Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Princess of Wales has cancer

13

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 57,379 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Relax. Just felt video was not necessary. I am not asking to be “pleased.” She deserves some proper privacy. And a statement would have afforded her that more in my view



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,661 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    For sure, but it was uncharted territory before early 2024. It does tell us there are different communications teams at Buckingham Palace and Kensington Palace - by all accounts, the Kensington people seem to have a total mess of things and not handled it well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,044 ✭✭✭Gusser09


    Best wishes to the princess and her family. A devastating diagnosis and a scary few months ahead while they await the prognosis.

    Hopefully its caught early.

    Tough with the nippers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 350 ✭✭backwards_man


    "Relax" Ah that chestnut. Why does one need to relax before digesting your nonsense?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,457 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    Didn't the queen also have cancer? So that's 4 generations of the same family now being affected. Doesn't seem that unusual then. I just don't think they anticipated people would care that much about Catherine's whereabouts



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 350 ✭✭backwards_man


    Right. Too sensitive to handle your comments. Got it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    IDK about that. I do think passing such judgement now just adds more fuel on the fires though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,880 ✭✭✭DeanAustin


    Jesus. Feel sorry for her and her family - hope she makes a full recovery.


    I know they are public property to an extent but dealing with cancer is stressful enough without the nonsense that went with it over the last few weeks. I'd imagine she was stressed to bits. The whole relationship that the British public (and other countries) have with the Royals is very dysfunctional and voyeuristic.





  • Depending entirely on type of cancer a high profile person with lots of influence can help 1000s others seek help. The one I mentioned is random one not picked up on screening, but other types can be, and a young “influencer” can make such a difference on others getting help.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Post edited by Boards.ie: Paul on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 409 ✭✭holliehobbie


    The Queen was ancient. Who’s the forth generation? Catherine married into the royal family.





  • Not possible. Most screenings are for more readily detectable types such as breast (radiograph), prostate (blood), colonoscopy. But cancers are an enormously diverse range of diseases spoken of under an enormous umbrella.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 409 ✭✭holliehobbie


    Sarah Ferguson had a mastectomy for breast cancer about a year ago I think?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,457 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    And now she has skin cancer. It's a pretty bad run of luck for that family health wise the past year .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 769 ✭✭✭EIREHotspur


    Always liked Kate....think she is a classy lady....hope she makes a full recovery!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,710 ✭✭✭Eibhir


    I feel very sorry for Catherine. I hope she recovers. I felt there was an awful lot of crap about the edited photo last week. Many of us mess around with these things.

    I'm an Irish Nationalist. However, while having no allegiance to the Royal Family, we have grown up seeing them, and most of us, being somewhat aware of their lives.

    I'd admired Elizabeth for her sense of duty and pushing herself to go to event after event, until 96. Likewise Phillip kept doing his bit until 99.

    If humanity doesn't trump your ideology, you have a problem.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,710 ✭✭✭Eibhir


    I don't know, when you have a serious message delivering both verbally and visually is so much stronger than a statement. And she feels she's one of her people's representatives. Feels she needs to do this.

    I was in the US in 1996 and saw this live. It had a profound effect on me at the time, granted as the years passed attitudes have changed towards him.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 89,032 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    Is any form not serious, cancer can get anyone it doesn't discriminate, rich or poor, she probably has the best medical team possible so hopefully a good outcome, a full recovery

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Paul on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,134 ✭✭✭joseywhales


    Her choice of course but I would have liked if she said nothing and just let it stew until some rag leaked it, then performed a breakdown and absolutely destroyed a newspaper, maybe thrown in a lawsuit too. Obviously she had bigger things to worry about but that's how they should be treated with maximum aggression. Maybe accidentally on purpose allow some paparazzi into some sensitive medical area, really lure them into their own downfall.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Then screen for the screenable types without the pedantry.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Paul on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 447 ✭✭Piskin


    Wish her a speedy recovery, she is a classy lady.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,295 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    You can only screen if people are willing to have the procedure needed be screened. Without public awareness, many aren't willing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 57,379 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    I see Nicola Sturgeon’s sister in a bit a bother for allegedly posting Kate’s diagnosis news on social media 25 minutes before it was officially announced.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 57,379 ✭✭✭✭walshb




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,062 ✭✭✭✭anewme


    As others have said, there are so many forms of cancer, some rare, some not, all very serious. It could be any of them and it’s not any of our business.

    Id say every single person on this thread has been impacted by cancer in their families or social circle.. You are the only one saying, it could be this form because my cousin had it. This is about Kate and her family only.

    Maybe when she is better she might give an insight into this period in her life with a view to raising awareness for the particular form she has, or maybe not. Entirely her decision.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Paul on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,169 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    It’s not always that simple: screening is only useful if in the end more harm is prevented than is caused by unnecessary treatment of people who would otherwise never have got ill, or for whom the extra years of treatment may only mean more years spent as a “cancer patient”.

    That’s because many pre or early cancers seem to “clear up” by mechanisms we don’t fully understand, and cancer treatment can itself be permanently damaging to health.

    Alternatively, if someone’s cancer is found 5 years earlier, pre symptoms, thanks to screening, but the treatment doesn’t help and they still die on the same date they’d have died without screening, then all the screening has done is to shorten the time they were able to lead a normal life.

    Prostate cancer is one where asymptomatic screening doesn’t have a good benefit risk balance, because the PSA test is not very accurate and the result of unnecessary treatment is itself often life changing, with a significant risk of impotence or incontinence.

    Breast cancer screening among young women has similar downsides, which is why it tends not to be systematic for the under 50s. The radiation itself increases the risk of cancer, and ultrasound doesn’t show up well in the premenopausal breast.

    Uncivil to the President (24 hour forum ban)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 171 ✭✭Blind As A Bat


    I think it's because of some stupid theories going around that she was already dead, that images of her were fake, that she'd had cosmetic surgery etc. It's disgraceful that she either felt she had to or was pressured into releasing a video. Poor woman. She's always seemed like a nice, down to earth person.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,020 ✭✭✭boetstark




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,697 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    This.

    At the end of the day, no matter what your thoughts are on the RF, and I'm no fan at all of this outdated nonsense, she is still a mother to 3 young children who need her.

    Everyone should be hoping she beats this illness and has many more years with her kids.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 839 ✭✭✭Juran


    Wishing her well, hope its fully treatable. Its close to my heart and my family's heart. We lost our sister last year to a gyno cancer, just a couple years older than Kate. So I totally appreciate that feeling of the unknown and saying to yourself and each other ..'she'll be fine ..most cancers are treatable these days.'

    But one thing she and her family has is the royal staff, nanny, house staff, etc to make life a little easier. Plenty of husbands or wives have to juggle school runs, kids sports training, shopping, cooking, driving their partner for medical appointments, and try to keep down a job to pay the bills. Money wont cure cancer, but it can make the journey easier on the family.

    I totally understand the need for privacy. My sister and our family appreciated the privacy during that time, and up to the end. We didnt share information, and we appreciated that neighbors, colleagues and people not close to us did not question us about her illness and treatment. They respected the privacy wishes. Now, I hope she, William, the kids and the Middleton family are left alone by the media and the world.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,297 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    She posted a Get Well Soon message. Bad timing, but she didn't post any details of the diagnosis.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 409 ✭✭holliehobbie


    Cancer of the thyroid gland or the parathyroid gland(s) would be considered less serious and more treatable than a lot of cancers. Also there are different types of skin cancer, one which is very slow growing and one which is much more aggressive and dangerous.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Then raise awareness and tell them to screen, you don't need a political prop. I'm done having this pedantic scutter thanks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,884 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl



    Not all cancers are detected through screening and that is why screening may not be helpful that is true

    However there needs to be more awareness of certain cancers that have very vague symptoms so that people are watching out themselves and attend their doctor early with the knowledge that they need, to look for certain cancers to be ruled out.

    We all know people who have attended various doctors for months with symptoms but were still not diagnosed in a timely manner. Whether this makes a difference to outomes is not clear but it is very upsetting for all involved.


    However and this is the point... do we really think that it is down to this young woman / mother who is going through the worst time of her life to publicise her symptoms and what cancer she has at this time?

    Absolutely not and it is just more of the nosiness and prying that some people feel she should be more open ' to help others '

    I don't buy that and its like another way of getting at this particular person..

    I know you didn't say that as you were replying to another, so no offence meant to you, but this is what we have seen on social media since she had her surgery.

    Yes, they are in the public eye, yes, they can help publicise any number of helpful messages to the wider public, but not now.

    She needs time to go through her treatment and be with her family like any one of the rest of us would if we were in her position.

    Time enough for lessons about whatever it is at a later stage.

    Lets just wish her the best and move on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 979 ✭✭✭Green Peter


    I think it's time to close the thread and respect the families privacy, we are only continuing on with the speculation of last week, why leave this open, let her get on with dealing with her illness. We know the story now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,295 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    Has she actually asked for privacy?

    I've been in a similar scenario (cancer diagnosed after treatment) and really didn't feel any need to keep it private.

    Yes, I'm not a celebrity - But equally I'm not having a lavish lifestyle funded by the taxpayer. The latter has a price.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,487 ✭✭✭Vote4Squirrels


    I can’t decide if that is deeply cynical or just horribly offensive.

    Her small children deserve privacy from some of the absolute bile that’s been posted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,416 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    In fairness, since they said she was gonna be remaining out of the public eye until after Easter, yes that does sound like privacy.


    Since she's in the public eye, she will get a tonne of flack over her appearance and what the odds of survival our. I loath the royal family but don't think her health is a public right to know. For some it's personal and they don't want to share it and being royalty shouldn't change that.


    For the record,I think the royal PR department were morons releasing that image. But I view the speculation about everything from bulimia to spousal abuse to be absolutely deplorable. They're the idiots who think they're entitled to know.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,980 ✭✭✭wyrn


    Fierce tough getting a cancer diagnosis without being forced to publicly announce it. I can't help but feel that Kensington Palace handled the whole thing so badly that she might not have had to make a video if they hadn't quashed any rumours. I'm not sure if it was them, but just before the video was released they were articles about her new project involving babies and early care and that's what she's working on while recovering. I don't think that helped because it made it sound like she wasn't as sick if she could somewhat work. I think that's why the video was released. I think KP PR just exasperated all this speculation.

    Before the video, I found it baffling at how quickly and bizarrely the rumours went, so much so that you can't blame Meghan and Harry fans. So many people, including celebrities started commenting on it. Even the papers started running "who is Rose Hanbury" type articles. I wonder if they, or maybe just William aren't as popular these days. Maybe the rumours of William's alleged affair has tarnished his imagine. I honestly though they were a beloved couple.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I hear mention that Charles has pancreatic cancer, very poor prognosis on that and usually takes you within a year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,988 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison


    the affair rumours have been around for many years - it’ was the idiocy of the posters that added two and two and got 73- they and only they are to blame- they’re total fckwits



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,439 ✭✭✭Quantum Erasure


    The Princess of Wales will probably “not appear in public for the rest of the year,” and is being “surrounded” by her birth family as she continues a course of preventive chemotherapy having been diagnosed with cancer earlier this year, royal sources and friends of Kate Middleton and Prince William have told The Daily Beast.

    https://www.thedailybeast.com/kate-middleton-may-not-appear-in-public-for-rest-of-the-year-sources



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 213 ✭✭SpoonyMcSpoon


    Between the planned/unplanned abdominal surgery and now 5 months completely hidden away, with even William now locking himself in he estate with her the next 6 weeks, it must be absolutely awful for the family and particularly the kids. This article seems to indicate that it is extremely serious and taking its toll on them all. No matter the money or the celebrity status, health and family is truly what makes you wealthy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,493 ✭✭✭tohaltuwi


    I don’t think The Beast is very reputable. However, the health situation may be very serious, and I wouldn’t blame them all trying to maximise family time together, rather than being in the limelight, if the prognosis is particularly guarded.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,169 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    The fact that it was identified as part of a different procedure might make all the difference though - one reason pancreatic cancer is so deadly is because it's rarely diagnosed until it's too late, because its symptoms are so vague in the early stages. It's possible that this won't be the case for Charles, assuming his prostate procedure was unrelated to the other cancer, whether pancreatic or something else.

    Uncivil to the President (24 hour forum ban)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,002 ✭✭✭ToweringPerformance


    No time for the royals but wouldn't wish this on my worst enemy. With young kids it must be intolerable stress on a person to guide themselves through this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,445 ✭✭✭AyeGer


    Chemo can leave her susceptible to infection, last thing she needs is an infection from shaking hands with someone or for William to bring one in to the house. An infection can throw her bloods off and mean she may miss a bout of Chemotherapy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,661 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    The fact that Catherine will be out of the public eye for so long is not necessarily bad news. Cancer treatment can sometimes go on for a very long time (over a year), so it doesn't mean that the outlook for her is grim. Even if the treatment is a success, she may wish to take a further six months or so to stay out of the public gaze and to fully recover.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,445 ✭✭✭AyeGer


    I see William was handing out the medals at Wembley for the FA Cup final between Man Utd and Man City yesterday. Things might not be too bad for Kate atm. She could be through her treatment and recovering now. Many post treatment cancer patients are advised to rest and avoid stress for a period after their treatment. Chemo is hard on the body.



Advertisement