Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

Options
1360836093611361336143691

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,390 ✭✭✭nigeldaniel


    I used to have time for Elon Musk. Not any more. He clearly has some kind of dependency on Russia, either money or raw materials for his electric cars. It just makes no sense for him to keep talking Russia up when Putin is clearly on his way down. Europe has pledged too much to Ukraine to give up now.

    Dan.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,014 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    you touch on an interesting point, below is Scott Adams commenting on a David Sacks Tweet commenting on a Musk tweet (bear with me) , the gist of it is that we have been sold on emotional narratives of who should win over the difficult analysis of who is going to "win" (based on your definition I guess) and that the decisions, policies etc should be framed in reality not on what you want reality to be. Its not being pro Putin /Putinbot (insert insult of choice) to point out the reality as one sees it.

    The high point for Ukraine was the end of 2022, questions have to be asked, was it incompetence in forecasting or were the yanks huffing their own supply or the yanks didnt care one way or another and hurting Russia was the main goal, that they didnt push for peace negotiations then as they should have known that Russian economy/military wouldnt collapse as predicted or that Putin wouldnt be taken out. The opposite has happened

    It looks like European and some American politicians are suffering from a gambling sunk cost fallacy and arent capable of coming to rational decisions with the present circumstances sort of obvious.

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,327 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    You’re way off.


    America warned Ukraine the counter offensive would fail.


    This was leaked in papers by that America soldier online.

    Ukraine pushed ahead regardless.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,422 ✭✭✭macraignil


    "that they didnt push for peace negotiations then"

    Why would anyone push for negotiations with putin when he has proved he does not believe in peace or with sticking to agreements or being in anyway honest or trustworthy?

    You have tried to repeat this negotiated peace nonsense before and there is still no sign putin has any interest in peace.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,014 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    the Yanks talked up the offensive, there might have been different/competing camps but as far as the public view of reality was set, the Russians were going to scarper when the NATO behemoths took to the field, which comes back to the theme of overstating Ukraine abilities and understating Russian ones.

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 18,014 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    you wouldnt know if you didnt try, I believe General Milley thought they should have to, as it was when Ukraine had the better momentum. In the context that NATO got involved more than Russia probably thought they would, it would have been quite a sobering situation

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,327 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    https://amp.theguardian.com/world/2023/apr/11/us-ukraine-counter-offensive-pentagon-leaks-reveal


    US intelligence reportedly warned in February that Ukraine might fail to amass sufficient troops and weaponry for its planned spring counter-offensive, and might fall “well short” of Kyiv’s goals for recapturing territory seized by Russia, according to one of a trove of leaked defence documents.


    Stop talking nonsense. The US knew and warned Ukraine it would fail. Your blame game talk is pure nonsense, just like Musk. Do a bit of research instead of Kremlin propaganda.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,014 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    Are you sure you arent misremembering the past to back up whatever is your position is today? if it was going to be a failed offensive then Musk was right and Ukraine should have focused on building its own defensive lines and keep its powder dry. The obvious best way to drain the Russians was to have them attacking Ukraine lines. The Americans ultimately had a veto as they were supplying the help. All I remember was "everyone" media etc. being totally up for the offensive and anyone that disagreed was a putin bot and this site was no different. I think I called it out here in late july/early Aug and anyone that quoted my post disagreeing was guaranteed 10 or 20 likes ;-)

    Im sure you could start a seperate thread on all the hot takes, but there is an example below

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,422 ✭✭✭macraignil


    You are just spouting nonsense again.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minsk_agreements

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapest_Memorandum

    putin has proved he does not believe in peace and the death tole in Ukraine is proof he should never be trusted in future. Here are the most up to date figures on just the losses on the moskovyte side and I have seen evidence provided that the number of people in putin's empire recognised as disabled has increased by half a million last year.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,004 ✭✭✭ToweringPerformance


    That's a really good analysis. Thanks for posting.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,390 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    Have to remember too the Kremlin had leaks in the german military who shared the plans for the offensive to Russia. Gradually these are being stopped and removed. The situation is getting more controlled on intelligence but it's not helpful if there's leaks sympathetic or just plain bought by the Kremlin operating supposedly in the ally forces.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,014 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    I dont really trust any casulty figures, are you saying Russia loses then or what are the numbers trying to tell me?

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,014 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    possibly they had but it was well telegraphed in the media, remember those silly propaganda adverts with the shush finger? given the landscape there was no possibility of hiding concentrations of armor and men.

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,291 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    I don't think the sunk cost fallacy is exactly right. That involves throwing good after bad in a vain hope of a reversal of fortune. In this case, though, the outcome could be changed, except it's a lack of will in western counties to do the job right. This is not being perceived as an existential threat, I'll guarantee that if the fighting was on the European borders, greater efforts would be made to increase defense production faster. Plants are being expanded, some more slowly than others, but if this was WW2, entire new factories would have been built by now.

    https://www.defenseone.com/business/2023/11/race-make-artillery-shells-us-eu-see-different-results/392288/



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,422 ✭✭✭macraignil


    I don't understand your question. I don't care what numbers you trust but the fact you are ignoring the links to agreements putin has broken just proves you are not interested in reality and just want to spout more pro putin nonsense. If you love putin so much then the numbers he has caused to die will very likely mean very little to you. The numbers from a variety of sources show he has lots of blood on his hands and this is after his empire had negotiated peace with Ukraine.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,014 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    thats the point though, its not existential for Europe, it would have been "nice" if Russia folded, Putin got kicked out of office and a magical West friendly leader came to power where Russia's energy reserves would get divvied up, it was expected to be a free punt. On the other hand, it is the reason though why Putin wouldnt attack NATO.

    At this stage there is a sunk cost especially for the careers of the Western and Ukrainian politicians involved, a lot of reputations on the line.

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,014 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    "love Putin" what are you on about? why was there no diplomacy form the US once it started? As far as I can see it, the US thought Russia had fallen into a trap at no cost to the US, the Ukraines were doing the fighting as US politicians were telling us.

    Anyway the point of my posts were to highlight the bad information circulating as fact and the decisons based off it

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,422 ✭✭✭macraignil


    It's really bizarre you think negotiating with putin who has broken previous peace agreements with Ukraine and shown no interest in peace would yield anything so I must assume you have some love for him.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,209 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Was there "no diplomacy"? None whatsoever? Statement of fact without foundation.

    What does this supposed negotiation in 2022 look like? Does Ukraine end up in NATO? Yes or no? Do you think Russia in 2022 accepts that and why?

    So what's to stop Russia breaking the agreement again, and coming back in 2024? Given Russia has broken agreements with Ukraine, Moldova and in Chechnya. In Chechnya, it was just an excuse for a truce to re-arm and return.

    Given that, if you think Ukraine hasn't received enough Western backing while actually at war with Russia, how much backing would it have received under a 'peace' with Russia? A peace that Russia could be expected to break when convenient.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,729 ✭✭✭zv2


    “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” — Voltaire



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,568 ✭✭✭20silkcut


    in the very early days of this war when Germany was sending helmets and gloves the thinking/hope was that this will be over quick. Just like crimea 8 years perviously. Business as usual would return after a few months of sanctions recriminations etc.

    The fact that the Russian army was so incompetent and the Ukrainians were so determined to fight was not factored in and was an economic and moral disaster for countries like Germany.

    Russia would be a far more acceptable to country to deal with if it had quickly annexed Ukraine and the population was relatively compliant about it.

    What has actually transpired has been a disaster. Especially for those with cosy sweet deals with Russia.

    The fact that it was unforeseen by many is startling. Anyone who has studied history at leaving cert secondary school level will be aware of the consequences and devastating nature of modern war on the European continent no matter how small. It is absolutely never quick and clean.

    And now Europe is faced with the spectre of at least a partial war economy for a sustained period. And maybe worse.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,890 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    What?

    Putin invaded Ukraine. He broke treaties to do that. He will break them again.

    Putin has been bombing Ukraine 24/7 since Feb 24th 2022. "Peace" is not and has never been on the table. The Ukrainians only have a choice of surrender (occupation) or fighting (survival). That's it.

    At some point, when war doesn't suit Putin, it's "expected" there could be some sort of settlement (that he could break at any time). It has not reached that point yet.



  • Registered Users Posts: 243 ✭✭pummice




  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 14,500 Mod ✭✭✭✭johnnyskeleton


    I like to ask people who promote the idea that Ukraine (or in this case, for some reason, the US) should push for peace. Just so I can understand you, and to avoid any misunderstandings or hot takes, can you please set out what, in your view is the answer to the following three questions:

    1. What peace terms would have been achieved if Ukraine and Russia had negotiated an agreement at the end of 2022?
    2. Where would we be now, in the sense of would the sides have stuck to it, would normal relations be restored between the countries, would the border areas be demilitarised and the armies demobbed etc?
    3. What peace terms would be achieveable if Ukraine and Russia were to negotiate an agreement right now?

    In anticipation of you dissappearing again for a few weeks and me not getting an answer, my own view is that:

    1. no terms would be agreeable because both sides want Donbas, Crimea, Kherson and Zhaporzhizia.

    2. Any deal would fall apart unless one side or the other gave up on this territory (and, more importantly, the people who live there) and

    3. the same as 1.

    TLDR, negotiating with Putin was futile then, and futile now.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,684 ✭✭✭flutered


    putin bluffed washington and berlin as regards nuclear weapons, they withdrew supplies, ukraine was left to hang and dry



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,684 ✭✭✭flutered


    sachs is a russian troll



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,658 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Russia (or should I say Putin) want Kyiv and Odessa in addition to the territories you mention. These would be regarded as two very integral cities of Ruskiy mir. The idea of a Ukrainian flag flying above both right now must utterly gall Putin.

    I suspect that Putin has a theory of victory, so it would be impossible to have meaningful negotiations with him where each side would feel like they had got something out of it. He would accept total surrender, but nothing whereby Ukraine could turn westward while still containing any territory he considers as being historically Russian.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,684 ✭✭✭flutered




  • Registered Users Posts: 222 ✭✭AngeloArgue


    Russia pretty much demanded that Ukraine become a Belarus style vassal state tied economically, militarily, and culturally to Russia forever, And to concede vast areas of territory over to Russia.

    The Ukrainians listened to the Russians in Istanbul and rejected their demands.

    Could the Ukrainians have agreed to Russian the demands?

    Yes, but then they would cease to exist as a distinct independent country that has a right to self determination.

    As for negotiations if they were to happen now?

    I think it would be hard to stomach for Ukraine to sit down and effectively surrender to a country that cold bloodedly murdered so many of it's people. But ultimately that is for them to decide.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,874 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    A load of counterfactual bollox imo. The one here with the clearest sunk cost delusion is Putin, who has kept on going, throwing loads of Russian and Ukrainian bodies on the fire after his original plan failed. Well, I suppose that is a benefit of being an absolute ruler answerable to noone.

    Ukraine's offensive failed, but they won't get back more territory they have had stolen or free people there without making the attempt. A few other reasons for the failure are tardiness and caution of the Western countries supplying them (allowed Russia ample time to build those minefields), restrictions placed on weapons that are supplied to Ukraine and how they can be used (no longer range missiles supplied from the US to Ukraine at all I think, Western countries demand Ukraine never attack targets in Russia with their weapons).

    The main reason there is any hope at all remaining for Russia to win something at the moment IMO is that the US political system is dysfunctional. New US materiel to Ukraine is stalled for 3 months now so far, it is likely stopped until the next election there and maybe indefinitely depending on the outcome. Likely Ukraine has had to get much more cautious with resources well before that (mid last year, around time of offensive) as clouds were gathering over the longevity of US support by then.

    We saw this US chaos and political dysfunction manifest during Covid, now we see it again during war in Ukraine.

    The reality is there are some MAGA/Trump people on the right of US politics engineering circumstances to cripple aid to Ukraine, Russia making a bit of progress now as a result of that (still at an horrific cost) and then you have wormtongue-like fellow travellers (pro Russia types whose tweets you love quoting/posting) piping up that they knew Ukraine never had a chance and should have chased a will o the wisp of "peace" with Russia that was never on the table unless they will kow-tow completely.

    It is quite ridiculous really. It's like a thief tries to break into a house, he can't get past the locks on the door and is held up…Someone inside tries to call the police. Then a bunch of accomplices/pals cut the phone line + block the road, then they also have the gall to nod wisely and wag a finger at the occupants…oh you should let the robbers take it all right at the start, because there was never a chance!

    Post edited by fly_agaric on


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement