Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

"average Dublin house prices should fall to ‘the €300,000 mark" according to Many Lou McD.

14142434446

Comments

  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,465 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    The problem with the "just build more" approach is that we are not, in fact, building more.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,104 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    We built the entire housing stock of Galway City last year. In 12 months.

    The numbers will be higher again this year.

    The problem is that almost all housing completions are taking place in Dublin.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,465 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    And it is nowhere near enough given the backlog we have helped manufacture over the last decade (also I have no idea how Galway City boundaries are defined, but 30,000 homes seems low for the entire city. The comparison is irrelevant anyway).


    636 new homes near a Luas line are going to Judicial Review after ABP gave approval because of complaints from resident associations that they didn't properly consider the impact on "bat fauna".

    We have a housing crisis because entitled and selfish home owners do everything in their power to make sure new homes are not built.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,104 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Yes, the Milltown Park objection is ridiculous.

    Hopefully these homes get built on what is prime land for families and professionals and has no direct impact at all on the wealthy neighbours.

    Galway city is about 30k households, yes.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,556 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    636 new homes near a Luas line are going to Judicial Review after ABP gave approval because of complaints from resident associations that they didn't properly consider the impact on "bat fauna".

    You obviously misread the article or are being economical with the facts because that wasn't the only reason (which in itself is a valid reason given how much we have damaged and continue to damage wildlife habitats around the country).



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,465 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I know it wasn't the only reason. I will simply never believe that the residents association gives any care whatsoever about bats. Also if public transportation on the luas line is insufficient then we can't build anywhere.


    They are not good faith objections and they are mirrored across the city. The objections forever boil down to "we don't want more building near us". They simply scattergun whatever objections they think might stick.

    Also it is simply not a valid reason. Humans matter more than bats and any development we can do in urban and suburban areas is good. Actual wildlife habitats are damaged by things like rampant pastural land not homes beside a tram line.



  • Registered Users Posts: 333 ✭✭Hawkeye123


    Precisely. And that brings us to the 200,000,000,000.00 euro FG borrowed to reinflate the house prices following the crash of 2008. Our ability to maintain high house prices is based on our ability to servive debt.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,423 ✭✭✭Patrick2010




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,270 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    Ok, how about, if you dont have/get an above average job, dont try and live in an above average part of the country?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,270 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    Where do you suggest the new, cheap houses within the city are built?

    And when you name all those areas, where after that?

    Land doesnt grow on trees you know.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 926 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    Let me ask you a question in return: how do you think the crisis is going to be solved without building accommodation both in the city and outside?

    This idea that if everyone upskills (as suggested in the post I was responding to), the crisis will be solved, is simplistic and fails to take into account how the market would react in such a circumstance.

    Part of the solution will always be building. The other aspect will be tighter control of population growth (mainly due to inward migration).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,104 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Yes. If that isnt a good place to build apartments that are not reliant on cars, then nowhere in Dublin is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 926 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    In fact, there was a story a few months ago about a couple of lads who had a successful business objecting to developments on environmental grounds. What they would do when they got wind of a development, was lodge a mild complaint about environmental concerns. The trick was not to be too dramatic and get the development shut down in the early stages (the developer would simply move on in this case, no money in that) but rather have it just serious enough to have the application go to the appeal stages where it could potentially drag on indefinitely. At some stage, the developer would cough up a "consultancy fee" to the lads, and the environmental concern would magically disappear.

    I would imagine this is just the tip of the iceberg.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,929 ✭✭✭Greyfox


    The problem is getting a home anywhere is difficult, not just Dublin. If you own a pub, shop or restaurant in Dublins city centre staff are not going to be willing to commute a large distance for minimum wage, they would instead get a job closer to where they live.



  • Registered Users Posts: 134 ✭✭oohlalala


    Completely unreasonable point of view in a country where just about every part of it is becoming unaffordable.

    I'll go back to the example of a student as a means to looking at the damage this is causing going forward.

    If that student cannot afford to live in a place offering medical degrees, then what is the suggestion there?

    Although it's a specific example, it does demonstrate the wider implications of this situation at large.

    That is to say, to pick trinity as an example, it is implicitly walled off to everyone in the rest of the country bar those that happen to live near it or some lucky circumstance. Nothing to do with merit, or hard work, or potential. Everything to do with a housing crisis that has been allowed/encouraged to limp ever downwards to destruction.

    Ditto particular industries and particular occupations. Take any person from a smaller town (or larger!), compare it against the courses available for students, and cross reference in terms of future potential in that confined geographic area. It's madness.

    It may seem dramatic at first, but what is happening in this country is very much like walls being built up around opportunity. Wall off Galway, wall off dublin, wall off every place in both terms of preventing entrance AND exit.

    This country is going to reap what it has sown, make no mistake about the future this ballooning inequality is bringing. And just like I pointed out earlier, most of it will be for the sake of nothing when it's said and done.



  • Registered Users Posts: 134 ✭✭oohlalala


    As I said above, it might as well be walls being built up around everything. Can't get in, can't get out.

    Unaffordability of housing has ruined us, and we haven't seen anything yet because of the latency effect.



  • Registered Users Posts: 134 ✭✭oohlalala



    But the economy, bro!

    Need all the extra people for the economy, sure it creates a housing crisis, but what about the economy.

    Sure it creates an ever declining educational opportunity, sure it creates an ever dwindling healtcare capacity, sure it puts back breaking pressure on transport, sure it creates social immobility. And more. But what about the economy, broseph?

    The Irish economy is about as useful as a spare arsehole sellotaped to your nose.

    The sheer volume of smoke being blown up peoples holes about the economy in this country could literally double climate change impacts alone.

    And there isn't a thing to be done about housing affordability without addressing, for the first time ever, the oh so taboo demand.




    Post edited by oohlalala on


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,465 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Sure it creates an ever declining educational opportunity, sure it creates an ever dwindling healtcare capacity

    These are both literally the opposite of true.

    Foreign fee-paying students fund under-subsidised Irish students in most courses and immigrants avail of healthcare far less than the native population and indeed supply significant resources to the HSE in both taxes and manpower. Healthcare capacity is dwindling due to aging Irish people.

    Also given the ever increasing retired population we need sufficient workers to fund it, which won't come naturally.



  • Registered Users Posts: 134 ✭✭oohlalala


    In quick succession...

    Ask an Irish student how easy it is to attend college with the housing crisis, ask parents how easy it is to find school places and childcare. Worse than ever, AFTER mass migration? Boom.

    Healthcare provision at large is measurably worse in many ways than ever, AFTER the "boon" of mass migration. Boom.

    And needing more migrants to sustain more migrants, a la the INCREASED pension ratio AFTER mass migration has occurred, is nothing more than a badly hawked pyramid scheme. Boom.

    Also consider the likely impact of multiple capacity crises on the Irish population going forward. More children, or less? Boom.

    Boom boom boom boom

    The proof is in the pudding for these fairy tales, and it tastes like shite.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,270 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    That's irrelevant if there is no where left to build on.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,270 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    Great, so they can work outside of Dublin and/or the wages for these roles will increase.

    Currently 1,558 properties for sale in Dublin for 475K and under.

    Also heres an idea, if you are on minimum wage, maybe you shouldn't be looking to buy a house, nevermind one in Dublin

    Post edited by GreeBo on


  • Registered Users Posts: 134 ✭✭oohlalala


    It is certainly an interesting proposition you put forward, that perhaps if you're on miminum wages you shouldn't aim to live in Dublin.

    Tell me, would you apply that same logic to everyone bussing in from across the planet to Dublin to pour coffee and ride bicycles and such, living 10 to a room?

    Because, call me mad, I can see a connection between one precluding the other. Not to mention the insanity of one.

    What do you think?

    You're a landlord, aren't you? I mean, come on.



  • Registered Users Posts: 333 ✭✭Hawkeye123


    Yes but we inflated house prices with 200 billion euro of borrowed money. Can we afford that? What if the multinationals run into difficulty?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,104 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Well the banks arent offering large LTV multipliers anymore and so I'd say people can afford it for the most part.

    If the MNCs run into trouble, that could cause problems of course - but they may not. The job cuts look to have stabilised.

    There are a lot of people with a lot of money in the country and the mortgages are relativley affordable, especially when contrasted against the price of rent (dead money).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,642 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    1,519 properties in Dublin currently listed on myhome.ie for under 450k.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,104 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Govt will increase new homes target to 50k per year, this year I believe.

    Probably an acceptance they wont hit it this year or maybe next, but good to see a more relevant target.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,095 ✭✭✭Blut2


    They'll increase the target to 50k homes a year immediately before they're voted out of office, so that they can point to the next government as failing to meet housing targets from the opposition benches. Unlike the current government which met every target (at the ridiculously below whats required level, of circa 30k a year), obviously.

    60k a year within 3 years should be the goal, with exact, realistic plans outlined on how to expand to this level consistently.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,104 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Except the current govt are likley to be returned...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,095 ✭✭✭Blut2


    The bookies disagree.

    They generally tend to be accurate about these things too given they lose very large sums of money if they're wrong.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,642 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Not really an accurate bet. There are no odds currently offered on Paddy Power on the composition of the next election.

    Betting on next Taoiseach has to include certain factors, will there be rotation, and if so, who first? Will the current incumbents be retained as leader?

    Based on that, MLMD is bound to be favourite, because the boys in Belfast won't remove her no matter what the result if they end up in government, and secondly, if Sinn Fein are in government, they will insist on first go.

    To sum up, those odds mean nothing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,095 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Those are Paddypower's odds on who the next Taoiseach in Ireland will be. No, more, no less.

    They very much suggest MLMD is expected to be our next Taoiseach by the people who have large amounts of money on the line. Which means Sinn Fein will be the major party of government after the next election.

    Which means according to the people who know best in Ireland its the most likely outcome that the current government isn't going to be returning, in direct contrast to what the post I replied to suggested.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,104 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Paddy Power are not the all seeing eye of politics.

    Also, those odds are specific to leader, not party.

    If you asked the same question to most political commentators, they would not agree that it is 3 times more likley SF will govern vs FF or FG.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,642 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    I have just explained in simple language how the odds for next Taoiseach are unrelated to the odds of Sinn Fein being in government because of complications around the formation of coalitions and potential retirements of leaders. Paddy Power are not currently offering odds on which parties will form the next government.

    Your example is like using the odds of next manager to be sacked to determine which club is going to win the league.

    The odds on who the next Taoiseach in Ireland will be are that, no more, no less. They tell us very little about which parties will be in government.

    Similarly, Sinn Fein are favourites to be the largest party after the next election, they were also the largest party after the last election, but they ended up in opposition. Pretty much the same outcome is likely.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,095 ✭✭✭Blut2


    The odds for SF to be the largest party are even stronger. The bookies prediction is SF as the largest party in Ireland, with Mary Lou as our Taoiseach, by quite a considerable margin.

    These aren't just the odds with Paddypower either, its the same with any bookie that offers political betting.

    Political commentators have no skin in the game, it costs them very little personally when they're wrong. And/or they have their own political biases. Their predictions are far less accurate than the bookies. Because when the bookies are very wrong it costs them prohibitively large sums of money.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,095 ✭✭✭Blut2


    "the odds for next Taoiseach are unrelated to the odds of Sinn Fein being in government" - actual lol. Do you think Mary Lou is going to get voted in as Taoiseach if SF aren't in government? Do explain how exactly?

    Mary Lou having the lowest odds of becoming Taoiseach means the bookies think SF are going to be a dominant party in our next government. Because if they aren't she won't be becoming Taoiseach. Surely thats rather obvious.

    If our current FF/FG/Green government is returned, as the poster I was replying to claimed is odds on, Mary Lou is not going to be our Taoiseach. But thats not the most likely outcome in the next election according to every bookmaker in the country.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,642 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Sinn Fein are the largest party in the current Dail, they are not in government.

    Neither of the two sets of betting odds that you have produced say anything about the likely formation of the next Government.

    They say a certain number of things as follows:

    1. Sinn Fein are likely to be the largest party in the Dail after the next election, according to the bookies, like duh, have you seen an opinion poll?
    2. MLMD is most likely to be still party leader after the next election, again duh, If Leo or MM drop seats, they are dead meat, MM will resign rather than go into coalition with SF, MM and LV have more chance of losing their seats than MLMD, therefore those possibilities reduce their likelihood of being Taoiseach, even if their parties are in government.
    3. If SF do go into government , they will be the largest party and more likely to have Taoiseach post, whereas MM and LV, if they end up in government are 50/50 on who is Taoiseach first.

    As I said already, the odds tell us nothing about likely government, only about what they say they are about.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,642 ✭✭✭✭blanch152




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,095 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Its rather hilarious seeing you tie yourself in knots trying to ignore the numbers here. The bookies figures aren't political, they're based on cold hard money. "the odds for next Taoiseach are unrelated to the odds of Sinn Fein being in government" is a genuinely hilarious line of argument of yours, you've either got no understanding of Irish politics or are deliberately trying to ignore the real world.

    There is absolutely zero possibility for Mary Lou to be Taoiseach if our current government is returned.

    If the most likely outcome of the next election was a return of our current government then the favourites to be Taoiseach would be one or both of Martin and Varadkar. They're not, by a long shot.

    The odds for our next Taoseach tell us very explicitly who is most likely to be leading our next government. Which is Mary Lou apparently, by a large margin. Which will require SF being in government, ie a rather significant change in government.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,566 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Let's wait and see. In terms of numbers if I was you I wouldn't be lecturing anyone. Remember the old tax post 😂



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,465 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    If the most likely outcome of the next election was a return of our current government then the favourites to be Taoiseach would be one or both of Martin and Varadkar. They're not, by a long shot.

    Whatever about anything else, this simply isn't true as both of their odds will be essentially doubled by the nature of the arrangement.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 333 ✭✭Hawkeye123


    The Irish government does not want house prices to fall because if they do, people who find themselves in negative equity will stop paying their mortgages and house prices will go into a downward spiral. It cost the state 200 billion to inflate house prices in the first place so falling house prices is a big no no for the government.

    Consequently, when the ECB started hiking interest rates a year or two ago, and Ireland's house prices showed signs of levelling off. The government responded by easing lending standards to ensure more people could borrow more money so that house prices would continue to rise. At the time, I predicted the return of the 110% mortgage because like I say, the government really really really DO NOT want house prices to fall.

    Well, this morning I read in the Irish Times that the talk in the Oireachtas is that multinationals have a big issue with the housing crisis and the blame is being put (by whom I can guess) on the tighter lending standards introduced following the 2008 housing crash.

    So kids, expect to be able to borrow more in the near future. Your bigger mortgage is what will keep house prices on an upward trajectory for the time being.

    The thing is, I think the multinationals are going to downsize or withdraw from Ireland anyway over the next few years, (due to other reasons).

    So, we will be left with people who are unemployed, with 110% mortgages, and a national debt of 240 billion, (most of which was used to re-inflate a bubble in house prices), and of course we will then have a newly popped bubble in house prices to contend with.

    Given the EU's sticky inflation, I doubt borrowing another 200 billion to re-blow the house bubble again is an option. The time is coming to pay the piper folks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,015 ✭✭✭blackwhite


    Firstly - odds aren't set based solely on who the bookmaker thinks will win - it's also weighted by what their exposures from pre-existing bets is. So the odds on MLMD will already be dampened due to people having placed bets on her being the next Taoiseach when SF were polling at 7-9% higher than they currently are.

    Secondly - the odds also factor in the likelihood of any particular party leader being ousted by their party before the next Taoiseach is elected by the Dáil.

    Hence you've Martin at 4-1, but also McGrath at 25-1; and Varadkar at 4-1 but also Coveney at 14-1 and Donohue at 33-1. For SF, you've MLMD at 8-13, but Doherty only at

    66-1.

    Current PP odds are

    MLMD 8/13 ~ 61.9%

    MM 4/1 ~ 20.0%

    LV 4/1 ~ 20.0%

    Coveney 14/1 ~ 6.7%

    McGrath 25/1 ~ 3.8%

    Pascal 33/1 ~ 2.9%

    Pearse 66/1 ~ 1.5%

    Ryan 125/1 ~ 0.8%

    Translate those odds to probabilities and it comes to approx. 63% probability for a SF Taoiseach vs 54% probability for a Taoiseach from one of the Govt parties - so SF approximately one-sixth more likely to lead the next Govt according to the bookies. That's not a large margin by any means, and is already weighted by SF likely having attract more bets during the period that they were polling at higher levels than currently.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,095 ✭✭✭Blut2


    So just to reiterate. The poster I replied to claimed the current government are most likely to be returned.

    I replied saying the bookies odds suggest otherwise.

    The odds, and your post, suggest exactly what I said - the current gov are not in fact the most likely to be returned. An SF government is currently the most likely election outcome.

    The cold hard statistics of this seem to have triggered a few posters in the thread.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,015 ✭✭✭blackwhite


    Again - the odds reflect two things - not solely what the bookies believe is the most likely result.

    Betting placed during 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023 all weigh into the odds offered by the bookies also, and based on polling during those years it's likely that weighting is also skewed towards MLMD and will have the impact of dampening the odds offered by bookies on her.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,083 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    ....increasing credit into housing markets is actually what causes house price inflation, this can come from individuals and/or from investment funds, including pension funds etc, this is occurring all over the world in most advanced economies, resulting in housing bubbles...

    ...this overall approach is known as financialisation, and its causing extremely serious property problems, and subsequent social problems, virtually everywhere it has been implemented....

    ...our national debt didnt actually go directly into inflating house prices, but went into filling the holes left in the balance sheets from the crash, bond holders etc....

    ...this debt would have been far better spent on our actual needs at the time, including building more public and social homes, as it was noted at the height of the crash that we were in fact running out of properties, particularly in the dublin region....

    ...some of this debt should have also been invested in other critical needs including major infrastructure needs, present and future needs....

    ...but instead, austerity was 'chosen' as the 'best' policy, and what a monumental success story it was and is!

    ...oh mnc's aint goin anywhere, so relax!

    ...national or public debt isnt necessarily a bad thing, but it does depend what it is used for, yes it can be used to inflate the price of assets, but if it used to actually build and create new assets such as housing, thats a good use of it....

    again, or problem is actually with credit, credit comes from the financial sector itself, as banks create it, but since we ve convinced ourselves that publicly created money such as deficit created money, is simply the work of the devil, this in turn forces us towards bank created credit for our needs, and it now is primarily being used to inflate the price of assets such as, and in particular property, we may never move back towards running deficits for some of our needs, including housing.....

    ...so basically, we re stuck, stuck with severely dysfunctional property markets, hyper inflated property prices, and serious supply problems, indefinitely...

    ...sorry folks, but you re kids, grand kids, nieces and nephews are now completely fcuked in regards their property needs....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,095 ✭✭✭Blut2


    But, again, you can make efforts to downplay the MLMD lead, but the odds are still very clearly not pointing towards a a return of the current government.

    This isn't even just the bookies alone, as polls show the same thing:

    "When it comes to choosing a coalition option for the next government, 27 per cent of voters support a continuation of the present Fianna Fáil-Fine Gael-Green coalition, marginally ahead of having a government led by Sinn Féin without either Fianna Fáil or Fine Gael at 25 per cent.

    A Sinn Féin-Fianna Fáil coalition is the top choice for 11 per cent, followed by a Sinn Féin-Fine Gael coalition at 6 per cent. Almost one in five voters (17 per cent) would prefer to see another combination, while 14 per cent are undecided."

    44% for a government with SF in it, vs 27% for a return of the current government.

    And:

    "89 per cent of voters would like to see a change to the way in which the country is run.

    One in every two voters (51 per cent) support moderate change, while 38 per cent are in favour of radical change. Only a small minority (8 per cent) are wary of change and 3 per cent are undecided."


    Again, very clearly suggesting the statement "the current government are most likely to be returned" is an incorrect statement.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/politics/2023/09/29/poll-shows-the-vast-majority-of-irish-voters-want-change/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,104 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Largest party yes, very likley - leading a govt, not so likley.

    But we will see.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,566 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Has Sinn Fein come out yet to confirm teh 300k price or was it just the usual noise from them?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,642 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    You have dismantled his points far better than I did.

    A 63% probability for a SF Taoiseach based on the bets already placed to date is quite low. As you say, those odds are weighted by existing exposure.

    We probably won't see odds on the parties to form the next government until after the European elections. Those will tell us a bit more.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,104 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Pretty pointless stats because 25% (2nd largest vote) saying they would hypothetically like to see a SF led govt without FFG, is ignoring the reality that the composition of such a govt is almost impossible.

    SF get in with FF's blessing.

    If they dont have FF as a coalition partner they cant reasonably form a govt.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement