Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Brand Loyalty

2

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,820 ✭✭✭The J Stands for Jay




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,820 ✭✭✭The J Stands for Jay


    They originally didn't carry any branded stuff and now they do, because we are brand loyal fools



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,643 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    I do have an anecdote on that particular example.

    I don't eat breakfast cereal, the wife does but couldn't give a toss about which brand as she reckons for the most part they taste similar enough to not justify paying 3-4x the price. I would've been pretty convinced that even that small difference in perception was a placebo from knowing it was the Kellog's box.

    So I thought until a few months ago anyway; my parents were visiting and stayed overnight. I put a bowl of cornflakes down for my father in the morning, after one spoonful he said to me, "oh those aren't Kellog's". He didn't see the box or any other packaging and we're not so boring that we've ever discussed preferred cereal brands so he'd even be looking out for it, but straight away he could tell that he didn't have Kellog's in his bowl.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,659 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Yeah, I can actually vouch for something like that because I've had the same experience myself years ago. My sister used to eat, what I seem to recall, were Dunnes Stores own cornflakes. She gave me a bowl without me knowing where they came from and I immediately tasted that something was off. Checked the date on the milk, it was fine. Then asked how long the cornflakes were sitting there. They were in date. She then told me that they weren't Kellogg's and that she had X brand in the house.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,000 ✭✭✭✭freshpopcorn


    I decided a few years back to start eating a breakfast in the morning and for it to be in some way healthy.

    I purchased it an own brand product and I just ate it.

    I can't standard the branded one tough.

    Kind of makes me question things if it's what's your used to.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,013 ✭✭✭NewbridgeIR


    Definitely worth paying extra for Kellogg's Corn Flakes. I can tell them apart from Tesco and Dunnes versions straightaway.

    The Lidl version of Weetabix is awful too.



  • Registered Users Posts: 53 ✭✭506972617465



    I would never, ever swap my Pixel for an Apple. Apple just locks it's users in an ecosystem and once you're in you're done for.

    Apple is for people who have no idea that adblockers exist, who have no clue that you can just copy your FLAC tracks and listen to them using a plethora of apps, that you can personalise your device to be exactly what you want it to be. It's usually people who have no idea that torrenting still exists and who pay for 8 different subscriptions to watch what they want to watch.

    My favorite is that "android is for poor people" - bitch I buy my brand new cars for cash and I still choose Android over Apple.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,903 ✭✭✭John_Rambo


    How to people that think brand loyalty is "for morons" (and then bizarrely name a brand they're loyal to) feel about Irish beef?






  • what way exactly are Apple “years behind”? From a purely objective standpoint how is the iPhone 15 say that far removed technology wise from the S24 for example?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,903 ✭✭✭John_Rambo


    I think you’re overthinking it and falling in to some snobbery here. 

    Some people drive Caterham Sevens that are seriously personalised, from tyres, suspension, tuning etc... They don’t spit at people who drive similarly priced normal cars or consider them inferior or clueless. They don’t sneer and laugh at people that don’t appreciate naturally aspirated engines or drive front wheel drive cars. 

    Some people just like different things to you, they’re not into brand snobbery and apple products suit them fine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,659 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Some people seem to be confusing the choice between the best product regardless of who makes it and choosing a product based on purely on the brandname.





  • I have to say I’m very interested to see exactly how Apples tech is “years behind”.

    another matter regarding the price of the products but to suggest they are inferior in comparison to the next leading brand* (ew) by *years* is a bit ridiculous.



  • Registered Users Posts: 53 ✭✭506972617465


    I believe I was misunderstood. Or maybe it's was just idiotic choice of words on my part, yeah probably that. I obviously failed in attempting to highlight how stupid it is to judge people by the mobile OS, Apple owners considering themselves as rich, worthy and others as poor peasants just because they don't have the latest MacBook Pro and an iPhone. Not so much in Ireland I believe, but there's been a trend in the US.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,903 ✭✭✭John_Rambo


    Who told you that? and... out of interest, what brand cars do you buy brand new for cash?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,659 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Well, going by what that poster said it's probably to do with Apple's penchant for being unadaptable. I remember the days of Ipods and other MP3 players and the MP3 players, like the ones from Sandisk, were easily the better products simply by virtue of the fact that you could change their firmware easily and port your music simply. With an Ipod you had to use Itunes to load your music and you were restricted to what came with your device in terms of changing how it operated.

    I had to use a Macbook for work back in the day too and it was a nightmare. Now the laptop was fine for simple tasks, but when it came to actually working on it, it was a pain. In the job I was in I had to transfer a lot of different types of files around to various stakeholders and these files came from PC users in the main, which could often cause the Macbook to get headaches trying to view them. I ended up bootstrapping a copy of Windows to the Apple machine.

    This is all years ago, of course. I've no idea what Apple products are like these days. But I do know that if I want an overpriced toy to surf the web or look at my email, I can get an Apple. If I want to work, I'll get a PC.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,468 ✭✭✭Bigmac1euro


    As someone who worked for 8 years fixing android and Apple phones. I use Apple. I understand they’re locked down quite a bit but then again everything works like it’s supposed to. I’m still constantly having to fix software issues on my dad’s android and his partners android phone. Infuriating operating system in my opinion. Both phones jammed with bloatware and all sorts. I hear the pixel is good. But android lost the race in my opinion many years ago. The OS is just unpredictable at the best of times and that comes with its relaxed rules on what certain apps can and can’t do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,742 ✭✭✭Wanderer2010


    Used to be Lucozade but they did something to the flavour or content a few years ago and now it just tastes awful with a really oily aftertaste. It used to be sugar liquid heaven but now it's like they added a tonne of preservatives to satisfy all the people complaining of high sugar.



  • Registered Users Posts: 53 ✭✭506972617465


    It doesn't matter what cars and if I personally do at all. You can swap cars with houses and it's gonna serve the same purpose. That's not the point I was trying to make.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,903 ✭✭✭John_Rambo




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,889 ✭✭✭mrslancaster


    Each to their own as they say.

    Some people like certain food brands because they've used them for years and like the taste, so a slightly higher cost is not an issue. Some own label products are fine but like other posters, our family prefer the taste of many well known brands that have been sold in irish supermarkets for decades.

    No need for some posters to label people morons because of how they choose to spend their family food budget 😏.



  • Advertisement


  • I think they have just started adding more water (and also the plastic bottles).

    It’s not nearly as thick and syrupy as it used to be but the glass bottles still taste much nicer.

    It’s 100% just more watered down, like most things now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,836 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    Butter is a good example.

    I know an ex-manager of a butter packing plant. This is from over 10+ years ago, before Kerrygold production was centralised.


    Sticks of butter would come down the line, some wrapped in SuperValu packaging, some to be wrapped in Kerrygold wrapper.

    Exact same butter, two different wrappers, different marketing, and very different prices.

    But the same cows.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,903 ✭✭✭John_Rambo


    That sound unlikely from a production, packaging point of view, very impractical. I'd say the ex-manager was pulling your leg.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,709 ✭✭✭Schwiiing


    I worked on a milk packaging line and everything Gueze said rings the same. Same milk gone through the same processes from the same cows put in the same cartons but different labels and price points.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,559 ✭✭✭RoboRat


    I have no brand loyalty. There are certain brands I like but if they unreasonably hiked their price or reduced their quality, I would drop them like a hot snot. I look at value (price and quality) and that's what I'm loyal to.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 749 ✭✭✭tjhook



    I've recently moved to an iPhone after years with Android. I find my years-old OnePlus 6 better than my iPhone 15 pro, but my desire to get away from Google (privacy) means I'll be staying with Apple.

    Some things I don't like about my iPhone:

    • iPhone is thick, shaped like a brick. The OnePlus was slimmer, with a curved back that fitted better in the pocket
    • My years-old OnePlus still has a longer-lasting battery than the new iPhone.
    • iPhone/IOS has no standard back button
    • iPhone has limited widgets available (and no transparency from what I can tell)
    • I loved "Tasker" on Android to automate phone behaviours like automatically switching to vibrate when I'm physically in the office during specified hours. iPhone has "Shortcuts" which is similar but not nearly as powerful.
    • IOS has poor customisation compared to Android.
    • Not a fan of the Apple "action button" to silence the phone. Oneplus had a 3-position switch between normal/vibrate/silent. I preferred that.
    • No side-loading of apps on Apple, although I think I heard this is changing?
    • No access to the Apple filesystem (that I could find anyway). While specific areas (iCloud, pictures) can be browsed or shared, I liked being able to browse the Android filesystem and create folders where I like.

    Despite those reasons (and some might not be true, maybe I just haven't seen the features yet), I'm happy to stick with Apple for privacy reasons. In fairness, the apple has certain advantages over my Android too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,723 ✭✭✭Feisar


    From memory and I was a pup at the time but weren't they a lot more utilitarian?

    First they came for the socialists...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,274 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    have heard the same from someone who worked for one of the big two tea companys



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,274 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    for 250 euro maybe, but one for about 400 euro will almost definitely be comparable if not better

    the mac/macbook being 'better' for 'creative work' is just savvy marketing hyperbole to be honest. both of the main OSs will be as good as the other (i'd have a preference for the windows versions of the software i use but i also understand theyre much of a muchness in all reality)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,659 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    If you're buying a particular product because you like the taste, that's an entirely different matter to buying something simply because of a brand name.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,836 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    Yes, you mean the interior fixtures and fittings?

    Yes.

    A Lidl store in Germany is not the same as one in Ireland.





  • Not even meaning to sound argumentative here but none of that points to Apple being “years behind” in technology.

    I’m growing tired of sounding like a parrot so I’ll answer my own question and that is there are no such examples of Apple trialing years behind in technology.

    In fact Apple has been more often at the forefront of genius innovation and technology. Granted nowadays the MacBook Air is a teenagers social media device at the time it was revolutionary.

    The price is often vastly overinflated compared to competitors but they have set themselves up as a premium brand and premium brands charge more.

    But I do have to laugh at the stark android defenders when they jump for the money argument as though Samsung and other big companies are much cheaper.

    An S24 base model for instance is around €920 and an iPhone 15 standard is €979. Naturally android savings are in buying high end tech from other brands but if comparing like to like you’re not exactly getting shafted anymore by Apple than Samsung.

    I suppose it goes to show how influenced we can be by marketing. I use iPhone primarily and only because no keyboard on Android I can find is comparable.

    In my opinion they are all terrible and make me sad.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,313 ✭✭✭Hamsterchops


    Brand loyalty - not anymore thanks to such a wide consumer choice. Gone are the days when I'd automatically pick up a tin of Heinz baked beans, or Heinz tomato ketchup, because nowadays there are so many rip offs (that taste better) than the original. Kellogs cornflakes is another example of a brand we would have been attached to for decades, then the German twins arrived with their own brands, and all allegiance to the original brand went out the window.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,559 ✭✭✭RoboRat


    I'm not an Apple fanboy, I don't like iPhones/ iPads but having worked in graphic design for over 20 years, I can say hand on heart that Macs are far superior to PCs for creative work. It's nothing to do with their marketing, it's from personal experience. I find that they can handle really large files without crashing. A Mac Pro is a beast of a computer and it's very pricey, but if you need a reliable computer that can handle big files, then it's perfect. I also like the Mac OS which is odd because I hate the iPhone/ iPad OS!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,903 ✭✭✭John_Rambo


    That makes sense. Same packaging, different labels. Different scenario to different packaging coming off the one line.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,903 ✭✭✭John_Rambo


    Worked on both for years. Apple is better I'm afraid, even with your loyalty to windows, you'd appreciate it if you worked in the area. That's why they're used in ad agencies and creative departments worldwide.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,308 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    Nike Air Max 90

    Coca Cola classic

    DeWalt

    Anything else I will buy I don't care about the brand



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,659 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    This kind of legacy thinking has been consigned to the bin years ago. There's nothing a mac can do that a PC can't with regards to graphic design or multimedia.

    This kind of attitude went out with the 386.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,903 ✭✭✭John_Rambo


    Probably true, but your brand loyalty is blinding you. Anyone working in the industry will tell you the Mac will do it faster, better & with more ease.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 632 ✭✭✭Gary_dunne


    Brands mean absolutely nothing to me, buy purely off quality and value. Have had both Apple and Android tech. Shop in Aldi/Lidl 99% of the time.

    There are certain branded products I buy purely because I like the taste of them eg. Carlsberg (I know most won't agree on the tatse). However if they doubled their prices I'd become a Heineken man fairly quickly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,659 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    It's fuck all to do with "brand loyalty".

    I've worked and can still on either hardware, whether it's a Mac or a PC. The point I'm making is that there's nothing a Mac can do that a PC cannot where design is concerned.

    And I've worked in the "industry" for decades in one capacity or another. The idea that a Mac is better for design work has been gone for donkey's years. If you'd asked me a quarter of a century ago if Mac's ran design software better than your average PC, then I'd have said yes. But today, there's nothing in it and that's been the case for a long time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,532 ✭✭✭con___manx1


    I used to repair iPhones . I would never buy one after that. I buy the cheaper chinese phones now. It's all in your head I'm afraid.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,903 ✭✭✭John_Rambo


    You're wrong I'm afraid, I admire your loyalty and you should stick to what you like and please, if you don't mind.. I will too!

    It's like saying an Opel Corsa can do anything a Ferrari can and you're right, it's just the Ferrari does it differently.

    That's why design agencies, ad agencies and even creative departments in traditional businesses use Macs, what do you work at? I'm a photographer & graphic designer working on the Adobe suite and after working in one agency (at the accountancy dept request) that changed to PC (and quickly changed back) I won't be moving over to PC's!

    By the way, for your information, Apple don't really market their professional products to the creative industry ;-)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,212 ✭✭✭893bet


    They tried it once, google “new coke”


    it didn’t go well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,659 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    It hasn't anything with "loyalty" to a brand. PC's aren't a brand.

    The fact of the matter is is that there is nothing, NOTHING WHATSOEVER, that a mac can do that a PC can't and your weak car analogy only shows that you don't really know what you're on about. If you think a PC equals an Opel Corsa and a Mac equals a Ferrari, it only compounds your ignorance on the matter.

    What you're saying is essentially thus...you can't use a PC for your design work, therefore Macs are "better".

    Enjoy the rest of your day. 😉



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,572 ✭✭✭✭murpho999


    These threads come up all the time and the OP always has these:

    Heinz Ketchup

    Hellman's Mayonnaise

    Heinz Beans.

    just don't get why people think first of all that these are quality products or the best in their class. If you must buy them then Irish brands like Chef or Bachelors are probably better but can people stop holding these 3 items up as vital foodstuffs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,903 ✭✭✭John_Rambo


    Don't get me wrong, you're branded and heavily marketed PC's are great for pottering around in design, photoshop etc... Even working professionally but Macs are far superior, that's why professionals use them much more than pc's. It's nothing to do with Brand loyalty (on my behalf anyway) it's just what works better for me.

    As I've said before I used pc's in an agency for design work and it just didn't work out. Clunky, slow, tedious and unsuitable.

    You can google it further, there's lots of info out there why we use them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,903 ✭✭✭John_Rambo


    Have you tried Ballymaloe Mayonnaise? It gives Hellman's a run for its money Murph.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,659 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    That's all nonsense.

    And I don't need to google anything. I was trained on Power Macs, worked on Mac pros and Macbooks and worked with PC's of various flavours.

    I'm, right now, using both Photoshop and Lightroom processing RAW's on a PC.

    There is nothing "superior" about a Mac no matter how much you keep banging that outdated drum. The main difference, these days, apart from basic OS layout is Apple's hideous over pricing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,903 ✭✭✭John_Rambo


    I'm afraid you're argument is unconvincing and your post history never mentions working in the creative realm so I'm going to refrain from taking your advice. Myself and millions of other designers, art directors, photographers etc... will continue using Macs! I'm sorry it bothers you and thanks for the advice!



  • Advertisement
Advertisement