Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Russian warship, go f**k yourself!

1111112113115117

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,463 ✭✭✭FintanMcluskey


    I've spent 2 years in here reading how the Russians are powerless gombeens days away from freezing to death in the Ukranian wastelands.

    The same people will argue how dangerous Russia is, and it's ability to take over Europe.

    Perhaps those most selfish of all are the fat middle aged western men who want to keep sending Ukrainians to their death in a war they can't win behind a guise of "Slava Ukraine"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,177 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    The same people will argue how dangerous Russia is

    They are invading a European country. They have used energy as a weapon against us. Their hackers constantly target us. They attack European elections. Their propagandists talk endlessly about war on other European countries and nuking us. Leaks have shown that they believed a successful invasion of Ukraine would have fractured NATO and Europe giving them more "opportunities" (which is Putin's doctrine). Most would call that dangerous.

    Apologists and contrarians seek to play this down or "create" some exaggerated generalisation to argue against.

    Perhaps those most selfish of all are the fat middle aged western men who want to keep sending Ukrainians to their death in a war they can't win behind a guise of "Slava Ukraine"

    The Ukrainians chose to defend themselves. They made that decision from day 1. They are sacrificing their own lives for the future of their country and their people. Any territory they don't take back during this war will likely be lost forever to a nuclear-armed occupier. Every Russian piece of equipment they destroy is more pressure on their invaders. They don't have an option of "peace", they only have the option to defend or brutal occupation by an enemy who will likely break any treaty that is made in the future.

    Post edited by Dohnjoe on


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,211 ✭✭✭Good loser




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,211 ✭✭✭Good loser


    Your first two sentences are directly contradictory. Together they are a nonsense.

    In the third sentence/paragraph the use of the word 'selfish' with 'most' implies the subjects of the first two sentences are selfish (people).

    What a strange construction.You don't have a clue do you?



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 9,041 Mod ✭✭✭✭greysides


    Mod: Keep personal remarks out of this discussion.

    Warnings have been issued. Escalation will follow.

    Battlelines may be drawn up. Attrition will result. Stalemate will not happen. Nuking may be necessary. This could result in the end of life (on this thread) as we know it.

    The aim of argument, or of discussion, should not be victory, but progress. Joseph Joubert

    The ultimate purpose of debate is not to produce consensus. It's to promote critical thinking.

    Adam Grant



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,875 ✭✭✭older by the day


    If you go back to the start of the discussion, myself and others got ate when we said not to discount Russia. There were lads putting up pictures of tanks breaking down and falling apart. Laughing at how disorganized they were. Years later and billions spent it's still the same way.

    Would that Leo and Martin ever keep there noses out of it. Every one knows the Irish army could not beat pussy. It's only to get the fools here to try and join some European army. Feck neutrality, they don't give a Shiite about us, only Europe

    Most here got carried away with Europes campaign to tell us all "the war Will be over by Christmas". It was only idiots that underestimated Russia



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,676 ✭✭✭Field east


    The main/big ‘ game changer ‘ is the sheer numbers of soldiers that Russia are throwing at the front lines . Surely there must be an end to this supply - either it will run out of numbers/refusing to take part/ God forbid a populist uprising against the war



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,982 ✭✭✭yosemitesam1


    Is there any real signs of any big shift? Maybe the supply will just stop one day but for now they seem to have a constant supply.

    It doesn't seem to make sense why Ukraine aren't recruiting heavily. You'd imagine even rounding up a load of lads to dig trenches, build fortifications like the russian lines would be happening but it doesn't seem to be.

    If we take zelensky at his word they're down 30k men dead and say another 100k injured, while 300k men turn 18 every year there. They should have a much greater supply of men.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,415 ✭✭✭Suckler


    You'd imagine even rounding up a load of lads to dig trenches, build fortifications like the russian lines would be happening but it doesn't seem to be.

    Lets not pretend you have a clue if this is happening - 'Doesn't seem to be' do you expect this to be headline information?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,269 ✭✭✭Tonynewholland


    What did any European country do in the 12 months Russia was building up on the border, nothing at all. The US was the only country sounding the warnings. I think most EU leaders just expected the country to be overrun in a few days and everything would be grand again after a few sanctions imposed on Russia. It’s hard to blame the likes of Trump when he wants Europe to pay more for its own defence



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,177 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Not much, but then again I'm not sure what they were supposed to do under the circumstances. Europe wasn't on a war footing. Likewise the US wasn't prepared for 911 despite all the warnings.

    Most of us, including analysts assumed it was a bluff by Putin for concessions (like Kim). There were plenty of warnings, they only became real about 1 or 2 weeks before invasion when it was noticed that the Russians were e.g. moving in blood reserves.

    Yes, now, Europe does have to pay more for defence. Two-thirds of NATO countries are now hitting there targets as opposed to something like one third two years ago. The Putin we are dealing with now is very different from the one pre 2013. We've cut the energy umbilical (something that was thought to be impossible), applied to strongest sanctions possible and countries are facing the fresh reality of a new defense outlook. Some are dragging their heels, but that will never change.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,982 ✭✭✭yosemitesam1


    Surely there's some sort of propaganda spin for Ukraine.

    There's no real advantage to keeping it hushed up.

    Breaking through heavily fortified areas is very difficult and costly. Showing off to the world that Russia has many more adiivkas to go through before taking a bigger stretch of land might make Russia start to reconsider while also giving the ukrainians a boost that they will be defending heavily prepared positions that they can hold with less cost.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,346 ✭✭✭green daries


    The one time article 5 was used was by the yanks .......... never have I heard of the European coalition sending an invoice to the USA............. I would laugh out loud if they decided to send one to Trump as an ex president. Just for the laughs



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,752 ✭✭✭jaymla627


    He's in serious bother moneywise with the near half a billion fine in his new York Real estate fraud case, hasn't the bond cash on-hand either to appeal it, needs to lodge the above amount to do so, theirs a 100k a day intrest going onto the above amount aswell that it's outstanding, he seems to be running out of road

    ,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,982 ✭✭✭yosemitesam1



    Doctors looking for bribes off injured soldiers to give them what they're entitled to... How low can you get?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,177 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Absolutely, like many veteran care systems around the world, the Ukrainian system is badly in need of reform. Keep in mind that Ukraine is a poor country, and it's being invaded, so it might not happen tomorrow.

    Again, you are systematically finding anything negative about Ukraine to act "concerned" about as part of your stance against Ukraine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,702 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    Not good indeed. They got as far as somewhere to get treatment. The Russians are left to rot



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,982 ✭✭✭yosemitesam1


    Fairly miserable outlook. Seems that things have a bit yet to go before both sides have run out of steam.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-68778338.amp



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,269 ✭✭✭Tonynewholland


    Look at the effort the world put into protecting Israel the other night, they are only giving Ukraine scraps of the table at this stage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,982 ✭✭✭yosemitesam1


    https://www.ft.com/content/dd1d3074-61af-4edb-9ed4-a3530158623e

    Will they all just come here instead?

    It's not the sort of thing you'd be expecting if they only had 30k soldiers killed...



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,177 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Invasions are scary, people run away. It's only natural.

    If Russia invaded Ireland, based on what you've expressed in your posting history here, it's obvious you would be one of the first to run.

    Incredibly, somehow, despite being much smaller and less powerful than the invaders, many Ukrainians bucked that trend, and stayed and fought. Unfortunately, not all. It's also been two years of gruelling fighting. Therefore, including more recently, there are efforts to try and encourage and push others to come back as they desperately need troops.

    Any nation under attack, fighting for survival, needs to keep national morale up at all costs. However since you openly want Ukraine to fail, like the Russian TV hosts, you predictably seize on any story that you perceive bucks their propaganda.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,982 ✭✭✭yosemitesam1


    I don't want Ukraine to fail. I just don't want them to be part of the EU. There's a big difference.

    There is lots of things that don't add up with their story though.

    One minute it's only 30k deaths but yet they're severely short of men.

    They are defending against a terrible regime who wants to destroy all of Ukraine and it's people but yet where are all the fighters? They aren't dead or injured according to Ukraine so why are Ukrainians so reluctant to fight.

    Obvious answers are much more deaths have occurred than reported and/or the average person doesn't want to give their life so those on top continue to make lots of money. But this is Russian propaganda so it can't be true...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,177 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    The "but I'm confused" act

    Putin is attempting to conquer and subjugate Ukraine, a country that poses no threat to Russia. To that end he uses propaganda to manipulate Russians into narratives that Ukraine is somehow a threat (Nazi's, etc), to validate the invasion, which involves killing people and taking their property and land. Invaders propaganda, there is no merit to it.

    Ukraine is having to defend itself, as such it needs propaganda to keep national morale up, critical for defending the country, keeping spirits up (and not collapsing). As such if they've e.g. lost 60k troops they may say they have only lost 30k.

    Two very different types of propaganda.

    Everyone and their dog understands this.

    You play a game in this thread where you pedantically pick through Ukrainian statements with this "confused" act. I see pro-Russian posters on social media (and Russian TV hosts) doing this all the time, e.g. "oh I thought Ukrainian soldiers were the bravest in the world, so why are some leaving Ukraine?", "Oh I see the Ukrainians lost a town, we were told they were doing well, very strange", "I keep seeing destroyed Abraams, we were told they would change the war"

    It's mealy-mouthed stuff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 857 ✭✭✭gk5000


    I for one want Ukraine to be part of the EU, obviously at the right time when this is over, they have repelled the invader and have sorted our their legacy issues due to being subjugated by Russia within the Soviet Union for so long.

    Their spirit and resolve can only be a good thing for the EU. And if farmers are worried, it is at least better if produce and competition are coming from Ukraine as opposed to Brazil etc…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,676 ✭✭✭Field east


    what have you got against UKr being I a FULL member of the EU?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,982 ✭✭✭yosemitesam1


    It will have a very negative effect on the agri food sector in the EU, put negative pressure on incomes and the surplus cash simply isn't there to invest in them in the way it was for Eastern European countries joining 20 years ago.

    Can't see how they can be effectively integrated without causing negative effects to the rest of the EU while not bringing anything to offset these negatives.

    The Eu can be completely self sufficient in all agricultural products if it wants as things stand.

    They don't have big energy supplies to replace the gap left by Russian supplies.

    What exactly do they bring to balance off the hundreds of billions of euros it could take to get them rebuilt and developed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,752 ✭✭✭jaymla627


    Ukraine lads try to steal millions while the cute russian lads try to steal billions, if theirs any truth in the above its probable that it was wholesale corruption in the russian army by the men at the top that instigated putin moving on ukraine in the first place



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,580 ✭✭✭jmreire


    And just what did you expect when Russia was the Mother and Putin the Father?? One or perhaps the main reason Ukraine sought independence and closer links to the EU was to eventually rid themselves of this corruption? And they will succeed too, but first Putin has to be defeated. Bear in mind that all ex-USSR countrys were corrupt to when they left. They will be an asset to the EU when they do get to join.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,580 ✭✭✭jmreire


    That link provides a very interesting story (and explanation for many other things too!) about what was going on in pre invasion times.



Advertisement