Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

March 8th - What’s your vote? **Mod Note In Post #677**

Options
1343537394046

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 29,384 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    ...governments parties are in deep sh1t now regarding the ge!



  • Registered Users Posts: 320 ✭✭pj12332


    They will all probably have a party tonight to drown their sorrows, at tax payers expense no doubt. Pack of clowns.



  • Registered Users Posts: 586 ✭✭✭dh1985


    Excellent post. A level of incompetence and out of touch with ordinary people that's shameful. But these c*nts have no shame



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,024 ✭✭✭Genghis


    Voting NO for both

    Or to put it another way, the majority of people who cared enough to vote, voted no.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,384 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    ...we may in fact start to see a panic ensue, with the lead up to the ge....



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 19,408 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    Voting NO for both

    As are the so called “opposition” who 💯 supported them such as Sinn Fein, Soc dems, Labour, PB4P etc. All in the government group think pocket and must be held accountable for that



  • Registered Users Posts: 22,419 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Voting YES for both

    Thats not how it works at all



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,123 ✭✭✭bigroad


    More millions of taxpayers money wasted ,thanks to O Gorman and his buddies.



  • Registered Users Posts: 333 ✭✭Hawkeye123


    Voting NO for both

    The woman's place is in the home just like I've always said. To be precise, down on her knees scrubbing the kitchen floor.

    We the people voted with the Bishops. Next job is to ban the stuff that was banned before, fill the schools and hospitals with nuns. Let the fun begin.

    Only joking.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,384 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,056 ✭✭✭SuperBowserWorld


    Voting NO for both

    McDowell was very dignified, eloquent, informed, educated and calm throughout the whole campaign and put the country and the constitution first. We need more politics and politicians like this. He did the country some service.




  • Registered Users Posts: 10,889 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    Voting YES for both

    I'm surprised the family amendment has failed, there's no obvious way to rerun it either unless they come up with a much larger piece of text.

    The care amendment seemed to be slipping in last few days, and seems the primary issues were from both sides of the spectrum. The right talking about keeping mothers in the constitution. The left talking about care text not going far enough. I reckon if the motion was simply to remove the wording about a woman's life in the home then it'd have passed.

    Who knows though? With FG specifically having been in power for so long, it's possible any proposal the government came up with would have failed. Might have been more sensible to wait until the other side of a general election?



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,876 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison


    Glad to see the No voters making the effort and coming out to vote- this could easily have passed if apathy took over - it’s reassuring that people hold the constitution with respect and don’t allow it to be messed with unless there’s a clear reason to do so and a clear and understandable amendment to replace whatever is being taken out.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,387 ✭✭✭BrianD3


    Great result, I'm a male, unpaid carer and I voted No because I simply don't believe that the state "striving" to support carers will do anything. And that this amendment was mainly a cynical attempt to exploit carers to remove the word woman from the constitution for woke, virtue signalling reasons.

    The existing constitution says that the state will endeavour to ensure that mothers don't have to take up paid employment. With hundreds of thousands of women/mothers working so they can pay their rent or mortgage, yeah that's working out really well.

    Carers going to court to challenge the state on its "striving" was not going to happen just as mothers in paid employment don't take cases on the state's "endeavouring".

    The NGO representative and others making confident flippant comments about how a Yes would do x, y and z were spewing BS. E.g. Catherine Cox from Family Carers Ireland (state funded NGO that supposedly represents people like me) on Six One claimed that a Yes vote would mean that a government could never again cut the carer's support grant as happened during the financial crisis. Absolutely rubbish claim.

    If the current government and FFG wanted to support carers they would have brought in regulation of the sh*tshow that is the homecare sector by now. Current government has been farting around for years with this and missing every timeframe it set. Also, we've known for at least 15 years about the major problems in this sector.

    https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/harney-warned-a-year-ago-on-home-care-regulations/26606651.html



  • Registered Users Posts: 734 ✭✭✭gandalfio


    But the health care system in this country is fundamentally broken. Whether it be years long waiting lists to see a consultant, getting appropriate intervention for children with autism, elderly people being denied access to home care hours which is detrimental to their wellbeing, the list goes on and on.

    I voted no because of the wording, not because 'if it's not broken don't fix it'.

    The referendum needs to be put to the people again, but with a commitment in the wording regarding the states obligation to provide care.

    I wonder will opposition parties now commit to this as an election promise.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,384 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    ...very emotional on radio 1, fair play to him, most citizens want to see more supports for such situations



  • Registered Users Posts: 55,603 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    The current text in the parts of the constitution referring to these proposals is not broken.

    and you’re pretty much advocating putting it to the people till they agree with a yes. Unbelievable.

    Post edited by walshb on


  • Registered Users Posts: 93 ✭✭Seamus4life


    Voting NO for both

    Bookies called it over last 48 hrs.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,035 ✭✭✭downtheroad


    Voting NO for both

    An inanimate carbon rod would be a better leader than McEntee. Simon Harris or Paschal Donohoe are the best options for FG.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,826 ✭✭✭✭Danzy




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 23,614 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Thats the bigger thing really. As much as most are trying to champion this as a victory against PC/The Government the woejus turn out indicates people either didn't care or understand WTF the point of the referendums were. Which tbf the govermment themselves didn't seem to actually understand or care about other than "Yes" because "Yes" is "Yes" and "Yes" is good for "Yes".

    Abortion and Marriage were pretty clear in what they were hence two clear sides. While this was just unclear and unnecessary hence most just not giving a damn.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,936 ✭✭✭I says


    Voting NO for both

    The arrogance of those in power and campaigning for the yes voted has derailed them and for the good. Who the fcuk do they think they are brushing aside ordinary peoples questions and fears over health, housing and immigration calling the vast majority of decent people FAR RIGHT thugs. Ye got yer answer yesterday start listening to the people roll on local and general elections.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,457 ✭✭✭This is it


    Voting NO for both

    Those saying, roll on the general elections. All of the larger parties were supporting a yes/yes, so where do the votes go in a GE?



  • Registered Users Posts: 394 ✭✭KevMayo88


    Post edited by Boards.ie: Paul on


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,408 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    Voting NO for both

    Anti government (ie not so called opposition) and independent candidates will sweep up. Whoever they may be. It doesn’t matter- anyone but the current government and opposition



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,264 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    And realistically that won't happen.

    Referendum rarely translate to GE so I'm not sure why people are getting so swept up in the result of this. The people were asked 2 questions, the majority have said no to what was put infront of them. That's grand, that's democracy, move on from it in the days and weeks ahead.

    Local and Europeans in May will give an idea of where the vote is going.



  • Registered Users Posts: 55,603 ✭✭✭✭walshb




  • Registered Users Posts: 28,860 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    Voting NO for both

    Donohue - maybe, but Harris is no better than McEntee or Varadkar.



  • Registered Users Posts: 394 ✭✭KevMayo88


    Voting NO for both

    Hey, they are all having a holiday this week for St. Patrick's Day at our expense. They need to relax the poor dears.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 394 ✭✭KevMayo88


    Voting NO for both

    How can you be "surprised the family amendment has failed"? It was a braindead amendment with no clarity that would have been completely open to abuse.



Advertisement