Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Waterford Airport.

1616264666772

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,619 ✭✭✭914


    I won't disagree I'm not sure that I have any faith in the board, comers or management.

    You will previously see me questioning what is in it for the Galway lads as we know there is little to no return on an investment in a regional airport.

    My thinking was, if the airport is as critical as the government say it is, what's stopping them pumping in €30 million, removing the board and management and replacing them with a new board and management.

    I'm just sick to death of government waffle saying how important it is and doing f all about it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,174 ✭✭✭hardybuck


    Yeah I think the elephant in the room is that the airport is not at all critical, and as you say if it was there would be a public facility there.

    It might be a case of how they can make the losses as minimal as possible, and how they can avoid a situation where the investors feck off or sell the place after getting all the public money

    That's an unpopular sentiment but it's probably the reality of the situation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,975 ✭✭✭blackwhite


    I'd imagine that's the scenario the Comers would love. A CPO where they get a hefty chunk of public money to buy out their stake.



  • Registered Users Posts: 96 ✭✭Dum_Dum_2


    If the Government feel stuck with the Comer's then that's on them. They chose not to build a public airport and they chose to drag their heels. Now they have to deal with pumped-up costs. Not our problem. They need to find the cash and they need to make things right.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,071 ✭✭✭purplepanda


    Why should people from Waterford, South Tipp / Kilkenny / Wexford have to travel for more than 3 hours to Dublin or Cork Airports, when other airports in the west are much more accessible & easier to travel to for regional passengers?

    We have a poster from the West of course, claiming 2 hours from Waterford City to Dublin Airport, good luck achieving that on the Train & then Airport Bus, or Bus, even if direct, when the traffic is heavy on the motorways / M50. Cork Airport is nearer but still takes more than 2 hours to Cork City when traffic is light & then another 30mins bus to Airport. Let's not mention the train LOL!.

    We still have no direct Eurobus / Bus Eireann / bus services to Wales & England since Covid. Also traveling by Sail Rail is no longer viable due to lack of connecting rail / bus services on half the ferry sailings to & from Fishguard / Rosslare. So it's more traveling down to Cork or up to Dublin.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 96 ✭✭Dum_Dum_2


    Now on Week 16 of crippling inertia by the Government.



  • Registered Users Posts: 96 ✭✭Dum_Dum_2


    Waterford is going through a low point with wider connectivity. Cultural exchange with the Dubs up the M9 doesn't count.

    Lost the rail-sail link via Fishguard. Irish Rail sabotaged it. (Google the "Fishguard and Rosslare Railways and Harbours Company" for the interesting history).
    Lost the Airport. Small runway crippled it.
    Lost the bus-sail link via Pembroke. I'm not sure why this hasn't been reinstated?

    Up until containerisation and successive inept Governments, I'd suggest Waterford would have been more international and outward looking and certainly better plugged-in to the wider world.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,174 ✭✭✭hardybuck


    Approximately 234 weeks of inertia from the Airport after receiving approval in principle for the funding.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,976 ✭✭✭Deise Vu


    Yeah, coming up with a detailed costed plan that encompasses the requirements of the existing stakeholders, new investors, the Govt and three councils is exactly the same as reading and reviewing the resulting report.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,174 ✭✭✭hardybuck




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,976 ✭✭✭Deise Vu


    As far as I recall, the Comer brothers only came on board in August 2022. I would imagine it is very difficult to get people to confirm their time and money on the very thin promise of govt support for the South East. I mean it would be unheard of that the Govt was just kicking the can down the road when they insisted on matching funds but you can’t really be sure can you?
    Id say there was total shock in the Dept of Transport when the Comets came on board. We will probably never get the extension but it’s good to catch the Cork/ Dublin govt out on their bullsh1t.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,174 ✭✭✭hardybuck


    But even if they did come on board then, there was still nothing submitted for 15-16 months afterwards.

    The whole thing looks very shabby really. Imagine your bank gave you mortgage approval in principle and you came back to them years later - they'd be wondering who you are.

    That's before we even consider the fact that they submitted a business case without informing members of their board. Very strange behaviour.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,082 ✭✭✭azimuth17


    Forgive me for saying so but you seem determined to find fault with it. Its simple for us.. People,private and local authority are prepared to put money into it and are waiting for a government response. Its very small money and worth a bet to deliver a piece of infrastructure. All else is simply raking over the coals. Its a yes or no job in truth.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,174 ✭✭✭hardybuck


    Well this is the thing - I think the ball is back in the airport's court or it has been until the last couple of days. Some extra detail was sought from airport management, and they indicated that they should be able to get back with a response by the end of March.

    The ball has been in the airport's court for about 53 of the last 55 months. I don't think too many posters here were complaining about how long the airport took to proceed after they received the approval in principle, and maybe if people in Waterford are frustrated with anyone they should be frustrated with them.

    The other point is that I really doubt it's a simple yes or no job. Costs will have spiraled in all those years between the approval in principle being granted and the updated business being submitted. Maybe the Councils and the investors can match the additional cost and increase their investment - but maybe they can't.

    I would like to see a better quality of discussion about the airport and what might be possible. I personally get a bit fed up of nearly every thread turning into a political moan about how Waterford is being treated unfairly - it just might be possible that there are two sides to every story.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 455 ✭✭Valhalla90




  • Registered Users Posts: 5,174 ✭✭✭hardybuck




  • Registered Users Posts: 96 ✭✭Dum_Dum_2


    Meg Ryan and her sister Mags. Sleepless in Ferrybank.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,082 ✭✭✭azimuth17


    While there might be two sides to every story, we have a record of coming out the wrong side of government decisions far too often for reasons that are often opaque. In 2016, one example, government were on for ceasing all emergency heart attack procedures at UHW . Now following eight years of protest and assessment of figures it turns out that we have two cath labs which perform nearly the same number of procedures as CUH and the emergency service will be extended to seven days a week twelve hours a day. Some criticisms of government actions are more than warranted. The airport is in the same category.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,174 ✭✭✭hardybuck


    I'm no moderator here but it might be better to just set up a thread where all those grievances are aired and not brought into every discussion on every topic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,082 ✭✭✭azimuth17


    Unfortunately, grievances always tend to surface when projects are delayed as in UHW or SETU or Airport etc. Delay happens so often with Waterford investments. I dont know why. No argument about our airport or other state impacted infrastruture investments can really happen outside the political context. To think it can, is wishful thinking, unless, without being offensive, you are a party member.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,174 ✭✭✭hardybuck


    I'm actually trying to keep politics out of the thread when others are desperate to keep it in. I'd much prefer to discuss the substance of what the investment might be able to achieve and what the future for the airport might look like. Far more likely that others are party members or political activists rather than me.

    The last thing I'll say on this is that the overall discussion will be better for everyone if there is balance in the views expressed, or maybe if there's some actual discussion about the airport itself (rather than speculation about stuff like what a Minister's views might be etc.).

    I think it's absolutely great that people would be passionate about Waterford getting investment in an airport or other things, but if people are going to have a cut off politicians they really should be really having a go at those running the airport too as they've been sitting on this for nearly half a decade.



  • Registered Users Posts: 96 ✭✭Dum_Dum_2


    There's nothing to "discuss". It's all waffle. Time for action. This is the only region without access to mass aviation. The Government need to make it right. If they don't like the Comers et al, then they can build it themselves.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,619 ✭✭✭914


    The only way you can have that conversation is by seeing the business case.

    I would imagine due to commerical sensitive subjects it won't be available to the public.

    The positives I see, for relatively small money, completion of the runway I would expect we see return flights to London, possibly other UK city's and the chance of mainland EU/summer destinations.

    This would inturn increase employment locally for the airport itself and other businesses linked to the airport.

    It helps increase tourists into Waterford and the South East (providing it's marketed abroad)

    It increases the chances of increased FDI, international students for Waterford campuses. It opens the doors to other businesses locating here who may have offices else where.

    The future for R117 is secured, aero club and Atlantic flight training school. Opportunities in aircraft maintenance can be explored as well as freight/cargo.

    Granted the majority of the above might not materialise but there is a chance that it would.

    Not investing means any chance of the above is gone.

    The risk, government invest, it doesn't work people complain and moan that government invested in a white elephant and its forgotten about in a number of weeks.

    Concerns, are the Comer brothers really on board?

    What happens it government commit but the private investment is not there?

    I presume they are questions, topics that the department are exploring.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,619 ✭✭✭914




  • Registered Users Posts: 134 ✭✭mail


    An International Airport for the South East at last!

    https://m.independent.ie/regionals/wicklow/news/no-frills-airport-could-open-in-just-four-years/27854031.html



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,798 ✭✭✭Bards


    Publication date was June 2nd 2010, didn't happen and won't happen



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,619 ✭✭✭914


    Aye, it just made me lol.

    Although it will never happen I do think it shows there is a need for another airport along the east/south east which would strengthen Waterford's case.

    Airport already in existence, just needs small money to make it a viable option.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,497 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    this seems like an insane idea- https://x.com/businessposthq/status/1776890201966616625?s=46&t=56pTEwavEvBg9OjIycQ6jwhttps://x.com/businessposthq/status/1776890201966616625?s=46&t=56pTEwavEvBg9OjIycQ6jw



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,497 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    granted it is a lot nearer to Dublin



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,071 ✭✭✭purplepanda


    Looks like the Arklow Airport thread has suddenly burst into life, whilst Waterford Airport just needs investment towards the cost of a longer runway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,931 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    …do we really want a significant amount of our critical infrastructure to be foreign owned, as it seems to be working well for many not so well developed countries!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,619 ✭✭✭914


    It was tongue and cheek, but probably the only way to get these kind of infrastructure projects built in Waterford is either local or foreign investment.

    Waiting on government means we are still talking about this project.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,931 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    yea we re kinna in a bind, governments have been severely curtailed in being able to finance such critical infrastructure, deficit spending etc, or lack of, this is forcing us towards methods such as foreign investment which is causing its own set of problems. foreign investment plays a critical role, and can be positive for everyone, but sometimes, too much is simply that, i am very concerned about how we re all being effectively forced into this approach for our critical needs, was only listening to a podcast about this financialisation of our economies recently, and the operations of the institutions behind it, disturbing stuff really….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 423 ✭✭invara


    Covney going might make the airport a tiny bit easier? He loved Cork Airport (around 50% of his twitter feed).

    But Leo was the only person to make positive noises over Waterford airport.

    Honestly, think it is not going to happen with this cabinet. Ryan will sit on it, and until he is bought off at cabinet by a green project, hard to see this cabinet going to the plate to bring the Greens on board. And even if it gets out of Transport, off to DPER where Pascal will kill it.

    Bad sign that Matt Shanahan did not vote for Goverment, he must have raised it, amongst other things and not liked what he heard.

    Post edited by invara on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,619 ✭✭✭914


    I thought the same, surely is Harris committed to one of the following options 24/7 cardiac care, SETU or airport then Shanahan would have gabe support.

    The airport will be used as a carrot for the next election and will disappear once again!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43 dan575283578


    Forgive my ignorance but why would it disappear? weve got the 12 million from investors, govt will give other 12m to look good for election, and then the actual work can crack on, no?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,619 ✭✭✭914


    Disappear as it the new government will go silent on it, news articles will stop reporting on it and then it will pop up again depending who the flavour of the day is.

    I don't mean the airport disappearing as in ceasing operations



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,931 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    strangly enough, politicians and governments bullsh1t, all of them do…..



  • Registered Users Posts: 602 ✭✭✭savic04


    Not going to happen under this gov in next 12 months



  • Registered Users Posts: 96 ✭✭Dum_Dum_2


    Week 17. Government still keeping family and friends apart. Government still stifling prosperity in the region.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 317 ✭✭nomoedoe


    Front page of the paper today saying the government are paying out 1 million a month to accommodate pets for Ukrainians ,and here we are cant even get 12 million to support an airport.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 455 ✭✭Valhalla90




  • Registered Users Posts: 96 ✭✭Dum_Dum_2


    Week 18. Silence*

    *this is how it dies as per Government rule book.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 365 ✭✭ExoPolitic


    I know we're not getting the extension, it's sat at the same stage for years, skillfully pushed down the line for the next government, every government…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43 dan575283578


    there's an election coming up soon though so the government may take this as an opportunity to look good in the se region



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 455 ✭✭Valhalla90


    maybe our Green TD could see if Ryan is asleep! That could be the delay.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,619 ✭✭✭914


    In the run up to the election looking good will be "we support the extension at Waterford airport and we are close to delivering it" once the election passes so does the empty promises.

    They have had 14 years to invest in the airport, they could have competed the whole works without private investment for a fraction of what it is going to cost government now.

    If the private investment is there then the airport need to call their bluff and just start work, start one end of the extension or start widening one side of the runway, start some sort of work then we can harp onto government that we put out money where our mouth is so cough up



  • Registered Users Posts: 96 ✭✭Dum_Dum_2


    The modus of Irish party politics is to set up the fall guy and blame them. I wouldn't be allowing them to shirk responsibility by singling out the Greens. FF/FG chose to get into bed with each other and the eco-zealots and now all of them are choosing to hold us back regarding the runway. They would just love for everyone to join in the finger pointing.

    Their sycophants on social media (including here) bang on about the 'ball being in someone else's court". So it's the Comer's fault about the Airport, it Harcourt's fault about the North Quays, it's poor financial management at WIT etc. etc. It's never them. Well I don't pay taxes to the Comer's or Harcourt I pay the Government. And I want my cut. Collecting my money and always spending somewhere else for decades is not how things work.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43 dan575283578




  • Registered Users Posts: 96 ✭✭Dum_Dum_2


    Not our problem. The Government made a mistake by stalling, now they have account for their stupidity as to why the taxpayer has to pay more. But we must absolutely get our cut.

    What's the Departments Plan B?. Have they scoped alternative sites? Or do they just sit back and watch it all fall apart? The only region and population centre in the whole State without access to mass aviation, they need to fix it and make it right.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement