Harry and Meghan - OP updated with Threadbanned Users 4/5/21

I think you should read them before coming to that conclusion. Certainly there is no imagined suffering in Harry's book from the age his mother died to where I'm at now. He comes across as a traumatised child by the death of his mother and then when he was 17 or 18 the death of his closest friend from school being killed in a car crash which seems to have brought the whole trauma of his mother's death back.

He refused to believe that she was dead and that she had disappeared to get away from the family and paps. And just for the record, he is deadpan about this and shows no emotion. He just accepts his treatment as a fact of life. Similarly about his room in Balmoral (how Willy had the bigger share). He was describing some of the rooms in Balmoral - thats all. He completely accepted that he was the 'Spare'.

Its Johnny Mercer, the Veterans Minister who is pushing to host the games, so a Government initiative. They would only need the facilities that Bermingham / Manchester would have to offer and bringing such an event would be good for the city.

I don’t have an issue with the UK hosting a future Invictus Games - which should wholly be for the benefit of veterans and not hijacked for the iniquitous promotion of H&M.

He completely accepted being the Spare. Then wrote a book about being the Spare. And called it Spare.

It seems to me that he needed, and probably still needs, therapy to deal with the obvious trauma - which both sons felt.

I don't think he has ever accepted being the Spare. Harry would have done well to taken a look at the Princess Royal. A lifetime of service and support for her parents and Charles. Still one of the hardest working royals. Does not have 24H protection - only whilst working. Subjected to a kidnap attempt during which two people were shot, and shots fired at two others. Did Anne moan, groan, whine and whinge about her protection - then or now? Not bloody likely.

Would appear the tabloids are being kept in the dark and they are starting to turn.

I wonder will Harry be summoned again.

This is out next month.

Having also read Spare, and listened to it all on audio book read by Harry, I didn't find it at all whinging. I found Harry to be factual and undramatic. Amazed then to see snippets quoted, out of context, and given such a different twist by different newsagents and "experts".

The rumours on X are unreal. The conspiracy theories are really out there. She will be back when she's up to it.

Her uncle is meant to be appearing in CBB. Can't imagine her mother would be very happy with him.

I saw that one too. Crazy.

Many of the comments, AI generated photos and general bulls!tt circulating online about Catherine are beyond sick. The instigators or posters have crossed the line on numerous occasions. Even on a relatively benign thread like this, some of the insinuations or speculation have been bad enough, but out in the big wide metaverse, it's gone mad. And now even so-called royal commentators are asking for news of Catherine. FFS!

Kensington Palace's original press release was perfectly clear and, you would have thought, could be understood by pretty well everyone. On 17 January, it said (my emphasis)

It all seems abundantly clear to me. So why doesn't everyone extend the courtesy to Catherine.

The supreme irony for me is that H&M, who claim to be constantly demanding privacy, can't go to a drive through milk shake outlet without being papped by speed-dial Backgrid. The "squadies" are going insane and loosing their shyte with demands that Catherine must appear. Well, Catherine wanted privacy, a clear press release said so, and so should have it.

This post is ridiculous. You’re constantly speculating re Meghan and Harry, and even rejoicing in security for their children being dropped in all but name. It turns out that prevented them from travelling back with their children in 2022 to see Queen Elizabeth, how sad and pathetic from the

https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/tradition/a60025686/prince-harry-meghan-markle-archie-lilibet-september-2022-security/

Prince William and Kate have no one to blame but themselves for this PR disaster and boy is it growing. The vague abdominal surgery statement at the start, the disappearance and zero photograph, no explanation given, Prince William not seen visiting Kate at the hospital except once, children or other family members not at all. William acting really strange at a medal awards ceremony…And that’s not even the worst of it. Randy Andy plus Queen Camilla leading the Royals at a recent event is a disaster. Now ‘Queen Camilla’ jetted off on holidays as she’s ‘exhausted’ and left her sick husband behind. What a joke. Imagine the backlash if Harry and Meghan had done any of the above. None of them are a patch on Queen Elizabeth.

It's giving a great laugh to a lot of people.

Yeah just been reading the comments. it's either pippa, or a double, or it is her and proof she had facial surgery, or proof that she was treated for an eating disorder, or photoshopped, or ai generated. Lol

I’m not rejoicing. Town and Country Magazine can “read between the lines” all it wants - it’s called conjecture. RAVEC did their job, devised a security plan, but it wasn’t enough for Harry. (You’d wonder if anything would be enough for Harry)

Maybe someone can tell me why he’s happy to roll the windows down to wave to people and have paps take his and Meghan’s photograph in Whistler. Or travel to Jamaica. Or why Harry "raised concerns" over taking public transport in Britain in 2022 because it would bring him in close proximity to the public?

The sense of entitlement is strong in this one. (With apologies to Yoda)

It's very sad that the children never came to Britain. Again, they invented a whole scenario of a birthday party for lily and a meetup with her grandfather and the queen. None of it was true, h&m will claim it's because they aren't safe. Really? Maybe that is why Frogmore was terminated. One day those children will be adults .it's sad. Growing up with no contact with any family except one granny.