Harry and Meghan - OP updated with Threadbanned Users 4/5/21

Generally, what happens in these type of cases which involve rape etc. the victims decide not to go through the trauma of a legal case.

edit: Its a direct quote from Police Scotland. Do you believe them?

So much promise, so little fulfilment. High hopes, low output. Shame, really.

It was an easy thing for Trump to say simply because the people behind funding the organisation with the current legal proceedings wanting Harry’s application details to be revealed are all conservative Trump supporters

My understanding is that when the matter was raised last year by an unnamed board member (presumably Harry), African Parks tried to investigate but as you can see above, Survival International refused to cooperate!

I also recall that one of the rangers was sacked and sent to prison for rape. Its up to the Congolese authorities to deal with these offences. Not sure just sacking a ranger is good enough for raping one of the locals! They need to face the courts and punished by the authorities in the Congo.

These articles are all rubbish as are most of the posts on this thread re anti Harry and Meghan nonsense. What will be interesting is the series of unfortunate events that seem to be unfolding for the Royals. I feel great sympathy for Charles with his cancer with his sons estranged. I’m sure he would like them to reconcile. Greek press are reporting his cancer is pancreatic, could be a pinch of salt but I hope it’s not true. William seems to be acting very strangely, and the situation with Kate must be extremely serious as she hasn’t been seen or heard from once since Dec 25th. Sad for her children if this is the case. William looks like he would not be as stable a King as Charles and certainly nothing compared to Elizabeth 2. Will Charles try and bring Harry back in? I’m not sure they want back in even if asked.

There's a couple of paragraphs on Meghan's new podcast in that article. It looks like there's not a long queue of A, B, C etc listers clamouring to be interviewed by Meghan. I would have thought that by now, there wasn't a lot about Meghan's life we haven't heard, except for the bits she doesn't want to share!

Thats in reference to the time they took time out (about 2 months before xmas).

It was right before the six week holiday in Canada. The question is who is briefing People magazine about what is a Megxit like scenario two months before Megxit actually happened?

As working royals, they had to say that they were taking a 6 week break and not doing any 'Royal duties'. It was when they were away they decided to ask for the half-in, half out.

They were not seen for 15 months after they left the UK. The problem was the British press couldn't stop making up bullshit stories about them. Thats why they did the Oprah interview to clear up a few things. They could have said a lot more. Then since they were cut off financially, needed to pay for security and were being offered large sum of money to do it, they did the docuseries and Harry wrote his book which was about himself growing up and his own struggles.

I'd give up that hope that Meghan is going to dump Harry. Whatever happens though, Harry isn't going back to the UK.

I think William is the jealous one who probably could go on an anger management course. Kate & William have admitted throwing stuff (supposedly cushins) at each other when they argue. There is a video of William losing the plot with a photographer, and boy was he over the top with his anger. The reason they wanted to move to Windsor was because they though Harry & Meghan were getting too close to the Queen (with the Queen popping in and out of Frogmore cottage frequently to see them).

But who do you think the insiders here are speaking to People magazine and predicting Megxit/Half In-Half Out which happened 8 weeks later?

Several insiders say the couple are eager to escape the intense tabloid scrutiny in the U.K. — maybe even by establishing a second “base” in the U.S., Canada or Africa.

You're implying that Dan Wooten was getting fed a story from a Palace insider which got him an exclusive yet clearly based on the above several insiders (whoever they are) were giving anyone paying attention a major clue weeks before any exclusive. It is more probable that the tabloids went sniffing for a story and if anyone was going to leak it could one of these "several insiders".

Knowing what we know happened then reading that article now reads like a plant, a power play made public to make the public know they were unhappy and to advance what they did subsequently propose i.e. establish a second base away from the UK maintain a first base there. That reads like half in and half out to me.

I mean Harry and Meghan would never use a proxy scribe to brief the press now would they?

Well, maybe you should have read the whole article before coming up with that post. Nigella has been back to the States several times since then.

Briefly, you need to be a habitual user which the emigration lawyer explained in that article is that you have taken drugs within the past year. Nigella was stopped because she admitted taking drugs 4 years previously in a court. She declared that she was not a habitual user and that she had used cocaine twice in her life.

Harry admitted taking drugs when he was in his teens, early 20s and he certainly would not have taken cocaine within the previous 3-4 years since meeting Meghan (I seem to recall several articles from his early days with Meghan that he had given up drinking and smoking and was looking after his health).

Thanks for the link to that article. It explains perfectly the process of getting a visa to the US if you have taken drugs in the past.

Are they still together? Surely it has ran its course....

OK, but according to you, H&M are still being hounded on the minutiae of Meghan's clothes and jewellery, etc., their many and various private jet flights, their "awards", their domestic arrangements, and so on. Jeez, I would not be jealous of H&M.

I did read it. You are side stepping your incorrect information..... You stated you had to have a conviction to be barred from entry. That is clearly not the case.

Any Harry has admitted to taking drugs as recently as 2016 in CC's house, 3 years before he went to the US and after he arrived in the USA in 2020:

" He also disclosed that he smoked marijuana to relax after moving to America in 2020 with his wife, Meghan Markle."

Prince Harry Says Psychedelics Are a “Fundamental Part” of His Life | Vanity Fair