Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

Options
1363736383640364236433691

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,161 ✭✭✭zerosquared


    I work in the industry your observation is partially correct

    Those born in USSR and not just Russia before 1990 are top notch engineers most of whom especially the better ones left long ago and are very very good

    Those born after 1990 are mediocre at best and dangerous in the code and configurations they produce at worst, I’ve seen better results from Indian colleagues than those in St Petersburg before the offices closed at start of war

    Now obviously older engineers would have more experience, but there is a marked decrease in quality and education after the fall of USSR



  • Registered Users Posts: 92 ✭✭Poon Tang


    So, how many more "massive aid packages" do you think Ukraine will need, to defeat this inept Russian military?

    And how many more years will they need to defeat an army that is very obviously inferior to them?



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,526 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    Your solution is for Ukraine to stop fighting and give in to a leader who has genocidal goals.... I also wouldn't be classifying the invasion as particularly successful when the Russian war machine failed to complete it in over two years...



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,161 ✭✭✭zerosquared


    They found a good use for all them bodies

    https://m.censor.net/en/video_news/3484620/russian_official_suggests_heating_russian_homes_with_heat_from_burning_bodies_in_crematoria_its_very



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,579 ✭✭✭20silkcut


    Your saying on one hand Russia are no threat to the west and on the other saying they can’t be defeated. Which is it?

    By the way your at nothing trying to convince people here that Russia are no threat to the west. They are very successfully trying to de-stabilize the entire western world with their insidious mis information campaigns. They are a massive massive threat. Pouring billions of their wealth into such poisonous bullsh1t while their country goes to sh1t.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,320 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    "However many it takes".

    It won't be a little, though.

    Russians have historically been very dogged on defense, even when offensively they sucked. 1940/41 is a case in point. They are also a learning organisation, which has improved a lot in some ways since 2022. (1940/41 is another case in point). Field Marshall Montgomery observed that Rule 1 on Page 1 in the Book of War is "Never March on Moscow".

    Fortunately for the Ukrainians, they have no intention of doing so and have set a far more attainable goal. Ukraine needs to hold on until the West gets its collective ass in gear. I agree with you that dollars alone will not kill Russians. But it permits those things which will, which, overly slowly though it's happening in my opinion, the West is starting to generate. But generate, it's doing.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,145 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Western sources: "Russian military is weak, pathetic, useless… comically inept…"

    Also

    western sources: "Ukraine is struggling… I know we've given them eyewatering amounts of military aid, but they need much more to defeat this useless Russian army…"

    For a start "Western sources" never put it like that about the Russian military. Indeed they initially thought they'd be far more successful in invading and taking Ukraine. A few "tactical feints" later and that view changed. I see you're still pimping the "eyewatering amounts of military aid" from your scrpt. Again please put a number to how many HIMARS/MBT/Bradleys/patriots have been sent to Ukraine?

    The plain facts are the majority of military kit Ukraine has used against Russia is legacy Soviet stuff. In the six months of the war they got anti tank and anti aircraft kit alright, but had no HIMARs, or modern Western self propelled guns, it took far longer for the couple of dozen MBT's to show up, Bradleys are the biggest vehicle transfer and they number about a hundred and no fighters have been delivered yet over two years in. Yet even in those first six months with none of the military aid that followed they harried Russia and forced them back.

    In any event both positions can be true. Five thugs, even if they're "weak, pathetic, useless, comically inept" thugs, are going to be a problem to one half decent fighter. Russia, because of the lack of air superiority, sluggish logistics and a lack of combined arms operational skills have been forced for over a year into WW1 trench warfare taking land where they can, field by field by pummeling with artillery and following on with tank/human waves. Even so and against a numerically inferior force conserving ammo their progress is measured in yards and piles of bodies.

    And it has been really quite unintelligent propaganda from the west.

    If Western propaganda has been unintelligent, Russian propaganda has veered from ridiculous to farcical on a near weekly basis, only for their latest daftness to be conveniently memory holed the following week. Actually their amnesia tends to run in three week cycles on average, just enough for the faithful to conveniently forget. Much of it aimed at appealing to fringe groups in the West, not unlike in Cold War 1, and it's been quite successful too. EG if you bump into someone who's bought into WEF/Anti Vaxx/Plandemic/Q-Anon/Deep State/MAGA/etc type it's a near certainty they're also newly minted Kremlin supporters.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users Posts: 92 ✭✭Poon Tang


    So, are the Russian military a strong or weak opponent for the Ukrainians to overcome? If they're strong, that might explain why Ukraine have needed so much time and money, and are struggling to achieve their goals.

    I think the Russian objectives are very attainable too, continue to defend their new annexed territories and prevent the Ukrainians from reclaiming them. I think they'll achieve that goal, unless something very big changes with the Ukrainian war effort.

    I don't think Russia has any ability to reform the soviet union or pose any significant threat to Europe militarily. I don't think they have the manpower or resources to do anything remotely like that. But then I don't think even the US would have the ability to take over Europe with military force, I think it's ridiculous notion cooked up by people who are very bad at the art of propaganda.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,254 ✭✭✭Virgil°


     I think it's ridiculous notion cooked up by people who are very bad at the art of propaganda.

    I wouldn't be throwing stones mo chara. You know what they say about people in glass houses and all that?



  • Registered Users Posts: 680 ✭✭✭I.am.Putins.raging.bile.duct


    Orcs in Mordor continuing to amaze us with innovative ideas

    https://censor.net/en/video_news/3484620/russian_official_suggests_heating_russian_homes_with_heat_from_burning_bodies_in_crematoria_its_very



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,161 ✭✭✭zerosquared


    The Russia is not a threat to Europe claims are laughable when

    1. Their politicians and media regularly says otherwise up to and including Putin himself who boldly claimed he wants to restore Russian empire borders on video, borders that used to cut deep into what is now EU
    2. They tried and fail to freeze Europe (who didn’t cut their gas off)
    3. They have a long history of murdering Europeans with exotic chemical and radioactive materials when not busy shooting down passenger planes
    4. Just today we have this

    https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/germany-arrests-two-alleged-military-sabotage-plot-behalf-russia-2024-04-18/



  • Registered Users Posts: 920 ✭✭✭ilkhanid


    Propaganda from the WEST?It seems to have escaped your notice that several of the most outlandish, vicious and ominous threats are emanating straight from the mouths of the Kremlin puppets on RT:Skabayeva, Solovyov, Simonyon and the rest of that motley crew. These included the promises to reoccupy not only Alaska, but California no less, and threats to destroy London, level Warsaw and attack the Baltic States-to name only a few. And that's before we even get to the threats-too numerous to mention-to eradicate the entire state of Ukraine, "re-educate" its people and kill as many as it takes to turn it into a subservient vassal of Moscow. Calls for genocide, in short.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,703 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Solovyov and co. are like the Russian version of Tucker Carlson and friends. Just saying any old nonsense as long as it gets them notoriety.

    Obviously Russia would be completely unable to reoccupy Alaska or something like that unless the USA agreed to sell it back or something. A more achievable aim is to continue spreading disinformation which leads to the election of Trump who then pulls out of NATO, leaving Europe vulnerable to vastly increased nuclear threats without any confidence of cover if Russia tried the unimaginable.



  • Registered Users Posts: 475 ✭✭SoapMcTavish


    "leaving Europe vulnerable to vastly increased nuclear threats without any confidence of cover if Russia tried the unimaginable"

    The British have 225 nuclear warheads, and the French have 300. Both have weapons deployed on submarines.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,630 ✭✭✭Paddigol


    Ah, in fairness I'd take the Ukrainian figures - both their casualties and Russia's (nearly half a million?!? 35,000 in Bahkmut alone?!?) with a massive serving of salt. That's not a criticism - they're doing exactly what they should be. But even if it was 'just' 100,000 Russian casualties (as well as the 10s of thousands who must have been seriously wounded), that's off the scale in terms of modern wars. The Ukriainian's tbf seem to have priorities protection of life from teh very outset. Any of the dug in campaigns they've had seem to have been very calculated rather than heads in the sand stuff - severely degrade the Russian forces before pulling back.

    Does anyone seriously believe the 450,000 is even remotely accurate?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,161 ✭✭✭zerosquared


    it’s not too far off the US and UK figures and probably includes seriously injured who won’t return to fight, the Ukrainians have been meticulous in their documentation of dead personnel and equipment, BBC had a piece about units whose job is to scrape DNA samples off the dead Russians, now obviously these units won’t get to all the bodies especially in areas where they had to retreat, but Ukrainian units do have direct incentive to document everything especially using drones as units with more kills get better kit and bonuses and funding

    A better question to ask why would anyone seriously believe anything Russian claim as all they ever do is lie lie lie about everything, this whole war tripped out the door because of lies, the whole society and neo fascist ideology is based on lies, and all the incentives are aligned to produce more lies and corruption

    We have one of them right here trying very hard to paint Russians as cuddly teddy bears which is laughable



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,703 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Yes, but the Russians have more, so there would be a subtext of if it came to an all-out exchange, Russia would still have the 'better' of it, whatever 'better' would mean in an apocalyptic nuclear exchange.

    But the bigger crux of that would be that Russia would stop trying to undermine NATO if the US left. They'll want to cleave the larger European partners away as well.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,637 ✭✭✭victor8600


    I do . The casualty figure includes wounded :

    Breakdown

    Casualties

    Time period

    Source

    Russian forces

    409,820 losses[f] (180,000 killed)

    24 February 2022 – 25 February 2024

    Armed Forces of Ukraine[114][116]

    think these figures are reasonably accurate.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,270 ✭✭✭thomil


    As strange as it may sound, but France's aggressive nuclear policy might actually provide an extra deterrent here. France's "force de dissuasion" has two squadrons of Rafale armed with nuclear-tipped ASMP cruise missiles ready to go at any moment, in addition to the more "conventional" submarine-based ballistic missiles. From what I've read, France has a policy of a "nuclear warning shot" prior to unleashing its full ballistic missile inventory. From what I've read, this warning shot does not require the previous use of nuclear weapons by the other side, merely an indication that their use is imminent, and you can bet that Putin knows this. Should Trump win and disentangle the US from NATO, France could find itself with far more leeway to act and take that nuclear warning shot, and even sixty aircraft launched nuclear cruise missiles are going to hurt…badly.

    I don't find this scenario in any way likely, by the way. As a cold war kid, the thought experiment is "interesting", though…

    Good luck trying to figure me out. I haven't managed that myself yet!



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,161 ✭✭✭zerosquared


    Found this article interesting and it touches on Ukraine regularly shooting down what Russians were claimed were unstoppable missiles

    makes an interesting point that US always downplays its capabilities while Russia overplays them and lies of course



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,087 ✭✭✭threeball


    Trumps so demented he doesn't know who hes talking to half the time. Throws out any old soundbite that is floating around in his goldfish capacity brain.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,161 ✭✭✭zerosquared


    Article gives a good overview of what’s in the bill in US Congress (its significant) with pork spread widely



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,320 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    Oh, they're a strong opponent all right. As Stalin observed, quantity has a quality all of its own.

    Your last line is a fallacious argument. It doesn't matter whether or not something can be done, what matters is what people are willing to try. We have ample evidence of leaders trying things which had basically zero chance of success. That they lost in the end did not prevent all sorts of chaos, destruction and death while the inevitable was played out. That is not a cost which countries should be willing to pay at the relatively cheap cost of preparedness and deterrence.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,879 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    Hmm, have to say I have wondered what the Law and Justice party made of Trump's reckless comments about how if NATO countries don't spend what he deems enough [presumably with Lockheed and Boeing etc.], he will give a green light to Russia / Putin "to do whatever the hell they want". Whether they were horrifed, or just think it doesn't apply to them?

    I suppose we can see it here, they still believe if they just brown-nose Trump/MAGA enough and abase themsleves before him, he'll look out for Poland if in power, shur didn't we splurge a load of money on US weapons…! Seems like a kind of a cringing, servile mentality but there you go.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,437 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Meanwhile, in case people may be starting to think that there's no longer any morality left in Russian people…….think aagain!!!



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,740 ✭✭✭zv2


    One casualty is a tragedy, a million casualties is a statistic ~Stalin

    “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” — Voltaire



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,428 ✭✭✭macraignil


    I believe they are released by the Ukrainian armed forces.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,839 ✭✭✭Polar101


    Which Western sources are calling Russian military pathetic? The whole point is that Russia is a danger to Europe - if they were weak, they wouldn't be trying to murder their neighbours - after two years of fighting. No-one is losing interest in the conflict, we all know what Russia are on about.

    BTW, you forgot that you were supposed to be "neutral", and not "pro-Russian".



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,102 ✭✭✭pcardin


    and not only that. Reading and wondering what the heck is that stuff the dude is smoking. Must be very strong and certainly not available here in Ireland. Reminds me this dude.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,161 ✭✭✭zerosquared


    Nice, quick back of envelope calculation of $300bn invested (in western countries and companies of course) will yield 5 to 7% a year average

    Which is at least 9 billion a year recurring, and when the war ends funds won’t be returned until Russia rebuilds what it destroyed, and this stash be used as collateral for loans to Ukraine

    Russia funding its own defeat, which is great, no longer the volume of noise has increased so much in last few weeks, you can hear the squealing coming from Kremlin



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement