Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Criminal Justice (Incitement to Violence or Hatred and Hate Offences) Bill 2022 - Read OP

Options
1123124126128129143

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 540 ✭✭✭Hungry Burger


    What we’ve seen in Scotland is nothing short of hilarious.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,921 ✭✭✭Shoog


    Hate speech is a crime to those who are subjected to it, it cause real harm and destroys real lives.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,921 ✭✭✭Shoog


    It suggests there are a lot of dick heads with serious disruptive agendas. As I have said before most of those 8000 complaints are from opponents of the legislation who want to bring it into disrepute. Not big and not clever.



  • Registered Users Posts: 753 ✭✭✭concerned_tenant


    It doesn't matter what the source of the mass reporting is — whether it's pro or anti-legislation sources. The police are obliged to look into each case, otherwise they have no idea which case is legitimate and which case is not.

    So what matters is that the problem exists.

    To prevent it existing, the legislation in this country must be amended — as you yourself have already implied.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,921 ✭✭✭Shoog


    The system must be developed to deal with vexatious complaints. The law is just the foundation on which the administrative system is built. The lesson to learn is to anticipate dick heads trying to crash the system and have a way of dealing with them otherwise those dick heads win - which was their intention all along.

    We cannot be governed by a rowdy mob of foot stampers.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 970 ✭✭✭Vote4Squirrels


    Yes, and so can bullying but where is the legislation to combat that ?

    So can verbal abuse but where is the law to stop this if the abuse is not listed in a "protected class" - a male wearing a female wig is mocked online or in person and can report this on the grounds of "gender expression" - the same moron pillories a female wearing a wig due to alopecia or cancer treatment and she has no recourse. Yet I would argue the latter has caused more psychogical harm.

    Supporters of this insane bill do not care about people's feelings or stopping "lives being destroyed" - they want to limit discussion and debate on agendas they have.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,921 ✭✭✭Shoog


    I want to see consequences for people who threaten violence to minorities and induce others into acts of violence against others. This what the legislation is all about. Your examples are an attempt to minimise the seriousness of hate speech by using absurd examples.



  • Registered Users Posts: 753 ✭✭✭concerned_tenant


    Only part of the legislation is about incitement to violence, which most people are on-board with (and as an addendum to that, why do you only specify "minorities"? Why shouldn't everyone be protected?). You are deliberately misleading people by saying this is what the legislation, to quote you, "is all about".

    It's every other part of the legislation, the so-called "hate speech" part, that people have a problem with. This has been explained many times now.

    Put another way, if the legislation were only about criminalizing incitement to violence, I would be in favour of passing it.

    It's precisely because the legislation is not only about this, that I have a major issue. 8,000+ reports in Scotland are not about incitement to violence. It's about the hate speech part, as well you know.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,921 ✭✭✭Shoog


    I don't accept your characterization of the bills function so we are going to have to agree to disagree on that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 753 ✭✭✭concerned_tenant


    Don't take my word for it.

    The title of the legislation is, Criminal Justice (Incitement to Violence or Hatred and Hate Offences) Bill 2022.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,921 ✭✭✭Shoog




  • Registered Users Posts: 970 ✭✭✭Vote4Squirrels


    This is why we do not need this bill. Dogma. Ideologues who refuse to see any perspective but their own.

    By the way - nice categorising of the bullying in my post as "an absurd example" and key that you care about "minorities" - so hate speech is okay against Irish people ? Women ? Any age demographic which is the majority ?

    See the "hate speech" part of the Bill is utter nonsense and you know it, your entrenched position doesn't allow you to see any point of view but what you have decided.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,921 ✭✭✭Shoog


    Hate speech can apply to anyone - but protected categories of minorities is based on those groups who are most subjected to hate speech. This is based upon analysis of actual crimes. If Irish people were disproportionately subjected to hate speech in Ireland they would warrant been a prescribed category - but hopefully you understand why this is not the case.



  • Registered Users Posts: 51,754 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    Of all people you should know the dangers of making a false complaint of rape to the Gardai.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,590 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    That what investigation are for. Someone makes a complaint to Gardai who then investigate.

    It is the exact same as any other complaint/investigation.

    There are penalties for making a false statement.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,590 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    There is no such thing as a notice of non crime hate incident. That's facts. I don't think it's me gaslighting



  • Registered Users Posts: 970 ✭✭✭Vote4Squirrels


    Ah the old "you don't understand" - it's not going to work anymore that, the veil has been lifted.

    What about women ? You don't think the fight for women's rights needs to continue, even more so now ? Women are a majority in Ireland - do we not need protection from hate speech ?

    By the way - great to see you've finally accepted the Bill is about hate speech and not just "incitement to violence".



  • Registered Users Posts: 753 ✭✭✭concerned_tenant


    If someone claims "hatred" against them because of something they read online, you cannot prove their claim is feigned or not.

    We can never know if they are being sincere. After all, it's subjective, what someone "perceives" to be hateful against them.

    8,000+ complaints in Scotland in a week strongly suggests that what I'm saying is true.



  • Registered Users Posts: 41,062 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    It's not dead though. There will be some amendments of course but it is very far from dead.

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,590 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    Same as any other complaint. There is nothing new about the way these crimes will be reported or investigated.

    If there is no crime, there will be no prosecution.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 753 ✭✭✭concerned_tenant


    The legislation allows for people to feign sincerity with their complaints of hatred which, at the very least, will be noted as non-crime hate incidents. It encourages people to report on the basis of how they "perceive" hatred against them.

    It's not "the same as any other complaint"; it is a subjective complaint and it wastes police time, as the experiment in Scotland has already demonstrated. The head of Scotland's police has already confirmed this. I will take his word on the matter, if you don't mind. Or is it your position that he's lying?

    Do you think 8,000 complaints a week in Scotland is okay? How many do you think are done by bad actors?

    I would say quite a lot, on both extremes.

    Doesn't that suggest the very weakness of the legislation, that it opens up the opportunity for people to take advantage of it in such an egregious manner?

    So the issue isn't the degree of "prosecutions", how you have erroneously tried to frame it.

    The issue is wasting police time, feigned sincerity, and people trying to settle scores or personal vendettas through this legislation.

    Put simply, this legislation will be manipulated by bad actors who take personal offense at opinions they don't like. Not actual hatred (undefined), but personal opinions that oppose their own ideological worldview.

    That's the real reason they support the legislation, not how they try to sell the legislation to the public through disingenuous sleight-of-hand.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,958 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    The process is the punishment. You could have someone's entire life turned upside down just by filing a complaint. This is true for current legislation and will be even more for this.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users Posts: 753 ✭✭✭concerned_tenant


    That's the insidious intent behind much of the core support base for this legislation.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,590 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    We currently record non crime hate incidents, so no change there.

    Your continual arguments about subjectivity means nothing, as every reported incident to Gardai is subjective based on the complainant.

    Make a complaint of dangerous driving? You do so in your perceived subjective view that the driver is driving dangerously. That doesn't make it so.

    Gardai waste time on frivolous, vexatious complaints everyday, nothing new there either.

    Dodo I believe some complainants will be bad actors? Absolutely. As is currently the case with many reports to Gardai.



  • Registered Users Posts: 970 ✭✭✭Vote4Squirrels


    "If there is no crime there will be no prosecution".

    Someone let Amnesty, the ACLU, and Paddy Hill's organisation "Say I'm Innocent" know - they can down tools.



  • Registered Users Posts: 41,062 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    This is utterly silly. I could go in and make a complaint right now. The legislation makes no difference.

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Registered Users Posts: 41,062 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    What current legislation does this? Again though this is silly. If a complaint isn't taken further by the DPP. Well then that's it.

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Registered Users Posts: 970 ✭✭✭Vote4Squirrels


    This.

    I've tried to explain this but you either get stupid questions, gaslighting nonsense or just denial.

    I suspect they actually are glad to see people not express their opinions due to the fear of losing their jobs etc. It's a win/win for the Orwellian crowd.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,590 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    I agree but won't be any more for this. Any complaint made falsely against someone will turn their life upside down. That's why there is an offence for making a false statement.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,590 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    Bit weird. Who is at danger of losing their jobs?



Advertisement