Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Clontarf to City Centre Cycle & Bus Priority Project discussion (renamed)

18889919394110

Comments

  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,835 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Very true and not just here, but across the entire bus network. Probably best done with automated cameras at bus gates and also cameras on the buses themselves automatically issuing fines to cars in the bus lanes.



  • Registered Users Posts: 615 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    My recent observations on the 24/7 bus lanes along Drumcondra road is that compliance is way up. If all bus lanes in the city were made 24/7, then drivers would have no excuse to justify to themselves. The vast majority of people want to respect the rules, but when there is ambiguity on the rules (only some lanes are 24/7), people abuse that ambiguity.

    Fully segregated lanes would be great, but for much of the city it's not possible given the level of driveways etc. Also, I'm not sure how well automatic cameras would work in practice given the shear level of driveways and side roads, plus at junctions you need to move into a bus lane to turn left etc.?



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,835 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Marked areas for turning lanes. If you are outside of the marked area, but in the bus lane, you get a ticket. Cars entering/exiting driveways wouldn't get a ticket as they would be 90 degrees to the lane and not actually in it and the camera couldn't catch the license plate anyway.

    Of course you'd have a process for people to challenge the fines and the camera footage could be reviewed.

    Of course you could also have static cameras at obvious pinch points, also cameras integrated with traffic lights, both to enforce bus lanes and red light jumping.



  • Registered Users Posts: 615 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    I think static cameras at pinch points is good and definitely for cars who use a bus lane to go straight through a junction.

    But any aggressive level of cameras is unrealistic. For example, it's unreasonable to expect someone to stay in a traffic jam for 5 minutes when their driveway or minor side road is only 50 metres up ahead. If they wait in the general traffic lane until right outside their driveway/side road, they will hold up all the traffic while they wait for buses, cyclists and pedestrians to clear out of the way.

    It's safer for them to use the bus lane for a short space rather than crossing a bus lane, cycle lane and pedestrian path in one move.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,228 ✭✭✭Breezer


    I’m sorry, but I don’t agree. “My house is only 50 m up ahead” becomes:

    ”I’m turning left just up ahead” (indicator on for the next 3 junctions),

    ”I’m pulling in to park just up ahead” (blocks the lane waiting for parking to appear/letting passenger out to the shops ‘just for 2 minutes’)

    ”I’m just going around the car ahead that’s turning right” (mounts the footpath to get past said car).

    We need a law that is enforced. Private traffic should not be in a bus lane. And if general traffic is so heavy that drivers feel they need to be in a bus lane to skip queues of traffic, then they’re not going to hold up that traffic for very long, relatively speaking, by turning into their driveways (while looking carefully for cyclists, pedestrians, etc.) They could also consider getting the bus instead of driving, in order to avoid the queue of traffic.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 615 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    My only point here is that over aggressive use of camera enforcement for bus lanes is unworkable when there are driveways and side roads every 20 metres.

    At junctions, yes. Bus gates, definitely. Other than that, it's not workable and unnecessary. It's not safe to cross multiple lanes in one movement.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,557 ✭✭✭Gloomtastic!


    Look into my eyes………

    Outside the bike shop at Marino Mart. It moves with you……



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,968 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    With on-bus cameras, I don't think people pulling into driveways would be an issue. A fine would be issued but the driver could challenge it, the footage reviewed and if it shows that they did turn into a driveway a short distance ahead, the fine cancelled. Those abusing it would not be seen turning on camera and their fine would stand. I don't see why it wouldn't work.

    Post edited by Pete_Cavan on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,228 ✭✭✭Breezer


    I’m going to go out on a limb and suggest it’s probably been done somewhere else, successfully, for years?

    If we could even roll these out it would be a massive improvement, I’ll give you that.

    Sorry I know we’re gone off topic now. Last I’ll say about this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,359 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    they're using a different entrance this weekend, interesting



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,366 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    That's the bus only road from Clontarf station onto the Alfie Byrne road.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,533 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    Great to hear they are having a meeting about it being difficult short term, for members to black the cycle lane and footpath.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,907 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    Didn’t interview one person who used PT. 🙄



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,470 ✭✭✭✭Murph_D


    Road tax, Joe.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,470 ✭✭✭✭Murph_D


    No suggestion at all in that blog post or related ones that members might consider parking elsewhere or using alternative means. 🙄



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,724 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    Westwood joining fee is €500 and €90 a month after that. If I was paying that kind of money I'd be wanting a car park right outside.

    It's not a driving problem, it's a Westwood problem. They're charging top dollar for a service that they cannot provide.

    They need to provide more parking or reduce they're head count or move the club somewhere else.

    Also I left town using the Car on Saturday via North Strand Rd. The plan was to only temporarily stop cars in bound right? doesn't look like there is room for 2 car lanes and 2 bus lanes on large sections of the road. I think it'll be 3 lanes max. I could be wrong now, but it doesn't seem possible to me. (and I drive a small car)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,359 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    The lanes going in and out will be the same as they were previous to the works.

    I'm a member of westwood and couldn't care less if there were no parking spaces at all so not everyone prioritises parking. You see way more people walking and cycling into the place while drivers sit in their cars blocking the bus and bike lanes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,724 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    I take you're point RE: people cycling/walking.

    Maybe they should reduce subscription for those who don't want a parking spot, they'd then know the true head count for those that wish to drive there. (and be able to plan for it accordingly)

    Probably wouldn't work though, as they have that global membership stuff (Wouldn't translate well to other westwood centres)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,557 ✭✭✭Gloomtastic!


    Chances of them doing that is next to zero but they could increase charges for members who want access to Car Park 1…….



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,359 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    i use the one in sandymount too, it has hardly any parking and it still manages to function ok.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,724 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    In Fairness the Club in Clontarf is over 10 times the size the only in Sandy mount, if you don't include the tennis courts it's about 5 times the size.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,417 ✭✭✭Shedite27


    The only thing that's changed with WW with this development is the addition of the bike lane, they need to figure out a way to better protect that from traffic.

    After that, sounds like a lot of the issues at the moment are the roadworks narrowing lanes, nce that's resolved hpefully it'll go back to functioning



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,835 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Very simple, put barriers on the car park (at least car park 1) and charge €20 per hour for parking.

    I would point out that many people who use Westwood, do so by walking/cycling/public transport. It is in the middle of a dense residential area, where lots of people can walk to it from. It is a 10 minutes walk from a major growing business park that is also served by a free mini bus. DART station right next to it, multiple bus lanes and now one of the cities busiest bike lanes. You really can't get a much better connected gym for walking/cycling/PT.

    Of course they could always look into build a multi storey car park at either car park 1 or 2. Maybe do a three way deal with DCC, Irish Rail and Westwood to develop the two car parks next to the DART station into a shared multi storey car park and close the one in front of the Gym.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,724 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    John and Mary have paid €100,000 for their Audi Q7.... they're not going to be using public transport, nor are they gonna pay for parking. There are ALOT of very expensive cars in the Westwood car park day to day.

    Westwood would lose a lot of customers if they did that. They're already way over priced when compared with Gym's like Flyefit (They're carrying 90's/Celtic tiger bloat).

    Realistically it's to big a premises in the wrong place. I think multistory would be an option but again that comes back to paying.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,835 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    If you put paid parking in, they will have to pay or leave their car home, simple as that.

    Tough if they aren't happy with it and tough on Westwood if they aren't, neither have a god given right to block bus lanes and cycle lanes.

    BTW I'd disagree that high earners don't use public transport, lots of folks with high paying jobs using the DART on the way too and from work, etc.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,039 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    The problem is not one of payment, public transport, spaces or whatever. It is simply one where people driving there feel they have the right to block the bus lane, the cycle path and the foot path. The gardai pretty much don't want to be bothered with it and the WW management don't care (and don't want to annoy their members by asking them to obey the law).

    WW need to be encouraging members to use the overflow car park (by choosing it before the main car park) and not creating traffic obstructions. How they do that though is really up to them but the council should be penalising them otherwise.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,835 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    You do that via barriers and paid parking. Basically the issue is too many people trying to park in car park 1, thus leading to queues.

    By making it €20 [1] per hour for car park 1 (while free for car park 2) you encourage less people to use car park 1 (the price sensitive ones) and thus eliminate the queues.

    [1] doesn't need to be €20, could be €5 or €50, whatever the price needs to be so that car park 1 is never full and thus no queues.

    It is the same concept how congestion charging works or the tolls on the port tunnel. The aim isn't to stop everyone from using them, but to reduce usage to a sustainable level.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,039 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    You do that via barriers and paid parking. Basically the issue is too many people trying to park in car park 1, thus leading to queues.

    You will still get the seflish entitled tossers sitting in their cars on the bus lane & cycle path while they wait the half hour for the barrier to lift.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,835 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    The point would be to set the parking charge high enough so that the car park is never full, so there would be no waiting at the barrier, there would always be space available in the car park.



Advertisement