Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Global warming

Options
1192022242552

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 13,511 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    That's the economics that works today. As food supplies become less secure in the (near?) future, it can change. One can thrive on just what's readily grown here.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,117 ✭✭✭Shoog


    We produce very little of what we actually eat and would want to eat. The reason we specialize in bovine products is because our climate suits that form of agriculture. Most of Ireland has soils which are not amenable to tillage so we couldn't easily diversify into vegetables and grains.

    A certain amount more self sufficiency would be good but if we attempted to go totally self sufficient we would be much more vulnerable to famine. We live in an interdependent world - and really that is not such a bad thing.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,557 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    We could diversify into tillage and grains, but the yields would be poor due to your aforementioned soil types being unsuitable. In the not too distant past each landholder would grow a mix of crops and have different animals. We can thank CAP and corporate interests for that change as it became no longer viable. Just 50 years ago on our land we grew oats, wheat, potatoes and sugar beet. Also had beef and dairy, a few retired work horses, sheep and pigs. Now none of that only grass and that's not sustainable without outside work whereas preciously 6 people lived off 20% of the land area we have now. Tillage/horticulture is ridiculous expensive to get into due to the capital costs. We're also flat out trying to shut down horticulture here meaning less native veg.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 39,749 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    It is moving off topic but Irish soils and climate won't grow the quality of wheat required for our existing needs. In fact most of the cereals we grow end up either in the brewing process or as animal feed.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,557 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    It would, and did grow it. But seed companies have the market there and none of the required seeds are licensed here. There's even a big push on to stop farmers holding grains back to use for next seasons seeds



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,117 ✭✭✭Shoog


    An equally important aspect to this is that the peasant economy which you describe (the sort of economy my grandparents lived in) is very hard work and highly skilled in a practical sort of way. All that generation actively encouraged all of their children to leave the land to avoid the low income hard work it represented. Once that skill set is lost its very difficult to relearn and all evidence points to people who leave the land almost never return to it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,117 ✭✭✭Shoog


    Its very on topic really - what the sort of tillage agriculture is most dependent on is a stable climate so that predictable planning can be carried out. Climate change has already shown itself to be highly disruptive of Irish climate with a very high probability (based on modelling) of it getting considerably more unpredictable.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 39,749 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Would you stop with the paranoid nonsense? If you want wheat flour of a certain quality then you simply won't grow it here.

    Pretty much the same reason why we import a load of spuds too!



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,117 ✭✭✭Shoog


    Historically the main grains we ever grew were oats and barley. Oats were highly successful and those areas local to me in the west which grew oats had significantly better survival rates in the famine times. Oats would be a staple if we attempted some form of self sufficiency so it would mean a radical change in our diet to something like the historical Scottish highlands diet.

    Its not going to happen - and why would we want it to happen.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,109 ✭✭✭SuperBowserWorld


    I'd imagine if there was a shortage of food then we'd quite happily eat whatever we could produce. The wealthy will still get stuff flown in via Amazon, from what's left of the Amazon. And the Irish Times will write about how tragic it all is, when the poor are trying to shoot down your drone delivery. Short little pieces in between the property sections. 😆



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,557 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    I don't know about that. Certainly some kids were told to head off, but some were kept at home to farm the land.

    Paranoid? What's paranoid about it. If you grow grains from seed grain you've kept from the previous harvest, it's very difficult to sell the subsequent crops on as the seed isn't certified. We used to grow the flour we needed in the not too distant past. We can do it again. We import spuds but grow a huge amount of it. For example, nearly all the Dunnes Stores own brand are grown by a farm located in Meath



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,511 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    I think one can do fine on meat, brassicas, turnips, potatoes, if the choice is starving. Grains might be a challenge, but as was stated above oats grow readily. "It's the economy, stupid" applies to food more than anything. Probably won't be much fish left given the AMOC failing and that'll make it, overall, colder.


    Of course, there's that pesky population problem - millions to feed and the population isn't dropping.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 49,536 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    yeah, we've specialised in beef and dairy because we're better at it than most other countries; but this also does not mean that it's the most efficient use of land.

    peas and beans, for example, are not as nutritionally as dense as beef, but the yield per hectare is over 10x, in terms of weight. obviously there are many differences nutritionally between them, but a bare calorific value can be calculated as:

    average beef output per hectare; 445kg x 2,500 calories = 1.1m calories.

    average pea and bean output per Ha - 6000kg x 800 = 4.8m calories (and there's a big condition there; as i don't know the balance between peas and beans grown in ireland, i've gone for the peas figure for calories. beans seem much more variable in terms of calories depending on the variety).



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,590 ✭✭✭cfuserkildare


    I find it so funny that so many people follow the faked information and not the Actual Scientific Historical Record.

    Remember how the Media panicked about El Nino, then 3 months later they found it works in a 7 year Cycle?

    How many people have Truly been influenced by the likes of Greta Thunberg and her families Double Standards?

    They didn't want to fly to the US because of emissions, so they sailed in a boat made from plastic and aluminium, how very Bio-Degradable those materials are!!



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,220 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    I don't think using a boat is the gotcha you think it is. She also wears clothes and breaths oxygen.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,511 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    How many do you think? And, if you're interested in a scientific discussion, back up your projection on how many you think with some data.

    Also, what's with the weird capitalizations? Is English your second language?



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,117 ✭✭✭Shoog


    If you think those who "belief" Greta as a metric of anything - your not interested in the actual science.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,511 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Continental Europe is the fastest warming continent, 2x the global rate. Going to be a hot summer.

    https://apnews.com/article/copernicus-heat-climate-europe-world-meteorological-organization-d08b3bd028bc461f281f39828bd73056



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,052 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    I imagine Europe is probably the continent with the most temperature monitoring also

    Quelle surprise



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,511 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Uhh, so what? Some other continent might be under-reporting means… somewhere else is worse than is being measured in Europe.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 14,220 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    Lol so you're saying the rest of the world would have similar reports of warming if they actually monitored it?

    Anyway it's bad news for crops in Europe, its already having big impacts in Spain with drought and crop failures.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,220 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    Wow how clever but I don't think anyone ever said dealing with rubbish better would reduce the planet's temperature

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,117 ✭✭✭Shoog


    The arctic has been heavily under reported and under represented in global warming trends. It is experiencing 5x the warming that the rest of the world is and that significant because it fairly much drives much of the North Atlantics weather.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,557 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    Bad news for Ireland too. Only this past few days have the majority of cereals started being planted



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,220 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    So I believe. So much of the fruit and veg we eat comes from Spain too so hopefully they can find ways around the drought.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,511 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    TBF the apnews article was about continents. What I realized later, where was Antarctica in that report? I thought it was seriously heating up, too.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,597 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande


    Everywhere is warming twice as fast as everywhere else. That headline gets more recycling than plastic bottles at a return bottle bank.


    back to that article, how many, many more people died from the effects of cold across Europe last year? or even how many peoples lives are saved by having affordable access to heating across Europe on an annual basis?

    The European report focuses this year on the impact of high temperatures on human health, noting that deaths related to heat have risen across the continent. It said more than 150 lives were lost directly last year in connection with storms, floods and wildfires.


    How many more people do you want killed because they cannot afford the cost of energy and food needed to sustain their lives? There is a reason the Irish government, took action to offset the cost burden of electricity prices due to a surge caused in 2021 by an extended cold Spring in Europe that consumed more gas, combined with a wind drought that consumed more gas, combined with a surge in demand for gas in advance of Winter than pushed up prices to record highs leading to surge in electricity prices. Weather dependent electricity generation is unreliable, cannot guarantee delivery and it's not cheap either, that's why "demand management" happens in the background as today heavy industrial consumers are forced off the grid on a regular basis in this country to their own generation facilities.

    Energy is not an input into the economy, IT IS THE ECONOMY.
    Humanity organizes its economic activities to ensure a steady growth in the extraction and exploitation of primary energy because energy is life, standards of living are defined by how much energy is available to be exploited, and all humans everywhere are perpetually seeking a higher standard of living.
    source


    European leaders have set the continent on a trajectory that can only result in economic and social disadvantage for most of the people they currently govern. What are these ejiits doing?

    1. Restricting access to affordable and reliable energy,
    2. Reducing food production by taking land out of production (re-wetting), covering land with solar panels, hedge funds buying up agricultural land for "carbon storage" and carbon credits. Pushing the cost of food production up by taxing energy and all this in the face of a growing population in main urban areas. This only means higher food prices. If you think we are going to switch over to a diet of vegetables, not going to happen there are https://www.independent.ie/farming/news/just-60-field-vegetable-growers-left-in-the-country-bord-bia-director/a1130369415.html Food prices are going much higher on this trajectory.
    3. Restricting public access to approved forms of transport, forget about that Mediterranean holiday, the ejiits are going to collapse the Mediterranean tourist economy if they have their way.
    4. Funding world war, apparently world peace is not in the UN sustainability goals.

    The electorate has been gradually waking up to the damage these ejiits are causing and no amount of weather propaganda headlines can mask this. The 2030 targets re being dumped, it's already happening and it will accelerate, it must.

    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,002 ✭✭✭ToweringPerformance


    Wish it would hurry up and send a bit of heat our way. Bloody freezing 🥶



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 39,749 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Welcome to the past where the effects climate change weren't really understood!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,117 ✭✭✭Shoog


    How many times are you going to cut and paste that propeganda from the oil industry ?



Advertisement