Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

Options
1355435553557355935603691

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 12,392 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Russians just tried to kill Zelensky on his way to meet a Greek government official.


    Edit" link


    All Eyes On Rafah



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,738 ✭✭✭zv2


    “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” — Voltaire



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,311 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    What do you mean it is not “meant” to be hit? Does that apply to other requirements like for environmental protection agreements?

    If 2% were not feasible (esp with previous precedent), it would not have been agreed upon.

    Regardless, from a Carnegie report on the matter in 2015:

    • Europeans underestimate the political significance of 2 percent in the U.S. debate over security commitments to Europe.

    • Americans overestimate the political significance of 2 percent among Europeans struggling with austerity and divergent threat perceptions, which make it difficult to increase their defense commitments.


    The problem is that when the US is the backbone of the organization Europeans underestimating the American political effect is far more consequential than Americans overestimating European effects, as we are seeing today.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,453 ✭✭✭weisses


    The US is again is proven to be an unreliable partner, they go in guns blazing but back out on a whim and leave coalition partners deal with the fallout .. Just remember the Kurds in Syria/Turkey, the shambolic withdrawal from Afghanistan, and now Ukraine. The US wants to be the big player on the world stage, its time they take responsibility and finish what they start.

    NATO provides the US with allies and because of its military power holds an almost guaranteed leading role in the alliance

    NATO provides the US an economic boost by completely dominating arms sales to members and other friendly countries

    NATO provides for the US to have a great deal of influence and power on joining countries.

    The 2% norm needs to be reached but grandstanding lead by that sexual predator, former president is laughable.

    The US without NATO means the US loses a great deal of its influence on the world stage.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,392 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Well, a NATO Prime Minister was nearly struck by a Russian missile.

    Who is escalating things again?

    All Eyes On Rafah



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,848 ✭✭✭✭josip


    OT but the US spent years and billions in Afghanistan trying to train and handover to an Afghan army. I'm not saying it was done for altruistic purposes, but the collapse when they left was down to the (lack of) willingness of the Afghans to fight the Taliban.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,815 ✭✭✭aidanodr


    Yesterday we heard Yulia Navalnaya declined the invite to be at the annual State of the Union speech in front of Congress tomorrow. And we were wondering why. Well here you go, THIS is why it seems.

    Washington Post reports that Olena Zelenska turned down Biden’s invitation to his annual State of the Union speech in front of Congress tomorrow.

    The reason for the snub is that Biden wanted to seat Zelenska next to Alexei Navalny’s widow Yulia.

    So what was Biden and Co up to here one wonders??



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,815 ✭✭✭aidanodr




  • Registered Users Posts: 4,819 ✭✭✭kksaints


    It's particularly crazy as Greece would have stronger cultural ties than most European countries to Russia.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,153 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Would that widow be willing to sit beside Trump?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,153 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Imagine going for a holiday in Russia in these times!



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,434 ✭✭✭jmreire


    What we are discussing here is Putins invasion of Ukraine, and nowhere else, not an invasion of Europe which would be a 100% different scenario, as you seem to be suggesting. War gaming is one thing, actual implementing it is something else. The UN-NATO Military manoeuvres planned for 2024 have been several years in the planning. For the US attack on Iraq, they began staging operations late 2022, but the attack didn't actually start until March 20, 2003. The ideal world (and start of ww3) would be to hit Putin's military when it was staging his forces for the actual attack itself, after conveniently finishing his own war games. That would have stopped it dead in its tracks, for sure, but like I said, started ww3. Two weeks advance notice would at best have given Zelensky a small chance to move critical stuff away from the front.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,801 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Maybe read the conversation, it was in response to a poster mentioning a Russian invasion of the Baltics.

    I notice you left out Afghanistan, they managed to start that within a month, maybe it had a little more urgency?

    An invasion can be planned well in advance it's a completely different scenario than defending. You don't sit there while being invaded to plan on how to repulse them.

    The 2024 manoeuvres are not the first time NATO have trained and it's certainly nott how they would defend. Spend years and years planning while countries in NATO are being invaded. It's training, they do them every year.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,557 ✭✭✭Hande hoche!


    The Greeks also have a surprising amount of military equipment (owing to their rather bellicose Turkish neighbors). Some of which would be very familiar to the Ukrainians. Might have been a considerable misstep on the Russians' part.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,153 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Probably Putin showing how much he doesn't give a damm. Prepared to risk killing an EU leader i.e. you could be next Macron..



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,434 ✭✭✭jmreire


    My whole point is about the 2-week time factor, and what is possible to do in that time. As you mentioned, it took the US almost a month to respond to the Sept 11 attacks, and this from a Country with the best military in the world. Regarding the current situation in the Baltics, the states themselves are on a high state of alert, the complete opposite to what Ukraine was on pre-Feb 24 2022, and backed up by NATO. They are 100% prepared for any attack by Putin at any time, 2-week advance warning or not. Everything that they need to repulse Putin is already there, ready to go. But what could Ukraine have done with their 2 weeks warning?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,738 ✭✭✭zv2


    “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” — Voltaire



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,140 ✭✭✭Dick phelan


    Well that's one way to ensure an increase in supplies for Ukraine. Absolutely insane, the potential consequences of killing an EU and NATO prime minister. Russia proving yet again there's no line they won't cross.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,746 ✭✭✭sxt


    Is there any footage of this attempted assassination?


    Zelensky mentions the visit of the Greek prime minister on twitter in the last hour but doesn't mention it?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,022 ✭✭✭gw80


    Me thinks these lads went to Russia probably thinking they were going to be getting paid to fight for Russia behind the lines, logistics or IT specialist and have been handed a rifle and told they will be going over the top,and came up with that nonsense story, hahaha, delighted for them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,982 ✭✭✭rogber




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,982 ✭✭✭rogber


    The usual question: why isn't the West/NATO responding militarily, rather than with the usual expressions of "outrage"? It only emboldens Russia to do it again



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,815 ✭✭✭aidanodr


    I can see this as being true

    In an interview with Sam Harris for his Making Sense podcast, Stevens, citing people around Trump, said that this is exactly Trump's plan. And that is why Trump is prohibiting congressional Republicans from passing a new aid package to Ukraine. Having exhausted Ukraine, Trump hopes that Putin will end the war, retaining the positions he will have at the beginning of 2025.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,982 ✭✭✭rogber




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,815 ✭✭✭aidanodr




  • Registered Users Posts: 7,948 ✭✭✭Christy42


    Why not agree on them? They have to out down a number for the sake of the agreement and they know people won't hit whatever they put down (unless they have other reason to). Yes it applies to environmental agreements as well. Don't get me wrong, I think if people commit to a number they should match it but that is not the world we live in.


    Like when a new building (children's hospital) is being made. It will take longer than announced and go over budget.


    Europe hitting spending targets might won't effect US decisions. Trump is just finding an excuse, no more than Putin claiming Nato was encroaching. He would find one irregardless to pull out of Nato commitments and Putin would have had another excuse for invading Ukraine.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement