Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ireland - now considered one of most vulnerable countries in the EU (defense wise)

1235728

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 978 ✭✭✭Palmach


    Not to mention that on the whole continent of Europe we are the MOST dependent on imported food.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,086 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    This.. 100% where any danger lies.

    Sure some of our politicians are all but calling thenselves Dmitri and Anya already.. well MEPs anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,086 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    "Weaken the left wing bias"? Wow thats some speech in favour of a military junta?!

    You know the military are meant to stay impartial and not be a political entity.. That way leads to military dictatorship

    Never realised the danger was so strong from within. 😯

    So whatever feeling I may have had for strengthening our military and navy has been well and truly banished after that post.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,600 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    Ah okay.

    Is there any other country in the world that depends on a neighbouring country to come to its aid in this way- considering the history between ourselves and the UK?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,192 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    I think you mistakenly believe that I am in favour of this nonsense. A quick read of any of my posts in this thread should set you straight!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 160 ✭✭ChickenDish


    Ireland doesnt need to spend anymore on defense if anything it needs more Guards, if it gets so bad that the big bad wolf ends up on our shores, then no amount of money or increase in military personnel will save us.

    All this talk on conscription around Europe is pure waffle. Neither Nato or Russia will face each other directly, its a no win scenario for everyone concerned.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,192 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    Why exactly would Russia "think twice" about entering our airspace because we had radar? Ukraine had radar, they still went ahead an launched an invasion there.

    There is nothing that any Irish army could do to increase the safety of its citizens, you would just be pissing away money.

    You are living in some immature dreamland if you think otherwise frankly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,192 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    Yeah, that really seems to be stopping them in their tracks doesn't it? So lucky that invasion is over now.


    I'll just leave this here.

    The Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) estimates that each Patriot battery costs about $1.1 billion: $400 million for the system, $690 million for the missiles – the cost of a single missile is estimated at $4.1 million (€3.8 million)


    A few nukes would also make them think twice I guess?

    Pie, meet sky.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,436 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    That pair's interactions should be watched, most definitely.



  • Registered Users Posts: 160 ✭✭Tippman24


    I have said it here before that since the foundation of the State the overall attitude of its citizens towards the Defence Forces has been poor. We have an army only because every country has an Army therefore we should have one too. However when it comes to equipping same to defend the country there is no desire to do so. Instead our army is deployed on peacekeepong missions keeping two tribes apart in so.e part of the world. We can all go around clapping ourselves on the back for this.

    We either pay up to have an army that can defend the state, which is the primary mission, or we get rid of it. Our politicians will easily find some way to waste the funds currently spent in effectively on the defence of the country.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 535 ✭✭✭Scipri0


    They are, but they're also receiving a lot of help because let's be honest here, the U.S. has a chance to take Russia down a peg without having any of it's forces harmed in the process. It's a win-win for them



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,773 ✭✭✭LambshankRedemption


    A couple of small things would greatly improve our defensive capabilities.

    A dedicated intelligence agency for example would be a start. Our current intelligence capabilities is provided by the Special Branch, the Department of Foreign Affairs, and Military intelligence, who it seems, spend most of their time tracking drug dealers in the Costa Del Sol, or keeping an eye on aged Republicans. One of the duties of a new intelligence service could be to check out the many immigrants arriving on our shores. I think very few people would be unhappy to hear money was being spent on that particular endeavour.

    For the protection of our underwater cables, we don't need a fleet of submarines, but a Sonar net would be extremely useful.

    A military grade radar system would also be of huge benefit to the country as a whole. It's one thing to rely on the RAF to be the bouncer for our airspace, but being unable to see what is happening in our own airspace is just negligence.

    None of this would cost much but would be a start.



  • Registered Users Posts: 535 ✭✭✭Scipri0


    I don't think there will be world peace, nor do i think by Ireland increasing its defence spending it going to help it protect underwater cables or indeed Ireland itself. All it is, is a ploy to have our country lobbied by foreign defence firms to sell their gear. It's not really about Ireland being able to defend itself. I think we have a lot of problems in this country that could do with the money, like better infrastructure and housing. Last thing most people want is money being drained out of this country just to make wealthy shareholders even richer.



  • Registered Users Posts: 535 ✭✭✭Scipri0


    You think that British Conservative think tank a while back actually cared about Ireland being able to defend itself or do you think they had their defence industry lobby on their behalf?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,186 ✭✭✭✭jmayo


    Ah don't worry Charlie Flanagan was on with Pat Kenny the other day saying how our defense spending is down way below European average.

    His biggest gripe though was there no longer was a Minister of Defense in cabinet.

    Reminds me how often I have seen company management working.

    There aren't the staff to run operations and carry out project work.

    The solution is to appoint a project manager or divert another manager to the task.

    All fooking chiefs and no fooking indians to actually do the work.


    As for the folks that think US and UK are just going to keep baby sitting us, just remember what old Trump thinks of NATO countries not ponying up.

    Imagine what he would think of the cost of looking after us.

    I am not allowed discuss …



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,798 ✭✭✭satguy


    We will be just fine,, we sit snugly under the wing of the RAF,, it's the least they can do after 800 years of occupation. They will keep an eye on our air space for us.

    Plus we really have nothing others might want,, we really have no country that hates us enough to invade us,, we are friends to all.

    Lets spend our money on schools and homes,, and all that good stuff. We have no need for tanks and fighter jets..



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,945 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    I don't give a monkies what they think, or the reasons/conspiracy theories why articles (like one in OP) appear now.

    Have come to conclusions about this issue (Irish defence/military spending, related issue of poor state of Irish defence forces etc.) that are independent of the Tories, or people linked to British military/defence ind. etc. that might bad mouth us in UK newspapers.

    Don't think we should buy UK weapons/equipment either. If we decide to spend more, that would be far better kept in the EU.

    Probably be cheaper too (and make more sense if we start to see further moves towards countries in the EU ordering the same stuff as a collective etc.)

    edit: Noticed you had nothing to say to my point that any extra spending Ireland does is miniscule in context of big events happening in Europe. The (EU) countries that might ask us to do more have other reasons for that. In case you hadn't been following UK politics since 2016, the Tories don't particularly like us. So for some of them it could be just a shiny new stick to bash Ireland (+ govt. here) with. Doesn't mean they are incorrect in what they say though!

    Post edited by fly_agaric on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,186 ✭✭✭✭jmayo


    There is something the folks that subscribe to "shure the yanks and Brits will look after us".

    You never want other countries fighting on your territory because neither of the sides give a flying fook about the people or country.

    I am not allowed discuss …



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 194 ✭✭Aurelian


    What if the stretched British military is stretched defending their own country and can't stretch to help us?

    And we are freeloaders.



  • Registered Users Posts: 378 ✭✭highpitcheric


    im sure there are a few.

    if uk wasn't in nato then russian jets wouldn't be messing with them and using our airspace as the route in the first place. now would they?


    its strange how theres a mental block in trying to get this through to some people .... uk/nato are the 'cause' of the russian planes being in irish airspace.

    they cause the issue. (-1) so they get to 'fix' the issue (+1). = 0. Which is the level of gratitude we owe.

    much as if i hit your car, i 'caused' the probem. so i get to 'fix' the problem.

    This is unless you believe Russia has been entering Irish airspace to target Dublin (non-nato, non-nuclear), rather than London (nuclear, nato member).



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,274 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    No. We are NOT.

    The ignorance on this thread to much of the reality of the situation we find ourselves in as a nation, is breathtaking.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,120 ✭✭✭Sandor Clegane


    Our position in the world has given us the option of being freeloaders, which we have accepted with gusto, but the world is changing...America can no longer be relied upon, the Trump presidency saw to that, the potential for chaos over there is scarily close now with religious fundamentalism on the rise, with isolationism and far right agendas gaining more and more traction, Trump has changed the rules forever, his presidency has allowed for lunacy to become a viable political option, where facts no longer matter, where deals and agreements don't matter, where being Allies now goes to the highest bidder.

    Nobody is expecting Ireland to be a superpower, but we don't even have the basics, no radar, navy, air force nothing, we should be able to monitor our own sea and sky, be capable of sharing information with our Allies, the current situation is embarrassing and we are freeloaders, taking advantage of our safe position but as I said the world is changing and not for the better.

    But our attitude is never going to change and we all no it, not unless something drastic happens, as per usual it will take something extreme to happen before anything is done about the current set up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 52,065 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    Scaremongering thread. Revive the FCA quick.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 248 ✭✭Randycove


    I’m not sure if you’ve ever seen a map, but Russian bombers flying down the west coast of Ireland aren’t heading for the uk. Unless you think they took the scenic route?


    they basically fly from northern Russia, north of Scandinavia and down towards Spain, before turning around and heading home.

    each country they fly past dispatches jets to escort them through their own areas of interest before handing over to the next country

    all except one that is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,436 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    Tbf at the outset, what was the then National Army didn't exactly cover itself in glory carrying out what we would call war crimes (for which no-one was was ever brought to account)

    Since the 1924 mutiny, the government's attitude ever since has been to keep the Army subservient and in its place.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,907 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    I'm all in favour of a good big strong army, it's just what we need.

    Provided of course it's 99% an engineering corp who can build houses and hospitals.



  • Registered Users Posts: 449 ✭✭L.Ball


    Imagine calling someone stupid and not knowing the difference between Army, Navy & Airforce, I'd delete my profile i made this much of a fool of myself.



Advertisement