Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Cross-border review of rail network officially launched

12022242526

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,615 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    It is funding the operating cost.

    The additional rolling stock for this timetable increase will be a mix of ICRs released as a result of the set reformations happening with the introduction of the 41 intermediate ICR coaches, and CAF units from NI.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,853 ✭✭✭Hibernicis


    Agreed. The cryptic phrase "The additional resourcing will allow for increased capacity for Iarnród Éireann and Translink NI with their respective fleet networks" doesn't sound like "New train-sets being bought"; much more a case of stretch what you already have a bit further. Anyway 2 x €12.5m wouldn't get you a lot in terms of carriages etc.

    To be honest, reading the press release both Taoiseach and Tánaiste wax lyrical on the €600m going on the A5 and on the Carlingford Narrow Water Bridge. The bit about ramping up the Enterprise to an hourly service has the feel of crumbs from the table to give the green third wheel something to point to. Which is a pity as an hourly Belfast-Dublin service is very welcome. Now all they need to do to make it really useful is it to speed it up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,615 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Any new Enterprise rolling stock is years away.

    They haven’t even gone to tender yet.

    This is a timetable enhancement using existing rolling stock that is becoming available.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,337 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    Still pending the ministerial order, RWO require a SI to be signed and recent history shows the minister is very slow to sign off on anything



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,809 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    I remember reading about hourly frequencies and line speed improvements for Enterprise since the late nineties ...I'll believe this when I see it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,615 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Given that they have more trains as a result of the recent ICR fleet deliveries, it is now possible to deliver the hourly service.

    It wasn’t possible beforehand.

    The fact that the Taoiseach is announcing that they are committed to providing the necessary money to fund it this year tells me that this is going to happen.

    Any previous statements have been aspirational.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,853 ✭✭✭Hibernicis


    I was wondering about this. Presumably it needs PSC Decision Gate 3 sign-off from DPER before the commencement order (SI) can be signed ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,413 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    That's going to be a higgledly piggedly mess of sets - will the ICRs be the few AWS-equipped ones with Premier (and if so, which services are losing Premier as a result - Waterford where it runs unclassified I presume) and have any catering in this case? 3000s certainly won't.

    The last southbound Enterprise is a miserable experience compared to the daytime ones already.

    Going to lead to a lengthy description on Seat61 anyway!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,154 ✭✭✭Economics101


    Hourly Enterprise? What about the already congested Dublin-Drogheda section? Its a fair bet that most of the passengers, especially south of the border, will be relatively local/commuter .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,615 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    I would think that they will be ICR premier sets yes.

    As for the mixed stock, well until new Enterprise stock is ordered, it's the best that they can do if they want the increased frequency.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,477 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    The DART+ North project seems to suggest 1 Enterprise per hour + 2 Commuters per hour are doable, along with 9 DART's per hour (from Howth Junction in). I'd assume once the project is complete of course.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,615 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    It's not that congested for this not to be possible, but there won't be accelerated journey times.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,698 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    If you're going to be stuck in a noisy cramped railcar with no food options, what is the point of taking the train at all, vs. a coach?

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,615 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    There will presumably still be a trolley service on the CAF operated departures.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,640 ✭✭✭Glaceon


    Where I live it’s still the fastest way into Dublin. The only bus near me is the 101 which is the slowest by far.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,489 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    they may have stock available, but do they have drivers? Any request for increased services in the timetable consultation seems to be met with the response "we don't have enough drivers". If they do have drivers, what exactly are they doing currently?



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,477 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Isn't the train already slightly faster, depending on where you are going? The train seems to be between 2h5m and 2h15m, while Dublin Express is 2h 20m to 2h 30m.

    I think it is a great first step to get frequency up to hourly. It seems doable for a relatively low cost and that is good news.

    Other bigger, long term projects are likely to bring speed improvements over time. DART+ North to start with, but beyond that electrification, 200km/h running, new trains, perhaps triple/quad tracking, etc.

    Of course non of that is going to happen over night, but what I do like about it is there is a plan for rolling projects and upgrades that will improve it over time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,976 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    The Belfast terminus is moving from lanyon place to the new central station, that will likely take about 5 mins off the trip. Making it an even 2hrs, with hourly departures. These are good improvements for now without spending serious money.

    What it really needs long term is a new Newry to Belfast alignment, new dedicated tracks between Drogheda and Dublin, electrification, rolling stock capable of 200kmh and half hour frequency. Pretty much what is proposed in the review. In my view this is much more important than the A5. The same money could have gone an awful long way towards providing the above



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,615 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Yes, but there are new drivers constantly being trained up, and every timetable change sees incremental service enhancements as a result of that.

    This won’t be happening until much later in the year when all of the rolling stock has entered service and by then you’ll have more drivers available to drive them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,557 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    The A5 is a critical safety concern. Also it is much closer to actually needing the funding than any Newry-Belfast realignment.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,976 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Safety requirements can be met with smaller schemes without increasing the road capacity significantly. Improving the Dublin Belfast rail service is much more critical if we've to have realistic chance of reducing road journeys and meeting the 2030 targets



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,557 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    The improved Dublin-Belfast service north of the border cannot be funded by ROI right now. There is nothing to throw funding at other than what has already been funded.

    You frame it as if there is an opportunity cost here, whereby funding the A5 means less funding for Dub-Bel line. This is completely false. Any works to improve the alignment (or lay new alignment) between Belfast and the border is ultimately a matter for NI's DFI. Until they progress it enough, it cannot be funded by us.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,976 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    That doesn't make any sense, if we can fund the A5 there's no reason why not also fund rail projects.

    Even still the same money could be used to build new track between Dublin and Drogheda which would be an improvement to the Dublin Belfast service entirely within the republic and much more important than dualling the A5 in terms of reducing emissions. Safety requirements can be met locally with much less expenditure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,615 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    The Northern Line is already the subject of an EU funded feasibility study looking at possible capacity enhancements.

    Any investment in the railway line will follow from that.

    The A5 is a project that has been put back time and time again, and with 52 deaths since 2006 needs addressing in the here and now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,413 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    The idea that patchwork quilts of unspecified safety upgrades are an option for roads like the A5 doesn't wash either.

    Multiple planning processes, procurement processes and construction timelines just make an expensive mess that delivers only part of what a full scheme could; often at the same or higher cost.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,477 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Plus if we are funding the A5, shouldn't the British really pull the finger out and fund line upgrades between Belfast and the border.

    Funding the A5 makes sense for us as it improves connectivity to Donegal, that is the real justification for that project, from our perspective, it improves connectivity between two parts of our country, even if it passes through a different jurisdiction.

    For the rail line, there isn't quiet the same justification. North of the border should really be financed by NI/UK government, we have enough to do to take care of the sections south of the Border.

    Plus perhaps selfishly as I'm a Corkonian, 2 hours already sounds pretty great for intercity travel. Sure 1h 30min would be even better, but you probably don't want to push much further then that or some folks might start thinking of commuting daily between the cities, which would be a very bad outcome.

    If there is money going, I'd rather see it being pumped into improving the Cork line. Get it down to 2 hours too, which of course would also benefit Galway, Limerick, Kerry, etc. You know, all places actually in Ireland rather then a city in another state!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,615 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Any capacity improvements in the Northern Line will improve journey times to outer suburban stations and Drogheda and Dundalk, so they are important.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,809 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    Would I be right in thinking that the extra services (hourly) can only be accommodated by the new Grand Central station? Lanyon seems pretty restricted as a through-station for terminal intercity services. Any ETA on when the new station is due to open?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,640 ✭✭✭Glaceon




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,615 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,739 ✭✭✭serfboard


    I had heard nothing about the new Grand Central Station in Belfast until I read about it on this thread. There's a webpage about it here. You can also see the progress on Google Maps here. According to the website:

    it will be the main transport gateway to Belfast ... with rail, bus and coach connections to all parts of Northern Ireland and beyond.

    Also:

    work on Belfast Grand Central Station is progressing at pace with completion expected during 2025.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,477 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Yep, just to be clear, I’m not suggesting that we don’t invest in the Northern line, just that our focus and priority should be the section South of the border, which improves Dundalk, Drogheda, etc. and would likely indirectly benefit the Enterprise.

    North of the border should really be financed by the UK government.

    The thing about the A5, it feels okay, because we have already built a pretty excellent intercity motorway network, with just the M20 and a few other bits left to do. So giving money to NI to do the A5, specially when it improves connectivity to Donegal, feels okay.

    Now imagine we were doing this before the Motorway to Cork was opened, well that wouldn’t go down well. Likewise, I don’t think financing rail projects North of the border would go down well, when so much work needs to be done on our own intercity network. 0% of our intercity network is electrified, speed restricted, sections of only single track, etc.

    Fix all that first, including the southern end of the northern line and if the UK government hasn’t done the section North of the border, sure, maybe we could finance that too, though that would be a truly sad state of affairs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,154 ✭✭✭Economics101


    There are a lot of important investments in the Irish Rail network to do before we start doing the UK's job for them. Such as track doubling, lengthening of passing loops, improving service frequency, improving line speeds, and most of all network electrification.

    Maybe a bit too much emphasis on the cross-border bit: there are competing projects and priorities.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,615 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    The rail element is definitely planned to open well before 2025 - Q3 2024 is the latest I’ve heard.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 267 ✭✭Ronald Binge Redux


    Great. So you would support a motorway and railway via Sligo to stop at Bridgend, Co Donegal, at the border with Derry. Of course I'm being cynical saying this. Up here in Donegal we've had to listen to a lot of what could be called "25 County Nationalism" over the A5 and the Enterprise over the last couple of days.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,895 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    and most of all network electrification

    This might not be as far away as people think

    The tender for the Enterprise replacement was relaunched having had no takers last time round (as far as I can see)

    The spec reads:

    This is a call to competition by IARNROD EIREANN (IE) and NORTHERN IRELAND RAILWAYS COMPANY LIMITED (NI Railways) for the establishment of an 8 Year, Single Party Framework Agreement for the procurement of new Enterprise vehicles (Enterprise Fleet Replacement Agreement) required for the replacement of the existing Enterprise Fleet (the Contract). Along with procurement of the rolling stock, the scope of the procurement process will also include a maintenance contract in respect of technical support services and spares supply in relation to the new rolling stock (Maintenance Contract). IE and NI Railways (the Contracting Entity) now wish to initially procure 8 new trainsets up to a maximum of 200m in length to operate an hourly service between Dublin and Belfast. It is planned to have the entire new fleet in service in 2028 to 2029 and to deliver the end to end journey sub 2 hours or better on the existing infrastructure. Initial traction power will be Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) Battery Electric (using the existing 1.5 kV DC OHLE) with the train designed to transition to a net zero carbon operation during its life by the removal of the diesel power generation for replacement with dual OHLE power supply equipment. The trains will operate on 1600mm track gauge, will operate in full length formation of a maximum of 200m in length and will be required to meet other gauging requirements of the Irish Rail - NI Railways network.

    Couple of take aways, the contract is to start with DC OHLE and a Diesel Motors / Batteries and eventually migrate to either full OHLE or OHLE / Batteries within the 8 year contract.

    The only issue I can see with this is that Irish rail want trainsets as opposed to locomotive + passenger coaches. This is going to be a problem as I don't think anyone really makes them with multiple traction power options/combinations.

    It also says replacement with "dual OHLE power supply equipment" so one would assume the new supply will be AC, that tightens up options even more.

    I think the only company that offers a locomotive that ticks all those boxes is Stadler (EURO9000) but its a bit long 24m, which will impact the 200M limit for the train.

    I think Irish rail will come to the realisation that the OHLE will need to be installed and running first (Which could expedite this even faster) before they can purchase new rolling stock, as the battery/ICE/AC/DC combo on a trainset is far to complicated and niche for any manufacturer to invest in given we just want 8 sets.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,154 ✭✭✭Economics101


    Calm down: I was referring to the R of I paying for rail improvements north of Newry. The A5 is another matter.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,477 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Unfortunately I suspect they will start out as Bimode Diesel + 1.5kv DC (under the Dart line). Something like the Hitachi Class 800’s in the UK, though say 7 car set to come in under 200m. Once the AC is in place between Drogheda and Belfast, swap the Diesel units out for 25kv AC/1.5kv DC bimode.

    Pretty much all the major manufacturers have train sets like this, Hitachi, Stadler, Alstom, CAF.

    Also check out the Class 745, 12 car FLIRTS, they are a very flexible trainsets.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,976 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Did the tender specify a maximum speed for the trainsets?

    I see that the wicklow/rosslare capacity enhancement project is to kick off soon.

    It would be great if we could get the 4North project and electrifying Drogheda to Newry off the ground ASAP, perhaps teams that worked on the earlier stages of DART+ can be redistributed now that those projects are moving to a construction stage stoon.

    I wouldn't be all too fussed about north of Newry at that stage, let them change trains in Newry even and just buy electric trains to serve Newry-Dublin if it saves a layer of complexity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,323 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    It's hard to buy inter-city trains that can't do 200km/h these days. I suspect IÉ will have an eye on using this procurement as a trial for replacing the 201-hauled trainsets for passenger service.

    One perennial bugbear with Enterprise was the need for special trains with special signalling. Is NIR adopting the same system (ETCS) that we're going with down here? That alone would make it much easier to keep service levels up: while I know the reasons why, it's still madness that a Cork-Dublin trainset cannot fill in on the Dublin-Belfast route



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,337 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    Spec required is 180kph

    While 200kph is easy enough these days two problems

    1. Crash structure requirement add weight and take up space, bear in mind we are stuck with UK regs
    2. For the same installed power a train geared for 180kph will accelerate faster than one geared for 200kph

    Given the nature of the route, which is full of corners 200kph doesn't seem sensible



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,976 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    But the all Ireland rail review calls for about 60% of the route to be built on a new alignment from scratch by 2040 so not catering for 200kmh would be short sighted.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,477 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    I feel there are many elements of the AIRR that sound more like a wish list and have very little chance of happening this side of the next 50 years!

    There are definitely parts of the review that are completely sensible and likely to happen, but then there are more then a few items that seem way out there.

    Personally I take it more of a high level strategy that might happen over the next 50 years at best, rather then the next 20.

    180km/h should easily allow for a 1h30m journey time, which seems very reasonable to me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,739 ✭✭✭serfboard


    An awful lot of our railways could do with being built on new alignments, or at least having their alignments straightened out.

    When we built the motorway network we built on new alignments - can't see why we couldn't do the same for some of the railway lines.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,337 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    The AIRR is a shopping list and unless there is a dramatic change in politics in this country, and I don't mean the parties involved but an end the parish focus grandstanding against large scale infrastructure projects are going nowhere quickly...

    The new straight alignment at Banbridge would change the game entirely, shorter and higher speed



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,323 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    It’s somewhat nuts that NIR isn’t able to decide its own standards for this kind of thing: it’s already an non-interoperable rail network with the rest of the UK due to the break of gauge. If the signalling issue is being fixed for new stock, then the sensible thing would be to develop a common set of requirements between NIR and IÉ so that both operators would save on procurement (let alone allowing stock to cover services on each others’ networks) - NIR would be the big beneficiary of this, but it would also help down South.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,154 ✭✭✭Economics101


    Irish Rail is going over to ECTS as a train protection system. Stands to reason the NIR should do so as well. I suppose some Brexit ideologue nutters will find reasons to object however.

    Post edited by Economics101 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,323 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Logically, they should, but "Logic" and "Northern Ireland" don't meet often.

    Actually, I read recently that whatever entity runs the British rail network these days has also mandated ETCS, but because the service operators have had difficulty retrofitting existing trains (or, as this is modern Britain, "have been starved of the money to do it"), the policy there is that new stock will use ETCS, but the existing signalling will run alongside the new ETCS system for a longer period until those older trains are either converted or retired.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,337 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    Irish Rail thought it was too good for ETCS, tried to build its own solution which failed and is now back to ETCS L1

    NI will likely follow GB practice due regulations and go with ETCS L2, ETCS L2 fitted trains will work fine on ETCS L1, the IE spec for L1 on train kit requires an upgrade path to L2



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,895 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    Don't the FLIRTS use a Jacobs Bogie? Will they work on our railways?

    I know they can be outfitted with a Diesel Generator but don't think they can have battery packs. (Could be wrong) I cannot see them being developed for just 8 sets either.

    Post edited by Beta Ray Bill on


  • Advertisement
Advertisement