Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

Options
1364136423644364636473691

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 797 ✭✭✭eoinbn


    It could just be politics.

    By delaying funding it has handed Russia the initiative. It also means that Ukraine wouldn't be able to launch an offensive this year. That reduces the chance of a Ukraine victory this year to close to zero. A Ukrainian victory over Russia, or even having the upper hand, would have been a huge feather on Biden's cap and a big boost in November.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,506 ✭✭✭amandstu




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,982 ✭✭✭rogber


    Fingers crossed this aid will finally pass. It won't win the war for Ukraine, but it keeps them in the game and will at least hopefully prevent Russia making more gains



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,792 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    The chances of a Ukrainian win this year were quite small and needing Russia to even be more of a fk up than it already is.

    Washington and much of Europe are pushing for a ceasefire and a pause, that means just enough to limit Russia to the 4 oblasts it has claimed and always late with supplies.

    Holding the line near where it is is going to be a big ask for Ukraine and a big Russian offensive might smash through and take more than that.

    It's a catastrophic approach by the West and driven by a foolish belief that peace and jaw jaw are always the best or preferable option

    Holding Russia in a qtr of Ukraine might bring peace but it also means a permanently failed Ukraine, a Russia that has had a reward and every evil group from Hezbollah, Iran, China etc confident that the West won't defend democracy, itself or long term peace and stability.

    Europe is tapped out of military hardware and America could flood Ukraine with it but chooses not to, never mind the bits Congress debated on.

    Russia wants to win l. The West doesn't really care either way what happens.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,254 ✭✭✭Virgil°


    Washington and much of Europe are pushing for a ceasefire and a pause, that means just enough to limit Russia to the 4 oblasts it has claimed and always late with supplies.

    I haven't seen this anywhere except from the loony fringes. Where are you seeing prominent world leaders pushing Ukraine to ceasefire or surrender territories?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,703 ✭✭✭✭briany


    "tHe amErIcaNS hAVE LOst inTEreSt!!"

    No, specific Americans like Marjorie Taylor Greene are doing their level best to block any aid getting through. Let the record show it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,428 ✭✭✭macraignil


    Ukraine are still in the game of defending their country from putin's terrorists even with aid from the USA cut off now for months. Hopefully the funds from the USA get freed up soon enough to help Ukraine make more progress in destroying putin's terrorist war machine. I read recently that the pentagon has made arrangements for military hardware to be shipped to Ukraine as soon as official sanction is given for more funding. Many of putin's terrorists have been on the offensive over winter and in the spring mud where their advances have been modest. Hopefully the moskovytes have now left themselves in no condition to hold the Ukrainian territory they have illegally occupied.

    https://newsukraine.rbc.ua/news/defense-forces-attacked-power-stations-and-1713603562.html



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,491 ✭✭✭swiwi_


    mate. Stop saying Europe and us are pushing for a ceasefire and a pause. Unless you have some solid supporting references. Otherwise you’re a spoofer talking out your arse tbh.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,792 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    I just think Europe should have been aggressively rearming since the first day of the war and viewed any level of defeat for Ukraine as a severe defeat and threat to all of Europe. Treat it as the reality of a pre war world, conscription, every spare penny in to weapons.

    That would also mean that Europe should have flooded Ukraine with weapons and support.

    A lot of the Ukrainian leadership are repeatedly more pessimistic about their situation. They are starved for ammunition.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,090 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    The Yanks finally pulling the finger out on this much needed package for Ukraine right when things have been looking exceedingly bleak for them, reminds me of that (possibly apocryphal) quote from Churchill:

    "Americans can always be trusted to do the right thing, once all other possibilities have been exhausted.” 



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 82,387 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    This crazy sow would probably rather see them all die just to disaffect Biden's re-election chances.

    The vote should be in a few hours here. Debate has begun on the House floor.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,703 ✭✭✭✭briany


    @Brussels Sprout

    "Americans can always be trusted to do the right thing, once all other possibilities have been exhausted.” 

    According to quote investigator Churchill most probably did not say this, but the sentiment is solid.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,819 ✭✭✭aidanodr


    The vote for Ukraine aid is at 1pm est, so 6pm Irish/gmt

    Here is a link to it

    https://live.house.gov/



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,703 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Unfortunately, it's just a part of human nature to tend not to deal with a problem until it's right in your face. We'd all be in a much better place as individuals and a species if we dealt with problems preemptively rather than waiting until there is no other options.

    And it's a tendency that trolls and those fed by trolls will feed upon. There'll always be some more pressing issue they'll want to give money to as a way out of giving money to anything.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,238 ✭✭✭EltonJohn69


    the delay was a shameful act that has cost countless lives. I wouldn’t be surprised that some of these republicans have been compromised by the russians.



  • Registered Users Posts: 82,387 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Other than Moscow Marge ranting and raving disprovable nonsense and russian propaganda and trying to zero out the bill, the floor debate has been overwhelmingly in favor of the bill.

    Vote begins now. It already has a number of Republican votes and seems poised to sail. Some votes against by the Democrats are signaling against the genocide in Israel.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,703 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Are the Isreal-protesting Democrats front-loading the nays because every Dem vote I've seen at the time of this writing is nay.



  • Registered Users Posts: 82,387 ✭✭✭✭Overheal




  • Registered Users Posts: 82,387 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Well uh, actually lots of opposition to the bill from the Democrats.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,002 ✭✭✭ToweringPerformance


    Well done those democrats voting against. Israeli genocide must stop.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,703 ✭✭✭✭briany




  • Registered Users Posts: 92 ✭✭Poon Tang


    Are the American tax payers obligated to continue funding the Ukrainian war effort indefinitely though?

    Your phrase "pulling the finger out" seems to suggest an element of entitlement to these funds, rather than them being a charitable contribution to help Ukraine fight their war.

    How strong would you say the Russian military are, to have caused this bleak outlook for the Ukrainians without having the benefit of such massive aid packages themselves?

    Many people are saying the Russian defences are near impenetrable in most parts of the frontline now, with row after row of trenches, anti-tank obstacles, ditches, reinforced bunkers etc often many kilometres deep. Apparently, this is seriously sapping the morale of the soldiers, which I can fully imagine it might. It sounds like an old-fashioned ww1 gruelling style of war. Can this latest aid package make much of a difference in such a war of attrition?



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,914 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe




  • Registered Users Posts: 82,387 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    lol of course it can. In a war of attrition the side with the largest economy will win with time. And Russia is dwarfed by the NATO economy, especially the US military industrial complex. And Russia has indeed had to transition to a full wartime economy while the US is business as usual.

    latest tally. I guess I was wrong to think the Dems would overwhelmingly support the bill. Strange given how a great many of them still express support for Israel. It's going to be tight.



  • Registered Users Posts: 82,387 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    The rules are not suspended, the bill is not passed. Further consideration.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,002 ✭✭✭ToweringPerformance


    There's a lot of anger in the US over Israeli genocide. Democrats will stay home and not vote in November if Biden doesn't act. This is a reflection of what democratic reps are hearing. Giving them money to slaughter more children isn't a good look.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,161 ✭✭✭zerosquared


    I don’t buy what you are trying to sell

    IMHO Ukrainians have learned from last year that painting an optimistic picture only leads to support dropping while keeping the war on the news as an existential issue for all of the civilised world (which it is) and not just Ukrainians (something that is not hard to do as the Russians just can’t help themselves in committing atrocities and threatening others beside Ukraine)
    In short Ukrainians are canny and learned what every project manager knows instinctively to do, underpromise, keep project prominently on minds and over deliver

    Between US and EU and other countries they will receive close to 100bn this year in aid from direct military kit to wages of soldiers paid to training and direct investment in Ukraine. For perspective their total military spend per year from 2014 to 2022 was 2.9 to 5.9bn

    They won’t squander it on offensive unless they see a clear opportunity somewhere especially until they know what happens to Trump, they will keep hitting Russians where it hurts most especially as atacams is in this bill



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,703 ✭✭✭✭briany


    In retrospect, it was more Western sources who were predicting the lines to move, big style, when the Ukrainians began their summer offensive last year. General Zaluzhny had said in various news outlets that people would have to temper their expectations as to what Ukraine could actually do and, as it turned out, that wasn't a psy-op or anything.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,161 ✭✭✭zerosquared




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 82,387 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    … oh

    The first vote that took place was to suspend the rules and pass H.R. 3602, a border security bill. The motion needs two-thirds approval, 290 votes, to pass. It failed with 215 in favor, 199 against while 17 members did not vote. But Republicans wanted votes on the record where lawmakers stood on the issue.

    Earlier this week, three hardliners on the House Rules Committee prevented its passage in protest of House Speaker Mike Johnson’s overall plan. Had that passed, the bill would have required just a simple majority vote in the House to be sent to the Senate.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/04/20/house-vote-ukraine-israel-aid-johnson/
    https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/3602



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement