Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

University Hospital Limerick- what can be done?

  • 24-02-2024 10:51pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,465 ✭✭✭History Queen


    There are lots of problems with the HSE-Long waiting lists, runaway budgets, trolley crises etc etc... but for those of us misfortunate enough to count UHL as our local hospital, all of these problems seem to be even more pronounced here.

    The CEO recently went on leave and there have been at least three inquirys in to patient deaths there reported in the media in recent months.

    Why has it become such a runaway train? And more importantly, what can be done?



«134

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,594 ✭✭✭karlitob


    UHL is the Model 4 hospital in the region (UL Hospital Group) - the old regional hospitals. There are no Model 3 hospitals within the Hospital Group - the old General Hospitals. Model 3 hospitals are an incredibly important part of the Irish health care system - they’re the work horses that get through an enormous amount of work. They provide elective and general medical and surgical services. They also treat unscheduled patients through acute medical assessment units (AMAU). emergency departments (ED), and intensive care units (category 1 or 2 CU) and may cater for some specialist services such as obstetrics, gynaecology, or paediatrics.

    ULHG is the ONLY HG in Ireland without a Model 3 hospital in its network. That means that UHL have to provide all services. It puts enormous pressure on the hospital.


    ED. There’s often reference to an Emergency Department crisis. There is no ED crises - there’s a bed crisis. In fact, some suggest - and not unreasonably that we have too many EDs in Ireland (I would subscribe to that). There is simply no place to put patients on the wards who have been admitted from ED. The problem comes from those patients - who are nearly always older persons - requiring significant amounts of care on an ED which isn’t built for it. Meaning that care is missed for others who attend - which gives you the very sad output of those persons who recently died. Regrettably, it’s a system not adequately built for the demands on it.

    Often mentioned is the closing of EDs in Ennis and St John’s, the issue is inpatient beds - UHL sends patients to beds all over the Hospital Group continually. Opening up EDs in those hospitals will result in worse care.

    UHL has been underfunded per capita for decades. In 2019, the Clinical Directors published an open letter where they outlined that UHL serves a population of approximately 385,000 while Beaumont serves 290,000; Beaumont has 630 inpatient beds while UHL has 454; Beaumont has 31% more staff; UHL saw 63,850 new emergency patients while Beaumont saw 52,956. Beaumont has access to three Model 3s. This has changed in recent years - I haven’t researched the stats

    Theres a lot that needs to improve in the health service. These deaths are tragic. But the notion that ‘better’ management can build a model 3 hospital, can build all the new beds it requires to meet the demands of a large region, can hire all the expert staff that it needs at a larger rate than other hospitals - it’s risible.






  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,465 ✭✭✭History Queen


    Thanks for the detailled reply. Really interesting reading. I didn't know that about UHL being the only hospital group without a Model 3 hospital.


    In my own interactions with the UHL group in recent years I've seen a huge disparity in service level and quality. Ranging from misdiagnosis in the ED to a missing patient file, to excellent patient care and diagnostics in the Breast Clinic.


    The inability for local GPs to refer to some clinics such as ENT without patients going through A&E seems to be another issue. Those patients are not "emergencies" but they cannot access the ENT department without first presenting to the already overburdened ED. And because they aren't an emergency, they are inevitably in for a long wait following triage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,594 ✭✭✭karlitob


    And to be fair to government there’s been a lot of investment.


    That said - 80,000 people is a lot.

    https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2024-01-18/33/

    The Emergency Department at UHL continues to manage high volumes of patients attending and like many EDs around the country is currently seeing a surge in patients with respiratory conditions. In 2023 the ED had 80,000 presentations,12% more than 2019.

    Significant additional investment has been provided to University Hospital Limerick in recent years, including the opening of 150 additional beds in the UL Hospital Group since 1st Jan 2020 - 98 of these beds have been in UHL.

    Over the past year the hospital has increased ED staffing and enhanced alternative care pathways to reduce demand on the ED and better facilitate patient flow. The Geriatric Emergency Medicine unit recently expanded to 24-hour operations during weekdays. Recruitment is complete following the Safer Staffing review that saw approval granted for 21.5WTE additional ED staff nurses. In the past year, an additional two consultants in emergency medicine have been recruited for the ED.

    The UEC Operational Plan contains measures to support the health system during the period of peak seasonal demand. There is ring-fenced funding to support specific named measures to provide additional capacity during the period of surge associated with exceptionally high level of respiratory illness. Funding and pathways are in place to facilitate hospital and CHOs to access additional hospital and community bed capacity in the private sector to facilitate optimum patient flow and to avoid congestion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,704 ✭✭✭flutered


    in other words re open st johns ennis and neneagh, a neighbour of mine was sent to neneagh 60 niles foe a tooth extraction, another was sent to tralee for camera up his bum 80 miles, this does not make sense



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,786 ✭✭✭mohawk


    It would take years to plan and build a Model 3 hospital. Plus the cost of it

    Could one of Ennis, Nenagh ot St John’s be ungraded to a Model 3? It would still be expensive.

    This isn’t the first time I have seen a link made between no Model 3 hospital in the region and the problems that hospital is having. The trolley crisis in UHL is constantly on the news. The Department of Health and successive Health Ministers know there is a problem in the UHL group and what action is being take ?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,594 ✭✭✭karlitob


    It does make sense. You’ll see why from my post.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,594 ✭✭✭karlitob


    I suppose that’s my point. Per capita, Limerick and the wider region have historically not been given the resources it deserves and requires. It’s not a management issue.

    The reason why Model 3s are always linked is because it’s a key factor. That and the reduced number of staff when compared to other hospitals. Limerick doesn’t have the beds and doesn’t have the staff for the service and demands that are required.

    I don’t understand your point about upgrading Ennis etc. Limerick doesn’t need a change in hospital grading - it’s needs more hospitals with more staff. There’s simply not enough beds and staff - regrading another hospital doesn’t do anything.

    The purpose of the RHAs is that money follows the patient. So we’ll see.


    As for being constantly in the news because of trolleys. I’m not sure what to say - bad news sells. Media love referencing that it’s the worst in the country but they never give the reasons why or what is being done to address it. Plenty of other hospitals have trolley issues but since they’re not as bad it’s not in the news. Trolley numbers are published daily. Remember - the issue is insufficient number of beds for admitted patients

    https://www2.hse.ie/services/urgent-emergency-care-report/


    The last thing I would say is - this is our health service, these are our health care staff, this constant negativity has a major affect on morale across the health service. Limerick performs very well on lots of metrics. We only hear the bad.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,594 ✭✭✭karlitob


    I understand that. Hospitals are merely collections of services - it’s normal in every hospital to have differing level of quality and service. To be fair, breast clinic is relatively straight forward and fully funded. ED isn’t. It’s as simple as that.

    As for ENT, it’s a surgical speciality and the only way to be admitted is by the ENT consultants themselves electively by patients who attend their outpatients, and emergency (trauma…RTCs etc). Otherwise GPs can refer to their clinic as an outpatient. I haven’t heard of services refusing to take outpatient referrals from GPs and asking them to send people to ED. Not doubting you but if that’s true it’s done to maximise their efficiency so that they can see the right patient at the right time.



    More to read below. Great to see this done but announcing, building and having an effect takes time. Regardless it’s still not enough for now. And we already know that the population is increasing, more people will go into the 65+ and 80+ bracket meaning that we’ll be running to stand still IF we’re lucky once they’re built.

    https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2023-01-18/1518/



  • Registered Users Posts: 925 ✭✭✭angel eyes 2012


    You have stated that Limerick Hospital doesn't have the staff for the service and demands that are required. They seem to have plenty of staff and tax payer funding for inclusion cakes, surely not a priority during a crisis? https://twitter.com/ULHospitals/status/1759882116785938887?t=RiitVodbQIWxDwlLD90NeQ&s=19



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,955 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    One thing it seems (from the outside) that the HSE doesn't followup on outcomes and the effectiveness of the treatment, especially time spent in hospital. Various people I've known that have had surgeries that, in other hospital systems would be brief stays in hospital, stay for days in hospital in Ireland. A plumber's wife due to have a second baby spends 3 days in hospital before going into labor. Surely 1 would be sufficient? Another woman having a hysterectomy, a week. Worst I've heard of is 2 days in the US, oh and there were no complications and, in fact, she was checked in a day early, unnecessarily.

    Plus the repeat surgeries aren't a good look. Another friend going in for the same bladder surgery for the third time. Three times? Really? A friend's healthy daughter breaks a finger playing basketball, has surgery, gets an infection from the surgery, back again two more times. An infection from surgery? Don't they sterilize surgical tools in Irish hospitals? Let alone get hardware at woodies to perform scoliosis surgeries - rogue surgeon? Really? Never a systemic failure in the HSE, oh no.

    You can have as many beds as you need, if the surgical and nursing care is poor (looking at NUI Galway and poor Savita H.), you'll fill them up soon enough.

    Accountability is not the motto of the HSE.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,637 ✭✭✭weisses


    We need to stop using EDs as a first contact source.... my experience during internship in an ED was that many patients who presented were not emergencies as such, EDs now function as a catch all hub... Patients should be seen in the community and only be transfered/referred to an acute hospital as a final option. I think the idea of slainte is adressing this issue but ofcourse the people who need to realize this are not up to the job while being massively overpaid at the same time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,465 ✭✭✭History Queen


    Agree with much of this. But for lots of patients they are referred to A&E by GPs because there is no referral pathway direct to certain services. This is highly inefficient. Those services are overstretched but making it harder to access them doesn't help the matter it just pushes the queue of waiting patients in to the ED department. People say "oh when i was last in the ED there were people there that should not have been" well in some cases they may have had no choice. There should be some sort of triage service for access to particular specialist departments that GPs can engage with to avoid the ED being overrun.

    As a result of constant overcrowding and poor patient service, tempers are frayed and many staff are working in a toxic environment. This creates a vicious circle and leads to poor patient outcomes. Mistakes are made, corners are cut, things are missed I would argue on a more frequent basis than should be the case. People who are very ill and elderly in particular are afraid to attend the hospital with the result that they linger at home and get sicker befire eventually being forved to present.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,594 ✭✭✭karlitob


    That looks like a patient support initiative in the paediatrics ward. I’d say you’re a lovely person in the flesh.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,594 ✭✭✭karlitob


    I’m not sure how to respond to that.

    It’s a mish mash of things that you’ve combined in your head that represents the output of our Health Service.

    There are millions of appointments, interventions, assessments, appointments and procedures every year in the health service. Millions. A hospital in an inherently dangerous place, and it’s full of sick people - so yes, incidents happen and lots of them. Your expectation of no harm ever is naive and unachievable in any health service anywhere in the world with all the money in the world.



  • Registered Users Posts: 925 ✭✭✭angel eyes 2012


    You never answered my question, just got personal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,594 ✭✭✭karlitob


    And I agree with much of this. I can’t account for it so not sure how to comment.

    Efficiency depends on perspective. Lots of GPs refer to lots of services; and not all valid. Health doesn’t know which person to which service. There are 900,000 on waiting lists - we don’t know if it’s 900,000 unique people or 1 person with 900,000 referrals. Not all referrals are valid, or sensible. The only thing I can think of is that it’s more efficient to make GPs refer to ED than accept referrals from everyone and everywhere gumming up their waiting lists with inappropriate referrals. (Just cos the GP says you need ENT doesn’t make it true - that’s for ENT to decide).

    All in all it’s a symptom of a regional health service under pressure and services doing their best to meet the demand, mitigate the risk, and ensure effective outcomes for patients.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,594 ✭✭✭karlitob


    I got personal??? You called patients and staff ‘inclusion cakes’ - an obvious dismissive phrase to the work of staff and to the mental health of patients who attend.

    in your ignorance to be smart, you are probably unaware that this is volunteer staff who’s role is to support the patient.

    You also haven’t highlighted how a few badges and a tweet to show support for persons struggling with their sexuality can know it’s safe to speak with a health care professional while they are in hospital affects patient safety and how it isn’t a patient quality initiative. You haven’t said how this affects other care being provided. You haven’t said how this is a mental health initiative to support those who need to talk.

    Instead you were just trying to be smart but denigrating people who care and people who need help


    https://healthservice.hse.ie/healthcare-delivery/ul-hospitals-group/ulh-blogs/call-out-for-pals-volunteers-in-university-hospital-limerick.html



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,594 ✭✭✭karlitob


    In the Oireacthas reference I put above you see the investment made into Ennis and St John to do exactly this.

    Patients are seen in the community - GPs, Community Health Centres, Pharmacists, etc.

    Can I ask your basis about people who are overpaid needing to realise this? What’s your basis for that?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,594 ✭✭✭karlitob


    And can I add - there is a central referral

    system already in place for GPs. So not sure about the ENT having to come to ED but what you suggest is already there.


    https://healthservice.hse.ie/healthcare-delivery/ul-hospitals-group/information-for-gps/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,842 ✭✭✭geotrig


    So how do they get a a "model 3 " Hospital into the group is their an option there or does it require a new build? The comparison between Beaumont/uhl is very interesting.

    On a side note I was led to believe before that their is a lot of inefficiency s in the system due to double jobing in free amalgamation when the current health board was created is this still true ?

    Also it's a bugbear of mine that certain departments run nearly 9-5 and an ED can be left waiting until it reopens,



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,594 ✭✭✭karlitob


    It’s a new build and as I reference above there is none planned for the region but one in Dublin, Cork and Galway. Patients will be referred to them from Limerick.


    So there are hospitals, hospital groups, community services, national operations and other national services. That’s being changed with the RHAs. In an organisation of 150,000 people no doubt there are roles that add little value but it’s not at the scale that people make out. Nor would it have the impact that people suggest. It’s a simple answer to a complex problem without understanding the question.


    The 9-5 is an interesting problem. The simple answer again is capacity. If it takes 100 people working 40 hours to run a service 9-5; then it’ll take more staff at higher rates to open longer. You can’t underestimate the impact on other services.

    Take Day Surgery - if the list overruns, everyone is under pressure. Nurses, porters, catering, kitchen, physio, surgical cleaning, MRI etc. It’s not so easy to open departments later.

    I’ve been part of a few pilots - you’d be surprised who refuses later appointments.



  • Registered Users Posts: 449 ✭✭L.Ball


    We have a record record budget surplus but unfortunately throwing money on a broken system will produce nothing.

    Speaking to other people's posts above, having spent over 100 hours in A&E's in the past 2 years with family members, they are clogged with people with sore legs, nauseu, drunks etc. and before you give out to those people, the fact is they cannot get a GP appointment, if I'm ill tomorrow I won't get an appointment at my GP till later in the week, so if my symptoms get bad I'd probably have to go to the A&E, and contribute to the number of "unnecessary" visits.

    How do you even fix this? Build or expand clinics around the country, with today's building costs and lead times? Incentivize our newly graduate doctors nurses to stay in the country? How do we even do that when there's nowhere for them to live, and that also covers attracting the best doctors and nurses from abroad, because they're gonna wanna live in a country where they can buy a home or rent at a reasonable price. Fix the atrocious agency worker situation? How? there's contracts in place. If any political party could actually sit down and come up with a real concrete plan to address these issues and the many many more in the health service, they'd win by landslide.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I think right there is why nobody’s ever going to fix health in Ireland.

    I don’t think iv heard a single person ever ask this question on the news or radio or anywhere actually.

    Why are so many people getting sick & ill?

    Look at the absolute crap we are buying and eating and drinking. Look at what goes into growing our food and how clean our water is. And women pretty much dont breastfeed anymore. Were feeding kids manufactured powder from another mammal. That’s absolutely detrimental to our health imo.

    Take 1 or 2 Billion from the HSE Budget, give it too farmers as a subsidy on condition that they produce the highest quality food without the use of chemicals or fertilisers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,594 ✭✭✭karlitob


    On agency, that issue is being addressed over the past number of years. There’s over €35m in funding for frontline nurses invested to date.

    I would note that the savings made are the agency fee (around 5% plus VAT). It’s not the beast of money everyone thinks it is. I’d also say that nurses want agency - they don’t want to give this up. Criticism should go to these nurses also, not just management.


    I hear the point about GPs. But again, GPs are private sector staff. They are not health service staff. GPs controlled how many people who were allowed to be trained as GPs for years. They kept a closed book. And now you hear references to ⅓ will be retired in the next 10 years. Who’s the blame for that? Remember, the HSE don’t control colleges or training or the RCPI/RCSI. The HSE can’t dictate who will be trained, when, how many and to what standard.



    All in all, the of capacity and demand is not an Irish only one. It’s a developed world problem. Quite simple healthcare has changed from treating singular diseases like heart attack on the cardiac ward to chronic disease management with interfaces of care between primary, secondary and tertiary services both public and private in older persons with more co-morbidities and more research, standards and guidelines to implement. To say it’s complex is an understatement.

    All on the back of decades (and I mean decades of underfunding). When you compare health services internationally - NHS Scotland is probably the most comparable as is our geography (ish). They should be our model.

    I know people won’t agree with me but we’re not doing so bad in the health service.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,842 ✭✭✭geotrig


    I’ve been part of a few pilots - you’d be surprised who refuses later appointments.

    I was thinking of this very fact as an issue myself

    Is there a reason the me was overlooked for a model 3 new build?

    Thanks to your posts I gave a better understanding of the issues faced there



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,594 ✭✭✭karlitob


    Nail on the head. This is from the UK.


    ‘fixing healthcare’ is the wrong end of the stick.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,594 ✭✭✭karlitob


    I think simple geography. One for the big smoke and one south for Limerick, Kerry, cork. And one for west - Donegal, Cavan, Westmeath etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,594 ✭✭✭karlitob


    Not at all.

    All given on the caveat that it’s only one persons perspective. If we could all accept that there’s so simple solution to complex problems which have multiple causes and no silver bullet then we’d all be in a better place.

    All in, it really is a good health service. My heart does go out to people who’ve been harmed. You’ve no idea how much that affects health care professionals and how hard they work to improve the quality of the service they provide. Looking back at hard cases it’s easy to identify the problems - it’s no excuse, it’s just trying to explain why what happens, happens.



  • Registered Users Posts: 925 ✭✭✭angel eyes 2012


    Yes, you did get personal, remember "hate the post, not the poster".

    You actually have no idea whether I support this initiative or not, you just made an assumption, and didn't welcome diversity of opinion on the prioritisation of scant resources.

    Fair enough, if this initiative was rolled out by staff volunteers on their own time.

    I note the the majority of posters under the tweet on X are far more vocal and negative than I have been. Some of the comments have been hidden by UHL too, which makes me wonder does the hospital include the input and opinions of everyone.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,594 ✭✭✭karlitob


    Oh well of the majority of posters are more negative than you have been, then I must get your reward ready.

    Too bad those posters didn’t teach you to ask first rather than post stupid comments.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29 textiles


    Thanks for the helpful information you've given on this thread - very informative. What is it about NHS Scotland that we should model (I understand the population/geography comparison) ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,637 ✭✭✭weisses


    What is wrong with Nurses wanting to work for Agency?... Why should they be criticized ? The flexibility suits their needs in a rotten system that is the opposite



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,594 ✭✭✭karlitob


    Those are the two main issues.

    The third is their regionalised health boards. To be fair, we are now adopting that. It will take time to see change but we are doing it. It’s disingenuous to say that we’re bringing back the health boards - it’s not the same model.

    Theyve had investment for decades - they’ve 22000 beds compared to our 12000 (approx last time I checked). Not that I’m advocating so many beds - just good to compare a geographically dispersed small population in a geographically / topographically difficult environment.

    Finally - it’s less politicised. NHS Eng is a mess - a total mess (and they don’t have social care which we do - and rightly so). Need I say anything about NHS Northern Ireland. And NHS Wales does ok for itself.


    In Ireland, we need to depoliticise Health. Far too many people want services on their doorstep. It’s not safe or sustainable to do so. 32 EDs for a country of 5 million - Madness. Demands for PCI centres in Waterford even though there’s one in Cork and Dublin because they get their nose put out of joint in Waterford - madness. Out of the 50 acute hospitals in the state - 20 (totally need to check that figure) are voluntary - own Board, own staff, but all money from public purse. I think that’s mad - though the output from those hospitals is world class in some areas (SJH, Mater, Beaumont). You’ll have seen the debacle with National Maternity Hospital (a voluntary Catholic hospital) going to St Vincent’s (a voluntary Catholic hospital) and them fighting about ‘independence’ - madness.

    We have Dublin, Cork, Galway and Limerick. To be fair, the latter three are relatively small. So we should - and do - have major tertiary hubs in Dublin but we need to bolster our hubs in the other three.

    We happily accept that UHL - the regional is the regional hospital in the area supported by other hospitals …Croom etc But we need to get into that mindset nationally also - instead of this professional protectionism.


    There’s also a challenge needed to put on HCPs also. The most common ortho procedure on waiting lists related to back injections and the other is arthroscopies. The evidence base behind back injections is weak; far better hire bucket loads of specialist physios who provide better care and better outcomes than injections. The evidence base behind arthroscopies is even poorer - they should be stopped unless a high bar of justification. Have you ever tried to suggest to an orthopod not to operate. Ha!!!!


    Not sure that made any sense now that I read back on it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 87,871 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    UHL has been an issue for many years with different health ministers failing to remedy the problems there or even coming close to solutions

    If it's not Dublin, do they even care

    Who are the main government TDs for Limerick, they need to be more vocal

    I think another A&E for acute care near the area, in the county, might help

    Has nearby Clare and Tipperary any open?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,594 ✭✭✭karlitob


    Well - and this shouldn’t be a surprise to you - not all nurses are Florence. Nightingale. Some are Nurse Ratchet.


    An an employer, it’s incredibly hard for an organisation to plan its service on the fear that someone might be working on your ward on a Monday and in a different hospital on a Tuesday. The nurse doesn’t get more money by the way (not at macro level and when you consider absence of pension contribution). Some

    agency nurses have been on the same line for years!! Same ward every day - they’re effectively employees. It’s not unreasonable for an employer to want to have a stable workforce and put staff where they are needed based on agreed ratios, patient acuity and patient dependency - that’s the fundamental basis of Safe Nurse Staffing that I referenced above.

    If they want flexibility - off they go to private sector. I would caveat of course that the HSE is THE most flexible organisation in Ireland for nurses - more than any other organisation in Ireland, more than ANY other profession. They wouldn’t get it anywhere else.

    There are physicians, surgeons, nurses and pharmacists - each with their own sub specialities. There ~ 30 Health and Social Care Professionals. If you think they all speak with the same voice asking for the same things and show no professional protectionism, then you’re naive to say the least. Why can’t a profession be criticised? All people who work in health care for the patient - nurses care more do they? So always listen to them? Doctors care more do they - so always listen to them.


    The figures speak for themselves - just FoI Safe Nurse Staffing data. Based on international research, over decades, and agreed by unions in 2019, loads of wards are either over staffed or perfectly staffed for the service they provide on a ward. It’s just habit to mouth off.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,594 ✭✭✭karlitob


    And with respect, people of lettekenny say the same, Portlaoise, Waterford, Mullingar etc. everyone thinks that about their local hospital.

    Limerick is a little more unusual - the public and the media are more critical of it than the other hospitals around the country. My only reasoning to that is that Limerick is not as big as Dublin and bigger than small towns and so it’s the right amount of focus on that’s not lost in Dublin and doesn’t peter out in small towns. Who knows? But it is more virulent that’s for sure.


    For example, a few years ago - the first NPHET on CPE. Jesus - the staff were ripped out of it as if it was the hospitals fault. A community generated infection and the hospital gets national focus and national blame. Madness.




    Interestingly, there was an ESRI report out a few years ago saying that community services were not being provided pro rata to the hinterland of Dublin - Meath, Kildare, Wicklow etc but instead being sent West because of political giving out. People and politicians saying that they’re not getting their dues cos Dublin gets everything. The data is there to inform this but - as I say - politics.



    Finally - Noonan was Health Minister and did a good job. But he got caught with the HepC scandal. And because he didn’t get everyone what they wanted when they wanted he got slated. Since then all ‘scandals’ are highly politicised (see a pattern) and those affected get anything they want - even when the blame doesn’t lie with Health Service. Take a look for yourselves when you see how hard it is to say something about an affected group - madness.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-29735725.ampo



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,955 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Yes, and does HSE in fact gather data on the effectiveness of their treatments and make improvements? And perhaps publish it for taxpayers to see how our euros are being spent? Again, I only have anecdotes but it seems like Ireland does worse in terms of medical outcomes. If an otherwise healthy woman needs 2 days for a hysterectomy in the US, why is it a week in Ireland?

    If you have a shortage of 'bed days' because people are in beds and not being treated, wouldn't it be more economical to send them home, or at least figure out ways to safely shorten the stays? A savings of 10% of stay time means a lot more capacity - for free.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,594 ✭✭✭karlitob


    Of course they publish it.

    Performance Profile

    NCCP

    Cancer Registry

    HIPE / ABF

    NQAIS / NQI

    HPSIR

    MPSIR

    NOCA

    Annual Reports eg Sepsis, etc

    HPSC

    Dont forget - the HSE is cradle to grave. It includes environmental health - all assessments of dodgy Chinese restaurants to the quality of the seawater. There’s enough there to keep you going if you’ve any specific queries let me know and I can direct you


    The HSE is one of the biggest data gatherers in the country / if not the biggest. Of course it publishes it - search there website. Of course they’re held to account - search oireacthas health committee.


    We don’t have worse health outcomes.


    As you can imagine to an organisation of 80000 + scientists - anecdotes is of limited use. Do you seriously want me to comment on why a women in the US only keeps a mother in for two days and a week here. Where to start:

    • Nothing about the US healthcare should ever form a basis of discussion
    • More women and babies die (yes DIE) in the US than ALL other developed countries. Off you go and your child there if you wanna take the chance.
    • I would have thought it obviously but they only stay two days because it’s based on cost, not need. Women stay in hospital here for as long as they need (not want).
    • We have the best maternity services in the world (says he confidently - close to if not the best).
    • You clearly no nothing about hysterectomies - some are laparoscopic but some include the removal of fallopian tubes, and their ovaries, all through their stomach. TAH BSO - look it up, you might learn something. Imagine thinking that the health service would be better if women were kicked out of hospital after 2 days post hysterectomy. I’ve treated many women post op - not a fun surgery.

    As for bed days; approx half of all bed days are used by people 50+. Of the delayed transfers of care, those numbers more or less match those waiting for admission. But here’s the kicker - while those patients do not need acute medical care they do need care - lots of it. Healthcare in the developed world is chronic disease

    management of older persons. Loads of people live alone and rely on care provided by their families. It’s exhausting for them. It’s not so easy to say ‘right, acute needs are finished, off you go home’. Frailty is an accumulation of health conditions which is staff intensive. It can’t be fixed by a tablet.

    Even if you magically found beds in nursing homes or care in the community to meet demand we’d still run at 100% occupancy - which is unsafe. International guidelines are 85%. That is, 15% of beds should be empty for safety. We run at 120% usually.

    I don’t mean to sound sarcastic but of course that’s been thought of. Of course that work has happened. Of course there’s a HUGE and I mean HIGE focus on discharge; there’s too many people coming to our services. And when we do discharge - then something happens and the health service is slated. There’s no winning. All on the presumption that discharge was incorrect of course




    All very sad. And all have their specific details that can’t be rounded up. It’s just to highlight the point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,465 ✭✭✭History Queen


    Alan Kelly was speaking about UHL in the Dáil today. Much of what has been discussed in this thread was mentioned by him. He's calling for a model 3 hospital.


    https://labour.ie/news/2024/02/26/government-have-lost-confidence-to-deal-with-uhl-situation-mid-west-needs-a-model-3-hospital/



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I didn't know there are 32 EDs in the country.

    Which ones would you close? Is it not better to have an ED to stablize someone before shipping them off to a more specialized hospital to continue their care? Or should there be more helicopter transfers to replace closed EDs? Helicopters have their own drawbacks as well, can't be used in rough weather for example.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 449 ✭✭L.Ball


    Your posts all seem to long winded versions of "everything's fine stop complaining other places have it worse". If all the data indicates that out health service isn't an abject disaster, then why is it so hard to find anyone with anything good to say about their experience with it?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,465 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Is it not better to have an ED to stablize someone before shipping them off to a more specialized hospital to continue their care?

    It is potentially counterintuitive but (to a point at least) the answer is no.

    ED treatment is a perishable skill so to speak, those who see fewer acute emergencies simply won't be as good at treating them. I'm going off memory here, so the exact numbers may be wrong, but for example when they shut the 24 hour Roscommon ED much of the coverage failed to mention that the cardiac fatality rate was something like 4 times as high as in Galway ED. You were better off staying in the ambulance, with well trained paramedics, to get to a large, experienced and resourced ED. The ambulance service probably isn't good enough overall though.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    That's interesting, that patients would be better staying in an ambulance to a better ED further away.

    I'm shocked there's so many EDs. I don't think many people realise that.

    Which should be closed? I guess Ballinasloe is close enough to Galway and motorway all the way in.



  • Registered Users Posts: 134 ✭✭oohlalala


    You seem quite up to speed with the situation.

    I've contended for a long time that population increase is the most significant factor for much of this record strain on public infrastructure. As in, previously existing factors such as funding/planning/efficiency have always been problematic, but the extra demand on top is breaking the system.

    Obviously it's a complicated situation but I see you mentioning demand several times.

    What are your thoughts on record population increase as a factor?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,594 ✭✭✭karlitob


    There are 29 24/7 EDs and 11 Injury Units.


    I’d close Portlaoise, for one.



    The type of patient that I think you’re thinking of is a major trauma patient. Ireland has way too many hospitals that deal with major trauma. We don’t have much major trauma - at least not the major trauma that I think you’re thinking of…..car accidents, exploding buildings, etc. Major trauma in a developed countries health service is hip fractures in people over 65. It’s actually very interesting stuff. The point about an ED or major trauma centre is to stabilise but then to treat as soon as. Why would you have an ED, in a small hospital, understaffed and staffed by people who don’t have the same experience or exposure to lots of trauma to build that expertise, without experienced clinical oversight just to stabilise a person before sending them another hospital which has ICU or surgery. Lots of our EDs have no surgical specialities required for the trauma that presents. The notion of speed to ED is an outdated one. We’re in a small country - we can get around it very quickly. Yes we should have more helicopter transfers.





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,594 ✭✭✭karlitob


    Exactly. It’s often forgotten that Frank Feighan lost his seat in Roscommon and was effectively shunned for years by people of Roscommon. No one said thanks for the fantastic health centres that have been put in / developed which gave the sick of Roscommon exactly what they needed - the right treatment, to the right people at the right time.

    If Ireland wants to improve its health service us citizens have to play our part too and not expect every service on our doorstep.


    God forbid I mention Cancer Centres of Excellence or PCI centres in Waterford.

    Post edited by karlitob on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,594 ✭✭✭karlitob


    Thanks. To be fair, what I’ve said is no secret, fully in public domain, well known by politicians and departments, known by healthcare professionals governing bodies etc.

    Yes, I agree. Population increase is a significant factor in my view. As I mentioned above, health care in the developed world can be boiled down to chronic disease management among older people. That’s who’s in our ED, that’s who’s in our ICUs, that’s who’s in our Major Trauma Services.

    Every person over 80 will use significant resources of the health service. Most people over 65 will. Not that many under-8s getting a GP card will. Don’t take this as criticism of older people - far far from it. We need to respond to it better. It will of course - eventually - be us.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,594 ✭✭✭karlitob


    Thanks for your contribution. I’m not sure you’ve read my posts closely enough.

    I have provided you with a wealth of objective evidence of the state of outcomes of our health service, I have acknowledged the prolonged waits for admission to ED (inc a link to where it’s measured daily), I have given some reasons from my perspective (with supportive evidence) as to why this occurs and what could be done, I have referenced tragic cases in which these issues where a contributory factor in those deaths, I have highlighted that in a service which provides millions and millions of appointments, procedures and investigations that lots of error and harm occurs, and I have challenged a lad who said he’s mothers, cousins, brothers sister - in AMERICA of all places - thinks our Health Service is poor (or the dreaded ‘third world’ BS); and you want to know why there’s such bad press.

    Well maybe because these cases are sad, maybe because people are seeking validation for themselves or their loved ones for the difficult time that they’ve been going through, maybe some people like to moan and moan and moan, maybe some people don’t like evidence as it challenges their perceived notions based on nothing but anecdote, maybe some people want to have an ED in the back end of Roscommon, and maybe not all journalist or media are insightful intellectuals. Take your pick.


    But since you brought up the topic, I’m sure you’re aware of the National Patient Experience Survey. A fantastic piece of work by many dedicated people.

    In 2022 Ireland’s fifth National Inpatient Experience Survey was carried out. Patients aged 16 years or older, who spent at least 24 hours in a public acute hospital and who were discharged from hospital during the month of May 2022, were invited to participate in the survey. 82% of participants rated their overall experience of hospital care as good or very good.


    82%.


    And if you have any interest you can go in and see each individual hospital, each year for the last five years, each main component of their care, and a big long list of projects undertaken and completed to improve the care you and your family receive each time they attend our health service.



    And the last thing I’d say is that it’s not so hard to find anyone to say anything good about the health service - sure, you found me!!!! Lucky you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,594 ✭✭✭karlitob




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,149 ✭✭✭BobMc


    another problem as someone else mentioned, the ED is the access point to the hospital, I've a 19 year old with a confirmed long term medical condition, if he needs access to his team for care during a flare up its thru the ED he has to go, I should be able to call and see the specialist rather than thru ED, they dont know him or his condition

    I also believe Dr's are too quick to dismiss patients off to ED, has an issue years ago with a smally attended urgent care Dr, barley looked at the kid, straight to ED, its wasnt a medical emergency, but a Paeds Dr the following morning would have sufficed in UHL instead your're forced to endure the ED for 24hrs

    next is the going to ED for crap complaints, my mother witnessed a person in the Q ask about getting a pregnancy test at the ED reception window I mean is cop on a rare commodity now !

    credit to the staff they've a shitbag to deal with and for the most part try there best, its a big problem with no easy solutions



  • Advertisement
Advertisement