Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Why wont die hard GAA fans admit football these days is muck?

Options
1202123252641

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 19,482 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    well as far as I am concerned, suggesting that the only thing sports teams are interested in is winning is rubbish.

    Heard Bernard Jackman on the radio this morning.... he was honest, said rugby had some issues which annoyed spectators

    and took from the game.

    Im basically saying the same, Gaelic football has some issues which take from the overall game, go fix them.

    Be honest and stop bull dusting folks.

    Breakin' my nuts here...

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Posts: 0 ✭✭ [Deleted User]


    More of your bs. Apparently anyone who shares your point of view is honest and anyone who doesn’t is dishonest?? What a load of nonsense. The orange man across the pond would be proud of your style of ‘debating’.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,274 ✭✭✭pgj2015



    This is the video im talking about.

    so would it work or would the forward players just stay as far up the field as they are allowed?



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,274 ✭✭✭pgj2015


    one thing I noticed is the way the game is played now is very bad to watch on tv but not as bad when you are at the game, still not as good as it was but better than watching it on tv.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,496 ✭✭✭Luxembourgo


    I think reducing the numbers of players is the main thing that would help. There is no space anymore.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,472 ✭✭✭celt262


    Yep large parts of the games are played with around 28 players within 45 meters of the goals.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,642 ✭✭✭flasher0030


    That's a great point. I was at a lot of game last year, and I found most of them enthralling. Actually, I though the whole championship last year was really good. More games for the fans, and there were many really good games from what I saw anyway. The last round of the group matches was brilliant - coming down to the wire as to who would go through or who would be knocked out at that point. The handpassing parts of the game didn't put me up or down.

    Going to the Dublin Kerry match tomorrow evening. And really looking forward to it. Even if it is draggy, and there are defensive moments, I know that there will also be moments in the game that are exciting, and there will be lots of skill involved. That is enough to keep me happy. And of course, a couple of pints on a cold Saturday evening in Croke Park.

    I guess what I am trying to say is that yes, there are some dull games (as there are in every sport). But it is not all doom and gloom. THere are many many good matches and skills in matches.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,050 ✭✭✭✭event


    So reduce the amount of opportunities young players have to play? Cant say I would agree with that. There are already 15/16 year olds on the fringes of squads. Now we would be telling them that there is even less opportunity to play. That will cause lads to flock to soccer and rugby in their droves IMO



  • Registered Users Posts: 21,021 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    A year ago when you started this thread you described football as being muck. What would you call it now?



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,774 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    It's a physiological phenomenon on the internet in online discussion apparently.

    If you go through each of a posters points while stating their own argument back to them, in fact eventually the poster becomes even more entrenched.

    If on the fourth occasion you try to interact and the poster has STILL has not accepted any alternatives to their argument they won't ever change and it goes around in circles.

    We ultimately have reached that point in this thread where one particular poster is digging their heels in with the same repetitive (I would argue flawed) argument.

    1) Football is boring - I have countered by showing were games entertaining. Games I have enjoyed recently and games in the decade past. But just received dismissive replies to avoid addressing my counter argument no matter how detailed or concise

    2) The hand pass rule is solely at fault - Again I countered with a number of other arguments teams sitting back, how the handpass keeps possesion, it allows the lesser team more a chance in a game to get a result, and how when done correctly in attacking sense such as Shane O'Hanlon's goal v Dublin the handpass can be a wonderfully executed part of the game.

    3) It is called football - the truth is the full name of the sport is called "Gaelic football", it permits the use of the hand and the handpass. Gaelic football without the hand would be another sport more similar to soccer. And Gaelic football without the handpass would be more similar to Aussie Rules

    --

    To be honest I think it comes down to the fact that some people just not have the patience to watch any period of handpassing, they want instant action, no "probing". No "teasing out scoring areas".

    Perhaps if they thought of a period of handpassing as "Gaelic football foreplay" they would be more inclined to wait for the results hand passing can bring?

    Especially when mixed in with the other arts of the game?

    Furthermore those who are digging their heels in on the football is "muck" argument seem to be very low on alternate workable solutions.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 18,480 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    They would have to come as deep as they can or they will never see the ball.

    I'm curious how they plan to define who the restricted players are? By number on the back? What about subs then, they have different numbers?

    And if my full back is getting roasted and I want to swap a quicker player from half back into the full back line, how does the ref know who is actually the designated full back? And if they can swap then why not just swap on the fly as and when they feel like it

    Whats the penalty for a restricted player moving out of their 45? If a defender steps over the line is it a free in from the 45? Does it only count when they have the ball or can they be penalised for making runs outside the 45?

    Is a defender going to get penalised for making a heroic interception of the ball that starts inside the area but ends a foot outside it? That means they can no longer defend from the front.

    I'm not for it nor against it at this stage, but there are plenty of unintended consequences that they would want to spend a bit of time thinking through.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,774 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    You might have a point here, because what I enjoy when at a live game is the movement of players.

    When not at a match and watching it on telly I cannot see the full pitch (the movement) my first question if I was not at a match live what was the movement like.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users Posts: 21,021 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    It's not as easy to count the handpasses at a live game. The advantage of watching on TV is that the cameras bring the ball close to the viewer, making it easier to count the handpasses.



  • Registered Users Posts: 21,021 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    Armbands are the way to go. See page 12:

    • 4 players designated as forward players (wearing armbands of a different colour to the jerseys main colours) who cannot touch the ball in their own half of the field. If they do, it's a direct free, and a second offence is a yellow card. A foul by a designated forward in their own half is a black card.




  • Registered Users Posts: 18,774 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Could give it a try and see if works I suppose, what it comes down to is are the players able to create space and movement. The peak Dublin side was great at this no matter how many players were back from the opposition (see Dublin v Tyrone AI Semi-Final 2017) a mixture of all arts of the game.

    But to do that you have to have highly skilled, intelligent pacey, players to break the defensive line for a scoring chance.

    Forcing forwards to stay up could work in theory, making the game easier for lesser teams. But in such scenarios/rules a much stronger team could really annihilate a weaker side.

    Dublin v Louth for example could end up being 40 plus points IMO, as Louth would have no way of easily keeping the score down. Good as Sam Mulroy is for Louth (probably the best unheralded player in the country IMO) Louth scores would not dramatically increase. From what I remember of the game Louth's main weakness was their keeper, very poor in distribution and kick outs. If a weak team consistently loses possession they are screwed.

    Looking at the first period of the Dublin v Louth Leinster Final match. Louth played cagey/keep ball with Mulroy as the "out ball" Louth kept the score way down early on in the first half. It remained a contest far longer than many expected it to. 15 minutes gone it was 3 each. Louth were working really hard pressing and keeping the ball from what I remember. It surprised Dublin I think.

    Just before the half hour mark Louth were just about hanging on there was 10 in it

    By the half hour Dublin had scored 1-9 without reply

    Even though Louth went 20 minutes without scoring.

    At Half Time there was 9 points in it. 1-12 to 0-6 for Dublin.

    By the 40th minute Louth got within 7 of Dublin


    63 minutes gone Dublin were 15 points up


    Full time score Dublin 5-21 Louth 0-15 - Dublin win by a margin of 21 points


    --

    Now if Wooly Parkinson's proposed rules came it in would mean even more space for the Dublin forwards, Louth would have even less respite. And I would guess that even this Dublin team could get close to a 40 point win as the forwards would have so much space from start to finish.

    The game could be over in 10 minutes even before Louth invariably tire from having to work harder, and the stronger Dublin subs.

    There would be massacre's in games where much stronger teams face much weaker ones - records broken all over the shop.

    Wooly's rules would work better where the teams are of nearer standard I think. The league? But the championship is not set up like that.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,774 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Fourth round of games played in league at the time of writing - Dublin v Kerry (which I was at) was a memorable game. People will be talking about it for a while.

    Lot's of quality stuff. Only saw highlights of Galway v Derry, but there seemed to be plenty happening.

    Tyrone beat Mayo by four points there were two goals in the match for either side - did not see that match as I was in Croke Park.

    Roscommon walloped Monaghan - did not see highlights yet

    Where were the "muck" games this week that I should be taking note of?

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,274 ✭✭✭pgj2015


    Was listening to newstalk earlier today, colm o rourke was saying the game will have to be changed by getting youngsters to play a different way, he said the 30 players in 1 half football is to ingrained now with adult players that it probably cant be changed through adult football.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,774 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    But the Kerry v Dublin game I saw live was not like that all, it was magic. Can't comment on other ones this weekend fully because I was not at them.

    Is football as bad overall as some make out? I really am starting to wonder what games people are watching to be honest.

    Of the league games I have been at and watched on telly from start to finish, it has been grand.

    Is the issue lower level teams putting men behind the ball constantly?

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,050 ✭✭✭✭event




  • Registered Users Posts: 9,274 ✭✭✭pgj2015


    It wasn't the youngsters who gave us 30 players in one half.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 9,274 ✭✭✭pgj2015


    Ok so in some games there are some good exciting moments, like when David Clifford gets the ball but the way it was 10 or 12 years ago, it was exciting most of the game, a lot faster, players willing to kick long. its the slow play, balls going backwards to the keeper etc that bores the life out of most people.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,506 ✭✭✭shockframe




  • Registered Users Posts: 18,774 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    I think it is mentality thing if you are less open minded to an evolving game, you would go into a football expecting it to be "muck" looking for any signs that would confirm it even for a minute or so.

    The reality is 12 years ago, McGuinness had already shook and confused the Gaelic Football world by winning Sam in 2012 with a counter attacking defensive style. Which borrowed a bit from basketball and rugby league. It was a style which destroyed Dublin in the 2014 Champioship and forced Jim Gavin and Dublin football (football itself) to evolve.

    I honestly think the "most people" who you claim find football boring -

    1) Don't like evolution

    2) Follow weak counties who do not have the skill/game intelligent to adapt to the changing landscape

    3) Are looking at football through rose tinted glasses

    --

    I used to go to the All-Ireland club championship finals a lot when it was held on St Patricks Day (Especially If the weather was reasonable)

    But there were some poor finals going a good bit back when I think of it.

    St Gall's (Antrim) v Kilmurray (Clare) in 2010 - 0-13 to 1-05

    After the initial flurry from Kilmurray early on (they got a goal) after were unable to break the Antrim men down while they tapped over points with no pressure on them - game over as a contest at 34 minutes. St Gall's was not pressed or pushed up at all. It was not really in vogue then.



    In 1999 Balina lost to Crossmaglen Rangers 0-9 -0-8

    (article from 2004)

    "IT was one of the worst of Mayo's many modern Croke Park calamities. St. Patrick's Day 1999 was freakishly hot and more than 40,000 spectators were present to witness a shocking football meltdown as Ballina Stephenites gifted an All-Ireland title to Crossmaglen Rangers.

    Five points up after 20 minutes, Ballina owned possession, but then the wides started to flow, each one a spur to the Armagh team who levelled the game eight points apiece in the final minutes and kicked the winner with time almost up. Ballina had time for one more attack but all it yielded was the 16th and final wide.-

    That was on a hot sunny day! 17 scores between both sides!

    --


    If you look at Corofin's unprecedented period of dominance in club football, their dominance was built on keep ball, and direct quick passing "running game". Players who were aware and showed movement.

    See the 2019 final Corofin v Dr Crokes 2019 - Corofin win 2-16 to 0-10



    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,274 ✭✭✭pgj2015


    Now you are talking about club football, which I wouldnt watch, most of the players arent near as good as inter county so im sure there was plenty of bad games. my county has actually never been better playing the crap football but its still crap.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,482 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Hmmmm……. Jarlath Burns doesn’t seem to agree with your rose tinted view of things.

    Listen back to Drivetime RTE 1 Radio…… lad seems to agree with my view on things.

    Rules change committee under J Gavin coming up. Hand pass came up as a specific item.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,274 ✭✭✭pgj2015


    The talented Gaelic footballers are playing well despite the way the game is played, but I believe they would lay even better if the rules were changed.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,050 ✭✭✭✭event


    Unlike yourself though, he might have a few ideas.

    Or do you think Jim and Jarlath will just say "The issue is the handpass lads" repeatedly



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,482 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Jarlath at the wheel… Jim chairing the rules committee……expect action on the handpass.

    specifically mentioned on the interview with Jarlath Burns.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,482 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    No, but they might say “We have an issue with the handpass lads, what did the fella Bendar say on Boards…37 passes around the 40 metre area and not a shot fired ..can’t have that surely”



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 21,021 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    More significant is his plan to give footballers and volunteers back a bit of normal life. He wants far fewer training sessions, and to cut back the money being spent on backroom teams. This should result in the fitness levels going down, and a different game developing. All I can say his good luck to him with that, if he thinks the likes of the Limerick hurlers will pay any attention. Whatever Jim comes up with, he has the good sense to make sure that the players will buy into it. No point in telling them they have to stay in a certain place on the pitch, or they can't do handpasses. Players have no interest in that sort of stuff.

    Another bumper weekend of exciting, high scoring football. Only one game of the sixteen had fewer than 20 scores, and five of them had over 30. Many close games with only a kick of a ball between the teams. This is a golden age for spectators who want to see well engineered scores. They don't waste their time counting handpasses.



Advertisement