Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Are we excited yet?

1192193195197198244

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,645 ✭✭✭Potatoeman


    IMG_0170.png

    You push it with your hand while going bbbbbrrrrrrrrrrrmmmmmmm.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,078 ✭✭✭BKtje




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,311 ✭✭✭erlichbachman


    That kinda defeats the purpose of owning a lambo, ugly too from the outside



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,467 ✭✭✭✭patsy_mccabe


    Sorry but just to be clear, I've no intention whatsoever in buying crypto. Probably as likely as Charlie Munger at this stage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,081 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Okay just to address this

    "In theory". In practice I've spent far more in crypto transfers and exchange fees in the last 7 years than I've spent on bank accounts/transfers in my entire life.

    That aside, yes some crypto moves fast and (almost) feeless, but we have cash systems that can move stuff fast and (almost) feeless.

    Take Revolut for example. Transfers to other revolut accounts? Free. Transfers to domestic accounts? Free. Transfers to the EU? Free. Transfers outside Europe? Usually around 0.15% or 0.20%.

    As for the "this is early yet". It's 15 years. Crypto purchases (after a peak) are decreasing. The public don't want to pay for their rent/utilities/groceries/etc in thousands of different volatile private assets or stable-coins no matter how "fast and feeless" they are. People don't want to play with passwords and one mistake and it's gone. Business absolutely doesn't want to touch that.

    Maybe there's a future with fully regulated crypto stable-coins as alternative currencies (and not risky **** like Tether and Terra)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,078 ✭✭✭BKtje


    I agree with a lot of what you say and most original crypto chain fees are incredibly high. I'd be in the same boat as you with regards to fees but that has changed since moving to the solana eco system.

    Do I see crypto being used as a currency in the future? Perhaps but that's not what I think it's main use case will be. Governments for the most part won't want to lose control of their economy and that's probably for the best.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 899 ✭✭✭Tango One


    Which one of you was it :)


    "Cryptocurrency trader, Graham De Barra, with an address at Rua Praia, Ribeira Seca in Portugal was the subject of a Revenue audit case for the under-declaration of income tax. Total settlements exceeded €202k, which included €89k in tax, €45k in interest and €67k in penalties. The total amount of €202k was unpaid. "



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 161 ✭✭Alexus25


    So I was thinking of investing approx 2k in Bitcoin on coinbase, any thoughts or suggestions?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,955 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    He's my new hero.

    Doubly so after finding he's likely a human rights campaigner who has said some very intelligent things about decriminalising drugs that align well with my own views

    As I said in another thread, I was just after reading the tax treaty with Portugal. I saw no mention of enforcement, so I don't think the Portuguese are going to go chasing payment on Revenue's behalf.

    Also with regard to CGT, the treaty makes no mention of that steaming turd of a 3 year CGT disposal rule, so it's probably safe to say it's unenforceable hopium nature is recognised at official levels.

    I wonder did some Irish lawyer try it on with his Portuguese counterpart when they were negotiating the treaty and got a reply related to unnatural acts with his burro?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,803 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    It's been in a hole for the past 2 years. You are abit late to the party. Some here think it's still a good bet and could possibly even double from here but equally you.could be left holding bitcoin worth half what you.paid for it for a year or 2.

    I'm certainly not buying in at this stage. I bought somewhere close to the bottom in last collapse so will take my cash in the next few weeks I'm thinking.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,165 ✭✭✭deadduck


    Although I hold neither, if I were you, I’d be doing something like 60/30 BTC/ETH, and then maybe 10% into SOL (or ADA).

    Of course DCA is always advisable too, and don’t be in a hurry for profits. ‘Time in the market’ is always better than ‘timing the market’!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45 ZMOONY




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,165 ✭✭✭deadduck


    This is probably a stupid hypothesis, but I wonder will this mean the likes of the Ethereum ETF will arrive sooner rather than later?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 161 ✭✭Alexus25




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 498 ✭✭HGVRHKYY


    All EU countries are part of a programme where they will cooperate for the recovery of taxes for individuals from other jurisdictions, so revenue could definitely pursue that through the Portuguese revenue service; that's likely how they obtained his address/details.


    You're only safe if you either leave the EU or do things correctly (this means becoming non-resident in Ireland, which takes 3+ years as far as I remember. But even then, until you go all the way and become non domiciled, you have a limit of how much you can dispose of apparently (think it's around €1m or so). Anyone considering relocating for something like this needs to do a lot of research and be certain to cover themselves.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 161 ✭✭Alexus25


    Thank you, where are you getting your insight from if you dont hold either? Also, what's ETH and what's SOL and ADA and DCA.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,789 ✭✭✭el diablo


    Looks like you've a lot of research to do before jumping into the market. Bitcoin's price is at an all time high now so it's a risky time to get involved. The price can continue to rise from here and go a lot higher but only speculate with money you can afford to lose. ETH is Ethereum, the number two ranked crypto (it's still 18% below its previous all time high price). SOL (Solana) and ADA (Cardano) are two riskier plays with more potential upside.

    (DCA)-Dollar-cost averaging is the system of regularly buying a fixed dollar amount of a specific investment, regardless of the price.

    https://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/dollarcostaveraging.asp

    Orange pilled.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 161 ✭✭Alexus25




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,645 ✭✭✭Potatoeman


    Would have been cheaper to pay. 89k owed now 202k.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,803 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    Not paid though.

    I doubt they will see a penny if he has left Ireland.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,778 ✭✭✭Markus Antonius


    Ireland Inc®️ 2016: "Crypto? What's that? I'm sure it's like gambling"

    Ireland Inc®️ 2017: "Come on lads, cough up the CGT - 33%, thanks!"

    Ireland Inc®️ 2022: "You made a loss? Tough sh!t investing in a risky asset"

    Ireland Inc®️ 2024: "That crypto you have stored away, that is undeclared income. Pay IT, PRSI, USC. 50%, thanks!"

    And they wonder why all the young people are moving away from this hell hole 🙄



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,311 ✭✭✭erlichbachman


    I would disagree with people saying entering the market now is risky, it looks healthier to me now than it ever has before, it really depends on peoples expectations from here, if the guy with 2k buys BTC now at 73k usd, then 110k is 1000 profit, and 90k is 500 profit. Ok something may happen now where BTC drops to 60k and doesn't go back up to 90-110 for a few months but I haven't seen anyone with an understanding in the crypto market say BTC wont reach 100k in the near future.

    There's a high probability that you can make at least 25% profit on BTC within this year from buying at this point, the problem is a lot of people will now start appearing with expectations of much greater than 25% profit. But still 25% is good money.

    Alts is a different story, put 2k in now and you could still 3-5x your money, but a reasonable understanding of the market is required, which one to pick, when to get out, when a drop of 50% of your money can be somewhat normal in a healthy market, etc.

    Where I can understand people feeling like they have missed the boat at this point, to say you cannot make money from here in a bull market is just plain wrong.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,778 ✭✭✭Markus Antonius


    Secret Token (SCRT) blasting off 24%. Bought a nice chunk of this in November purely for the 20-24% staking rewards. Was thinking "that's a nice cushion on a risky token that has a 21 day unstake period". didn't think it would triple in value as well 😊



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,803 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    I'm not aware of a private individual having to pay anything other than cgt on disposal of crypto.

    Can you direct me to something that says its subject to income tax and the rest?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,311 ✭✭✭erlichbachman


    You can buy some crypto, hold onto it for a while, sell it for a profit and you owe cgt.

    If you do that frequently enough, buy and sell for a profit on a number of occasions it can then at some point be deemed an income, so income tax can be due. Where exactly the line between the two is I’ve no idea.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,778 ✭✭✭Markus Antonius


    Only going off the article discussed above:

    Cryptocurrency trader, Graham De Barra, with an address at Rua Praia, Ribeira Seca in Portugal was the subject of a Revenue audit case for the under-declaration of income tax. Total settlements exceeded €202k, which included €89k in tax, €45k in interest and €67k in penalties. The total amount of €202k was unpaid.

    If Revenue decide that your trading behaviours exceed a certain threshold they will pursue you for income tax instead of CGT. This is based off the "Aggregate Consideration" a nonsense perspective on your investments which is the sum of all the sell amounts of a specific product. It is scumbaggery of the highest level by Government/Revenue (just look at the "interest" and "penalties" amounts above) and is clear evidence of a highly socialist state.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,311 ✭✭✭erlichbachman


    Once this whole picture starts to assemble, devaluation of fiat, taxes on the transfer of BTC to fiat, what Saylor is saying becomes clearer and clearer.

    You do not sell your bitcoin folks



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,803 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    Thanks. I get you now but it's clearly different for traders as opposed to the ordinary worker dipping into crypto occasionally.

    Still cgt is more than enough to be paying.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,645 ✭✭✭Potatoeman


    It sounds like he moved to Portugal for tax reasons but was hit with undeclared profits, he might have sold before the move for liquidity. If you do move abroad there is always a chance they change the tax rules there too. As far as I’m aware it’s capital gains tax of 33%.

    I think it was India that was looking for 50% of every transaction. That’s nuts, it implied even onboarding cash.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,955 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    I would agree. The person also has a masters degree in law and likely would be held in high regard by many to the point I could possibly see him getting pro bono assistance should this ever be contested. From what I can see they have been resident in Portugal for some years so the basis for Revenue's claims might not be cut and dried.

    From my own experience revenue are a lazy, greedy, pack of dogs, all too ready to try and take a nip. Last year I received a missive from them claiming I owed them for unpaid CGT. After some time investigating the matter, I found in their own feckin records that it had been paid in full and on time. Imagine having to pay an accountant to sort out Revenue's lazy false accusations.



Advertisement