crap to watch because gaelic football is their number one love but deep down they know its awful to watch and was better 10 years ago.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,408 ✭✭✭megadodge


    This might come as a shock to you, but people tend to do things they enjoy and not do things they don't enjoy.

    Your inability to accept people having different tastes and likes to you reminds me of those clowns who describe people who have different musical tastes to them as having 'bad taste'.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,520 ✭✭✭shockframe


    40,000.

    With combined populations of about 250,000.

    About 16% attendance overall.

    Compared to Premier League grounds which are on average 10% capacity of the cities they are in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,000 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    The league has been great this year three rounds gone at the time of writing. Yeah, football does have it's problems with teams sitting too deep occasionally and over handpassing.

    But on the whole I think that that criticise the football harshly are:

    1) Of a certain generation - kick and catch - kick it as far as you can and as high as you can etc

    And/Or

    2) Out and out hurling people - who think by criticising football puts hurling in a better light (yet would never say a bad word about hurling - even if some turn into long distance freetaking competitions)

    --

    A shot clock was suggested in the changes in the changes in the GAA thread for football, might be something to try. To cut down the amount of passing and speed it up a bit

    But personally my main gripe is that advanced mark. Get rid of that first!

    To be honest I don't think teams in div1 and the likes of Donegal in div 2 have been as close in standard as they are now. for a long time.

    That only bodes well for the game. It has a feeling that a lot of teams have a chance on any given day. When could you say that last?

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,866 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Because that’s the problem, my friend.

    You can come up with all the stats you like, but 37 hand passes sideways and back …there’s your problem ,lad.

    Yo can dress it up any you like.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,445 ✭✭✭crusd


    Like anything a mix is best. Many seem to be saying there is too much hand passing therefore ban hand passing. I showed many examples of iconic goals that would have been frees the other way without handpassing. In most cases they also included good accutrate kick passing also.

    The statement that prime Kieran Donaghy or Gooch would not get a sniff near Kerry in todays game is patent bullsh*t also. Both could execute the handpass expertly and both benefited from moves that may have been started with a run off a handpass into space.

    Do people seriously want to turn the game into endless lobbing balls into packed defences from 60 yards?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,598 ✭✭✭pgj2015




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,598 ✭✭✭pgj2015


    why into packed defences? the new rules wouldnt have packed defences. that is what is killing the game.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,445 ✭✭✭crusd


    You believe that without the prospect of breaking up play with quick interchanges defences would just filter back and mark the target inside the scoring zone.


    The belief that long kicking is some sort of utopia is short sighted in the extreme. The most effective, and pleasing to the eye, tactics are when a mix is employed. The prospect and quick interchanges and fast running out the field is what draws out defenders freeing up space for the ball inside. Look at clips from the so called glory days. This is what was happening then and what the best teams are doing now. Doing something to discourage 15 behind the ball tactics is needed however the proposal being advance here of banning hand passes between the 45s does nothing to address that. Teams are not hand passing out the field for the craic. Its in the hope of drawing out a player from the massed defence and freeing up space closer to goal. Its why the keeper is coming up too. To draw a man out of position. Its pulling numbers out of the back not eliminating hand passing that will improve the game. If the numbers remain in defence aimless kicking will be one of the consequences. Teams with a big target man will be successful but others who prefer the pacier running game will be disadvantage. The Donaghys and Gooches prospered in a mixed game.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,445 ✭✭✭crusd


    Lots of handpasses in that Mayo Dublin game so not sure what point you are trying to make



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,866 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    37 handpasses ..gain of around 10 yards……most of them across the field around the 40 yard distance.

    Rinse and repeat.

    Dress it up however you like , that’s a load of crud.

    Needs to be examined before the game loses any failing attraction it has now as an enjoyable watch.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,598 ✭✭✭pgj2015


    Really? you didnt watch much of it so, the mayo v Dublin game there was maybe 2 hand passes at most in a row, only used when suitable, way quicker game than anything you have these days, exciting fast paced football with lots of good kick passes.

    free kicks never went backwards in these games either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,598 ✭✭✭pgj2015


    Another classic game, lots of fast paced attacking play. if you think anything we get these days is any way as good as this game, you are deluded.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,000 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Well the two best games I have seen in my lifetime in football at the top of my head (the ones that really stick in my mind) would have been the 2008 Galway v Kerry QF in torrential rain.

    It had everything in it a mixture of handpassing and kickpassing. But it was non stop stuff.


    The other one was the 2013 AI Semi Final between Dublin and Kerry

    Again it was a non-stop pacey game. Had a mixture of handpassing AND kicking.

    The key similarity between the two games was the pace of the games. Both teams wanted to attack whether that be by the hand pass or the kick pass.

    But at the same time there was no lamping the ball for the sake of it.

    Look at the 1956 AI football final between Cork and Galway (Galway in white)

    From @6:12 -

    Galway fella boots it, loses possession, Cork fella (Sean Moore) boots it loses possession, Galway fella boots it as soon as he gets it. Awful stuff really. So be careful what you wish for on the kicking front as well.

    --

    The problem as I see it is handpassing is grand if a team is doing it to find angles and be progressive, or even trying to kill a game for a minute or two. But if both teams are sitting back at the same time with a big massive gap in the middle of the pitch it looks awful.

    The worst game I remember for handpassing and sitting back that was a Div2 Final Galway v Kildare they might as well have removed the posts for long periods! Neither team wanted to attack for ages. It was 6 each at half time, terrible for the neutral.


    But the game loosened up at half time with the score finishing at 0-18 to 0-16 points for the Tribesmen.

    --

    So it just shows to that the debate is not really handpassing v kickpassing. It is when it is constantly aimless kickpasses, or constantly safety first side to side passing from both sides that it can get tedious.

    I know they tried counting the number of handpasses which was disaster, but what about borrowing a bit from Rugby a hand pass has to go forward? It would cut out the constant side to side stuff, and it would be much more difficult to the same with the kick pass as often.

    The game of football only needs a few tweaks at best, the question is what is right move to make. As it could have unintended consequences like the "advanced mark"

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,520 ✭✭✭shockframe




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,866 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Two biggest problems (and they are big) are

    1. the tackle
    2. the handpass


    37 handpasses across the field ain’t goin to butter any parsnips.

    Might as well say goodbye (a long goodbye) to the game.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,952 ✭✭✭Bobson Dugnutt


    Unusually perceptive by yourself, Brendan. The hand passing over and back across the midfield and forwards unable to shoot from outside the 21 are killing the game. It’s dour, nasty, and agricultural stuff and radical solutions are required.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,096 ✭✭✭✭event


    Are you going to repeat this comment 37 times?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,000 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    I think you are being slightly on the hyperbolic side, 37 handpassesses across the course of about 75 minutes = about 2 hand passes a minute. The fix for that would be to make them go forwards.

    The tackle there is some argument. But your statement on saying 'goodbye' to the game. Gaelic football has never been as innovative since the foundation of the GAA. Borrowing pieces from other sports tactically and analytically

    As I said earlier the league has been great attacking stuff, teams mostly well met.

    I think your view of football is through rose tinted glasses, pining for the "good auld days" which always seem better when looked back nostalgically, forgetting the shite games.

    Plus lets be honest there is cohort who are never going to like tactical thinking, and strategic thinking no matter what form it comes in. Lamp it instead etc.

    The problem is the GAA rules cannot keep up with the evolution of the game, it was much easier for them when it was 15 v 15 and lamp it. Now teams actually think.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,866 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    O

    No. 37 handpasses in a row my friend.

    If anyone thinks that this and the tackle don’t need to be reformed , well what can I say.

    As for pineing for anything f from the past…… nah mate.

    Something watchable will do this poster.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,000 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Ok fair enough how many minutes did it take? What game was it?

    What was the context? Was it done to control or kill the game? Why were the opposition not able to win the ball back?

    I mean Dublin won the 2017 AI with strategic play at the end they kept the ball handpassing. Mayo were incapable of winning the ball back, due to Dublin's superior movement skill and nous.

    Peak Dublin knew when to handpass, knew when to kick, took the percentage shots. And crucially always had tremendous movement lads with their head up ready to switch play.

    The problem with the handpass is when poor teams use it constantly as a safety net with no variation, because they are afraid to kick it. The good teams still have variation in the play.

    There was some handpassing in the Dublin Monaghan game in the league but it was strategic, team probing for weakness, or taking the sting out of it. Then Monaghan struck when the time was right and won the game. If Monaghan aimlessly kicked the ball no way would they have beaten Dublin. Simple as that.

    Look at O'Hanlon's goal for Monaghan that was a handpassing move done properly.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,866 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Galway Tyrone….. done by Galway I think around the 19th min first half… score I think 4 pts each.

    There was a free to Gwy in the middle of it…short kick to a teammate and off again



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,000 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Didn't Galway get a win in the end? That to me is playing smart. Great goal scored and showed control.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,504 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    I've been hearing about forwards not being able to shoot my entire life, that they do nothing but fitness at training and must never do shooting drills, its no exaggeration to say that I have been hearing and reading that literally since I was able to pick up a newspaper back in the day.

    But back then it was players missing shots, today it is players never shooting at all.

    I have to say, I find it very strange to see players get into what I always thought were very attractive shooting positions, 20/30 yards out, with the nearest defender over 10 feet away and they don't even entertain a shot. Just turn yet again and recycle the ball back to midfield.

    There is nothing new about scoring zones but by god they take it to extremes these days if a lad free 30 yards out can't have a go at the posts.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,000 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Dubin used to that only shoot from the D in front of the posts waiting for the chance. I can't remember which year it was but it was v Tyrone in the championship. The Dublin wide count was ridiculously low, which was helped by Tyrone sitting back.

    However there are still players who take a shot from range. Fenton v Roscommon, and David Clifford v Mayo at the weekend. But those are lads not short on technique or confidence.

    I think it again comes down to players who have a fear that they will miss, or are told not too shoot from a certain range.

    Personally I think it is players lacking confidence more than anything else too easy too recycle rather than shoot. If they brought in a forward hand pass rule, they might have no choice but to shoot?

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,504 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    Diarmuid Connolly used to shoot from range, what I am talking about I wouldn't describe as being from range at all.

    Having a go from the 45 or from wide on the left is one thing, but I'm seeing players central not far from the D not even looking at the posts.

    Its bizarre, the point of recycling used to be to hold the ball until you created separation in the scoring zone. Now they have that separation and still don't shoot.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,445 ✭✭✭crusd


    5 of the first 6 passes in that Mayo Dublin game were hand passes. The reason for more positive play in that game was not lack of hand passes, it was lack of massed defences. Space is what is needed not no hand passes



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,866 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    One highlight in a seventy plus game isn’t a good watch.

    It’s not entertainment, and you know it.

    Rest of the game was to put it mildly- turgid.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,598 ✭✭✭pgj2015


    it isnt me mentioning the hand pass by the way. but there was less hand passing years ago by a long way, game is too slow now.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 55 ✭✭_Knight


    Go to 70:47 in the first video. Mayo are up by 2 points in added time and they win a free at half way.

    There isn't even an inkling of pass backwards. A ball is kicked forward.

    Nowadays, they wouldn't look forward, they'd be facing their own goal all the way back to their keeper.



  • Registered Users Posts: 55 ✭✭_Knight


    Be honest lads, gaelic football today is just basketball without a shot clock.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 925 ✭✭✭homewardbound11


    Interesting point here . Would a shot clock be worth introducing once the ball enters the opponents half . ? Worth a trial at least . Say 120 seconds once the first pass passes the half way line .

    -) probably eould speed up the game

    -) probably would make it an ultra defensive game .

    -) team like mayo would thrive as basically for them it’s 100 miles an hour once they get it past half way .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,598 ✭✭✭pgj2015


    im baffled as to why those in charge of rule changes dont make some, like would they not be guys who played the game when it wasnt 30 players in 1 half?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,000 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    What about the tactical nous the naunce of control, getting the better over a team who are better on paper? Hurling have the opposite problem too many scores.

    At least football teams can show some tactical intelligence, to get victory against teams that are slightly better than them.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,000 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    I already saw that suggested by a poster on the GAA changes thread.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,583 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    The shot clock is an old chestnut on this thread. The post I copied and pasted below is from Page 1. Imagine being a GAA footballer reading this stuff. Or a referee. They would think that people are out to make their lives a nightmare.

    "Bring in a half pitch rule like basketballs half court rule, once you bring the ball over the half it can’t go back over or you forfeit possession.

    Must keep a minimum of 3 players in your own and the the opposition half at all times.

    Bring in a shot clock if needs must. Bring in a half way line clock if needs be.

    Plenty of ways to counter 15 man possession passing and full team defending in your own half without reinventing the wheel."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,598 ✭✭✭pgj2015


    Do you get enjoyment from a game like France V Gibraltar? you know the kind of game, 11 behind the ball trying to keep France from scoring. Do you think that shows great tactics and is interesting to watch?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,096 ✭✭✭✭event




  • Registered Users Posts: 55 ✭✭_Knight


    I don't know why they're so slow to protect the entertainment value of the game.

    Compare GAA to rugby.

    For example, few years ago Ireland perfected a rule and employed a 'choke tackle'. This meant Ireland nullified the opposition using suffocation tactics. But it killed attacking play. Now once a players knee hits the ground, it's a tackle and players have to release the man.

    Similarly, laws recently introduced such as the 50/22, where if a player kicks inside his own half and puts it out inside the opposition 22, the kicker gets the lineout. This means more players need to cover the backfield, which means more space to attack the line.

    The only changes in football from what I can see in the last few years is keepers needing to kick past the 21 which teams have perfected now anyways and the attacking mark, which is a horrible rule.

    Rules need to evolve to protect the entertainment value because teams squeeze every last drop out of the rules if they remain the same.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 55 ✭✭_Knight


    I would question whether players actually enjoy playing the modern game. They might enjoy winning, but I don't know how a half forward enjoys playing football when all they do is handpass it. Maybe they are happy because they don't have the skill to kick it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,598 ✭✭✭pgj2015


    Was chatting a guy a couple of years ago, a forward, he said he had a little patch to stay in all game, it didnt sound like he was enjoying it at all. The fun is gone out of playing id say.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,296 ✭✭✭threeball


    Almost every Galway supporter would disagree with you. 90% of us are bored to tears and couldn't care less whether they win or lose at the moment. Its septic stuff to watch and its not just Galway. Even watching the All Ireland champions is a snoozefest.

    The structure of the competitions doesn't help any team experiment however, as there's no margin for losses. Once you lose 2 games in either competition you're either done for or in serious trouble.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,866 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Someone will now come along and ask for your 'survey' or stats on that statement, when the dogs in the street know its true.

    The game urgently needs to get a makeover as its not a good watch right now.

    No point in sticking your head in the sand.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,296 ✭✭✭threeball


    At least we used to be able to fall back on the club game to get some entertainment but all the little copy and paste merchant coaches have brought the IC sh1te there too. This years club championships had some of the worst games of sport I've ever had the displeasure of watching. One particular game went down to the wire but people had lost interest and for the final 15 mins 80% of people were on their phones or had left.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,096 ✭✭✭✭event




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,866 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Read the last line my friend.... tells you everything



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,096 ✭✭✭✭event


    So it wasnt 37 hand passes in a row. Gotcha



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,866 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    My friend , its people like you who can't see the wood from the trees.

    I wouldn't waste my time engaging with you.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,866 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Read Galway GAA thread from post 8095 onwards and see what Galway supporters thought of the game.

    Then tell me its a good spectator event.



Advertisement