Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Drew Harris and the continuing story of the bike

  • 22-03-2024 1:02pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,527 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    Harris suggesting the full story hasn't come out, suggesting the guard concerned was guilty of something more than loaning a bike. They had 4 years to prove this but didn't.


    Later, the Garda Representative Association issued a statement welcoming the fact its member has returned to full duties as of Thursday. 

    "We believe the process has fully vindicated our member and endorsed the integrity of his actions and decision making," it said. "However, the Commissioner's comments today before the Public Accounts Committee has done little to diffuse the anger and disillusionment felt by both the member concerned and his family and colleagues within An Garda Síochána over the entire matter.

    "On a day that should be about acknowledging the finding of no wrongdoing and restoring the dignity and reputation of this member, the Garda Commissioner has chosen to make comments that had the potential to cast a doubt over that reputation.

    "We believe that instead of making comments which could be interpreted as questioning those findings, the Commissioner should have perhaps conceded that this entire investigation was in part mishandled, escalated and then drawn out beyond normal comprehension."



«13

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,159 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    I'll be generous and say Harris left himself open to misinterpretation there. Is this the beginning of the end for him?





  • If that Garda doesn’t resign fair play to him.

    Even after being exonerated the commissioner is telling the Dail he wasn’t really innocent at all basically.

    Shambles



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 909 ✭✭✭JPCN1




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,608 ✭✭✭mikethecop


    Imagine your boss accusing you of stealing in these circumstances , being cleared repeatedly and very publicly and then still being slandered in public , by the supposed leader of the national polices service .

    id find a good solicitor first of all id try to ensure he is removed so that he cant do that kind of damage to other innocent people and then go after millions and millions and then offending persons personal financial health.

    i ve said this before here but this isn't a unique case of innocents people being suspended for years then cleared , its just the most public one



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41 foxhunter2024


    The government control the guards, what will the other Harris report be?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,228 ✭✭✭Odhinn


    The notion that - simply by being a Garda - somebody is automatically telling the truth really has to go.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,071 ✭✭✭ebbsy


    Drew Harris. The man who sent his staff out into a riot without so much as a water cannon.

    Please resign Mr.Silly Man.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,688 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    Harris is a disgrace.

    The man was cleared after all that time and instead of just coming out and saying the man is innocent and we need to do better in terms of investigating these type of things in future, he basically said there is more to the story than you know.

    Disgrace.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,228 ✭✭✭Odhinn


    Essentially sabotaging that Gardas future without trial or any sort of due process. Almost as bad as Callinan briefing groundless stories about SgtMccabe.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,200 ✭✭✭appledrop


    I hope he does sue.

    The whole thing was an absolute disgrace from start to finish but Harris had some cheek saying full details not released!

    What a load of balony. We had a number of very detailed articles given a very clear account of what happened and four years after the man is finally cleared Harris tries to pull a fast one on their total incompetence by saying full facts not released!

    Just as bad is McEntee yet again backing up Harris. The both of them need to go.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 599 ✭✭✭iffandonlyif


    Everyone thinks they’re sticking up for the little guy by defending this guard, but it seems to me that the characteristic rude, arrogant guard who fabricated breathalyser tests and cancelled emergency calls is of a piece with this guard going into a locked Garda store, containing cash, drugs, etc, and taking a bike without so much as registering it.

    The Garda Siochana is a desperately dysfunctional organisation. It does seem that the guard in this case was hard done by, but if you want a professional police service, it has to start with enforcing proper procedure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,842 ✭✭✭Floppybits


    I think has much more serious things going on than a garda taking a condemned bike to give to a man to help him out until he got things sorted. This should have been sorted in a half hour not 4 years and causing this amount of grief. We have had drugs go missing from evidence, files lost, templemore and the finances there to name but a few but we have had more attention to this guard and this bike than those more serious things.

    This is a ridiculous hill for the commissioner to die on, the commissioner should have just taken the hit, held his hands up but no he doubled down and now an assistant commissioner is looking at the report and people who changed their statements. Again ridiculous carry on from the higher echelons of the Gardaí. Hope the guard does take a case against them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,527 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    How much time was spent on investigating the suicide by a senior guard in Ballymun involved in the Hutch/Kinahan feud investigation compared to the loan of a bike in a rural area? Hope that guard sues



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,688 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    Yes put the proper procedures in place. Warn the garda through the correct processes. That would all be progress.

    However, he has been cleared. It has taken years but he has been cleared.

    Drew Harris should have gone to committee and said, procedure needed to be followed but it took too long and promise to be better in future. Then he should have apologised to the garda and the old man and left it there. Instead, he decided, despite the Garda being cleared to state that the full facts were not known to public. He basically decided to play his last card and **** all over the Garda again to ensure there is always a question mark over his actions.

    Harris needs to go.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 41,230 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Just for clarity, what exactly did Harris say and could his words be attributed more towards the garda management who changed their statements rather than the garda who gave out the bike?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 130 ✭✭fawlty682


    1000 page report on a triviality. Obviously, there was bad blood in that station or it would not have gone past

    the Sergeant in charge. An issue like this would be dealt with in house anywhere else.Involvement of the National Criminal Investigation Gardai, at least 2 Assistant Commissioners,a Chief Super, the DPPs office is pure comedy. They always cry about no Garda resources. This proves what I’ve always thought, they waste the resources they have with poor management, like the HSE etc. The RUC must have been as inefficient, as Harris has shown by his ineptitude down south. Mr Tansey is the right man to sort out Harris and Co.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,949 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    Sincerely hope that guard is straight down to his solicitors office. Would love to see Harris sued for defamation



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,688 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    I believe the garda is taking a compensation case



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,655 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    The government will do its usual of offering a nice chunk of taxpayers money as compensation along with a NDA and we will hear no more about it.


    The government should never be allowed pay people compensation without publishing details of it. Redact the recipients name by all means but not the amount.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,159 ✭✭✭Pauliedragon


    Iirc the gards solicitor mentioned that Harris made those comments under privilege so can't be used against him. I'm open to correction though.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,752 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    The commissioner has absolute privilege in a committee meeting afaik.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 741 ✭✭✭Mr Disco


    Time for the Commissioner to return to the wee six and use his pedantic jobsworth approach up there



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,949 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    I doubt it, you may be right but Dail privilege doesn't extend to witnesses in commitee hearings, I don't think?

    I'm sure he would come up with some other defence, still love to see him in the box.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,009 ✭✭✭Allinall


    If it came to a defamation case, the commissioner wouldn’t have to say a word.

    The Garda would be in the box, getting grilled and told to prove his case.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,384 ✭✭✭Kaisr Sose


    He would be under privlidge at the PAC. On that basis, saying what he did, with all that's out there about this, was inappropriate, cowardly, etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,949 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,949 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,009 ✭✭✭Allinall




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,949 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,986 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison


    So suing the force- hmmm- good luck with that. All in the detail really around what exactly he’s suing for. I support him I truely do and have done since this story broke but I imagine being a guard there’s all sorts of legislation that protects the hierarchy from legal action - we’ll wait and see but even an attempt to sue just shows how nothing that Garda has to hide.

    The taxpayer, you and me, ultimately funded this pile of sh1t investigation which as someone said, could have been sorted with a quiet bollicing by a supervisor then off to the pub and no hard feelings- and yes the elderly man would have got to keep the bike too.

    This innuendo is a dangerous precedent and as someone rightly said above, all the hallmarks of a Garda McCabe muddy the waters type disparaging comment - he tried to justify 3 years investigation and unknown grief for the Garda and his family by essentially trying to allude there was more to the story - you certainly don’t say those things in public. The investigation is over - Garda cleared - that’s all he had to say



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,986 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison


    This is some of it anyway :


    "The case is finished. The difficulty I have, in respect of talking about this, is that only partial information has been put into the public domain," said the Garda Commissioner.

    "I'm supplying all of the information, both to the Police Authority and to the Minister (for Justice), the established accountability regime.

    "We only received yesterday the report from the panel chair, and that's an important piece of information to receive as well. I haven't seen that yet, nor the transcript of the panel.

    "For my purposes, there's no further action for me in respect of that individual member. I'm reluctant to engage in the detail of this, because a lot of detail is not in the public domain," he said


    https://www.westmeathindependent.ie/2024/03/22/commissioner-criticised-over-comments-on-case-of-midlands-garda-cleared-in-bicycle-probe/



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 41,230 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    So that looks like Harris is criticising others involved, not the bike garda?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,986 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison


    Not by me as an independent observer it isn’t

    (not arguing with you BTW, just stating what I genuinely got from that article and th quoted text)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,009 ✭✭✭Allinall


    To be able to confidently make a statement like that- probably.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,746 ✭✭✭Dick phelan


    Harris is an example of no matter how incompetent, clueless and unpopular you are, nobody in Ireland ever seems to be forced to resign. The man is deeply unpopular with the vast majority of the force and the public yet holds on to his position because our equally incompetent and out of depth Minister backs him.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,384 ✭✭✭Kaisr Sose


    It's impossible to know what he meant because he did not clarify.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,986 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison


    I think he needs to clarify what he means about not all of the information in the public domain - like what does that matter? It’s a statement that totally open to interpretation and one of those interpretations, whether Harris likes it or not or meant it or not, is that had we had access to all of this other information not in the public domain we might think differently about the whole situation and possibly the Garda in question too- thats what I interpreted it as meaning and since communication is in the interpretation, I can’t be found wrong here - it’s Harris that has made a mistake here leaving comments open to interpretation



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,949 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    You don't have to be a barrister to know how the courts, and the justice system work, or to be aware of the proofs needed to win a case.

    Plenty of people involved.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,009 ✭✭✭Allinall


    What does plenty of people involved mean?

    And on what basis do you think the Garda would win a defamation case, given the information in the public domain?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,949 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    This is not an exam. The thread is not about my knowledge of the law. I'm not sure why you're making it that.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,009 ✭✭✭Allinall


    Because you made a definitive statement, that apparently you now cannot back up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,949 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,009 ✭✭✭Allinall




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,384 ✭✭✭Kaisr Sose


    Maybe just let the definitive statement about whatever go. I don't see how it matters. A view was expressed. That's all. This is not a court witness box where a question must be answered.

    The thread is about Drew Harris's statement to the PAC...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,009 ✭✭✭Allinall


    Yes. Which led to the poster claiming the Garda would have a nailed on defamation claim.

    That needs to be backed up, or withdrawn.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,608 ✭✭✭mikethecop


    unless you are the judge that may be ruling on the case its hardly up to you now is it ?

    s it is he is entitled to take any case he wants and let the courts decide , not some randomer on the internet



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,527 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    This is a discussion forum not a court of law. Poster was expressing an opinion, you're at liberty to disagree.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,121 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Because all opinions on the internet are "backed up" ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,969 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    From The Ditch:

    The garda suspended for lending a bicycle to an elderly man assisted a whistleblower colleague who’d raised evidence of another guard's collusion in the drug trade. The suspended garda was identified to gardaí during a tribunal.


    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,309 ✭✭✭evolvingtipperary101


    How are whistleblowers and those who assist them treated in this country?

    The garda suspended for lending a bicycle to an elderly man assisted a whistleblower colleague who’d raised evidence of another guard’s collusion in the drug trade. The suspended garda – as well as the assistance he gave the whistleblower – was identified to colleagues during a tribunal.  

    An investigation into garda involvement in midlands drug dealing “found evidence to substantiate claims” made by whistleblower Nicky Keogh but that this evidence fell short of what was required for criminal prosecutions. Among these claims were allegations that an Athlone garda had a relationship with a female drug dealer and had intentionally thwarted garda drug operations to her benefit. 

    Bike loan garda was identified in tribunal (ontheditch.com)



  • Advertisement
Advertisement