Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Changes in the GAA - super thread

Options
1100101102103105

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 14,609 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    Don’t like absolute nothing exhibition games like the Railway Cup. Surely there’s something else that could be fit in if necessary.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,991 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    Why not have both? Players vote as well as journalists. i think the format of competitions will help just see finalists/semi finalists be rewarded more

    I dont see a 4 team all star would be great at pre season at all. might get good tv coverage but how many players would take part. county managers wouldnt want it nor would county boards.

    Why is a warm up game needed? Most other players in other counties could have club championship or anything else on.

    Why do you need to have 25th anniversary teams more a part of the occasion. and how do you do that?

    Finalists? Would they really want to come on. fair enough celebrate/honour the winners of the past but the runners up as well? Would they really be interested in that?

    Such as?



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,609 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    I dunno what else could go in there - but an Exhibition match isn't good enough.

    I'm not saying something has to go in, for what it's worth.



  • Registered Users Posts: 38,321 ✭✭✭✭PTH2009


    I see there scheduling league games for Paddys Day next year

    I'd imagine could be some chaos getting too venues



  • Registered Users Posts: 263 ✭✭agfasfos


    Where did you locate the fixtures list for the league fixtures for 2024 ?, cant see them anywhere.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,446 ✭✭✭legendary.xix


    It's tough on some counties that they are expected to play the final two rounds of the football league, possibly a league final and then provincial first round on 4 consecutive weekends.

    An alternative scheduling would be the first 3 rounds of the league, a rest weekend, another 3 rounds of the league, a rest weekend, round 7, league finals and then start the provincial championships. This way counties are not playing for more than 3 consecutive weekends.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,704 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Just sparked from a something another poster said on another thread - basically going on about how teams keep the ball for ages in football, hoping the other side make a mistake.

    Would the simple answer be a shot clock (like in basketball) could be the answer to that 'keep ball' problem? 1/2 minute limit? Have a separate ref for it in the stands. Anything more than 2 minutes of keep ball is really taking the mick as far as I am concerned. I remember years ago div 2 final Galway v Kildare. Both sides were afraid to get out of their own half and afraid to take any shot. It was not a great spectacle for the neutral.

    I think could make it harsh and give a 45 to the opposition for repetitive breeching of the rule etc. That would put some smacht on them.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,399 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    @gormdubhgorm

    I think it causes as many problems as it solves.

    There's a technological issue as players would need to see how much time they have left so the shot clock needs to be visible. So all scoreboards would need to be changed - not sure how feasible that is or what level it goes down to in the pyramid.

    30 seconds isn't a lot of time if you gained initial possession in your own square against the hurricane on a wintry day (e.g., June/July) in Salthill - probably not physically possible to go the ~60 metres needed to get a realistic shot off. So there'd have to be some 'kick it in the general direction of the goal' alternative to count as a valid shot to avoid penalty. Would this descend into 'we gain 40 metres, kick it 30 metres, try to hold them to 20 metres and when they kick it 30 metres, we have gained net 20 metres'? Like a bad NFL-USA punt-fest game.

    Lots of fun with 'did he get the shot off on 29.9 or 30.1 seconds?' arguments.

    (Maybe some limit on the amount of backward passes in any uninterrupted possession might be a better solution, probably flawed as well)



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,704 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Yeah, hard to figure it out. That is why I said two mintues max - 30 seconds does not seem long enough.

    Though a rule like that would fundamentally change the sport and could have unintended consequences - (like the advanced mark). There definitely needs to more incentive for attacking in football though. Way too easy for a side to just shut up shop. Maybe 5 points for a goal would be a much simpler solution? Or would that make some sides even more defensive?

    I don't mind a small bit of defensive football, but when they are all at it gets silly - no contrast in styles. It does not make for a nice spectacle and would not encourage neutrals to switch on.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 18,704 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    But as usual this time of year I am really looking forwards to the league, and wondering why I bother going to Leinster matches at all, we are in 2024 for flip sake, nothing changing in the provincials The spilt season was almost a smokescreen for the competition structural issues IMO. Ulster will say no - no doubt.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users Posts: 33,518 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    Came on here to raise a point, and hope this is the correct forum.

    First off, I'm not a bigg GAA fan. I'll get that out in the open, and may get told to butt out due to this, but I would have followed a bit of football many moons back.

    My point is about hurling though. Always enjoyed watching it over the years, and I know it's a very skillful game and a tough one as well, but as a spectacle is it starting to fail a little bit? I think with the strength of the players now, plus their skill levels, scoring is too easy. Watching games, guys are scoring from 3/4 of the pitch away, and seem to do it with ease. Their accuracy is amazing.

    Do rules need changed? Or equipment? To make it harder to score from so far out?



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,581 ✭✭✭MacDanger


    I'd agree that intercounty hurling could do with having a differently weighted ball to make it a little harder to score from way out.

    On the flip side, I think football would benefit from changing the ball weighting to make it a little easier to score from distance which would create more space inside as teams push out to defend



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,704 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    I think this is good idea, simple and does not radically change both codes. A slightly smaller ball in football might be the answer either.

    It would be great to see the end of glorified hurling free-taking competitions, constant risk adverse football.

    Your ideas are much better than the one I was thinking the last day when watching hurling, that that it should be 1 point for a placed ball, 2 points from play. It was correctly pointed out to me that fellas would be deliberately fouling then. So that would end up creating more problems than it would solve.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,609 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    Was at a match yesterday where the ref blew his whistle 39 times for fouls in 75 mins incl. injury time. 39! That doesn't include stopping play for Lineballs/Puckouts/Throw-Ins.

    Ball-In-Play time must have been non-existent.

    Between a taker setting up for a free, shooting it and the goalkeeper pucking the ball out it's some amount of dead-ball time.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,704 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Hurling is in danger of moving from the fastest field game in the world to the most "stop start" game in the world at this rate.

    I was trying to think of some in-between benefit instead of a free that would be permitted to shot at goal.

    Maybe a sin bin for 2 minutes for a foul might be better than a free? Could have a ref in the stands to time that.

    Only a max of 3 players can be sin binned from a team at any one time, then it reverts to the current type of free instead of a sin bin rule?

    Because if a team cannot take advantage of being 3 men up there must be something wrong.

    You certainly would have open games.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,609 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    Without having thought about that too much, I think some sort of a sin bin system is a good idea. Maybe even a totting of fouls conceded along the line of basketball



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,704 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Yeah something like that, because missing a player for two minutes in hurling can count for a lot. As there is no "black card" in hurling it could be a nice happy medium,

    But what would worry me is the competence of the officials to keep track of it, it could be fairly constant. The watch could stop, they could leave it at home etc

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,609 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    There is a black card in hurling (just in case you didn’t know!) 😎



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,704 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Jayus I must have gotten a wallop of a hurl to forget that.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 18,704 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    This is a football idea what about borrowing from Rugby? The hand pass has to go forward, the would cut out the side to side stuff and it would be much easier to ref than the thing they tried with counting the handpasses.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,803 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Would like to see them try a ban on the ball going backwards past the 21/45/65.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,685 ✭✭✭✭klose



    How this was even a thing I’ll never know.



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,803 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Larry McCarthy is a strange man. I thought we couldn't top his "and now we move on to the liars" All Ireland hurling speech but his final speech about paedophiles and sectarian cold cases was a real blast.

    A positive change for the GAA this weekend I think.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,703 ✭✭✭StupidLikeAFox


    I think the reasoning was that extra time is a separate game. The first game was drawn, the "replay" follows immediately but is actually a separate game



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,135 ✭✭✭Jack Daw


    Martin Breheny on again about 5 points for a goal he's been writing this article for as long as I've been reading the paper (25 years).Utterly stupid suggestion as if a goal is worth 5 points it devalues scoring a point and therefore ends up making the game completely tedious as teams have to go searching for goals in the main.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,991 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    Why would it devalue scoring points. Goals arent that common and this would entice more teams to try score goals which should be better for the game overall



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,609 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    Of course it would devalue scoring points. A value of 5 for a goal is ridiculous and really jumps the line of the risk/reward of going for a goal when it’s worth 3.

    They’ve sussed it out in basketball that the value of a 3 pointer and the % chance of making one makes it worthwhile to just shoot, shoot and shoot. The value of the 2 pointer is gone now essentially unless it’s a dunk or easy layup.

    In Gaelic football a 5 point goal would do the same. Going for a 1 point shot would pretty much always be crazy. Also, if you’re chasing a game and you’re fouled - the time it’ll take to get a single point back with your free wouldn’t be worth it anymore.

    Post edited by callaway92 on


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,704 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Yeah it would kill the "point" in Gaelic Football.

    What about 2 points for a long range point (from whatever defined distance) from play in football?

    I was just thinking of how well the 3 pointer worked in basketball. You would get more long range attempts then. It gives a bit of incentive for the long range point but not too much. Gives the players/team a decision to make.

    And there will be at least be one player on each side that will become the "go to man" for it. Could really make matches interesting when there are 3/4 points in it with not long left.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,135 ✭✭✭Jack Daw


    I often wonder would a 2 point shot have the same effect the 3 pointer had in basketball.You would think it would encourage teams to go for more long range points which would cause defenses to push out and therefore open up space closer to goal.



Advertisement