Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

DNA Analysis

Options
13031323335

Comments

  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,646 Mod ✭✭✭✭pinkypinky


    I returned both kits I had from them in the regular post with no difficulties.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Registered Users Posts: 281 ✭✭mindhorn


    Anyone here have experience with figuring out an adoption connection? Received an email about a close match and this person matches my dad (potential first cousin at 1,088.5‎ cM). The person has since been in touch but doesn't have a whole lot of info. Grandparents on his mother's side don't match any of my records and he mentioned then that his father was adopted (I have his birth name but I haven't come across this surname in any of my research before).

    Obviously possible that the connection is on his mother's side but the fact that he and my father share quite a bit of DNA suggests that maybe it's on the adoptive fathers side...not sure how to approach this one.



  • Registered Users Posts: 113 ✭✭55Gem


    Shared matches and geography is I find the key.

    With a test of a friend I manage a matches mother had an unknown father, for about two years I got no where trying to figure out how they matched other than it had to be on my friends mother’s side by shared matches and where they all lived. Than a person related to my friend whom I personally know did a DNA test and also matched the unknown father match, with the help of that match I could work out which family the father was from but not which of two brothers.

    on my own test a son of an adoptee matched with me, from shared matches the link was clearly on my mothers side and appeared to match to her mothers family, as the child was born in a town in America two of my mothers uncles emigrated to and having no other relatives in that area it appears more than likely one of these uncles was the father.

    and yet another on my fathers side where the match found one male from a family had lived in the right place at the right time.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,646 Mod ✭✭✭✭pinkypinky


    I do this work professionally.

    @55Gem is spot on that the shared matches are important, but also look at the ages of people. There's several possibilities for that level of match, and you should consider them all.

    When you look at the shared matches, do you recognise any names that can pin it to a side of your father's tree? On the basis of what you said above, there's nothing to rule out either side of either person yet.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Registered Users Posts: 281 ✭✭mindhorn


    Thanks, both. They uploaded their results on MyHeritage so unfortunately I don't have as many matches there. It's going to cost them but I have mentioned that it might be worthwhile getting an Ancestry kit.


    I recognise only two of the shared matches and they're both on my dad's side of the family.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 192 ✭✭JDERIC2017


    Hello looking for your thoughts on this close dna match?

    This person thinks they may be half siblings but not 100 %. how can we be sure. We think they shared a father who is now passed. Thanks





  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,646 Mod ✭✭✭✭pinkypinky


    What are the genders of the people?

    If both women, then they would share a X chromosome from their father. You could upload them both to Gedmatch to compare.

    What are the relative ages?

    Shared cM project gives a few possibilities and many can be ruled out on age grounds. See here.

    https://dnapainter.com/tools/sharedcmv4/1517

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Registered Users Posts: 192 ✭✭JDERIC2017


    Thanks for the reply. Man and woman, 56 and 63. will look at link also. Thank you.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,646 Mod ✭✭✭✭pinkypinky


    MyHeritage has enabled sharing your test results (similar to what Ancestry does).

    I've done a quick video explaining how to do it.

    This will be very useful for professionals who are trying to help people and stay within the terms and conditions.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Registered Users Posts: 916 ✭✭✭Jellybaby_1


    My most recent discovery is that its not only Mr. Genealogy who has a Youtube channel, Ms. Genealogy also has a Youtube channel. See ye on Youtube! 🙂 I don't have a MyHeritage account so I won't be accessing that.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,646 Mod ✭✭✭✭pinkypinky


    MyHeritage has a huge DNA database. Their Irish records are limited (although they are promising something in the pipeline) but it's a must-use for DNA work. I just solved a double unknown parentage mystery through a match there. (My client had an unknown father, it turned out he did too. For ages, things didn't add up, and there was some age confusion about a key individual, but we got there in the end.)

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,353 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    I have just today got the results back from 23andMe, very accurate compared with my own knowledge. Two of the health pages that I would have been particularly interested in give 404s so I have contacted them about that. Some of the traits are entertaining but mostly correct - I think 2 were not accurate.

    My family background shows me as mostly from a fairly specific area of England with a bit of French and some Scandinavian. All of which I might have guessed at, though I was expecting a small level of maybe northern African which came up a minute fraction, < 1%. I am 99.3 northern European. Traits and health also very accurate - since I am in my late 70s I know about pretty much all the issues I might have, and they correspond with my experience, apart from the two that I cannot access.

    The free post was accepted no problem.



  • Registered Users Posts: 281 ✭✭mindhorn


    Something seems to have changed recently enough on Ancestry. I used to be able to see all the connections to my DNA matches but now it's only showing a few and advising that you need to become a member to see the entire list.



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,658 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Yes, they've decided to do a cash-grab. It has been exceptionally unpopular



  • Registered Users Posts: 281 ✭✭mindhorn


    Pain in the…



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,646 Mod ✭✭✭✭pinkypinky


    Agreed, but it is quite a small charge: $30 for 6 months.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Registered Users Posts: 113 ✭✭55Gem


    It’s like you bought a 3 piece suite and after a few years the shop decided it’s selling each piece individually from now on so they come to your house and take the sofa and one armchair, saying you can rent them back.

    They can stuff them where the sun never shines.

    When My Heritage started charging for extra features for DNA uploads from other sites they didn’t take the features away from existing uploads.

    Ancestry should have restructured the price and product for new customers and left the existing ones with what they bought.

    I paid Ancestry for the DNA test available at the time, taking abilities of the test away is unacceptable, no doubt there was something buried in the terms and conditions which covers them but would anyone knowing buy anything that was going to suddenly be reduced to next to useless at the whim of the seller.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 11,374 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hermy


    It does seem like sharp practice.

    And any increase from zero, however small, is a significant increase in my humble.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,646 Mod ✭✭✭✭pinkypinky


    I'm not trying to justify them at all. I agree it's crappy to offer it for free and then change the structure, but companies want to make money, so I'm not surprised. If you have an Ancestry subscription, then you don't have to pay for the DNA stuff on top.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Registered Users Posts: 113 ✭✭55Gem


    When did they offer it for free?

    We paid for it, it was part of the DNA package. We paid in full, no one is asking for anything for free just what we paid for.

    I have never wanted or needed a subscription to Ancestry and I won't be forced into getting one to view something I've already paid for.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 670 ✭✭✭Mick Tator


    Ancestry is owned by Blackstone, a global investor / asset manager. Both L1011 and I have - as far back as 2020 (maybe earlier?) said it was only a matter of time before they started sweating the Ancestry assets. I’ve maintained for a long time that Ancestry’s business is down, judging by the number of new matches I’m getting. They need to drive revenue, so it’ll be interesting to watch what they do next – they seem to have given up pushing ‘check your pet’s DNA’ and ‘Traits’.

    My Ancestry sub is expired, they also ‘turned off’ my maternal/paternal match identifications; luckily I had marked them and also made notes, still recorded/accessible.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,646 Mod ✭✭✭✭pinkypinky


    They absolutely have not given up on the dog DNA. They had a big stand about it at Rootstech!

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Registered Users Posts: 402 ✭✭VirginiaB


    I do have an Ancestry subscription, at a princely price—over $400 a year, fainting as I write. It includes Fold3 which I only use for NY and Brooklyn city directories and the basic newspapers.com, very useful for Brooklyn. With DNA, some time ago, I went thru all my matches 16 cM and above and noted how many matches, if any, date I checked and which parent. I get a number of matches each week, almost all useless, but I note the same info for them every day. So hopefully I'm covered if my subscription ever lapses.



  • Registered Users Posts: 670 ✭✭✭Mick Tator




  • Registered Users Posts: 670 ✭✭✭Mick Tator


    I've set the bar at 14cMs and set the filter as 'unviewed'. A Melanie Reid match at 14 cM remains my top match most days I get one or two matches above hereach week, generally only those >20cM have a shared match. I also enter a note if the match has possibilities - e.g. 9/23 mesgd No tree Prob ABC line - m's John A and R McT (which translates as date of match, message sent, match has no tree, probably ABC ancestral line because he matches John A and R McT who are known to match the ABC line).

    I wonder how long some of those functions will remain……



  • Registered Users Posts: 670 ✭✭✭Mick Tator


    I’ve been dipping into the DNA pool again using my mother’s kit (myHeritage) and my own (Ancestry and FTDNA-Y). The first two are uploaded to Gedmatch, I’ve also uploaded to FTDNA; the results are mediocre, but a surprising number of matches are with 23andMe (23) tests, a company that has been around for about 20 years. It would make sense to consider a 23 test, I’ve done some research and the results show a basket-case, I’m not going to test with them, for reasons below, but if you have, you should continue reading.

    So, what does 23 do differently? It is a genetic testing company that is heavily weighted towards ‘medical traits’ and has about 10 million customers who have consented to share their genetic information for research. As a result, it’s also a pharma company, co-developing drugs based on what it has learned from its customer’s genetic databank. It did this for more than five years with Glaxo Smith Kline (GSK). Last year 23 had a major data-hack that continued for 5 months (April through September). More than 7 million accounts were compromised; in the hack two groups were specifically targeted, Jews and Chinese. Instead of owning up immediately, they let it slide, downplaying what had happened. Then, when news of the breach became widely known via Internet forums in early October 2023, the company again tried to minimise it, saying while an unspecified amount of "customer profile information" had been accessed "through access to individual 23andMe.com accounts," the company itself had not been breached. This specious statement was followed by blaming users who “……negligently recycled and failed to update their passwords”. If that was not enough, they added “Therefore, the incident was not a result of 23andMe’s alleged failure to maintain reasonable security measures.” At the same time, they changed their Ts & Cs to make class actions more difficult. Currently, it is known that almost 7 million accounts were breached and more than 30 class actions have been instituted against them. Soon after the hack 23 instigated a two-factor ID log-in system, one that had long been suggested and sought by many customers over an extended period.

    The company has been in existence for almost 20 years and in 2021 went public which valued it at about $3.5bn. However, it has yet to make a profit, its shares have continued to tumble and today it’s worth roughly $250m, a decline of about 95%.

    Revenue for the latest year is US$219.6m (down 27% on 2023) and had a net loss of US$666.7m (an increase of 114% on 2023). Over a few years, a company that once was hailed to become the star of the DNA industry is now a sick cripple. The company blamed the revenue loss on decreased sales of genetic testing kits and lower research revenue after its five-year exclusive collaboration with GSK ended last July. Losses continue to be incurred and if they continue at the present rate (highly likely) it could run out of cash by 2025

    Is there a future for 23? Yes, but not as the company is structured today. Its databank of customer genetic information is a very valuable asset and would make it attractive to any acquiring pharma company. It probably will either be de-listed from the Nasdaq and struggle on, or bought out by its key shareholder. Either way, it will focus on collecting and using its genetic data to become a healthcare company concentrating on disease prevention and treatment, all of which will be based on the genetic data it holds on you and others. Given its response to the hack, is this the type of company you want to take care of you or share your genome with?



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,646 Mod ✭✭✭✭pinkypinky


    Agreed, I wouldn't be recommending testing with 23andme at the moment. Their response was poor. I was aware of the credential stuffing in the first weekend of October and it was well over a week before the company communicated directly.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 11,374 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hermy


    Wow, I'd no idea they had such issues.

    As an aside a single match I had at 23andme was vital in identifying my French birth father.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,646 Mod ✭✭✭✭pinkypinky


    Ancestry has launched the shared matches of matches tool - you have subscribe to their Pro Tools at a cost of $10 a month.

    Oh my goodness is it worth it. I've been figuring out all kinds of small matches now that I can see who is more closely related to them. MyHeritage already had this tool and it's great.

    Here's an anonymised example of what it looks like. In this example, person A and B share 251cM. It actually identifies the middle shared match as the son of person B.

    This tool is going to be a gamechanger.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 793 ✭✭✭cobham


    I did 23&me some years ago but only this week uploaded DNA data to GEDmatch. There is a facebook group for a family line with DNA. So I have passed on the reference no to them. I really have not got my head around DNA. I dont think I have brick walls to motivate me. I tried upload to GEDmatch some years ago and got so far but not successful. This time it was much easier.



Advertisement