Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Plans to end direct rail services between Wexford and Dublin

«13

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,903 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    It actually takes the same time on Intercity and Dart from connolly to Greystones. There will be hugh backash to this but if as they suggest that they could provide an hourly train service from wexford to greystones and guarantee that Darts will be waiting the public could be sold on it with increase service as the current service is shocking.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,075 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Mr Gleeson compared the move to “asking passengers on the Belfast line
    change at Malahide or those on the Cork line change at Hazlehatch,
    before they enter the Dublin area”.

    LOL, Mark, you'd make a great politician, carefully avoiding mentioning Limerick I see!

    People coming from Limerick, our third biggest city have to change to the Cork train at Limerick Junction every time and it works fine.

    The numbers boarding south of Wicklow are tiny, these changes will lead to a better DART service, better, more frequent service for Greystones and Wicklow and also more frequent and better service for Wexford too.

    We are going to see more interchange between services as the network grows and expands. Howth is becoming a shuttle service under Dart+, we will likely see intercity trains stop at one of the DART+ stations so people can transfer onto DART+ and then onto Metrolink for the airport in the future.

    Such interchange is common on expanding rail networks all over Europe.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,748 ✭✭✭GerardKeating


    It take about 3 hours for the full route, but only two hours if the service was terminated in Greystones. Cutting out the Greystones-Connolly round trip saves two hours of driving.

    So given the current 4 services per day, this could/would allow an extra two trips per day with the current fleet and driver pool.

    And maybe repopen one or two stations on the line and make a nice and handy cross platform transfer



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,518 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    There are 'some' direct services from Dublin<>Colbert at peak times, so it's not a change "every time".

    But notwithstanding that, and accepting that the majority of services do require a change at LJ, I still think Mark Gleason's comparison is perfectly fine. Changing at LJ is now an accepted part of the system, has been for many years (decades?). It's no longer an issue (perhaps it was when it was first introduced?)

    But asking Wexford commuters to swap at Wicklow would be a change/downgrade to their current service and seems reasonable to me to compare it with Belfast<>Dublin travellers being made to change at Malahide.

    Whether it's a good idea or not for overall network efficiency is a different issue obviously - it probably is good. But it's clearly a negative for the Wexford train users and needs to be 'sold' to them by something better than "it's what happens for Limerick".



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,075 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    I'm sorry, but it was a totally laughable comment!

    A total of 154 people boarded the train the entire day at Wexford during the rail census. The numbers using this service are tiny. It is in no way comparable to Belfast or Cork.

    Howth had 1,250 people boarding the same day, but where is all the complaints about that being turned into a shuttle service?

    This is good news for everyone, a better service for everyone.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,518 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    Just because there were only 154 passengers doesn't make the inconvenience for those 154 any less. What you are saying is because there is only a small amount of people that therefore inconveniencing them doesn't matter, which to an extent I agree with. But MGs fundamental point that it is the equivalent of Mrs Dundalk being asked to change at Malahide seems correct to me. There is just more Dundalk commuters than Wexford so we are less concerned.

    By the way the Howth shuttle service does have complaints - "we are being sacrificed for Drogheda". https://www.irishtimes.com/ireland/dublin/2023/05/16/howth-and-sutton-dart-users-face-major-changes-to-commute-with-potential-shuttle-trains-splitting-journey/



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,075 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    But again, he very carefully left out Limerick. It was a pretty silly comment IMO and I'm disappointed in seeing him making it, rather then pointing out that overall this will lead to a significantly better service.

    A person with years of experience in public transport should know that interconnection is a normal part of any well developed system and often leads to a much better service.

    I was genuinely shocked and disappointed to see him make this comment, which is the sort of stuff I expect to see from the normal misinformed rabble.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,059 ✭✭✭Vic_08


    Sorry, but that is absolute nonsense.

    Limerick is no way an equivalent. There are currently 3 direct Limerick - Dublin return Mon-Sat and 6 on Sundays.

    The hourly connections at Limerick Jct are to fast Intercity trains, not dumping long distance passengers at the edge of a suburban area on to stopping metro trains.

    It certainly isn't common on any decent European railway to stop regional express trains over an hour short of a major city for connection onto all stop suburban/metro/s-bahn trains.

    I wait to hear your examples of all the similar places this happens.

    The 2 morning and 3 evening peak Rosslare line trains are a long standing integral part of the service, removing them would leave a significant capacity gap which would have to be filled with additional Dart services anyway.

    The 2 late trains probably need to return to Dublin for fuel/servicing/set swap anyway, that just leaves the post peak morning and afternoon trains.

    If the proposal was that additional trains would only run to Greystones/Bray or a re-cast with a similar number of through trains and additional shorts to increase frequency south of Greystones I think that would be a reasonable compromise but cutting the through service altogether is just intentionally killing the route.

    Howth is in no way similar, it is cutting a short branch in exchange for a doubling of frequency, even so there have been complaints and no doubt as the proposal becomes more of a reality I expect there to be lots of pushback.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,229 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    an increased frequency could be delivered today direct to dublin, only thing stopping that is drivers and rolling stock.

    sure, you might be able to sell this plan to a gullible few but there are enough who won't be sold on a service as **** as the ballybroaphy line ultimately.

    this is just a shifting of the deck chairs from a lowish frequency but mostly useful service to more likely still the same frequency but waste of space service, even if they did increase the frequencies that wouldn't change.

    this is just an NTA obsession for an already discredited idea with irish rail just doing as they are told as they have always had contempt for this line more then others.

    forget it, it will be stopped if there is any chance of it actually happening.

    to mention also for your interest there is a thread on this forum discussing this very thing all be it's from before it became an NTA hobby horse, it's a good bit back in the forum at this stage now i would imagine as it's an old thread, but might be worth a read as it discusses everything.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,229 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    well mark is ultimately correct.
    limerick passengers change on to the main line services from cork, and near the start of their journey, as does tralee, so hardly a valid comparison.
    whatever about tralee, the only reason limerick passengers are changing is rolling stock saving issues, nothing more, limerick could very much support at least a 2 hourly, probably hourly in reality, direct service.
    just because people use the services from limerick, does not mean the change works fine, as none of us know how much passenger demand is being suppressed.
    the numbers boarding south of wicklow are not tiny, they haven't been since the end of the recession, you should actually go and use the services and you will see what i see which is trains full to capacity all across the day.
    there will be no increase in frequency for darts regardless of what anyone says, 10 minute is likely the frequency as is for the forseeable.
    even if there is a frequency increase south of wicklow, a change on to a dart invalidates it.
    ultimately, there is no redeaming features for what will be if the plans go ahead, one of the worst services in the country's history.
    but of course we have been round this roundabout a few times before haven't we.

    Post edited by end of the road on

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,229 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    .
    you are incorrect, it saves no driving as the diesels will still be running all be it empty to connolly as servicing is done there with big maintenence done at portlaoise and droghida, that is not going to change and there will not be a depot or servicing facilities built.
    a nice and handy cross platform change is unviable due to operational and other issues that mean such a thing cannot be guaranteed for the 2 users that would be the only ones using this service as proposed, yourself and bk.
    the only station that has a slim chance of reopening on the line is avoka and that has a very slim chance.
    ultimately, this discredited idea has nothing going for it but a discontinuation of rail services to wexford which is a guaranteed certainty.
    funnily enough i've been on this roundabout a few times with you also.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,987 ✭✭✭SeanW


    >_< This stupid idea needs to die. Permanently. It's not bad enough that IE is sending those godawful rattling cattle car 29000 trains long distance to places like Sligo and Rosslare, nor that the trip from Dublin to Rosslare takes like 3 hours or something, but to have it no longer even being direct and forcing the few passengers that remain to switch to another mode in the commuter belt is beyond absurd.

    It would be like if Bus Eireann decided to terminate their services at the outskirts of Dublin and tell everyone to switch to local Dublin Bus services, this would be a particular PITA for people carrying luggage for whatever reason. It's beyond silly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,229 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    yes the day of the rail census.
    ultimately 1 day so is meaningless, certainly not justification for starting the process of killing off services to wexford when trains are full all of the time, even if they wereen't it wouldn't be justification.
    this is bad news for everyone, a worse service for everyone, a service so laughable it has nothing going for it.
    full wexford trains transferring on to already full, or will be full very soon dart trains which are currently mostly half capacity, and even at full capacity would still take them from currently beyond overcrowded to ridiculous levels.
    embarrassing stuff but not surprising from the NTA.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users Posts: 219 ✭✭Kiteview


    What Irish Rail should be doing is continually running direct services between Belfast and Rosslare Europort with Dublin “just another stop” on that route. It is ridiculous that if you want to go from Wicklow to Belfast, you take one train to Dublin and then have to change to another train to Belfast.


    This proposal would make such a journey even more arduous than it already is - and there’s no need for it because the money that is being squandered on the Airport-Dundrum Metro vanity project could pay for a tunnel or tunnels for the DART instead, leaving the existing rail free for Irish Rail to run mainline services.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,229 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    it's an interesting idea but the problem is that the belfast trains are operated by both northern ireland railways and irish rail with it's own bespoke rolling stock.
    while some 22000s and 2900s can run to belfast the problem is that a rosslare to belfast would take the set away for quite a while longer then intended and it would mean dedicating the sets able to run on the northern ireland railways section of the belfast service to the rosslare line and there aren't enough of those sets to do it.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,949 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    This does not seem a progressive proposal. As previous posters have said, Limerick is connected by a fast train, not one with 20 odd stops. Howth is short suburban connection.

    While it is an urban area there are several places where passing loops could be added and this should be done to allow trains actually run to Dublin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 469 ✭✭Bodan


    Barry Kenny was on newstalk today where he went into a bit more detail. In the interview he said it would be a mix of direct and interchange trains to increase capacity on the line…

    “We’ve six trains each way a day to either Gorey or Wexford or Rosslare. “We want to expand all of the trains;
    in modelling the infrastructure, one of the ways you can do that and get much better frequency is by having an interchange between the Rosslare service and the DART at somewhere like Greystones.” 

    Mr Kenny said no decision has been made and in the future some trains could terminate in Wicklow, while
    other continue to travel onto Dublin. “It’ll be able to have direct services, it’ll be able to have a mixture of direct and interchange,” he said. “The infrastructure modelling says to absolutely squeeze every last bit of capacity out, you would have an interchange. “But that decision is absolutely not made. 

    Mr Kenny said Irish Rail’s priority is to “run more trains for everybody” and a consultation on the issue will begin this summer. 

    https://www.newstalk.com/lunchtime-live/decision-on-ending-direct-wexford-dublin-trains-has-absolutely-not-been-made-1712311



  • Registered Users Posts: 157 ✭✭ArcadiaJunction


    All things considered, the reaction to this has been somewhat hyterical. No, it won't kill off the service and might even grow more numbers considering the greater frequency.

    These kinds of outer suburban changes to rapid transit are not uncommon. Isn't this happening with HS2?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,771 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    I woudl support once they implement the Howth shuttle and close the Merrion Gates.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,771 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    Slower service. Limerick offers a quicker service with connections.

    They might get it over the line if there was a 2 hourly service from Wexford but that won't be under consideration.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,229 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    the reaction has been justifiable.
    there is absolutely no chance this shitshow will grow passengers if implemented.
    there is absolutely nothing here that would encourage growth or the current passengers to stay.
    there is absolutely no comparison what soever to anything else either here, the uk or europe.

    it will absolutely kill off the service, there is no doubt about that.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,229 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    nothing will get this over the line trust me on that.

    enough people will see this as poorer then what they have even in the unlikely event there was a greater frequency.

    put that with all the other issues down here and people see this for what it is.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,099 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    If it enables the DART to run more frequently and increases passenger capacity overall, there is some sense in it.

    But we would need to see the DART frequency increase.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,229 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    removing the rosslare services won't make any difference to the dart being able to run more frequently.
    the dart can't run more frequently at the moment due to lack of rolling stock hence lots of half size trains running around, and when the new stock arrives signalling will prevent it for a bit until the new signalling is commissioned whenever that is.
    the rosslare diesels will still run empty to connolly anyway as they are serviced there with big maintenence carried out at portlaoise and droghida depots and that regime is not going to change, nor are there going to be any sort of servicing and depot facilities built on the rosslare line as it would make no sense.
    so this idea makes no sense, it's just a non-baked idea by the NTA who are clueless to reality hence the 10 minute dart with half capacity trains rather then waiting until the new stock arrived and launching it then.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,477 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm


    HOw can you say that removing the Rosslare trains from the DART paths "won'tmake any difference" - as the Rosslare train runs through, additional space needs to be left.

    Will every running of the Rosslare train require a trip to Connolly etc for maintenance? That's not what happens now. INstead of running onto Connolly, they willgo back down the line providing additional capacity but more improtantly frequency.

    Why is running half-sized trains at a greater frequency non-sensical? Other than at rush times, capacity is not an issue, frequency is.

    NIce to see some fo the Gorey commuters supporting the proposal in the IT today - unsurprisingly, the negative comments there came from the infrequent users.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,290 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    The "direct" train to Limerick is actually the less direct option.

    It exists to serve places like Nenagh but anyone going from Limerick to Dublin is much better off changing at the junction.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,286 ✭✭✭Glaceon


    The direct service doesn’t go via Nenagh, it branches off the Cork line on a tight curve just before Limerick Junction.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,229 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    whatever way it runs, there will be the same or a lot more ECS moves to connolly as a trains is not going to stay running up and down the line as sets are swapped out as they require servicing or trips to portlaoise or droghida or a particular car set is required elsewhere ETC.
    because half sized trains at a greater frequency mean less capacity available at a particular time meaning where once passengers could get a seat or stand comfortably, they now can't and are standing uncomfortably because what was once a full capacity train able to take the required capacity of the service, is now a half sized train that can't.
    that does effect rush hour because a lot of rush hour darts are not 8 car from what i both hear and from what i have witnessed myself.
    sure, some gorey commuters who don't really know what exactly they are getting and just see the headline of more frequent trains will support this nonsense, not their fault but the campaign groups down here will get the message out as to the actual reality and why this should not be supported ultimately.
    infrequent users are infrequent for a reason, and understandably when they do use the service they want something that meets their needs which this plan doesn't.
    meaning infrequent users go to not at all users meaning less users, along with the frequent users who will also drop out.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,099 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Is the DART running at 10 minute intervals now?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,229 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,987 ✭✭✭SeanW


    Is there much space being left between DARTs to facilitate speeding up Rosslare trains these days? I suspect IE would be prioritising more DARTs already.

    I liken this bizarre idea to terminating Bus Eireann coach services on the outskirts of Dublin and telling passengers to get a Dublin Bus onwards. If you're going to the airport for example and you have luggage, this means getting out of your comfy coach seat, getting out your luggage to schlep onto a local Dublin Bus, passengers would soon decide "Forget this" and look for alternatives.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,730 ✭✭✭TheChrisD


    Yet, the roads between Dublin Airport and Busáras aren't exactly single-lane all the way and already pretty close to capacity.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27 AndB456


    I thought it was to switch at Bray? If it was Bray I would use the train as the current times are so limited but if it's a switch any further south of Bray I wouldn't bother. I can't see them linking a useable service.



  • Registered Users Posts: 312 ✭✭ohographite


    I don't see the need for ending direct services from the Rosslare line to Dublin. Additional capacity on the DART off peak is less important than additional capacity during peak times, so it shouldn't be a problem to keep Rosslare trains going into and out of Dublin off peak. If you keep the Rosslare trains out of Dublin, I think you'll only make room on the tracks for 6 more DART trains a day (because there are 6 trains a day each way on the Rosslare line) , most of which would be off peak.

    There is only one Rosslare train a day that leaves Dublin during what I'd call evening peak time(it leaves connolly at 17:33) and only one Rosslare train a day that comes into Dublin during what I call morning peak time(it reaches connolly at 8:46) so if they are robbing Dublin of an extra peak time DART each, I suppose I'd understand keeping just those two out of Dublin and running them to/from BRAY(which is better connected to Dublin by buses than Greystones or Wicklow, and a bigger town). That still leaves 5 trains a day each way that I definitely think should run to/from central Dublin though, which only robs Dublin of 5 off peak DARTs a day.

    Having 5 less DARTs a day would inconvenience, I think, almost no DART users, but I reckon the need to change trains to get to Dublin from anywhere in Wexford(and some parts of Wicklow) would inconvenience almost all Rosslare line users, especially considering it would slow the journey down somewhat, and DART trains have less facilities (there are no toilets, luggage racks, etc. on the DART) It only means that a relatively tiny number of DART passengers will have to wait a relatively tiny bit longer for the next DART to arrive (which they could sometimes even avoid by looking at the timetable).

    Some may ask why I think some DART passengers should have to wait a little while for their DART to arrive, when I think that some Rosslare train passengers shouldn't have to change trains to the DART to get to Dublin. I'm not sure if the number of DART users who'd have to wait is bigger than the number of Rosslare train users who'd have to change trains, but I am sure that the latter deserve better travelling conditions than the former because they are mostly making significantly longer journeys (A journey from Gorey to Pearse Station is much longer than a journey from Blackrock to Pearse Station, for example). I think forcing people to change trains from a Rosslare train to a DART just to get to Dublin is a significant disimprovement in travelling conditions, because (like I've said) it adds journey time and the DART has less on board facilities. Also, I think some people might be annoyed by just having to get off a train and onto another one, even if I personally rarely mind doing this.

    I definitely think the Rosslare line should have a more frequent service, especially between Dublin and Wicklow, but I don't think this has to (or should) happen by keeping all Rosslare trains out of Dublin. I think they should at least keep the existing off peak Rosslare trains going into and out of Dublin, and maybe they could have the peak time trains and any additional trains only operating as far north as Bray.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,730 ✭✭✭TheChrisD


    If anything it should be the other way around entirely. Keep a peak train or two going all the way (especially the morning 5:30am Rosslare departure which is scheduled to go all the way to Dundalk), but the rest should be shuttles.

    You are overlooking the opportunity cost. It takes three hours to go from Rosslare to Dublin; but only two hours from Rosslare to Greystones. Instead of one train doing four full trips all the way (two each direction), it could instead do six shuttle runs (three each direction). Multiply that by however many trains are running the Rosslare services, and you can see how much the frequency can theoretically increase with no need for additional rolling stock or drivers.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,286 ✭✭✭Glaceon


    My concern here (and what fuelled my thought that it could kill off the line) is that if you're trying to propose the train as an alternative to driving, this proposal introduces another level of inconvenience. The question is whether that inconvenience is tolerable or not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,229 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    but that's not going to happen as you aren't going to have the same train traveling up and down the line all day, the train will still be making the trips it does but then it will run empty through to connolly.
    the same trains aren't even on the line all day, they go to connolly and will either run other services, not to mention servicing there which will not be changed.
    also the line is already under capacity in terms of carages as trains are already over crowded from early on, so more carrages are going to have to be provided eventually anyway and when dart + is up and running there will be stock freed up.
    this is not about delivering more frequent services to south of wicklow as if they were serious about it they would deliver it direct and they could have made a start on it years ago with gradual increases as more stock freed up.
    lets say that some how this sub par plan did manage to grow passengers, the next step will be for the NTA to claim that it is passengers off these services who are causing the over crowding issues on the dart, and they will now have to discontinue services south due to the need to free up capacity on dart services.
    mark my words if i am wrong on this i will be shocked beyond belief.
    this along with all of the other issues is why people should not support this and instead fight to both keep and implement more direct services which will secure the future of the line, bring more growth and end once and for all the outdated mindset that this is a line in decline.

    not to mention it will show that finally people in the southeast have had enough of poor public services and paper crack solutions.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,337 ✭✭✭dowlingm


    if additional DART slots divert 1,000 net drivers off roads north from Bray/Greystones but adds 100 drivers originating south of Greystones, is that worth it? Depends who you ask. A South Dublin roads planner would probably sing hallelujahs. An environmentalist would probably condemn it since the south of Greystones people are each driving longer distances.


    If the boundary of frequent service / train turn backs could come as far as Wicklow (along with platform extensions to 180m there and at Kilcoole, that’s a reasonably straight run before having to turn west away from the M11 competition and speeds fall off. But that would probably be opposed by the usual suspects since it would drive development even harder in Wicklow and environs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,337 ✭✭✭dowlingm


    if Ballina can have a DMU shuttle to Manulla and only exchanged to/from Limerick once a week or whatever, why would it be assumed that a (yes, longer) shuttle to/from Rosslare would require a daily or better run into Connolly?

    One of the reasons I think Wicklow would be a good place to extend some DART service to and turn the Rosslare trains is that there is room to lengthen the existing station platforms to 180m but also to put one or more storage and servicing tracks north of the existing platforms. Greystones is a pretty constrained station area.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,229 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    because the trains that operate Ballina are based out of limerick and the diagramming and maintenence regime takes Ballina into account as the 2800 sets aren't worked as hard and generally stay around the limerick area apart from the Ballina set and the odd jaunt to cork to replace a 26 or to help out.
    different for rosslare as the set needs to get back to dublin, especially if it's a 29 as it will be needed on a suburban, and in the case of the 22000s they are diagrammed to eventually get them back to the depots so one set that comes from rosslare could end up god knows where after it arrives in connolly, the servicing and maintenence regimes wouldn't change on either classes just to suit ideological nonsense from the NTA that has no actual need to be implemented.
    there is not going to be servicing facilities built on the rosslare line, it would make no sense what soever, especially when usership south of the turnback would fall with this proposal anyway to a trickle of die hards.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,337 ✭✭✭dowlingm


    just to be clear by servicing I mean in the “cleaning/toilet emptying/fuelling” sense - whatever is done in Ballina, not building a full depot



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,805 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    @bk

    Sorry I'm only reading the thread now, and seen this:

    Howth is becoming a shuttle service under Dart+

    Just to be clear, this is happening because the most common failure on the main line is the points at Howth Junction. The plan is to leave them set for Kilbarrack ←→ Portmarnock 99% of the time thus avoiding the issue. A signal controller working for Irish rail explained this to me. It's nothing to do with efficiency or min maxing, it's a work around for an intermittent mechanical problem.

    That being said I do think that switching trains should be on the table for infrequent services at junctions, but not on a single line or on a Rapid transit system.

    The points at Howth Junction have had upgrades over the years but they're still sitting on old wooden sleepers and the core mechanical system of how they work has not changed a whole lot.

    Every cat and dog in the street knows a 3rd track is what's needed. Or at least modify some of the stations so they are like Clongriffin allowing trains to overtake one another. Looking North, the obvious choices are Clontarf Road and Raheny.

    Looking South there are options along the coast but the problem is all the level crossings…. If only there was an elevated rail system from the South into somewhere like Harcourt St… Oh wait… 😂🤣



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,033 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    It has far more to do with the desire to increase frequency on the Northern Line north of Howth Junction, and also to reduce the numbers of conflicts - every train that crosses from the mainline to the Howth branch reduces the number of services that can operate on the mainline in both directions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,805 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    We'll agree to disagree, I'm only relaying what I've been told by a person that works in CTC.

    I think it's a risky move to be honest, it's only 3.5 miles long with 3 stops. (Very short for a branch). A feeder bus service would be significantly cheaper than operating a 3.5 mile branch. Either that or people will get the H3 or the 6

    Worst case scenario the service is stopped cause no one uses it and tracks get lifted. (I get that's extreme but it's not impossible) It would also be political suicide, ripping up track in this day and age is not gonna win votes 🤣



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,033 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    The branch is not going to be closed under any scenario. That’s just pure nonsense and frankly isn’t even worth discussing.

    As for the person in CTC - they aren’t schedulers or service planners. They’re seeing one aspect.

    The bottom line is the desire by the NTA to deliver a higher and consistent base frequency all along the Northern line. That cannot be delivered if some services are switching to the branch at Howth Junction.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 25,239 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    Let me open by saying I am a daily user of the Wexford line. Let's start with the facts. There aren't enough trains or drivers. The suggestion of a switchover at Greystones is not a runner for multiple reasons, even a legally required accessibility audit would shoot it down.

    Would a regular like myself have an issue with it though, not really if done right but there are lots of things to do.

    First, the speed needs to be increased asap. It is as quick to drive most of the way up as it is to get the train. If I sleep in, I can still hop in the car and beat the first train to Gorey with ease, even get the earlier Gorey train. The line needs a major overhaul. If I kept driving I'd be in work over an hour earlier.

    Second, that god damned bone shaker on the first run. Heating breaks half the time, to the point several regulars bring blankets in the mornings. The only reason for it is that there are so many users if they use the ICR you can't actually get off at Dun Laoghaire or BlackRock.

    Third, add extra carriages. They keep using the excuse that one of the stops has too short a platform. BS, do what the UK do and inform people if they are getting off at that stop to use specific carriages, it is not rocket science.

    Four, if you want to switch to DART, have it come in behind a DART from Greystones and run in to the left in Bray. No crossing the track, instant turn around, very few commuters will complain. It would suit a few to switch to the 155.

    Five, increase frequency in the mornings. People like the train but Wexford Bus and BE are more frequent so people take the risk out. If I miss the 5:57 in Wexford, it is 7:45 before the next one. They should be hourly. Loads of double track that gets used at Gorey and Arklow to pass trains in the other direction.

    Lastly, this was only suggested to shut up all the complaints from users about frequency because they knew people would over react about switching trains. I certainly have no issue and neither do most regular commuters on the line.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,033 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    None of the Irish Rail train fleets are equipped with Selective Door Opening (SDO). The GB fleets do have it which allows them to use certain coaches at short platforms.

    Without it there is no chance of trains operating that are longer than a platform at a station that the service they’re operating calls at.

    I can’t see speeds changing anytime soon either. You’d be better off building a brand new railway.

    Post edited by LXFlyer on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,033 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    On the scheduling, if you want to maintain a half-hourly DART to/from Greystones, then there are only two paths each hour that can be used between Bray and Greystones in either direction for trains to/from south of Greystones.

    A northbound train from south of Greystones would have to run directly in front of a northbound DART, and then it could have a 12 min turnaround at Bray and return 6 mins behind a southbound DART as at present.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,805 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    I genuinely hope you're correct and I'm wrong.

    I'm pessimistic by nature…

    I had a look at the Jacobs report for DART+ for Connolly. According to them it's at or near Max. (Northern line)
    The plan to use Newcomen is "interesting" and would increase capacity slightly, but according to the report won't deliver 30 trains per hour.

    Dart+ is a good project, we need to do it. But I think the NTA are going to have to bite the bullet on this accept that the only way to get the capacity they need/want is to laydown more track and build more platforms. We all know it'll cost a bomb, but I don't see any other option.

    That includes the topic for this thread, double tracking at least some of the line allows more trains to run. More frequent trains will entice more people to use the service. Last time I went to Gorey on the train (April) the train was fairly full.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,730 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    The did of course tender for SDO for the 22ks; but did not proceed with the tender

    Were any reasons revealed for that?



  • Advertisement
Advertisement