Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

Options
1363136323634363636373691

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2,355 ✭✭✭Hoop66


    Russia's economy is actually doing remarkably well all things considered



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,145 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    The US occupied Germany and could have controlled much of Western Europe if they wanted to. In 1945 they were the military and economic superpower. They could have dropped nukes on Moscow, or anywhere else pretty much unopposed. For all their faults and they have a few, they could have run with that overseas, but they didn't. They threw trillions at Europe to rebuild it. The post war economic and social growth across much of the world and especially in the West has much to thank the Yanks for. Compare and contrast with Russia and how well the nations under their control(and it was far more direct control) fared.

    China was fooked post WW2, after Mao went for a great reset and the resultant famines that killed millions meant it didn't recover until the 80's. So they were off the geopolitical table, though they did throw cash at revolutions in their backyard even while their own people were resorting to cannibalism. QV Indochina, North Korea. Iran was a clusterfook, made worse by US and British oil concerns, so they weren't on the table either. Oh and China hasn't been "communist" for decades. They were bright enough to realise it didn't work, so now just wear the label, but are a single party, single leader autocratic state.

    And yep I can indeed call what's happening in the US a free press and democracy. Periods of apparent chaos are what often mark both out. One sure sign of functioning democracies for all their issues is change and even surprise. Trump was one. Brexit another. Hell the recent defeat in the referendum of pretty much the entire Irish political class is one too. You don't get that with totalitarian states like Russia. How many different parties, prime ministers and presidents has the average western democracy had compared to the 20+ years Putin has been ensconced in his leadership role? Oh he passed on the presidency to his patsy for a time so that he could come back and change their constitution to allow him to rule for life.

    "Oh but the chaos is different now!!". Instant news and social media makes it feel different but nope, it's really not. Imagine twitter had been around in the 1960's that so many halfwits in the US see as a Golden Age©. In 60's America you had duck and cover, fear of commies and invasion and The Bomb™, Cuban missile crisis, their president shot dead like a dog in the street, his brother shot later on, along with MLK and Malcolm X among others, race riots, national guard on the streets setting dogs on people, a couple of mass shootings to add to the mix, Vietnam, drugs, the sexual revolution, women's lib, abortion, men on the moon while poor kids were dying in the projects and places like NY were murder capitals beyond 5th Avenue and the neon. If your average slackjawed "MAGA" or dopey "Liberal" were watching all that now, they'd have a complete fooking meltdown on Twitter. Goes for pretty much any 20th century decade in America too. But, oh look, America is still there. On the other hand Russia/Soviet Union was on the surface far more stable, but the latter isn't around any more and the former is a shadow of what it could be if it weren't so badly run for the benefit of a tiny minority.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users Posts: 92 ✭✭Poon Tang


    Does this still pass as logic? That Putin wants to reform the old soviet bloc? lol

    And take back Alaska? lol ffs

    Seriously, anyone who actually swallowed that nonsense at the beginning of this war, deserves some sort of medal for epic levels of stupidity.

    The Americans just basically sold you the boogie man under the bed, and you bought it hook line and sinker. It's depressing how easy it is to fool some people. Makes me wonder how easily we'll get dragged into some ridiculous war with China next… again another completely un-winnable conflict.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,254 ✭✭✭Virgil°


    I'm not pro or anti Russia. I just don't swallow the nonsense we've been fed for 2 years about this war, or it's origins either.

    Then proceeds to recite literal kremlin talking points. You are 100% pro russian. No question about it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,879 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    @Poon Tang

    I'm not pro or anti Russia. I just don't swallow the nonsense we've been fed for 2 years about this war, or it's origins either.

    All of these large power players are brutal in their own ways. The Russians are no more barbaric than the yanks in how they try to eliminate a threat, but they just do it in a different way. The Americans try to pretend they're very civilized, but it's just a façade. Russia will ruthlessly squash any terrorism or guerrilla style war, they won't tolerate it or make any attempt to appease anybody.

    Anyone who thinks the Russians are more ruthless in nature, you clearly haven't been looking at the evidence of what certain nations have been doing around the world for the last half a century or more. There is a top dog in the league of brutality, and it ain't the Russians or the Chinese leading that table right now!

    You should own it (the pro Russia label) rather than pretend objectivity.

    The boast about effectiveness and efficiency of ruthless Gestapo-like tactics for quelling dissent and occupying hostile territory was an accidental start towards honesty.

    The second paragraph is nonsense, you can't relativise the differences away like that. You are contradicting yourself too. I mean you even mentioned/semi-mocked at "the Brits" (of the early 20C) and how they dealt with guerilla warfare in Ireland in a restrained by comparison (with Soviet's, CCP's, or Putin's Russia) way.

    If there are no differences, it is all the same, or just a "facade" and militaries/occupiers will just pretend to be civilised, why did you bring that up? I think it definitely made a difference to people of this country, and how events developed here since then.

    You have the usual Soviet/CCP shaped blind spots in your ranking of evils of this world over last "half century or more" IMO but that has all been done to death and prob. nothing I can repeat will change your mind or anyone else's.

    Post edited by fly_agaric on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,704 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Untrue.

    There was widespread outrage from US citizens when news came back about atrocities their soldiers had committed in the Vietnam war. It was dwindling public support from this which is a large factor in why the US had to withdraw in the end.

    By contrast, this kind of public protest is pretty much off limits in Russia and expressions of discontent about the war has led to mass arrests, all for the simple act of protesting.

    When the Abu Ghraib torture came to light, there was also outrage and repercussions for the soldiers found to have been involved.

    When Yevgheny Prigozhin bragged about a turncoat his men killed with a sledgehammer, he, well, it wasn't that incident which turned Putin against him, oh no. He was still bessie mates with Putin at this time. And remember those big demonstrations in Moscow about Bucha? Yeah, me neither.

    All you're doing is using the oft-used fallacy that just because no side is perfect that they're as bad as each other. This is patently false. The Russians will bomb and blast Ukraine to bits if they see fit and can, with barely a peep about it back home. This is untrue of western countries, including the US. It's one of the things which places like Russia and China see as a weakness of the West; that its too tolerant and merciful. They (Russia and China et al don't give a fúck about human rights when it comes to opponents in combat. Due process? Just gets in the way.



  • Registered Users Posts: 797 ✭✭✭eoinbn


    This is already happening and we are standing by....

    Bucha, Bakhmut, Mariupol... The list goes on.



  • Registered Users Posts: 92 ✭✭Poon Tang


    I would have no qualms about admitting if I was pro-Russian, since I don't view this conflict the same way you likely do. But I'm not.

    The fact that anyone who questions the official narrative gets labelled as such, is part of the reason why these stupid conflicts rage on for so long - they become ideological. Nobody can pass the picket line or get called some sort of heretic… well fcuk that, I'll speak my mind. If that makes me a kremlin bot or whatever the latest buzz word is, so be it.

    We have been fed a bunch of nonsense about this conflict. The Russians have very little control over the narrative in the western media, so it has mostly been us feeding ourselves our own BS!



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,093 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    Isn't it amazing how all these people claiming to be neutral just end up spouting Kremlin talking points?

    Well actually no it's not really. It's really the goal of Kremlin propaganda in the west. Their messages to Western audiences aren't designed to make people be supportive of Russia. No, instead they are designed to drag down everyone else - to muddy the waters if you will. They try to inject and promote cynicism in every target country. Given all of the social and economic problems in late stage capitalism in an era of accelerating climate change that's pushing at an open door.



  • Registered Users Posts: 92 ✭✭Poon Tang


    Would this not be better suited to a conspiracy theory forum? Unless you have solid evidence to back up this level of sophistication in propaganda? Russia are generally considered to be pretty useless at the information war, compared with the west. Again, it just comes off as boogie man under the bed type logic.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 29,369 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    You're certainly feeding us a bunch of nonsense about this conflict, dumping Russian propaganda here. If you can't see that it originated as Russian propaganda and that repeating it here makes you come across as pro-Russian - that's entirely on you. That's not questioning the 'official' narrative, that is lock, stock and barrel reposting the 'official' and completely false Russian narrative.

    You have been completely unable to engage with any of the many posts discrediting your claims, responding with whataboutery and more propaganda and now playing the victom card. Utterly transparent tactics of someone who has lost the debate.

    You pretend to be concerned about countries such as Poland and Ukraine, and yet you had zero answer to such points put to you as:

    Those countries, when given the free choice to do so, either have or want to take their place in Western alliances such as NATO or the EU.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users Posts: 99 ✭✭randomuser02125


    Putin told Carlson Ukraine is not a country. Your medal is well deserved.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,704 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Many of us on this thread will have read literal essays penned by Putin on why he thinks that Ukraine can only be a partner of Russia. We've seen Lavrov talk to the BBC about needing to rid Kyiv of the 'drug addicts and neo-nazis' who were in power there (while keeping fairly quiet about Russia's PMC named after Hitler's favourite composer, but we'll leave that). We watched live the Russian security council convene a day or two before the invasion began as they stammered and shook before Putin.

    We get far, far more of the Russian point of view in the West than vice-versa, that's for sure.



  • Registered Users Posts: 99 ✭✭randomuser02125


    Jaysus man, you're parroting Russian propoganda, not marching over the bridge in Selma.



  • Registered Users Posts: 55 ✭✭doyle55


    And here you are feeding this forum a bunch of nonsense.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,093 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    We could be off to the races again with the House Speaker. A couple of the dingleberrys in the Republican caucus are unhappy about Ukraine getting some help:



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,633 ✭✭✭Paddigol


    You may/ may not be pro-Russian. And everyone is entitled to their opinions. But they're also entitled to be called out on them for lack of factual context. And you've basically just been spouting a lot of generalisations which a few posters have picked apart with precision - you haven't even attempted to debate the issues with those posters, instead just raging against the posters who simply resort to throwing insults at you.

    So you are entitled to your opinions, but you're not entitled to hold your opinions out as fact if you're not willing to debate the issues you raise.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,579 ✭✭✭20silkcut


    before Bucha, Mariupol , etc the likes of the Germans were sending helmets.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,741 ✭✭✭zv2


    @Poon Tang "The Russians are no more barbaric than the yanks in how they try to eliminate a threat, but they just do it in a different way."

    Most armies are cruel to different degrees but Russia has been, and is, the most mendacious, brutal regime that ever existed on earth. I once read an account of Russia's brutality written in 1900. (Can't seem to locate it again.) They have been evil since Russia came into existence.

    “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” — Voltaire



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,154 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    I

    They are pretty good at manipulating media and influencing elections. Funny too how their neighbours are russian to help them out or join them?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,459 ✭✭✭denismc


    I kinda stopped checking this thread every day but then I see 50 posts in one day and my interest is renewed.

    Do the bots not realise they are actually keeping this thread alive and keeping people interested in Ukraine which is the total opposite of what they are hoping to achieve?



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,321 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    I haven't released it yet, but I've recorded a series of videos from Fort Irwin about 11th ACR, the professional opposing force. That tends to almost always win. As they represent the potential adversary, they don't play by the rules that US forces play with. I asked a couple of their officers directly for some examples, they varied from firing into occupied civilian areas or firing at things they can't see, to lying in public affairs/Info Ops as things they were allowed to do but US operations probhibited. One squadron commander said "My limits are 'what would Vladimir Putin do? And there's not much he wouldn't do'"



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,254 ✭✭✭Virgil°


    In a weird way this could be good news if true.

    Johnson was about to bring Israel and Ukraine standalone bills to the floor and vote separately but wasn't directly opposed to merging them. Which isn't great news since any new bill could spend months bouncing back and forward between the Senate and Congress over any amendment(And there'd probably be lots since Johnson would likely have poison pilled the bill). And in the worst case the Israel bill could slip through leaving Ukraine solo on the floor. At which point Johnson could ignore it. So if the MAGA Republicans are getting this riled about it then maybe the bill is decent for Ukraine?

    Equally if he doesn't want to get ousted he may now be in the position of needing democrats to save him. Which will almost certainly come with the condition of putting the senate approved bill to the floor for a vote.

    It's just such a brutally unfair world really.

    Ukraine are increasingly having to give ground and intercept missiles with their hospitals/power plants and infrastructure. In Congress they're seemingly much less popular on the aid front than Israel. Despite Russia being the more clear and present danger to the western world, the UK, US, Jordan and Saudis are happy to close the skies over from Iranian drones as long as they aren't Russian.

    Ukraine also may have to take the aid in the form of a loan if at all. And Israel doesn't for ….. reasons, despite not even needing any of it in the first place. And I've never historically been a huge critic of Israel honestly. It really is just such a bitter pill to swallow.



  • Registered Users Posts: 797 ✭✭✭eoinbn


    I stick to what I said in this thread over 2 months ago. This war will end in 2025, in Russia's favour, unless US aid is resumed. Unfortunately, I don't see it resuming.

    Note the ISW have said the very same thing today - that Russia will likely win the war in 2025 unless the US resumes in the near future.



  • Registered Users Posts: 920 ✭✭✭ilkhanid


    To anybody with a smidgeon of sense, humanity and perceptiveness, watching Russian representatives and propagandists present their point of view arouses only derision, horror and repugnance. They condemn themselves out of their own mouths. It speaks to the ignorant, blinkered and primitive nature of the MAGA faction in American politics that they are one of the few groups (along with the compromised, bribed and fascist-leaning in the EU) in the western world to swallow these rants, fantasies and threats hook, line and sinker.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,526 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    Given the fact that so many Russian talking points seem to infiltrate the forum and international politics at large, I'd say it's happy to say that it's pretty effective. The same posters who espouse the views are always entirely unwilling to admit that Russia is pursuing a genocidal agenda. You yourself have already made multiple efforts to downplay their actions and move to "what about America". The US aren't responsible for Russia kidnapping children, they're not responsible for the pursuit of destroying Ukrainian culture and they're not responsible for acts like Bucha.

    Also it's not exactly surprising that Ukraine have no desire to negotiate handing over any territory after the invasion and genocidal acts against their citizens. The reality is, this is gonna be something Ukraine will take a long time to ever culturally recover from. So nope, not problems on both sides.



  • Registered Users Posts: 92 ✭✭Poon Tang


    The only sort of interest in Ukraine that would make any substantive difference to the outcome of this war, would be if more westerners were interested in grabbing a gun and signing up for the Ukrainian armed forces… save for that level of interest, Ukraine are doomed to lose this thing!



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,321 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    I think they'd be OK if we just gave them more guns and bullets… (Big ones, preferably)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 92 ✭✭Poon Tang


    Not really. It only keeps them in the fight. To truly have a good chance of winning, they need much more manpower.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement